Harry
I bet you money the guys that were there from the US and actually killed
Obama bin Laden were republicans.
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's
not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
Working under Obama? For that long? Yeah. Sure.
Where's the body?
In transit.
Osama Bin Laden dead: Photo of body unlikely to be seen on U.S.
television
When President Barack Obama addressed the nation late on Sunday night
to announce the death of Al Quaeda leader Osama Bin Laden, he
confirmed that the U.S. "took custody of [Bin Laden's] body." Special
Operations forces confirmed through forensic and DNA testing that the
body in custody was in fact that of the man the U.S. has hunted for
nearly a decade.
We can expect photos to be taken of the body and, in all likelihood,
released to the media in some form before the body is buried by Monday
afternoon in accordance with Muslim law. FOX News reports that the
photo has already been shown on television in Pakistan, where Bin
Laden was found in a mansion on a compound.
While the release of photos is expected if only to silence skeptics,
the likelihood of any such photograph being shown on American
television without significant censoring or blurring is very slim. Bin
Laden's body is described as being in "gruesome" condition, as can be
expected as his cause of death was at least one shot to the head.
-30-
http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/05/osama-bin-laden-dead-photo-of-body-unlikely-to-be-seen-on-us-television.html
However:
Former CIA official: US will likely release photos of bin Laden to
prove he's dead
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/158573-former-cia-official-us-will-likely-release-photos-of-bin-laden
They might as well; seeing as:
TV9 Exclusive - OSAMA BIN LADEN RARE "DEAD BODY PICTURE"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfoiSKX_RRk
What's you address, well send it to you.
Nope...they weren't wearing faux flight jackets or driving a little
clown car with a Bush/Cheney 2008 bumper sticker.
TMT
You know this for a fact how?
Buried at sea. They kept it long enough to get DNA and confirm it was
him, offered the body to his native Saudi Arabia, but they refused to
take him. Rather than risk having his grave turn into a shrine and in
accordance with Islamic burial rites, they had 24 hours to inter him.
The Navy Seals buried him at sea.
..
--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us
Given a proper burial, I'm sure.
The Seals lined up and blew a load of goo on
Bin Laden's bullet-riddled face, then dumped
his festering corpse overboard with the rest
of the trash.
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo
>
> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
>
> Harry
>
Another worthless ass.
--
Herman Cain for President! http://hermancain.com/
If you don't support him you are a Racist!!
He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer)
Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as much
ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT much
competence?
> On 02/05/2011 12:33 PM, LHBDS wrote:
> > Harry Hope wrote:
> >> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
> >>
> >> Harry
> >
> > Where's the body?
>
>
> Buried at sea. They kept it long enough to get DNA and confirm it was
> him, offered the body to his native Saudi Arabia, but they refused to
> take him. Rather than risk having his grave turn into a shrine and in
> accordance with Islamic burial rites, they had 24 hours to inter him.
> The Navy Seals buried him at sea.
Should have fed him to pigs.
> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
Actually Republicans WERE the ones who snagged him.
snicker.
You concluded TBone "know[s] this for a fact", how?
Leftards: Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you
And with a reading comprehension problem.
snicker
>
> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
>
> Harry
It's because conservatives are stupid assholes. It took them years and years to
learn to tie their own shoes and wipe their own assholes.
--
Ezekiel 23:20
> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
>
> Harry
I imagine the when Al Gore first heard about the Lewinski/Clinton affair
he said "Fuck!"
I imagine that when the Republican presidential hopefuls heard that
Osama bin Laden was killed the each said "Fuck!" as their hopes were
dashed of being president in 2012's election results while they smiled
to their constituents their satisfaction at Osama's death.
What you heard last night when Obama gave his speech last night was his
acceptance speech for 2012...simply given early.
Best part...his announcement last night was in the middle of Celebrity
Apprentice...LOL
http://cheezburger.com/View/4715946752
:)
>Actually Republicans WERE the ones who snagged him.
Republicants couldn't snag there on ass if it was in
front of them
<snicker>
Because 80+ % if the military is republican and the remaining 20% is a
mix of Independants, and tire biting rear ecelone jody fucks who may be
Democrats.
Gunner
--
"If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight,
it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is
six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified)
Though to be fair..if he did get shot in the head..there is probably
little likelyhood of a photo being able to ID the stump that used to be
his noggin and face.
Bush was right. Historically, the killing of a single individual is rarely
that disruptive a force.
During WWII a lot of effort went into killing Yamamoto, and they succeeded,
yet the war went on for another 2 years. And frankly, in retrospect, after
studying the history of the IJN, I really don’t think he was that good. He
was blessed with an unprepared enemy.
It was decided in 1943 to no longer attempt to kill Hitler because it was
realized his direction of the war was disastrous. He, too, was blessed with
unprepared opponents in the beginning and confused fortunate circumstance
with strategic brilliance.
So, it may be emotionally satisfying, but strategically, I’m not so sure.
Has there been any hard intelligence that OBL was still in overall command
and directing operations?
Never the less, President Bush is the person, who after we had been
attacked by terrorists repeatedly for over 30 years, finally said enough.
Had Bush not taken the actions he did, when he did, this day would not have
come.
Furthermore
The Irony Grows Deeper - Key Intel Came From Enhanced Interrogations In
Secret Prisons
It will be interesting to see how this plays out, via AP:
Officials say CIA interrogators in secret overseas prisons developed the
first strands of information that ultimately led to the killing of Osama
bin Laden.
Current and former U.S. officials say that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the
mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, provided the nom de
guerre of one of bin Laden’s most trusted aides. The CIA got similar
information from Mohammed’s successor, Abu Faraj al-Libi. Both were
subjected to harsh interrogation tactics inside CIA prisons in Poland and
Romania.
The ironies of this story are growing deeper and deeper by the hour.
Obama and his supporters, who opposed the secret intelligence operations
and interrogations as illegal, now are reaping the political benefits of
those operations and interrogations.
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/
Put simply if we had in fact acquiesced to the caterwauling of the left
this could not have happened.
And amidst all the primeval howls of blood lust by the formerly pacifist
progressives bear in mind the counter strike that may come. This was cheap
theatrics plain and simple. The revenge of his followers will spill more
American blood. And I suspect the regime really isn’t prepared for it. It’s
clear from having Janet the Puppethead in charge of Homeland Security
(snort, snicker) that the very idea of defending our borders is the punch
line of a warped joke.
O may look manly now in the light of the achievements of better men then
him, but his hubris will cost him and America.
Enjoy your bloody shirt. There will be more and you won’t be cheering.
舛uz progressives only like killing when it痴 done by someone else.
> On 02/05/2011 12:33 PM, LHBDS wrote:
>> Harry Hope wrote:
>>> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
>>>
>>> Harry
>>
>> Where's the body?
>
>
> Buried at sea. They kept it long enough to get DNA and confirm it was
> him, offered the body to his native Saudi Arabia, but they refused to
> take him. Rather than risk having his grave turn into a shrine and in
> accordance with Islamic burial rites, they had 24 hours to inter him.
> The Navy Seals buried him at sea.
>
> ..
>
Hopefully wrapped in pigskin and urinated on by the whole crew. Or simply
dumped with the trash.
So what is it then? Yay to Bush for starting the war and boo to Obama for
following through?
From the video posted from TV9 Kannada, it looks like he took one
through the left eye.
If that’s what you took away from my comments, no amount of explanation
will clarify it for you. Just accept that you are a puppet head and do as
your masters instruct you.
But in the interests of trying to remediate the irremedial...
Good for Bush for finally saying enough after 30 plus years of attacks by
the Islamofacists. Clearly your knowledge of fighting a war is confined to
Hollywood productions otherwise you would apprectiate the efforts made and
victories won so far by the US under Bush's direction.
And good for Obama for not, despite all the political pablum he vomited up,
disassembling the infrastructure put together by Bush (remember how
chastened Obama looked when he came out of his first defense briefings
after his election, nothing like a little reality to deflate campaign
rhetoric).
And good for Obama for acting on the intellignece when and how he did. In
point of fact I think he (accidentally, of course) made the correct
decision to not use UAVs or air power last week to do the deed, but to send
in American troops, mano y mano. While the "bolt from the blue" has certain
value in certain situations, in Bin Laden's case, for reasons I will not
pontificate on now, the sort of personal, man to man, looking at the man
who killed you type of death is more meaningful in a world where every
little gesture has significance.
But bad for Obama for having the sort of civilain staff that only a
absurdly politically motivated joke considers effective.
So enjoy your bloody shirt for now. I'm sure you'll have more to wave soon
due to the incompetence of of Napolitano and racial politics of Holder.
Just don't think the death of one man means a great deal in a war that has
been waged for over 2 centuries with the US and longer with the other
infidels of the West.
Because the 3,000 dead from 9/11 are still dead and thier survivors still
mourn them and killing one sick, sad old man hardly balances the scales.
What victories would those be? Bush hasn't been commander in chief for a
couple of years now. He booted Saddam and left a shambles in the wake.
Only recently have neighboring states clammored for democratic reforms.
> And good for Obama for not, despite all the political pablum he vomited
> up,
> disassembling the infrastructure put together by Bush (remember how
> chastened Obama looked when he came out of his first defense briefings
> after his election, nothing like a little reality to deflate campaign
> rhetoric).
>
> And good for Obama for acting on the intellignece when and how he did. In
> point of fact I think he (accidentally, of course)made the correct
> decision to not use UAVs or air power last week to do the deed, but to
> send
> in American troops, mano y mano. While the "bolt from the blue" has
> certain
> value in certain situations, in Bin Laden's case, for reasons I will not
> pontificate on now, the sort of personal, man to man, looking at the man
> who killed you type of death is more meaningful in a world where every
> little gesture has significance.
>
> But bad for Obama for having the sort of civilain staff that only a
> absurdly politically motivated joke considers effective.
>
> So enjoy your bloody shirt for now. I'm sure you'll have more to wave soon
> due to the incompetence of of Napolitano and racial politics of Holder.
>
> Just don't think the death of one man means a great deal in a war that has
> been waged for over 2 centuries with the US and longer with the other
> infidels of the West.
>
> Because the 3,000 dead from 9/11 are still dead and thier survivors still
> mourn them and killing one sick, sad old man hardly balances the scales.
>
In your own words "Every little gesture has significance" There is
significance in the death of the leader of Al Qaida.
sit back and count the days until Obama is out of office.
"I agree: Barack Obama is a terrible president; we have to get him out
of office..."
--Stephen Colbert, The Colbert Report, Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Sunday, January 20th, 2013: The End of an Error
>
> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9ED9968957C69We...@216.196.97.142...
>>> So what is it then? Yay to Bush for starting the war and boo to Obama
>> for
>>> following through?
>>>
>>
>> If that's what you took away from my comments, no amount of explanation
>> will clarify it for you. Just accept that you are a puppet head and do
>> as your masters instruct you.
>>
>> But in the interests of trying to remediate the irremedial...
>>
>> Good for Bush for finally saying enough after 30 plus years of attacks
>> by the Islamofacists. Clearly your knowledge of fighting a war is
>> confined to Hollywood productions otherwise you would apprectiate the
>> efforts made and victories won so far by the US under Bush's direction.
>>
>
>
> What victories would those be? Bush hasn't been commander in chief for
> a couple of years now. He booted Saddam and left a shambles in the
> wake. Only recently have neighboring states clammored for democratic
> reforms.
As I said. You are to immature and/or partisan to be taken seriously.
Clearly, you don’t get it. Bathe in your ignorance.
Kettle.. Pot....
The beat goes on. I get it.
> Harold Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Actually Republicans WERE the ones who snagged him.
>
> Republicants couldn't snag there (sic) on (sic) ass if it was (sic) in
> front of them
Leftards learned English from members of the NEA.
snicker
>Fritz Wuehler <fr...@spamexpire-201105.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote in
>news:210b88e56eb32747...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
>
>> In article <mh3tr619cq7aejopr...@4ax.com>
>> Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Republicans
>>
>> sit back and count the days until Obama is out of office.
>>
>
>http://www.obamacountdownwidget.com/
I am not too sure Herman has the right policies to win . I do like him
though in general .
well put.
> Republicans couldn't snag the guy for 8 years...wimpy assholes
> Harry
talk.politics.GUNS
>>> They might as well; seeing as:
>>
>>> TV9 Exclusive - OSAMA BIN LADEN RARE "DEAD BODY PICTURE"
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfoiSKX_RRk
>>
>> Though to be fair..if he did get shot in the head..there is probably
>> little likelyhood of a photo being able to ID the stump that used to be
>> his noggin and face.
>>
>> Gunner
>
>From the video posted from TV9 Kannada, it looks like he took one
>through the left eye.
I found this to be of interest. We shall have to wait and see...
"This photo has now been identified as being fake and? all major media
outlets are pulling it from their archives."
Shrug
Gunner
That's because it's not a pic of the corpse of Bin Laden. It's a fake.
The real pictures have not been released.
..
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:21:14 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>> They might as well; seeing as:
>>>
>>>> TV9 Exclusive - OSAMA BIN LADEN RARE "DEAD BODY PICTURE"
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfoiSKX_RRk
>>>
>>> Though to be fair..if he did get shot in the head..there is probably
>>> little likelyhood of a photo being able to ID the stump that used to
be
>>> his noggin and face.
>>>
>>> Gunner
>>
>>From the video posted from TV9 Kannada, it looks like he took one
>>through the left eye.
>
>
> I found this to be of interest. We shall have to wait and see...
>
> "This photo has now been identified as being fake and? all major media
> outlets are pulling it from their archives."
>
> Shrug
That would apparently be correct. That is a faked composite picture that
has been circulating for awhile. Just saw a report on it on either
Politifact or Factcheck.
--
Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman)
If you woke up this morning....
Don't complain.
>69ingch...@park.com wrote in
>news:na6ur6prip02erjov...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 15:41:56 -0500, Gray Ghost
>><grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Fritz Wuehler <fr...@spamexpire-201105.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
>>>wrote in
>>>news:210b88e56eb32747...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
>>>
>>>> In article <mh3tr619cq7aejopr...@4ax.com>
>>>> Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>
>>>> sit back and count the days until Obama is out of office.
>>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.obamacountdownwidget.com/
>> I am not too sure Herman has the right policies to win . I do like him
>> though in general .
>>
>
>Allen West?
He seems Okay . Do not know anything about his policies either .
waiting for the debates to start so I can here what they all have to
say .
-----
“I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don’t
care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.”
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
“I am truly not that concerned about [Osama bin Laden].” –
-- George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
"And so shortly after taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the
director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden
the top priority of our war against al Qaeda, even as we continued
our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network."
-- Barack Obama, May 1, 2011
>69ingch...@park.com wrote in
>news:na6ur6prip02erjov...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 15:41:56 -0500, Gray Ghost
>><grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Fritz Wuehler <fr...@spamexpire-201105.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
>>>wrote in
>>>news:210b88e56eb32747...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
>>>
>>>> In article <mh3tr619cq7aejopr...@4ax.com>
>>>> Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>
>>>> sit back and count the days until Obama is out of office.
>>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.obamacountdownwidget.com/
>> I am not too sure Herman has the right policies to win . I do like him
>> though in general .
>>
>
>Allen West?
I am not real sure another black man will get elected after the stuff
Obama has done , or not done and not kept his word on .
Not that he is the only bad one we have had just that he is the first
black man we have had . If he would have been a good president and
accomplished something good then that would have made a big difference
.
He would have to do a 180 and start doing something positive about the
economy instead of just spending money to come out of this smelling
good .
I would like to think that Obama is a loser because he is a brain dead
leftist, not because he’s black. I like Cain and West mainly because it
isn’t the same old recycled shit and they both sound intelligent and
conservative. The fact they are clack is a delicious irony. Sort of ruins
the “you’re all racists” line of campaigning the left is so good at. I like
Ryan too, he seems to have balls and some very good ideas.
That is because Gray Gonads is a lunatic himself.
TMT
that is it exactly . Obama is just a bad president . nothing to do
with him being black . But liberals need to cry racist so let them .
there is no dealing with their insanity . they claim all republicans
are white . they are just like that swarm of gnats at your picnic
table . Annoying
Hell..the Obamassiah isnt even black. He is 50% white, 44% middle
eastern and only..only 6% black.
but he only claims to be black like most partial blacks . The black
makes them hate all other races .
It has to be racism, dontcha know, it can’t be the liberals picked a moron
or that their philosophy that’s flawed.
that has been shown not to be the case. only those implicated are claiming
waterboarding had any effect. no one involved in getting OBL thinks
waterboarding or enhanced interogation played a part
Riiiight. And a drunken bum named Ray O'Hara has all the latest scoop
right from the horse's ass, Obama.
Your boy with the general complex didn't score so well with his liberal
base after the initial press conference.
Enjoy the comments:
Think those Seals "only got in nine holes of golf and managed to deliver
their joke script to the White House Correspondents Assn. dinner Saturday
evening" before doing the real heavy lifting?
Posted by: Deb | May 03, 2011 at 04:12 AM
Well said LA Times. If these statements had had been made by GWB staff the
press would be ridiculing him. Yet the rest of them haven't got the guts
to say anything about Obama.
Kudos to the man for making the decision; but then making tough decisions
is his job. But to make him out as some kind of hero? Get real
Posted by: Peter | May 03, 2011 at 04:20 AM
Bin Laden's Dead. That's great. Hail, to our Armed Forces. Hail, to the
Men and Women, of the LAST Administration, who stuck with it, as the
"OTHER" Party, and their Fellow Travelers in the Media, went after them
RELENTLESSLY. Especially our INTERROGATERS. As I recall, the first thing
THIS ADMINISTRATION did, when it got the Keys, was to GO AFTER the men and
women who GOT THE INFORMATION that we just used.
It makes me SICK, to see them, NOW, out there taking BOWS.
Posted by: gommygoomy | May 03, 2011 at 04:21 AM
I am curious... Did Obama seek out his Czars for this "decision", or did
he decide to thow out the body all on his own?
Posted by: Contarian | May 03, 2011 at 04:30 AM
Obama and his ilk are the ones that spit on our sons and daughters in
uniform when they returned from combat in Viet Nam. They can claim all the
credit they like. It means nothing. They will get the credit the citizens
will give them. You can be sure it will fall down party lines, like the
2010 elections. Credit is ‘earned’ not ‘claimes.’
Posted by: Cogito | May 03, 2011 at 04:36 AM
All hail glorious victory of our Supreme Leader Comrade Obama!
Posted by: Bryan | May 03, 2011 at 04:41 AM
What amazing contortionists are the progressives. They, on the one hand
deplore GWB's waterboarding of terrorists, while with the other applaud
BHOs assassination of terrorists in their pajamas. Bravo!
Posted by: ala | May 03, 2011 at 04:42 AM
Will the President be nominating himself for the Congressional Medal of
Honor for his war room heroics?
Posted by: Joe Industry | May 03, 2011 at 04:47 AM
Brhahahahahahahahahahahahaha....situation room bravery? That's hysterical.
Posted by: godsmotive | May 03, 2011 at 05:29 AM
All you arrogant libs, simultaneously with your noses in the air and your
heads up your asses, are just pissed off that this snarky piece evicerates
your egomaniacal manchild loser president. I LOVE IT. The more that comes
out about what was done to get Bin Laden, the more it's proven how inept
and stupid your side has always been. Suck on it, hippies.
Posted by: BunniCQ | May 03, 2011 at 05:49 AM
Doesn't anyone else think the timing of this whole mission smacks of pre-
campaign tactics? The whereabouts of OBL known for months. Birth
certificate controversy. Donald Trump. Disappointing fundraisers in
liberal states. Come on. The young men and women in our military are this
Nation's unsung heroes. They deserve the credit. Period.
Posted by: Lore | May 03, 2011 at 05:58 AM
I've noticed also that almost everything coming from the WhiteHouse on
this has a lack of mention of our brave men and women in our Military who
done the actual mission. In this I believe the WH is pandering to the
Presidents Left Base who as we know has a real disdain for our people in
uniform.
Posted by: satch | May 03, 2011 at 08:44 AM
Wow. How totally brave for Obama and his staff. Sitting in the safety and
security of the White House. If the mission failed, no one would know,
because it was Top Secret. And if it succeeded, everyone would know.
That is, everyone would know whatever the White House and press want them
to know, with the proper spin, that we're supposed to believe without
question.
Posted by: Bob | May 03, 2011 at 10:23 AM
Finally! Someone represents how my friends & I feel. Obama didnt do
squat...all our respect and gratitude go out to those NAVY SEALS & their
families for "their gutsy decisions and actions"...oh, and Bush for
loading the gun to take out those that caused 9/11. Obama gets no credit
accept for signing the check to pay for the capture/killshot of Osama &
his men.
Posted by: Stacy | May 03, 2011 at 11:06 AM
LA Times,
You must be kidding? All the key statistics say Obama is the worst
President in the history of the USA.
1) Obama tripled our federal debt by 300% is less thank 3 years
2) Highest Issuance of food stamps in 27 years
3) Hired 400,000 Federal workers while the private sector shed 2.5million
jobs
4) Shut down Gulf of Mexico oil drillers, laying off 15,000 workers during
a recession
5) Attacked Arizona with his attorney general for a state law to help
control immigration since the US government was unwilling to support
existing immigration law
6) Obama voted against the Iraq, Afghanistan wars and the "troop surge"
that eventually led to Iraq becoming stabilized
7) Obama and Democrats investigated the CIA for interrogation methods and
Gauntanamo Bay detainee procedures. These methods led to the capture of
key Al Queda members and the death of Osama Bin Laden by the US Navy
Seals.
Obama, you've hurt the USA beyond repair. You should be ashamed of
yourself.
Posted by: Kevin Jones | May 03, 2011 at 11:46 AM
Hey progressives, not you Democrats that have some honor, yeah you!
For 7 years you called Bush a war monger and had the GALL to accuse him of
being a party to 9/11. You called him a torturer and killer.
Tell me, are you cheering your president now that he had a person
assassinated?
You know who you are, yeah you!
Cognitive Dissonance, look it up and do not be surprised that your picture
is RIGHT THERE next to the definition!
Posted by: David Kramer | May 03, 2011 at 01:12 PM
That’s contrary to reality if you read how they developed the intelligence
and from whom.
But dwell in ignorance. Far be it for me to educate you.
But, But, But, But, But, his highness Barack Hussein Obama ran
his campaign stating that waterboarding was being done to those
poor poor people in GITMO and that the United States was a
nation of war criminals. His rectum sucking sycophant liberal
followers claimed the same thing.
Are you now saying the liberals are liars?
This has certainly turned out to be a quagmire of contradictions for a
“victory”.
> 69ingch...@park.com wrote in
> news:na6ur6prip02erjov...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 15:41:56 -0500, Gray Ghost
>><grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Fritz Wuehler <fr...@spamexpire-201105.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
>>>wrote in
>>>news:210b88e56eb32747...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:
>>>
>>>> In article <mh3tr619cq7aejopr...@4ax.com>
>>>> Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>
>>>> sit back and count the days until Obama is out of office.
>>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.obamacountdownwidget.com/
>> I am not too sure Herman has the right policies to win . I do like
>> him though in general .
>>
>
> Allen West?
Allen calls a spade a spade. Unfortunately for Allen, Obama has
probably poisoned his chances of ever being a serious contender. A lot
of people will simply point at Obama and say negroes don't have the
intelligence or class to lead a republic.
How many legs does a horse have if you decide to call it's tail, a leg?
Answer, 4. cause a tail will never be a leg. And therefore, an ignorant
racist will always be a racist regardless if he says he's not.
The stupid ones might. The rest of us judge a man on his character.
And your point is?
well maybe not liars . Psychopathic compulsive perpetual liars and
hypocritical bigots
I don't dislike obama because of the black part. It's the filthy NIGGER
part I don't like.
When you can't attack what he's doing, you attack who he is. Not
surprising. You're all low educated types who haven't amounted to much
and it's an insult to your intelligence that a black man can ascend to
the Presidency.
Sad. People like you is what is dragging down your country. People so
unintelligent that something as petty as skin colour can such a divider.
Your nation is falling apart at the seams.
One president wastes hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq and ignores
a well known economic danger and he's fine.
But spend that money on your own country and pull it up out of the worst
economic slump in 80 years and he's the worst?
You people are disgraceful. You don't see what Obama is doing simply
because you're not looking. You don't want to see his accomplishments.
You'd rather be ignorant than educated.
Absolutely disgraceful.
..
--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us
"LHBDS" wrote in message
news:_dOdne4a8aQMwV7Q...@earthlink.com...
69ingch...@park.com wrote:
Your mom sure likes it.
>>>
>>> Allen West?
>>
>> Allen calls a spade a spade. Unfortunately for Allen, Obama has
>> probably poisoned his chances of ever being a serious contender. A lot
>> of people will simply point at Obama and say negroes don't have the
>> intelligence or class to lead a republic.
>>
>>
>
>The stupid ones might. The rest of us judge a man on his character.
Correct.
Skin color is just that..skin color. The make up of the man inside the
skin is far far more important than skin
>
>
>When you can't attack what he's doing, you attack who he is. Not
>surprising. You're all low educated types who haven't amounted to much
>and it's an insult to your intelligence that a black man can ascend to
>the Presidency.
Surely you are not saying that as a Democrat..are you?
KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party
By Frances Rice
History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
Democrat Party. This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in
the book, A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers,
Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renown liberal historian who is the
DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. As a
further testament to his impeccable credentials, Professor Foner is only
the second person to serve as president of the three major professional
organizations: the Organization of American Historians, American
Historical Association, and Society of American Historians.
Democrats in the last century did not hide their connections to the Ku
Klux Klan. Georgia-born Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest, a Grand Dragon
of the Ku Klux Klan wrote on page 21 of the September 1928 edition of
the Klan’s “The Kourier Magazine”: “I have never voted for any man who
was not a regular Democrat. My father … never voted for any man who was
not a Democrat. My grandfather was …the head of the Ku Klux Klan in
reconstruction days…. My great-grandfather was a life-long Democrat….
My great-great-grandfather was…one of the founders of the Democratic
party.”
Dr. Foner in his book explores the history of the origins of Ku Klux
Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by
Democrats against Republicans, black and white.
On page 146 of his book, Professor Foner wrote: “Founded in 1866 as a
Tennessee social club, the Ku Klux Klan spread into nearly every
Southern state, launching a ‘reign of terror‘ against Republican leaders
black and white.” Page 184 of his book contains the definitive
statements: “In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the
interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy the
Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the Reconstruction state,
reestablish control of the black labor force, and restore racial
subordination in every aspect of Southern life.”
Heartbreaking are Professor Foner’s recitations of the horrific acts of
terror inflicted by Democrats on black and white Republicans. Recounted
on pages 184-185 of his book is one such act of terror: “Jack Dupree, a
victim of a particularly brutal murder in Monroe County, Mississippi -
assailants cut his throat and disemboweled him, all within sight of his
wife, who had just given birth to twins - was ‘president of a republican
club‘ and known as a man who ‘would speak his mind.’”
“White gangs roamed New Orleans, intimidating blacks and breaking up
Republican meetings,“ wrote Dr. Foner on page 146 of his book. On page
186, he wrote: “An even more extensive ‘reign of terror’ engulfed
Jackson, a plantation county in Florida’s panhandle. ‘That is where
Satan has his seat,‘ remarked a black clergyman; all told over 150
persons were killed, among them black leaders and Jewish merchant Samuel
Fleischman, resented for his Republican views and for dealing fairly
with black customers.“
Frances Rice is the Chairman of the National Black Republican
Association and may be contacted at: http://www.nbra.info/
True indeed.
> On Fri, 06 May 2011 08:24:05 -0230, cloud dreamer <Sa...@Resources.now>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>When you can't attack what he's doing, you attack who he is. Not
>>surprising. You're all low educated types who haven't amounted to much
>>and it's an insult to your intelligence that a black man can ascend to
>>the Presidency.
>
>
> Surely you are not saying that as a Democrat..are you?
>
> KKK Terrorist Arm of the Democratic Party
>
> By Frances Rice
>
> History shows that the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the
> Democrat Party.
Regarding race relations, Republicans swapped sides with Democrats in
1965. Republicans were assholes before that, they simply needed another
item to add to there assholic list. This is recent history you may
have even lived thru, not ancient American history. Surely you know that.