BOXSCORE: Montreal Canadiens 3 Boston Bruins 0 (2/1/01)
Brad Murray
Boston 0 0 0--0
FIRST PERIOD -- Scoring:
1, Montreal, T Linden 10 (Laflamme, Poulin), 4:13
2, Montreal, Poulin 5 (Weinrich), 12:38
Penalties:
Asham, MTL (unsportsmanlike conduct), 8:33
Henderson, BOS (unsportsmanlike conduct), 8:33
Asham, MTL (fighting major), 10:41
Henderson, BOS (fighting major), 10:41
Souray, MTL (fighting major), 12:03
Nazarov, BOS (fighting major), 12:03
Thornton, BOS (cross checking), 17:22
SECOND PERIOD -- Scoring:
None
Penalties:
Girard, BOS (slashing), 4:34
Kilger, MTL (interference), 8:39
Girard, BOS (double high sticking minor), 17:58
THIRD PERIOD -- Scoring:
3, Montreal, Poulin 6 (empty net) (Markov), 19:42
Penalties:
Campbell, MTL (holding stick), 1:24
Kilger, MTL (double high sticking minor), 11:20
Shots on Goal:
Montreal 5 4 4--13
Boston 10 14 15--39
Goalies:
Montreal, Theodore (39 shots, 39 saves; record: 12-17-3)
Boston, Dafoe (12, 10; record: 13-10-5)
Skudra (10:16 of 2nd period, 0, 0)
Dafoe (10:55 of 2nd period)
Power-play conversions: MTL - 0 of 4, BOS - 0 of 4
Referees: Kowal, B McCreary
Linesmen: Gauthier, Seitz
Attendance: 16,066 (out of 17,565)
Player Stats
------ -----
Montreal Boston
G A +/- Shots G A +/- Shots
Asham 0 0 even 0 Allison 0 0 -2 2
Campbell 0 0 even 1 Axelsson 0 0 even 4
Chouinard 0 0 even 0 Eloranta 0 0 even 4
Darby 0 0 even 0 Gill 0 0 even 1
Dykhuis 0 0 even 1 Girard 0 0 -1 2
Higgins 0 0 even 0 Guerin 0 0 -2 3
Kilger 0 0 even 3 Henderson 0 0 even 0
Koivu 0 0 even 0 K McLaren 0 0 -1 4
Laflamme 0 1 +1 0 Knuble 0 0 even 1
Landry 0 0 even 0 Kovalenko 0 0 even 2
Markov 0 1 even 1 Kultanen 0 0 even 1
Petrov 0 0 even 0 Nazarov 0 0 even 0
Poulin 2 1 +2 2 Rolston 0 0 even 5
Robidas 0 0 +1 1 Samsonov 0 0 -2 4
Souray 0 0 +1 0 Sweeney 0 0 -1 2
T Linden 1 0 +2 1 Thornton 0 0 even 2
Weinrich 0 1 +1 2 Traverse 0 0 -1 0
Witehall 0 0 +2 1 Ward 0 0 even 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to the free NHL boxscore or stat mailing lists, go to
http://www.scoresandstats.com or send a blank message with no
subject to nhlboxs...@lists.advantage.com. If all else fails,
mail NHLStats(at)poboxes.com. Boxscores and stats are archived at
http://www.scoresandstats.com
Winkie
obviously. We stole another one. what happened with Poulin?....he must be
reading some of the posts in the group.
"Brad Murray" <NHLS...@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:iOte6.208453$w35.36...@news1.rdc1.nj.home.com...
stonea...@my-deja.com
"Winkie" <win...@rotfl.com> wrote:
> Wow... 39 shots!!!!! Go Theo! I saw a bit of the game but not enough
> obviously. We stole another one. what happened with Poulin?....he
must be
> reading some of the posts in the group.
Seems to me the Habs steal quite a few games, what can this be
attributed to? Talent? No. Luck? No. Goaltending? No. Hmmmmmmmmmm shit
the only thing left is officiating. Looks like we will have to go with
that. Seems funny to me that a sad sack bunch like the Habs have what,
30 to 40 more power plays than any other team in the league? Hmmmmmmmm.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
Raymond Chénier
could have if he hadn't wimped out because of a bruise that might knock a
girl out of action. We aren't a great team, but obviously better than the Bs
with the flake coach ... Go back to the flinstones munchy.
<stonea...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:95goi1$rn8$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
JOEY DI RAIMO
been getting rookie officials constantly screwing them over. Just
recently have more experienced refs have begun working Habs game. It has
something to do with the NHL not wasting their better refs on lower
teams in the standings as Bergeron stated on many Saturday nights. I am
sorry if the B's could not score any goals against a injury riddled
team. All we needed was one goal because your offence could not even put
1 goal in 39 shots. I guess no bruin will be picked in the all-star game
for the shooting accuracy competition.
Sports Fan
stonea...@my-deja.com wrote:
> In article <ehAe6.4075$TR6.1...@sodalite.nbnet.nb.ca>,
> "Winkie" <win...@rotfl.com> wrote:
> > Wow... 39 shots!!!!! Go Theo! I saw a bit of the game but not enough
> > obviously. We stole another one. what happened with Poulin?....he
> must be
> > reading some of the posts in the group.
>
> Seems to me the Habs steal quite a few games, what can this be
> attributed to? Talent? No. Luck? No. Goaltending? No. Hmmmmmmmmmm shit
> the only thing left is officiating. Looks like we will have to go with
> that. Seems funny to me that a sad sack bunch like the Habs have what,
> 30 to 40 more power plays than any other team in the league? Hmmmmmmmm.
I'm not sure what you are talking about. If you look at the boxscore, both
teams had 4 penalties. The Habs and Bruins won't make the playoffs. The
Habs have injuries as an excuse. What will Boston's be? "The refs hate
us!", "The League is against us!". "It's because Bettman is a Canadian and
he ruining the game for American teams!", "The weak US dollar really hurts
the US teams!", "American teams are way overtaxed so they can't sign free
agents!"
stonea...@my-deja.com
HAHA you fucking Hab fans make me laugh. If you had any intelligence,
you would know the Bruins are second in man games lost, and they dont
count the Markovs and the Landrys of the world in the total.
Chenier, you make me laugh cause you reply to every post I make,
therefore, you must in some tiny way, agree with what I am saying.
To the lad who said the Habs are getting screwed over by rookie
officials, does that explain why the Habs have had 40 more power plays
than any other team? You got it backwards chuck, the ONLY REASON
MONTREAL WINS, IS BECAUSE OF POWER PLAY GOALS. Except of course when
they get a bullshit effort from Joser. Dream on Hab fans, lets hope the
team moves to the US so we dont have to watch the league manufacture
victories for the ignorant Montreal fans.
stonea...@my-deja.com
HAHA once again, the Bruins will make the playoffs, and we wont hear
them whining about their injuries either. Oh my god, I cant believe we
have so many injuries this year, I thought we had all our injuries last
year, oh my god, this is so unfair. Lets call up Higgins, he can play
one game, do nothing, get hurt, and we will add him to our man games
lost total, so we can whine about our injuries...boo hoo hoo.
Raymond Chénier
behind your obsession with the Montreal Canadiens and the past, and anyone
with a brain would be able to sit back, look, and be real embarrassed. I
guess that's why you are one of these little cowards that hide behind
aliases and such ...
Where I live, most of the rabid Bs/Habhaters fans have become Senators fans
... Tells you something don't it ? After the Bs 99-00 season, I would be so
far under a rock ... If I had any pride that is. Seems your ng has a couple
of delusional characters with the same mental capacity as yours, and you're
outcasts among people with normal thinking processes ... :-) Enjoy !
<stonea...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:95j01e$e8r$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
JOEY DI RAIMO
Savage, Rosie, Linden, Brunet, Hackett, Rivet, and Zubrus are all AHL
quality player's. I don't think that the Bruins have lost their top 5
scorers at the same time. Get a clue. Don't worry about winning about
another cup because it won't happen. The curse of Raymond Bourque will
make sure of that.
Yves
go with insults that are unfounded.
I am a hockey fan, and I wish all teams were at .500 so we could have great
games a rattle each other in a fun way, not nasty like some do.
Raymond Chénier <raych...@spam.home.com> wrote in message
news:%obf6.55272$KP3.15...@news3.rdc1.on.home.com...
Raymond Chénier
sweater in sports history, a symbol of perseverance and champions for the
world, is also an object of great distress for others with unresolved
emotional issues.
"Yves" <mad...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:S4ef6.820$HE....@weber.videotron.net...
<snip inferiority-complex-induced blah blah blah>
Yves
even though it is extremelly fifficult, resist.
Raymond Chénier <raych...@spam.home.com> wrote in message
news:6uef6.56148$KP3.15...@news3.rdc1.on.home.com...
John McE
do me,
>even though it is extremelly fifficult, resist.
>
>
>Raymond Chénier <raych...@spam.home.com> wrote in message
----------------------------------------------------
only 1 a on the end of my email address to send me a reply
John McE
>Where I live, most of the rabid Bs/Habhaters fans have become Senators fans
>... Tells you something don't it ? After the Bs 99-00 season, I would be so
>far under a rock ... If I had any pride that is. Seems your ng has a couple
>of delusional characters with the same mental capacity as yours, and you're
>outcasts among people with normal thinking processes ... :-) Enjoy !
bull shit i was at the last game in montreal and the B's fan's where there loud and clear . Don't
make up bullshit, and it it your friends changing teams i can believe that.
John McE
>
>I am a hockey fan, and I wish all teams were at .500 so we could have great
>games a rattle each other in a fun way, not nasty like some do.
>
first of all your boy came in here with the bullshit Neely remarks, so even though this clown
came here , then told you you to post here shows you are just another moron .
John McE
>I am only trying to help ... :-) It pains me to know that the most famous
>sweater in sports history, a symbol of perseverance and champions for the
>world, is also an object of great distress for others with unresolved
>emotional issues.
>
>"Yves" <mad...@excite.com> wrote in message
>
>> > I am not the only one laughing at you. Habs fans understand the reasons
>> > behind your obsession with the Montreal Canadiens and the past, and
>anyone
>> > with a brain would be able to sit back, look, and be real embarrassed. I
>> > guess that's why you are one of these little cowards that hide behind
>> > aliases and such ...
>> >
what are you saying about being a coward , you looking for a fist fight , that sounds really tough
considering that the posting can come from anywhere in the world.waht if the guy lived in yor town ,
or was sitting beside you at the molson center would you be such a tough guy.
Yves
right away you are cross posting, well shit happens, third of all, you want
to make an issue, let's get together off these newsgroups and leave the
others alone with your blind stupidity
John McE <joh...@sympatico.caaaa> wrote in message
news:3a7fde51...@news1.qc.sympatico.ca...
Yves
other regulars will attest to that, so go elsewhere to try to fake words in
someone else's mouth, John
P.S.: If anyone wants to meet me, I'm open anytime.
John McE <joh...@sympatico.caaaa> wrote in message
news:3a80df16...@news1.qc.sympatico.ca...
John McE
John McE
north west of America? a in perticular???? These newsgroups are seen all
over the world, a little more precision.
John McE
>you can add anything written, but it wasn't Yves that wrote that, all the
>other regulars will attest to that, so go elsewhere to try to fake words in
>someone else's mouth, John
>
>P.S.: If anyone wants to meet me, I'm open anytime.
>
>
P.S are they your words , because nobody in the alt.sports.hockey.nhl.boston-bruins. have seen you
post before
Raymond Chénier
on ... LOL Fist fights ... what a moron ... :-) Try the sentence again and
if required, I'll break it up into smaller pieces for you genius.
"John McE" <joh...@sympatico.caaaa> wrote in message
news:3a80df16...@news1.qc.sympatico.ca...
John McE
>I am only trying to help ... :-) It pains me to know that the most famous
>sweater in sports history, a symbol of perseverance and champions for the
>world, is also an object of great distress for others with unresolved
>emotional issues.
>
I was told you replied wit something stupid again ,but i had you in my "kids posting in this ng
kill file " please repost ,
John McE
>First of all, he's not MY boy, second of all, when you post and don't notice
>right away you are cross posting, well shit happens, third of all, you want
>to make an issue, let's get together off these newsgroups and leave the
>others alone with your blind stupidity
>
>
sorry i always make the mistake between Bitch ot Boy
Ian Merrithew
reply to a thread is a *good* thing -- you can stop flamewars before
they start. Especially when you're dealing with two groups of fans who
can't stand each other :P.
--
Ian Merrithew - DPL Systems Engineering
(email to ian.merrithew "at" ieee.org)
John McE
your right next time i will look , this is getting out of hand
stonea...@my-deja.com
JOEY DI RAIMO <jdir...@home.com> wrote:
> For your info Markov and Landry have never been hurt. I guess Koivu,
> Savage, Rosie, Linden, Brunet, Hackett, Rivet, and Zubrus are all AHL
> quality player's. I don't think that the Bruins have lost their top 5
> scorers at the same time. Get a clue. Don't worry about winning about
> another cup because it won't happen. The curse of Raymond Bourque will
> make sure of that.
Ok Ok I will give you Rosie. Maybe even Zubrus. The others? Names only
a Hab fan could love.
stonea...@my-deja.com
"Raymond Chénier" <raych...@spam.home.com> wrote:
> I am not the only one laughing at you. Habs fans understand the
reasons
> behind your obsession with the Montreal Canadiens and the past, and
anyone
> with a brain would be able to sit back, look, and be real
embarrassed. I
> guess that's why you are one of these little cowards that hide behind
> aliases and such ...
>
> Where I live, most of the rabid Bs/Habhaters fans have become
Senators fans
> ... Tells you something don't it ? After the Bs 99-00 season, I would
be so
> far under a rock ... If I had any pride that is. Seems your ng has a
couple
> of delusional characters with the same mental capacity as yours, and
you're
> outcasts among people with normal thinking processes ... :-) Enjoy !
Hehe, suffice is to say I know more about the game of hockey than
most, and I know when I see cheating officials. Its quite obvious. You
and I should get together and watch some of the 80s playoff games
between Montreal and Boston. You would then change your opinion.
And despite the fact I probably reside in the same city you do, Sens
town, I have not become a Sens fan.
Its all well and good though, watching the Bruins skate circles
around the Habs last game, and throughout the 90s, is my own personal
Stanley Cup. Hehe.
stonea...@my-deja.com
"Raymond Chénier" <raych...@spam.home.com> wrote:
> > Hehe, suffice is to say I know more about the game of hockey than
> > most, and I know when I see cheating officials. Its quite obvious.
You
> > and I should get together and watch some of the 80s playoff games
> > between Montreal and Boston. You would then change your opinion.
>
Stanley
> Cup parades ... If you knew what that was like, you would not attempt
to
> minimize it. Fans of teams that have won the cup in the nineties are
never
> in here spouting off. However, a more generalised view always shows
things
> even out. One only needs to spend a bit of time comparing playoff
records
> for the pre-nineties decades. I understand your delusions about the
> officiating ... Boston were cup contenders many years, but just
didn't make
> to to the finals because of your's truly. But the outcome is
predictable
> when you never compared talentwise. When you did compare, and even
> surpassed, you won your own cups.
>
> > And despite the fact I probably reside in the same city you do, Sens
> > town, I have not become a Sens fan.
>
Forget
> where you live ... :-) What is tongue-and-cheek about honesty ?
>
> > Its all well and good though, watching the Bruins skate circles
> > around the Habs last game, and throughout the 90s, is my own
personal
> > Stanley Cup. Hehe.
>
Raymond Raymond Raymond,
Are you telling me the Habs of 71 were more talented than the Bruins of
71???????????? Hahahahahahah typical habitant dreams. Tell me why sir,
did the Bruins win the cup in 70, and 72, but lost to Montreal in 71?
Any moron can tell you the Bruins of 71 were far more talented than the
habs of 71. But, still, Montreal beat them. I wonder why?
stonea...@my-deja.com
sa...@sympatico.ca wrote:
> > Hehe, suffice is to say I know more about the game of hockey than
> > most, and I know when I see cheating officials. Its quite obvious.
>
on the
> ice against Montreal?
Indeed he may well have put 6 players on the ice, but you see, the
difference is, Boston got called for it, whereas Montreal would not
have been called for it. You see what I am getting at? NAME ONE OTHER
SEVENTH GAME WHERE ANY TEAM IN HISTORY HAS BEEN CALLED FOR TO MANY MEN.
So I guess, since there isnt any, suffice is to say that no team has
ever had 6 players plus the goalie on the ice in a seventh game. yeah,
right.
stonea...@my-deja.com
"Marc Cormier" <mac...@nb.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> yeah... and like any Boston fan wouldn't give their left nut to have
Koivu,
> Savage, Linden and Hackett in their lineup..
>
> well... come to think of it.... most Hab fans would give theirleft
nut to
> have Koivu in the lineup... :-)
Yeah, I would love to have Mr October (savage) in the bs line up, I
could watch him score 15 goals in the first 10 games, and then 5 the
rest of the year. Clutch stuff there for sure. Koivu? No thanks, touch
him and he gets hurt. Hackett? No thanks, although he is a very good
goaltender, he still sucks LOL. Linden? Nah, maybe if he came from
Vancouver to Boston, maybe, but from Montreal? No he would just get
hurt.
>
> <stonea...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:95oeaq$l5c$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
HabAnatic
> SEVENTH GAME WHERE ANY TEAM IN HISTORY HAS BEEN CALLED FOR TO MANY MEN.
1945 Detroit Redwings, Game 7.. coach was Hap Day, Toronto went on to win
that game 7. Go ahead and check it out!
Stop crying and whining about how unfair life and refs have been to you and
you team.
Besides if you do the crime then you do the time(2mins!).
HabAnatic
<stonea...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:965oqp$nkq$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Raymond Chénier
>
> Are you telling me the Habs of 71 were more talented than the Bruins of
> 71???????????? Hahahahahahah typical habitant dreams. Tell me why sir,
> did the Bruins win the cup in 70, and 72, but lost to Montreal in 71?
> Any moron can tell you the Bruins of 71 were far more talented than the
> habs of 71. But, still, Montreal beat them. I wonder why?
> >
Why are you calling yourself a moron.
'71 ... Yawn ...
And they accuse Habs fans of living in the past.
Fore !
Yves
<stonea...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:965oj1$nbl$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> Raymond Raymond Raymond,
>
> Are you telling me the Habs of 71 were more talented than the Bruins of
> 71???????????? Hahahahahahah typical habitant dreams. Tell me why sir,
> did the Bruins win the cup in 70, and 72, but lost to Montreal in 71?
> Any moron can tell you the Bruins of 71 were far more talented than the
> habs of 71. But, still, Montreal beat them. I wonder why?
KEN DRYDEN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yves
<stonea...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:965oqp$nkq$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> Indeed he may well have put 6 players on the ice, but you see, the
> difference is, Boston got called for it, whereas Montreal would not
> have been called for it. You see what I am getting at? NAME ONE OTHER
> SEVENTH GAME WHERE ANY TEAM IN HISTORY HAS BEEN CALLED FOR TO MANY MEN.
> So I guess, since there isnt any, suffice is to say that no team has
> ever had 6 players plus the goalie on the ice in a seventh game. yeah,
> right.
Hey, I have a taped Cherry interview where he admits it was his fault and
his team was to blame for that call, that the ref did a great job throughout
the series, so take your false excuse somewhere else.
Yves
Raymond Chénier
> Hey, I have a taped Cherry interview where he admits it was his fault and
> his team was to blame for that call, that the ref did a great job
throughout
> the series, so take your false excuse somewhere else.
>
.... lol
We were not exactly the best team in the league in '93 either ... sour
grapes !
Or as you say, sounds like grapes isn't sour ... lol He must've gone to
therapy.
Raymond