Re: That bomb they just tried to throw to Cassell
Cleatarrior
> On Jan 4, 4:26 pm, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
>
> september.invalid> wrote:
> > KG said:
>
> > > was one of the worst ideas of a play I've ever seen in the NFL.
>
> > > I can't recall anyone ever trying to complete a long pass to a
> > > QUARTERBACK! who was surrounded by defenders.
>
> > > I guess it could've been worse. They could've had the center try a
> > > Hail Mary to the field goal kicker.
>
> > Great idea, agressive unusual play, poor execution on Castille's part. He
> > should have thrown it away when he saw the coverage. Not that it did much
> > harm in the long run...
>
> There were 3 defenders around Cassell. He had about zero chance of
> getting that ball. I'm guessing they won't be trusting Castille to
> make reads in the future eh?
>
> You're right though, it didn't do any harm in the long run.
Go away TROLL! This is a FOOTBALL newsgroup!
KG
Dude. Thine knee jerketh. That post was about the game.
Nunya Bidnits
Get a clue, Einstein, it's a nameshifter, the same pathetic coward who's
been pestifying your Chargers NG for over a month now under various names
including yours.
<waiting a moment for the big reveal to sink in...>
I thought that was obvious to everyone by now who's reading this thread.
Look at the headers before you go off next time. The only difference is that
the nameshifting degenerate has changed to a new server, at IP address
203.16.61.77, almost certainly because AT&T Houston shut the pathetic
sissy's account down for abuse. The coward can change it's posting nick, and
even it's supposed posting address, but it can't change the headers upstream
that identify the server unless it's a complete tech genius, which clearly,
it's not, it's just a worthless little rodent. So stop feeding the rodents,
please.
MBKC
ScottW
LOL!
BZZZZT
KG
I'd like to ask you to reflect on a few things:
1) My words constituted "going off"?
2) you also wrote, "Get a clue, Einstein". I don't read headers when I
read posts. I kinda doubt that anyone does. Those words in that
forgery are kinda the same words that the real Cleat's been throwing
about. So . . . . I guess I'm just an idiot.
kurgan
Out of curiosity: I understand the Aussie IP, how do you get that AT&T
Houston is tied into this?
ScottW
99.7.215.131 is AT&T Houston. It's the IP ssssh uses who has been
nameshifting since he lost a bet to leave the group.
He's still on AT&T, still in violation of their terms of service and
still showing himself to be the lowest lifeform on usenet.
ScottW
kurgan
I'm viewing the group through a webpage. I see the Aussie IP when I go
to "show original" but I don't see the 99.7.215.131 address.
Am I being a total idiot? Or?
ScottW
No, I don't see the whole thread or OP on google groups so I don't see
the aussie IP.
I do see a post (4th in this thread) that has my name on it from the
ass who appear here as ssshhhh
and posts from AT&T Houston at IP 99.7.215.131
So he hasn't had his plug pulled and moved to Australia. I don't know
what that's about.
ScottW
ScottW
Nunya is an idiot, not you.
> Or?
ScottW is too.
badlands420
>> Out of curiosity: I understand the Aussie IP, how do you get that AT&T
>> Houston is tied into this?
>99.7.215.131 is AT&T Houston. It's the IP ssssh uses who has been
>nameshifting since he lost a bet to leave the group.
Here's the WhoIs info for the Aussie IP.
http://toolserver.org/~chm/whois.php?ip=203.16.61.77
Which leads us to....
http://www.web24.com.au/splash2.php
So, not only is he using a shitty proxy server that leaves his original IP
exposed, he's also paying money for it, which is pretty goddamn funny.
Nunya Bidnits
I guess so.
There were plenty of clues... I guess that means... oh never mind.
Nunya Bidnits
You actually think you have two persistent separate nameshifters? I suppose
it's possible. Highly unlikely though, that would mean an unusually high
proportion of degenerate cowards reading the groups.
Perp may have just gotten a warning from AT&T, but he's not nameshifting
under that IP address any more as far as I can tell.
MartyB in KC
Nunya Bidnits
or your one primary coward is doubling up on servers.
If you all follow my earlier instructions and report these violations
accordingly, the volume of complaints will inevitably influence both ISP
hosts whose terms are being violated at the expense of the honor and good
names of legitimate posters.
MartyB in KC
ScottW
A whole slew of posts under my name this morning from the Houston
degenerate.
See the 4th post in this thread for example (7:58 AM)
ScottW
Nunya Bidnits
No shit, anyone who is actually paying extra to post text messages to Usenet
is just fucking dumber than dirt. Or suffering from significant mental
health disease. Or both. Most likely, both.
badlands420
> If you all follow my earlier instructions
Pretty sure nobody elected you newsgroup emperor.
> and report these violations
> accordingly, the volume of complaints will inevitably influence both ISP
> hosts whose terms are being violated at the expense of the honor and good
> names of legitimate posters.
Or just ignore his stupid ass until he gets bored and leaves in a couple
days.
ScottW
What an idiot.
badlands420
> No shit, anyone who is actually paying extra to post text messages to
> Usenet
> is just fucking dumber than dirt. Or suffering from significant mental
> health disease. Or both. Most likely, both.
There are literally hundreds of dedicated usenet proxy servers he could be
using, that don't cost money and wouldn't leave his ass hanging out for all
to see, so I'm going with the dumber-than-dirt hypothesis.
ScottW
LOL!
So I'm an Aussie now?
Duh. You guys are morons.
ScottW
No, but you are a disgrace to the service you claimed to serve.
ScottW
ScottW
Except for the part about you being totally wrong. Aside from that you
got it all right.
If you need clues about that look in the mirror.
badlands420
>LOL!
>So I'm an Aussie now?
>Duh. You guys are morons.
References:
<0d0f90f4-445d-4c97...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhu0v1$tke$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
<17d4f0ee-10c1-4e39...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<0ac3e104-e259-443a...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<16b31aeb-f890-45ff...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhvl91$ddg$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
<1bd087f1-9b39-4e25...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<b924b2d6-5c4d-4100...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<8647bacd-039a-45b6...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<DjM0n.763$Mv3...@newsfe05.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.7.215.131
So he snips the Aussie server, re-routes this message eight times, and his
ass is STILL hanging out. This couldn't get much more comical.
It's not like masking an IP is fucking rocket surgery, dude.
ScottW
Um, dummy? Do you really suppose that ISPs care about the Usenet? As
in losing a paying customer because a bunch of geeks get their
feathers ruffled?
Maybe in your world but certainly not in the real world.
Nunya has his head up his ass is all. Perhaps you'd care to join him.
LoL
ScottW
> >LOL!
> >So I'm an Aussie now?
> >Duh. You guys are morons.
>
> References:
> <hhu0v1$tk...@news.eternal-september.org>
> <17d4f0ee-10c1-4e39-9a20-f913f5c28...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
> <0ac3e104-e259-443a-97a4-271951255...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
> <16b31aeb-f890-45ff-96e4-7e75e5425...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
> <hhvl91$dd...@news.eternal-september.org>
> <1bd087f1-9b39-4e25-b024-99a8b0dda...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
> <b924b2d6-5c4d-4100-a9fc-fe391387f...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
> <8647bacd-039a-45b6-8345-95495a0de...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
> <DjM0n.763$Mv3....@newsfe05.iad>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.7.215.131
>
> So he snips the Aussie server, re-routes this message eight times, and his
> ass is STILL hanging out. This couldn't get much more comical.
>
> It's not like masking an IP is fucking rocket surgery, dude.
Except he have no reason to seeing as he still posts from this ISP and
he is successful getting your panties in a bunch.
Quit smoking the bud, dude. It's making you see things that aren't
there.
ScottW
Is that your life? Ruffling feathers on usenet?
I think being condemned to commit the crime is the worst form of
punishment you can serve.
ScottW
Kurgan Gringioni
Is it really a violation of terms to spoof someone who is using a
psuedonym?
Most, but not all of us are using pseudonymns. I'm pretty sure that no
US laws would be broken by spoofing a psuedonym, but I don't know
about Terms of Service. I never read the TOSs. I'm very bad at reading
legalese - it's such dry reading that my ADD takes me away from it in
about 10 seconds.
ScottW
And why do you say that, Mr. 'Integrity'?
ScottW
Is that your life? Getting your feathers ruffled on the Usenet?
> I think being condemned to commit the crime is the worst form of
> punishment you can serve.
OMG! What is I was *you*?
badlands420
>Except he have no reason to seeing as he still posts from this ISP and
>he is successful getting your panties in a bunch.
Sorry, your words and your actions don't match up. The fact is, you're going
to great lengths to conceal your identity (including paying for an
Australian proxy server) and you still can't get it right because you're
quite possibly the stupidest fucktard in usenet history.
And yes, my panties are in a bunch, because I keep nearly falling off my
chair laughing at your ineptitude.
ScottW
> On Jan 5, 11:29 am, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
>
> september.invalid> wrote:
> > Obviously I spoke too soon. Either you have two sissy cowards nameshifting
> > or your one primary coward is doubling up on servers.
>
> > If you all follow my earlier instructions and report these violations
> > accordingly, the volume of complaints will inevitably influence both ISP
> > hosts whose terms are being violated at the expense of the honor and good
> > names of legitimate posters.
>
> > MartyB in KC
>
> Is it really a violation of terms to spoof someone who is using a
> psuedonym?
Forgery is. While there are forgers here I am not one of them like
badlands420 is.
> Most, but not all of us are using pseudonymns. I'm pretty sure that no
> US laws would be broken by spoofing a psuedonym, but I don't know
> about Terms of Service. I never read the TOSs. I'm very bad at reading
> legalese - it's such dry reading that my ADD takes me away from it in
> about 10 seconds.
The small backwater of the Usenet is not going to create a ripple at
an ISP.
Kurgan Gringioni
> On Jan 5, 2:26 pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 11:29 am, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
>
> > september.invalid> wrote:
> > > Obviously I spoke too soon. Either you have two sissy cowards nameshifting
> > > or your one primary coward is doubling up on servers.
>
> > > If you all follow my earlier instructions and report these violations
> > > accordingly, the volume of complaints will inevitably influence both ISP
> > > hosts whose terms are being violated at the expense of the honor and good
> > > names of legitimate posters.
>
> > > MartyB in KC
>
> > Is it really a violation of terms to spoof someone who is using a
> > psuedonym?
>
> Forgery is. While there are forgers here I am not one of them like
> badlands420 is.
What's the difference between forgery and spoofing?
ScottW
It's obvious to anyone with any integrity that a Major in the US
Army wouldn't be so bothered with usenet and go out of their way to
disrupt the pasttimes of so many for so little. Being a usenet scum
is pathetic, but fraudulently claiming to be currently serving in the
army is despicable.
ScottW
UCLAN
> I'm viewing the group through a webpage. I see the Aussie IP when I go
> to "show original" but I don't see the 99.7.215.131 address.
>
> Am I being a total idiot? Or?
Make sure you're looking at NNTP-Posting-Host. 99.7.215.131 is
AT&T Internet Services, Texas (SBC Global.net, Houston.)
What Aussie IP are you seeing?
UCLAN
> You actually think you have two persistent separate nameshifters? I suppose
> it's possible. Highly unlikely though, that would mean an unusually high
> proportion of degenerate cowards reading the groups.
>
> Perp may have just gotten a warning from AT&T, but he's not nameshifting
> under that IP address any more as far as I can tell.
Sure he is:
Path:
s03-b28.iad!npeersf01.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: ScottW <swill...@live.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos,alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers,alt.sports.football.pro.oak-raiders,alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
Subject: Re: NAMESHIFTER- FORGER Re: That bomb they just tried to throw to
Cassell
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 104
Message-ID: <5f2699ab-178b-4e4c...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
References: <0d0f90f4-445d-4c97...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhu0v1$tke$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
<17d4f0ee-10c1-4e39...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<0ac3e104-e259-443a...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<16b31aeb-f890-45ff...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhvl91$ddg$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
<1bd087f1-9b39-4e25...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<b924b2d6-5c4d-4100...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<8647bacd-039a-45b6...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<cc7db153-3b92-49fd...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>
<b4cd991d-eed2-4c56...@34g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>
<hi03po$msn$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.7.215.131
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1262721561 2004 127.0.0.1 (5 Jan 2010 19:59:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=99.7.215.131;
posting-account=MqW_3woAAAAmq68RS4wmK6EgleC0l9ZZ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; FunWebProducts; GTB6.3; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; yie8),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: Hurricane-Charley alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos:61626
alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers:110154
alt.sports.football.pro.oak-raiders:144987
alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots:311017
X-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:00:21 MST (s03-b28.iad)
badlands420
>but fraudulently claiming to be currently serving in the
army is despicable.
For what it's worth, impersonating a military officer is also a prosecutable
federal offense.
Cleatarrior
> On Jan 4, 7:31 pm, Cleatarrior <heleo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 4, 5:10 pm, KG <kgringi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> september.invalid> wrote:
>>>> KG said:
>>>>> was one of the worst ideas of a play I've ever seen in the NFL.
>>>>> I can't recall anyone ever trying to complete a long pass to a
>>>>> QUARTERBACK! who was surrounded by defenders.
>>>>> I guess it could've been worse. They could've had the center try a
>>>>> Hail Mary to the field goal kicker.
>>>> Great idea, agressive unusual play, poor execution on Castille's part. He
>>>> should have thrown it away when he saw the coverage. Not that it did much
>>>> harm in the long run...
>>> There were 3 defenders around Cassell. He had about zero chance of
>>> getting that ball. I'm guessing they won't be trusting Castille to
>>> make reads in the future eh?
>>> You're right though, it didn't do any harm in the long run.
>> Go away TROLL! This is a FOOTBALL newsgroup!
>
>
> Dude. Thine knee jerketh. That post was about the game.
Dude, you fell for the fraud.
Cleatarrior
> On Jan 5, 7:19 am, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
> september.invalid> wrote:
>> KG said:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 4, 7:31 pm, Cleatarrior <heleo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 4, 5:10 pm, KG <kgringi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 4, 4:26 pm, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
>>>>> september.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> KG said:
>>>>>>> was one of the worst ideas of a play I've ever seen in the NFL.
>>>>>>> I can't recall anyone ever trying to complete a long pass to a
>>>>>>> QUARTERBACK! who was surrounded by defenders.
>>>>>>> I guess it could've been worse. They could've had the center try a
>>>>>>> Hail Mary to the field goal kicker.
>>>>>> Great idea, agressive unusual play, poor execution on Castille's
>>>>>> part. He should have thrown it away when he saw the coverage. Not
>>>>>> that it did much harm in the long run...
>>>>> There were 3 defenders around Cassell. He had about zero chance of
>>>>> getting that ball. I'm guessing they won't be trusting Castille to
>>>>> make reads in the future eh?
>>>>> You're right though, it didn't do any harm in the long run.
>>>> Go away TROLL! This is a FOOTBALL newsgroup!
>>> Dude. Thine knee jerketh. That post was about the game.
>> been pestifying your Chargers NG for over a month now under various names
>> including yours.
>>
>> <waiting a moment for the big reveal to sink in...>
>>
>> I thought that was obvious to everyone by now who's reading this thread.
>> Look at the headers before you go off next time.
>
>
>
> I'd like to ask you to reflect on a few things:
>
> 1) My words constituted "going off"?
> 2) you also wrote, "Get a clue, Einstein". I don't read headers when I
> read posts. I kinda doubt that anyone does. Those words in that
> forgery are kinda the same words that the real Cleat's been throwing
> about. So . . . . I guess I'm just an idiot.
And probably a rather young one, my guess...
Kurgan Gringioni
There really isn't much of a difference between the "fraud" and the
"real thing". I wonder why the fraud even bothered.
Cleatarrior
> On Jan 5, 10:17 am, kurgan <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 5, 10:12 am, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 5, 9:22 am, kurgan <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 5, 8:58 am, KG <kgringi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 5, 7:19 am, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
>>>>> september.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> KG said:
>>>>>>> On Jan 4, 7:31 pm, Cleatarrior <heleo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jan 4, 5:10 pm, KG <kgringi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 4, 4:26 pm, "Nunya Bidnits" <nunyabidn...@eternal-
>>>>>>>>> september.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> KG said:
>>>>>>>>>>> was one of the worst ideas of a play I've ever seen in the NFL.
>>>>>>>>>>> I can't recall anyone ever trying to complete a long pass to a
>>>>>>>>>>> QUARTERBACK! who was surrounded by defenders.
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess it could've been worse. They could've had the center try a
>>>>>>>>>>> Hail Mary to the field goal kicker.
>>>>>>>>>> Great idea, agressive unusual play, poor execution on Castille's
>>>>>>>>>> part. He should have thrown it away when he saw the coverage. Not
>>>>>>>>>> that it did much harm in the long run...
>>>>>>>>> There were 3 defenders around Cassell. He had about zero chance of
>>>>>>>>> getting that ball. I'm guessing they won't be trusting Castille to
>>>>>>>>> make reads in the future eh?
>>>>>>>>> You're right though, it didn't do any harm in the long run.
>>>>>>>> Go away TROLL! This is a FOOTBALL newsgroup!
>>>>>>> Dude. Thine knee jerketh. That post was about the game.
>>>>>> been pestifying your Chargers NG for over a month now under various names
>>>>>> including yours.
>>>>>> <waiting a moment for the big reveal to sink in...>
>>>>>> I thought that was obvious to everyone by now who's reading this thread.
>>>>>> Look at the headers before you go off next time.
>>>>> I'd like to ask you to reflect on a few things:
>>>>> 1) My words constituted "going off"?
>>>>> 2) you also wrote, "Get a clue, Einstein". I don't read headers when I
>>>>> read posts. I kinda doubt that anyone does. Those words in that
>>>>> forgery are kinda the same words that the real Cleat's been throwing
>>>>> about. So . . . . I guess I'm just an idiot.
>>>> Houston is tied into this?
>>> 99.7.215.131 is AT&T Houston. It's the IP ssssh uses who has been
>>> nameshifting since he lost a bet to leave the group.
>>> still showing himself to be the lowest lifeform on usenet.
>> to "show original" but I don't see the 99.7.215.131 address.
>>
>> Am I being a total idiot? Or?
>
> the aussie IP.
>
> I do see a post (4th in this thread) that has my name on it from the
> ass who appear here as ssshhhh
> and posts from AT&T Houston at IP 99.7.215.131
>
> So he hasn't had his plug pulled and moved to Australia. I don't know
> what that's about.
>
Tor?
Cleatarrior
Consider KG, look at what your selfish trolling has inevitably led to.
Happy with yourself?
Cleatarrior
And:
99.7.215.131
29.7755 -95.4152
5210-5298 Inker St
Houston, TX 77007
The google maps street view is interesting...
Sort of a nondescript duplex.
ScottW
I think you should show the entire message including ID, moron. Here,
watch:
References:
<0d0f90f4-445d-4c97-955a-367cbf524...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhu0v1$tk...@news.eternal-september.org>
<17d4f0ee-10c1-4e39-9a20-f913f5c28...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<0ac3e104-e259-443a-97a4-271951255...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<16b31aeb-f890-45ff-96e4-7e75e5425...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhvl91$dd...@news.eternal-september.org>
<1bd087f1-9b39-4e25-b024-99a8b0dda...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<b924b2d6-5c4d-4100-a9fc-fe391387f...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<8647bacd-039a-45b6-8345-95495a0de...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<DjM0n.763$Mv3....@newsfe05.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.220.10.119
As it turns out YOU sent it.
Moron. LOL!
ScottW
<yawn>
Is that your ass hanging out in the wind?
ScottW
LOL!
Go ahead: prosecute. I double-dog dare you. Be sure to clean out your
stash first.
Nunya Bidnits
> Nunya Bidnits wrote:
>
>> You actually think you have two persistent separate nameshifters? I
>> suppose it's possible. Highly unlikely though, that would mean an
>> unusually high proportion of degenerate cowards reading the groups.
>>
>> Perp may have just gotten a warning from AT&T, but he's not
>> nameshifting under that IP address any more as far as I can tell.
>
> Sure he is:
>
Yep. swill...@live.com is the addy to block, it will force him to change
his underlying fake posting addy as well as posting name, and give ISPs and
News Hosts much more reason to kick his cowardly ass into the cesspool.
Nunya Bidnits
> Um, dummy? Do you really suppose that ISPs care about the Usenet? As
> in losing a paying customer because a bunch of geeks get their
> feathers ruffled?
We'll find out.
Nunya Bidnits
It is considered a violation by every host I've ever had, either ISP or
NNTP, to intentionally impersonate someone else. It's not a matter of law,
it's a matter of common sense policy. I know for a fact that impersonators
get tossed, because the last time someone pulled that cowardly bullshit on
my I reported them and I was informed action had been taken to close the
account.
Hey, you can read TOS, you just have to adjust your ADD to include the
hyperfocus element.
And sometimes it's an unwritten rule, but admins everywhere absolutely
loathe that behavior and don't mind killing the account.
MBKC
Nunya Bidnits
Path:
feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news2.glor
b.com!postnews.google.com!f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: ScottW <swill...@live.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos,alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers,a
lt.sports.football.pro.oak-raiders,alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
Xref: eternal-september.org alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos:5540
alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers:11248
alt.sports.football.pro.oak-raiders:13308
alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots:8184
Nunya Bidnits
fatal mistake.
badlands420
>Go ahead: prosecute. I double-dog dare you. Be sure to clean out your
stash first.
Ad hominem much? LMAO.
And yeah, I'll totally take that dare. Let's go to the FBI, tell them you're
impersonating a military officer and I've got two weed plants in my back
yard, and we'll see who they arrest and prosecute. In fact, I'll drive to
wherever you are and give you a ride to the nearest field office. Deal?
ScottW
KG isn't. Nunya is the bonehead. badlands is following him into the
sewer.
Nunya Bidnits
> There really isn't much of a difference between the "fraud" and the
> "real thing". I wonder why the fraud even bothered.
The same thing could be posted about the shifter sissy impersonating you
too. And I notice you persist in perpetuating the cowardshifter's addition
of crossposts to the raiders and patriots NGs. Quit helping the
sissyshifter.
ScottW
september.invalid> wrote:
> Killfile swillab...@live.com to force the nameshifter to make the final
> fatal mistake.
"Fatal mistake". LOL! "Usenet is a deadly serious business."
Nunya Bidnits
shit
<swill...@live.com> Killfile this addy to kill the shifter or make it out
itself.
ScottW
september.invalid> wrote:
> Shiftercoward said:
> shit
>
> <swillab...@live.com> Killfile this addy to kill the shifter or make it out
> itself.
You're a bossy little thing, aren't you.
badlands420
> And I notice you persist in perpetuating the cowardshifter's addition
> of crossposts to the raiders and patriots NGs. Quit helping the
> sissyshifter.
This is a fair point. If you don't fix somebody else's crosspost, it becomes
your crosspost.
ScottW
I'll bet you're actually a real nice guy.
Except that you seem just a little unhinged mentally.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
september.invalid> wrote:
> And sometimes it's an unwritten rule, but admins everywhere absolutely
> loathe that behavior and don't mind killing the account.
Now I suppose you'll try to report me for impersonating a President of
the US. What an idiot.
Ah, those "unwritten rules" are so hard to follow...
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
> It's obvious to anyone with any integrity
Have you called the police on badlands for the felony he admitted to?
'Integrity' indeed.
Cleatarrior
Nice, your petulance predefines you.
Cleatarrior
How about they just call you by your recent troll-handle - 'pitchforks &
torches'?
There's an artless complacency to your trolling that will inevitiabley
lead to an unhappy ending.
Cleatarrior
Trash like you brings that out, yes.
badlands420
> Have you called the police on badlands for the felony he admitted to?
What "police" would he call? And say what exactly?
badlands420
> What "police" would he call? And say what exactly?
Also, what "felony" did I admit to? This is a vital piece of information, so
please feel free to produce it.
Additionally, how do you propose that Scott find out my name and place of
residence so he knows what law enforcement agency to call? I suppose my
ISP's going to freely disclose this information just because he asked for
it?
Please, go ahead and flesh out this little fantasy of yours. I can't wait to
hear how it ends.
ScottW
> > Have you called the police on badlands for the felony he admitted to?
>
> What "police" would he call? And say what exactly?
Don't get they psycho started. Shhhtards loser buddies have been
going on for 10 years on RAO about an alleged child porn sent to a guy
named Arny who accused half the group of sending it to him and then
the loony phillips (aka Boon) claimed he called the Michigan cops
where Arny lives and filed a child porn possession complaint.
They still get spun up on the subject from time to time.
I don't think you understand how deep these losers usenet psychosis
has become.
ScottW
ScottW
> > What "police" would he call? And say what exactly?
>
> Also, what "felony" did I admit to? This is a vital piece of information, so
> please feel free to produce it.
>
> Additionally, how do you propose that Scott find out my name and place of
> residence so he knows what law enforcement agency to call?
County Sheriff wouldn't even bother to visit you on a possession
complaint.
Now maybe in Texas......you don't suppose this all a jealous rage from
the namshifter? He used to live in Minneapolis and now posts from
Texas. Must be a culture shock, especially for a black power wannabe
who thinks being a pollwatcher is a major civic duty.
ScottW
badlands420
> County Sheriff wouldn't even bother to visit you on a possession
complaint.
Gosh, really?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
> And yeah, I'll totally take that dare. Let's go to the FBI, tell them you're
> impersonating a military officer and I've got two weed plants in my back
> yard, and we'll see who they arrest and prosecute. In fact, I'll drive to
> wherever you are and give you a ride to the nearest field office. Deal?
Cool! What's in it for me?
badlands420
>Cool! What's in it for me?
An active duty military assignment that inexplicably leaves you enough spare
time to troll usenet groups all day every day.
KG
I dunno.
The fraud was using the same words you were. The only difference would
be the IP addy.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
I already have that.
What else?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Was it in Australia?
(You're not dumb enough to follow bads and ScottW down that rat hole,
are you?)
badlands420
>> An active duty military assignment that inexplicably leaves you enough
>> spare
>> time to troll usenet groups all day every day.
>I already have that.
Really? Pretty odd, then, that none of your posts come through either a
government server or a wireless provider. In fact, it's already been
established that your IP originates from a residential duplex in Houston.
Just so we're straight, do you in fact claim to be an active duty Major in
the US Army?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
LOL!
What's in it for me? (Just so we're straight.)
And tell me: aside from you're getting busted for a felony (which I
could care less about), what's in it for me?
(Just so we're straight.)
badlands420
"Franklin Delano Roosevelt" <swill...@live.com> wrote in message
news:1357f056-d7f3-4207...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Kurgan Gringioni
wrote:
Who is hotter: Aussie women or Houston women?
Cleatarrior
No, the difference would be it's inability to even begin to talk actual
football, though I'm not surprised you would gloss over such a relevant
distinction, given your own trollish posts.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
> Was that a yes or a no?
Here's the deal, badlands. You have Nunya who seems on the verge of
threatening physical violence. You yourself have imagined that I've
routed posts through Australia. You have people who have Google-
Earthed my ISP. There are people here who don't seem to have a very
good grasp of reality. Some of you seem mentally unhinged, suffering
from OCD or other mental illnesses, or just plain creepy.
So here's what you do. You call your local FBI office and tell them
you suspect there's somebody impersonating a field-grade Army officer.
If you really want quick action make up some kind of connection with
Al Queda. Ask ScottW to help you with this as there are several
accusations from him about this in the RAO archive. He's another one
of your "less than mentally healthy" group.
The FBI will be able to track me down in short order and prosecute me
if your accusation is accurate. I've really not taken any big steps to
hide myself, certainly no more than you have.
So there you go, bozo. Bring it on. See if you can get me put behind
bars. And don't forget to confess to your felony as a part of the
process.
(Wouldn't it be creepy if I was trying to track you down to get you
busted for weed?)
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
I served with some Aussie women during a deployment. A couple of them
were kind of hot.
That's the only experience with them I have.
Cleatarrior
Go away! or I will flood your newsgroup out of sheer spite.
Anonymous
> TROLL! This is a FOOTBALL newsgroup!
>
> Go away! or I will flood your newsgroup out of sheer spite.
Go ahead.
badlands420
for yourself. There are two potential realities here, and neither of them
reflect favorably on you. You're either...
A) An actual service member who gleefully admits to spending his on-duty
hours trolling usenet groups at taxpayer expense, and whose online
activities constitute the fraudulent misuse of US government computer
systems (punishable by court martial/imprisonment/bad conduct discharge
under the UCMJ and fine/imprisonment under United States Code), or
B) A private citizen with a verifiable track record of impersonating a US
military officer, in violation of United States Code Title 18, Section 912
and punishable by three years in federal prison. To wit:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000912----000-.html
Either way, you've engaged in some pretty serious criminal misconduct. You
may want to give some consideration to how much further down this road
you're willing to travel.
"Franklin Delano Roosevelt" <swill...@live.com> wrote in message
news:b3fdab75-6201-4691...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Anonymous
> Well, well, well, this is a lovely little situation you've managed to create
> for yourself. There are two potential realities here, and neither of them
> reflect favorably on you. You're either...
(As usual badlands420, in his drug-addled state, has created an
excluded-middle argument. I doubt the poor simp ever went to college
so he probably doesn't know what that means.)
> A) An actual service member who gleefully admits to spending his on-duty
> hours trolling usenet groups at taxpayer expense, and whose online
> activities constitute the fraudulent misuse of US government computer
> systems (punishable by court martial/imprisonment/bad conduct discharge
> under the UCMJ and fine/imprisonment under United States Code), or
(This assumes that I'm on-duty when I post here and that I post on
equipment owned by the US government. And nobody has "gleefully
admitted" any such thing! Poor badlands420! He's a real moron!)
> B) A private citizen with a verifiable track record of impersonating a US
> military officer, in violation of United States Code Title 18, Section 912
> and punishable by three years in federal prison. To wit:http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000912-...
Bring it on. Either way you'll look even more foolish than you already
do.
(See how obsessed badlands is? Quoting US Code on matters he knows
nothing about. And he wonders why I wish to remain anonymous. He seems
pretty ill. There are some real nuts out there!)
> Either way, you've engaged in some pretty serious criminal misconduct.
Yes, the Usenet is Very Serious Business indeed. And you have jumped
to your conclusion. Now follow through with it or shut your pie-hole.
> You may want to give some consideration to how much further down this road
> you're willing to travel.
You have everything you need. Get with ScottW to filter through the
RAO archives. He can point you to my "useless Usenet resume".
Um, I wonder what the criminal or civil penalties are for making false
accusations to federal officers. Do you know? You'd perhaps be smart
to check that out first. I find the civil penalties perhaps the most
intriguing. Do you own your own home? Is it paid for? Is it nice? Do
you have any savings? A decent car? What other assets do you have?
Oh, never mind. There's plenty of time for all of that during
discovery.
Go for it, bitch, unless you're too much of a pussy. I still double-
dog dare you. I doubt you will though. I predict that this is just a
result of that cloud of smoke around your head.
Nunya Bidnits
>
> This is a fair point. If you don't fix somebody else's crosspost, it
> becomes your crosspost.
Word.
badlands420
> Go for it, bitch, unless you're too much of a pussy.
Wow, the troll sounds pretty upset. Maybe things are starting to hit too
close to home.
Anonymous
I'm not upset at all. I'm trying to goad you into action. Owning
property on the West Coast that I don't have to pay for is
interesting. And to see your "bitchenest" wife crying as they hand
your property over to me... Priceless! (Will she stay with you when
you lose everything in a civil suit due to your own stupidity?)
There's only one way to find out. You seem to have the "goods" on me.
So go for it!
Follow through with it. It seems a pretty sure bet for you. As you
pointed out there seem to be only two possibilities here.
badlands420
>So go for it!
Go for what?
> Follow through with it.
Follow through with what?
Anonymous
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!
npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-
me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!
newsfe02.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net>
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers
References:
<0d0f90f4-445d-4c97...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<17d4f0ee-10c1-4e39...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<0ac3e104-e259-443a...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<16b31aeb-f890-45ff...@f5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<hhvl91$ddg$1...@news.eternal-september.org> <1bd087f1-9b39-4e25-
b024-99a...@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <b924b2d6-5c4d-4100-
a9fc-fe3...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<8647bacd-039a-45b6...@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<DjM0n.763$Mv3...@newsfe05.iad> <15471f69-bb4e-44e4-8326-
c4b9c2...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <32ab9b6f-a9a4-49e2-
b95a-45a...@35g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
<90aef759-6cf9-4256...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<c60e7661-729f-4b49...@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
<EhO0n.12720$Gf3....@newsfe22.iad> <a8c44644-
db0a-4bc8-8b6...@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: NAMESHIFTER- FORGER Re: That bomb they just tried to
throw to Cassell
Lines: 12
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <mHP0n.1814$AO4...@newsfe02.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.220.10.119
X-Complaints-To: newsm...@cox.net
X-Trace: newsfe02.iad 1262733138 72.220.10.119 (Tue, 05 Jan 2010
23:12:18 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:12:18 UTC
Organization: Cox
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:12:28 -0800
>Go ahead: prosecute. I double-dog dare you. Be sure to clean out your
stash first.
Ad hominem much? LMAO.
And yeah, I'll totally take that dare. Let's go to the FBI, tell them
you're
impersonating a military officer and I've got two weed plants in my
back
yard, and we'll see who they arrest and prosecute. In fact, I'll drive
to
wherever you are and give you a ride to the nearest field office.
Deal?
******************************************************
"And yeah, I'll totally take that dare."
Give them a call. Start the ball rolling.
Or you can admit that you're just a drug-addled loser. Either way is
fine with me.
badlands420
>Or you can admit that you're just a drug-addled loser. Either way is
fine with me.
If your posting behavior is indicative of the dangers of excessive sobriety,
then yes, I proudly proclaim myself to be a drug-addled loser.
Also, I'm a bit upset that you dropped the "he supports terrorism" angle.
I'd appreciate it if you could please start emphasizing that again.
Anonymous
Have you called the FBI yet, dipshit?
It's time to look at the retirement portfolio. I'd like to get an idea
what your contribution to it will be.
badlands420
> Have you called the FBI yet, dipshit?
Oh fuck yeah, I love Fat Buds Incorporated!
Anonymous
> > Have you called the FBI yet, dipshit?
>
> Oh fuck yeah, I love Fat Buds Incorporated!
"And yeah, I'll totally take that dare."
Boon
> On Jan 5, 4:33 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:
>
> > > Have you called the police on badlands for the felony he admitted to?
>
> > What "police" would he call? And say what exactly?
>
> Don't get they psycho started. Shhhtards loser buddies have been
> going on for 10 years on RAO about an alleged child porn sent to a guy
> named Arny who accused half the group of sending it to him and then
> the loony phillips (aka Boon) claimed he called the Michigan cops
> where Arny lives and filed a child porn possession complaint.
That would be an out-and-out lie.
badlands420
>"And yeah, I'll totally take that dare."
Dude, I said I'd give you a ride down there, and I meant it. You did not
respond, opting instead to change the subject.
Consequently, you talking shit about other people being no-ball-having
backpedalers is just as hilarious as you talking shit about other people
being criminals. Good work, Major Manmuncher.
Boon
My take on it is that he's laughing hysterically at your empty threats.
Anonymous
> >"And yeah, I'll totally take that dare."
>
> Dude, I said I'd give you a ride down there, and I meant it. You did not
> respond, opting instead to change the subject.
Uh-huh.
>Go ahead: prosecute. I double-dog dare you. Be sure to clean out your stash first.
Ad hominem much? LMAO.
And yeah, I'll totally take that dare.
So, "Dude", start prosecuting.
> Consequently, you talking shit about other people being no-ball-having
> backpedalers is just as hilarious as you talking shit about other people
> being criminals. Good work, Major Manmuncher.
Funny is watching you backpedal. "Hm. I wonder is there isn't another
possibility that I left out of my excluded middle argument. I'd better
start some name-calling or I'll look pretty stupid. I probably already
do."
But I do appreciate your tacit admission.
Anonymous
I want him to do it. I can see the FBI guys now: "We're sorry, Major.
You have a good day. We'll go take care of the druggie now."
But badlands420 has already shown what he's made of: nothing.
Anonymous
> On Jan 5, 6:46 pm, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 4:33 pm, "badlands420" <mikeh...@uranus.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Have you called the police on badlands for the felony he admitted to?
>
> > > What "police" would he call? And say what exactly?
Is ScottW had an ounce of the "integrity" that he has so long claimed
he has, he'd be eager to find out the identity of a self-confessed
felon and would want to see them taken off the streets.
> > Don't get they psycho started.
LoL.
> > Shhhtards loser buddies have been
> > going on for 10 years on RAO about an alleged child porn sent to a guy
> > named Arny who accused half the group of sending it to him and then
> > the loony phillips (aka Boon) claimed he called the Michigan cops
> > where Arny lives and filed a child porn possession complaint.
>
> That would be an out-and-out lie.
Wouldn't Clyde be amused to be called a "loser buddy" of mine by The
Imbecile? He was the one who seemed to go on and on about it. And
Clyde was a "loser buddy" of ScottW's until he saw what a piece of
shit Scoots is.
Meanwhile, I'm amused by Scooter's lack of integrity, but I'm not at
all surprised by it. Note how he shifts from intense hatred of me to
an "argument" that some people other than me did something and so I
therefore must do the same thing. If I was guilty of what he's
claiming you'd think he'd just come out and say so.
The poor moron. He's all muddled up.
Boon
The funny part is that the more RAO business Scooter tries to drag in
here, the more everyone despises him. Does he really believe he's
distancing himself from his despicable behavior on other groups?
Another interesting question: does he think that the people here hold
him in higher regard than the people of RAO? It boggles the mind.