Uh oh, how is clouddipshit going to explain away this one? :)
===============================================================
It was Bush who allowed Bin Laden to escape and the Taliban to survive.
so why don't you explain it away.
after all its your side that allowed this to happen not the liberals.
Right Ray the same Liberals like the pussies at moveon.org,
huffingtonpost and dailykhost that didn't want to go to Afghanistan to
begin with....or the race baiting punk asses like Reverend Wright who
blamed us for the attacks? Just to be clear the real National Security
Hawks like you and your ilk who had a real plan for the war and no Ray
I don't mean an exit plan.
>
> It was Bush who allowed Bin Laden to escape and the Taliban to survive.
> so why don't you explain it away.
> after all its your side that allowed this to happen not the liberals.
Bin Laden was going to be handled to Bubba Clinton three times!!!
Each time he refused!!! He was too busy forcibly shoving his cock down
the throat of a girl his daughter's age.
mr dude
==============================================================
you confuse Iraq, the wrong war, with Afghanistan, the right war.
but then you think Saddam was behind 9/11
That is the most convoluted bullshit yu've spewed in a while, O'Hara.
Bush allowed bin Laden to escape? Well, then so did Clinton. And the
there's the fact that we put him in business in the first place.
The fact of the matter is that if we back out of Afghanistan and turn it
back over to the Taliban, then we should be ashamed and we will regret
choice on every possible level. Even if your boiling liberal blood
doesn't demand that you spare the women of Afghanistan from the brutal
and insane treatment that they would and will receive under the Taliban,
maybe you should consider the purely strategic value of Afghanistan,
given the direction you want the world to go in terms of just your
environmental concerns... See if you can make the connection:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world/asia/14minerals.html?no_interstitial
I know it is painful to deal with the world the way it really is and
losing young men and women in any war is a painful sacrifice, but our
leaders would really have to be tremendously short sighted on a purely
strategic basis to abandon Afghanistan because of a bunch of anti-war
nimrods. Maybe you guys can say we're doing it for the children?
Ü
Four days later and clouddipshit still refuses to address this. What
is she so afraid of? :)
> Four days later and clouddipshit still refuses to address this. What
> is she so afraid of? :)
We are need to be more tolerant of people with no noses.
mr dude
Feeling jilted fanboi?
>
> >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1299799/Mutilated-T...
>
No nose OR ears????
I bet she has a hell of a time trying on glasses!
mr dude
Maybe if Bush concentrated on Afghanistan, and didn't let the Taliban
start to regain power instead of pointing his bombers at Iraq, the war
could've been over.
Clinton wanted to go after Bin Laden, but the Repubs were too interested
in getting him impeached, and if by we you mean Ronnie Raygun, then
you'd be correct.
But you're right, Ray does spew.