Re: Schott single-handedly destroyed that drive...
Tutor
> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the two, until 4th
> down.
>
> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB imploring the OC
> for a play.
game set and match for me as far as schott is concerned
Still Roper
> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the two, until 4th
> down.
>
> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB imploring the OC
> for a play.
Not all on offense but when we did get the chance...suspect
playcalling...
yoyodog
"buRford" <buR...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
news:7lopj6dtd77rnnb3s...@4ax.com...
> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the
> two, until 4th
> down.
>
> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB
> imploring the OC
> for a play.
At least the guys on SNY agreed.... what can be done to be loud about
getting a real OC?
Johnny Morongo
Welcome to the Dark Side, Tut.
Johnny Morongo
> "buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
Severl years ago, some folks in this group got together a very sane
but logical call for Herm's head. Somehow, Woody heard it and he
subsequently greased the skids for Herm's escape to KC. Can it be
done again?
papa.carl44
"buRford" <buR...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
> Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
> Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the
> two, until 4th
> down.
>
> I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB
> imploring the OC
> for a play.
Can't communicate...can't call a timely play...he can't think ahead...it is
always his quick decision...a good OC is always two to three plays ahead
based on various outcomes....Rex has got to go to Woody and tell him he
needs a real OC.
John C TX
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:22:45 -0500, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:
>
> >"buRford" <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
> A conspiracy minded person might think hanky-panky... but that aside, that drive was a
> killer. It wasted so much time (where was the hurryup), and why LT was in there, after
> Greene was rushing well? Why the passes?
> LT had a weak game, yet Schott continued to go with him.
>
> Just baffling.
The play calling at the goal line was puzzling. I just read about
both radios going out which explains the confusion.
All year LT is their choice near the goal line. Maybe because he is
the best at diving over the line or maybe the like him but for some
reason he is their choice near the goal line.
Michael
>
> - Show quoted text -
i think they may be worried about green putting the ball on the ground
Parker Race
"buRford" <buR...@buR.ford.com> wrote in message
: First, he doesn't do hurryup, and wastes a ton of time.
: Then he can't get the play in, with Sanchez calling for it.
: Then, with the Jets rushing well, he goes to the pass on 1st down at the
two, until 4th
: down.
:
: I've never seen a coach destroy a drive like that... and the 24 yr old QB
imploring the OC
: for a play.
The team sharing the stadium has an OC with Super Bowl experience. He
wouldn't even have to move.
It would be tough to let him go but anything to help our AFC brothers. ; )
Seriously though, I have seen just about the same scenarioplayed out with
Gilbride in 1st and goal situations.
Michael
>
> - Show quoted text -
why use the word "puzzling" it was not "puzzling" it was more of the
same monumental incompetence that we have seen time and time again
from schotty. once again, he pulled a play out of his ass
irrespective of circumstances.
Harlan Lachman
buRford <buR...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> And Rex said he's bringing him back.
> It may be time to re-evaluate Rex.
At this point, complaining about Shott is unfair.
The man is not not competent to prepare an offense and consistently call
a winning set of plays. What is he supposed to do? Say please fire me.
Give me a break.
Shott works for Rex. Rex is the HC. If Rex says play LT at the goal line
or not, Rex is the one who can insist that Shott not go away from what
ain't broke.
Rex has been getting a pass from most fans. Hell, it has been great to
see a competitive Jets team that player supposedly want to play for.
OTOH, Rex is the HC. The buck stops with him and this one is up his butt.
harlan
Harlan Lachman
buRford <buR...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> To me, having worked in a field that used similar communications, it's very
> troubling that
> it happened at that moment. It's the home team that is responsible for
> communications.
> A system & the backup going out at once, makes one wonder ;)
>
> >
> >All year LT is their choice near the goal line. Maybe because he is
> >the best at diving over the line or maybe the like him but for some
> >reason he is their choice near the goal line.
>
>
> And that, too... LT didn't even go over the top.
> 9 carries for 15 yards, or 9 carries for 50... Schott chose the former, at a
> critical
> time.
> For you, you're ok with Schott. But for me, and a lot of others, it's the
> same nonsense
> every game. And I try to keep an open mind, I couldn't have thought we'd
> win yesterday,
> if I didn't. But it's impossible to, especially knowing that in the end, the
> wrong play
> will be called... using the wrong player... at the wrong time.
>
> The bottom line... when an offense cannot score a TD in the first quarter,
> for 13 or 14
> straight games, is it on the players... or might there be a problem with the
> OC?
I would say there is a problem with the HC who is bringing this guy back.
harlan