Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Game 4

2 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

The Unforgiving Squid

unread,
Apr 23, 2011, 9:39:02 AM4/23/11
to
On Apr 21, 1:09 pm, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> I'm having trouble figuring out what's more entertaining.
>
> The Sabres total dominance over the Flyers for most of the game last
> night.
>
> Or the Flyers and their whiney ass fans crying about not getting help
> they somehow think they automatically deserve from the officials.
>
> :)
>
> --
> Black Dragon
>
> If you stick your head in the sand,
> one thing is for sure, you're gonna get your rear kicked.

Come back and post when you learn the game.

Message has been deleted

MBD

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 10:53:41 AM4/24/11
to
Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote in news:4krrgp.7l4.17.1
@news.alt.net:

> The Unforgiving Squid wrote:
>
>> On Apr 21, 1:09 pm, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
>>> I'm having trouble figuring out what's more entertaining.
>
>>> The Sabres total dominance over the Flyers for most of the game last
>>> night.
>
>>> Or the Flyers and their whiney ass fans crying about not getting help
>>> they somehow think they automatically deserve from the officials.
>

>> Come back and post when you learn the game.
>

> How quaint.
>
> Yet another Philly whiner whining.
>
> Seeing how the Flyers wishes were answered by the officials in game 5
> and they still couldn't beat a highly resilient since January Sabres
> *Team*, what lame excuses did they come up with this time?

It's because they're missing Pronger, and now Carter. Like the Sabres
didn't lose Roy and Hecht (word is that both have been cleared to play,
which is great news), and now Pominville.

As for the officials, the funny thing is that the Whyners are claiming
they're walking-away from stuff they normally wouldn't, and for that they
should be commended. Please.

Good to see that the Sabres CAN play a physical game. For too long
they've been viewed as soft, but this series has served notice to
everyone that if you want the bull, you'll get the horns.

MBD

Message has been deleted

MBD

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 12:48:04 PM4/24/11
to
>>> Seeing how the Flyers wishes were answered by the officials in game
>>> 5 and they still couldn't beat a highly resilient since January
>>> Sabres *Team*, what lame excuses did they come up with this time?
>
>> It's because they're missing Pronger, and now Carter. Like the
>> Sabres didn't lose Roy and Hecht (word is that both have been cleared
>> to play, which is great news), and now Pominville.
>
> With all the depth the Flyers claim to have a couple injured players
> shouldn't pose any problem for them. The Sabres have been dealing with
> injuries to key players the entire season yet not a single word was
> spoken publicly about it by anyone in the Sabres organization until
> Lindy mentioned having a short bench for more than half of game 5 to
> the media in the post game interview. That short bench played a
> significant role in the Sabres being flat in period 2 allowing the
> Flyers to get into the game.

While the short bench didn't help, the Sabres' defense has been pretty poor
in terms of giveaways and manning-up, and their MO this season has been one
where no mutliple goal lead is safe. It also seemed like they felt they
had the game in-hand after going up 3-0 early. And to be fair, I haven't
heard any Whyners player or fan use Pronger or Carter as an excuse (yet).
But I wouldn't be surprised if they did after the series is over.

>> As for the officials, the funny thing is that the Whyners are
>> claiming they're walking-away from stuff they normally wouldn't, and
>> for that they should be commended. Please.
>

> Indeed. Do they not remember that Danny Breire played for the Sabres
> and any Buffalo fan that watched him play knows what a slashing
> hacking ball jabbing spearing cross checking tripping interfering
> cheap shot behind the play artist he is? I was glad to see him go to
> Philly, he's a real good fit on that team chock full of dirtbags like
> himself.
>
> Despite all the whining about the officiating it hasn't had any affect
> on the outcomes of the games since neither teams power plays has been
> very effective. What do they expect, to be given even more chances
> than they've already had? Like the totally bogus interference call on
> Stafford? Isn't a Flyers opponent supposed to be allowed to make a
> play on a loose puck in the neutral zone? Is that they only way they
> stand a chance of winning the series? Really?

Good point. They (both) have been pretty bad on the PP. And the
officiating has easily been more biased in favor of the Whyners.

>> Good to see that the Sabres CAN play a physical game. For too long
>> they've been viewed as soft, but this series has served notice to
>> everyone that if you want the bull, you'll get the horns.
>

> They tried the intimidation with physicality card, even announced
> before the series they were going to take runs at Miller and did.
> Where did that leave them? One game away from elimination against a
> scrappy Sabres team that has been grinding out more wins (not many of
> them very pretty either) than losses since early January.

The Sabres have the 2nd-best (Sharks) record since the All-Star break. To
hear some, it's like they don't belong on the same ice as the Whyners, when
they may be the most dangerous team in at least the EC playoffs. Can't
wait to get Roy and Hecht (and now Pominville) back. And hopefully they're
not hit with a rash of injuries like in 2004-2005, when the Cup was theirs.

> Go Sabres!

Yes, and go golfing, Whyners.

MBD

The Unforgiving Squid

unread,
Apr 26, 2011, 10:24:26 AM4/26/11
to
On Apr 23, 2:32 pm, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote:

> The Unforgiving Squid wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 1:09 pm, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> >> I'm having trouble figuring out what's more entertaining.
> >> The Sabres total dominance over the Flyers for most of the game last
> >> night.
> >> Or the Flyers and their whiney ass fans crying about not getting help
> >> they somehow think they automatically deserve from the officials.
> > Come back and post when you learn the game.
>
> How quaint.
>
> Yet another Philly whiner whining.
>
> Seeing how the Flyers wishes were answered by the officials in game 5
> and they still couldn't beat a highly resilient since January Sabres
> *Team*, what lame excuses did they come up with this time?
>
> --
> Black Dragon
>
> It is hard to predict, in particular about the future.
>                 -- Robert Storm Petersen

Funny, I don't recall whining at all. Just pointing out your lame
claims. It's hysterical to me that you say the Flyers and fans think
that they deserve automatic help from the officials. Nobody thinks
that, you made it up yourself. All teams whine to some extent. Just
look at Ruff after game 6 whining like a bitch and Miller equating a
push to mass murder. It was a penalty and the officials called it a
penalty.

The Unforgiving Squid

unread,
Apr 27, 2011, 7:22:04 AM4/27/11
to
On Apr 24, 11:43 am, Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote:

> MBD wrote:
> > Black Dragon <b...@nomail.invalid> wrote in news:4krrgp.7l4.17.1
> > @news.alt.net:
> >> The Unforgiving Squid wrote:
> >>> Come back and post when you learn the game.
> >> How quaint.
> >> Yet another Philly whiner whining.
> >> Seeing how the Flyers wishes were answered by the officials in game 5
> >> and they still couldn't beat a highly resilient since January Sabres
> >> *Team*, what lame excuses did they come up with this time?
> > It's because they're missing Pronger, and now Carter.  Like the Sabres
> > didn't lose Roy and Hecht (word is that both have been cleared to play,
> > which is great news), and now Pominville.
>
> With all the depth the Flyers claim to have a couple injured players
> shouldn't pose any problem for them. The Sabres have been dealing with
> injuries to key players the entire season yet not a single word was
> spoken publicly about it by anyone in the Sabres organization until Lindy
> mentioned having a short bench for more than half of game 5 to the media
> in the post game interview. That short bench played a significant role
> in the Sabres being flat in period 2 allowing the Flyers to get into the
> game.
>
> > As for the officials, the funny thing is that the Whyners are claiming
> > they're walking-away from stuff they normally wouldn't, and for that they
> > should be commended.  Please.
>
> Indeed. Do they not remember that Danny Breire played for the Sabres and
> any Buffalo fan that watched him play knows what a slashing hacking ball
> jabbing spearing cross checking tripping interfering cheap shot behind
> the play artist he is? I was glad to see him go to Philly, he's a real
> good fit on that team chock full of dirtbags like himself.
>
> Despite all the whining about the officiating it hasn't had any affect
> on the outcomes of the games since neither teams power plays has been
> very effective. What do they expect, to be given even more chances than
> they've already had? Like the totally bogus interference call on
> Stafford? Isn't a Flyers opponent supposed to be allowed to make a play
> on a loose puck in the neutral zone? Is that they only way they stand a
> chance of winning the series? Really?
>
> > Good to see that the Sabres CAN play a physical game.  For too long
> > they've been viewed as soft, but this series has served notice to
> > everyone that if you want the bull, you'll get the horns.
>
> They tried the intimidation with physicality card, even announced
> before the series they were going to take runs at Miller and did. Where
> did that leave them? One game away from elimination against a scrappy
> Sabres team that has been grinding out more wins (not many of them very
> pretty either) than losses since early January.
>
> Go Sabres!
>
> --
> Black Dragon

Bye bye, whiner

The Unforgiving Squid

unread,
Apr 27, 2011, 7:22:49 AM4/27/11
to

You first.

MBD

unread,
Apr 27, 2011, 1:56:34 PM4/27/11
to
The Unforgiving Squid <marry...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:6b1ff91f-e862-4847...@n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:

The Cryers were the better team last night and deserved to win. I guess
$8M more in salaries will get you that 4-3 series win. But the Cryers
won't make it past the next round. Not with those goalies.

MBD

MBD

unread,
Apr 30, 2011, 6:43:07 PM4/30/11
to
> The Cryers were the better team last night and deserved to win. I guess
> $8M more in salaries will get you that 4-3 series win. But the Cryers
> won't make it past the next round. Not with those goalies.

Like I said...

MBD

0 new messages