Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New Patriot's Rules in Effect:

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Megatron

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 4:58:43 PM12/11/07
to
New Patriots Rules in Effect:
In order to address the complaints and hurt feelings of the rest of the NFL,
the commissioner has adopted 10 new "Special Rules" for all New England
Patriots games. They take effect immediately, and are as follows:

Special Rules for the Patriots


1) In the course of an NFL game, if the Patriots go up by more than 31
points, they are not allowed to play offense until the opposing team draws
to within one score. (Pats will kick-off after an opposing team's touchdown
or FG). Once the team is within one score, the Pats offense may play, but
Tom Brady may not, unless: the Pats play with 8 players (including Tom), or
the Pats play with 9 players, but 1 player for the Patriots is chosen by the
opposing team from the stands. no Patriots linebacker is allowed to play
offense, unless that LB is inserted at quarterback. However, Mike Vrabel
cannot be quarterback.

2) If an opposing player states "It's like were playing 7-on-5s" (7 offense,
5 defense during practice), such as indicated by Justin Smith, DE,
Cincinnati Bengals 10/1/07, the Patriots must take a time out and serve ice
cold lemonade or hot tea (weather dependent) to the opposing team. Scones
are optional.

3) Once the 31 pt rule is in effect, Patriots may challenge any play, but
the opposing team gets veto power over the referee.

4) Once the Pats offense is allowed back onto the field (7 pts), for any
forward pass the Pats QB must point to the receiver and call out his number
BEFORE passing. If Tom Brady is quarterbacking at the time, he must do that,
plus turn the opposing team's water cooler into wine BEFORE passing.

5) Belichick must diagram any Patriots play to the opposing defense and
ensure they understand exactly how to disrupt the play. This all must be
done within the play clock. If this process is not complete prior to the
play clock expiring, the Patriots will be assessed a delay of game and
double unsportsmanlike conduct penalties.

6) Randy Moss must play with 10lb ankle weights on each ankle. An additional
pound will be added for each TD this season.

7) Wes Welker is not allowed to have "that crazy look" in his eyes. 10 yd,
"crazy eyes"penalty assessed.

8) Tom Brady must immediately stop dating super-models as he will not be
allowed to date anyone that is more attractive then the least attractive
significant other of an opposing team member (including coaches). He also
must start doing commercials for every product imaginable, especially ones
where he chants "cut that meat!"or refers to himself "as a 6'5" quarterback
with a laser-rocket arm" ( Oh wait sorry, isn't that Peyton?)

9) Bill Belichick is not allowed to be within 100 yds of any infant, for
fear that his evil super-genius powers would assimilate such a defenseless
creature into the Patriots System. We have already seen this effect on an
inordinate amount of chipmunks, squirrels, and 'possum that commit suicide
while crossing Rte 1 to reach Gillette Stadium.

10) Patriots must respect all opposing players feelings and apologize for
every first down. Touchdowns must be followed by a written apology and a
fruit basket presented with a hug.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 5:12:05 PM12/11/07
to
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:58:43 -0500, "Megatron" <Megatron@home> wrote:

>New Patriots Rules in Effect:

More silly whining

OceanView

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 5:44:46 PM12/11/07
to
who'sthat <whosthat> wrote in news:3p2ul3pu0hgri7k1e5v2hpudtgummjos1g@
4ax.com:

> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:58:43 -0500, "Megatron" <Megatron@home> wrote:
>
>>New Patriots Rules in Effect:
>
> More silly whining
>

Whining? Did you read it? It's just a joke.

Polarhound

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 7:37:43 PM12/11/07
to
Next time, try to be less than several weeks behind on your
plagarization, will ya?

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2kcgcf

You are fail.

MZ

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 7:41:11 PM12/11/07
to
"Polarhound" <polar...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Uridnb6-gKfKsMLa...@comcast.com...

I like how that thread ALSO began with a snide comment from ol' killjoy
himself, "who'sthat".


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 11, 2007, 10:39:18 PM12/11/07
to

More whining

ndy

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 9:22:18 AM12/12/07
to

more delusion ....

"I'm whogivesashit, so much better than all of you and I need to remind
you everyday and help you experience my superior mind????"

nip...@yahoo.com

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 9:53:13 AM12/12/07
to

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 9:58:52 AM12/12/07
to

You are fail?

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 10:00:04 AM12/12/07
to

"ndy" <goa...@fusionnet.com> wrote in message
news:u8S7j.4387$R4.1789@trndny05...

Don't forget that you all have inferior newsreaders!


ndy

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 3:21:27 PM12/12/07
to
who'sthat wrote:
>>> More whining
>> more delusion ....
>>
>> "I'm whogivesashit, so much better than all of you and I need to remind
>> you everyday and help you experience my superior mind????"
>
> Don't forget that you all have inferior newsreaders!
>
that explains it then .... I see now, its an error in the code???

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 3:39:50 PM12/12/07
to

OE is for idiots.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 3:43:49 PM12/12/07
to

"ndy" <goa...@fusionnet.com> wrote in message
news:bpX7j.4647$xd.745@trndny03...

Only partly. The other part is that everyone in this newsgroup is a troll
except me! You troll!


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 3:44:35 PM12/12/07
to

"who'sthat" <whosthat> wrote in message
news:snh0m3pvmq0l8vfr2...@4ax.com...

Thus I have spoke! Thus it shall be!


MZ

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 3:44:08 PM12/12/07
to
"who'sthat" <whosthat> wrote in message
news:snh0m3pvmq0l8vfr2...@4ax.com...

Like I said during your last diatribe, some of us actually find email
integration useful (that was before "Sarah" confirmed that Agent indeed was
deficient when it came to that feature).


who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 3:48:49 PM12/12/07
to

"MZ" <ma...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:2aidnXtZJOEf1f3a...@giganews.com...

Don't argue with me! As supreme ASSHOLE in this newsgroup I am always
right! Besides you use an inferior newsreader. That makes me feel a lot
better about myself. Idiot!


Message has been deleted

MZ

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 4:13:16 PM12/12/07
to
<je.s...@hehxduhmp.org> wrote in message
news:pfGdncG0SJM10_3a...@comcast.com...

> MZ <ma...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Like I said during your last diatribe, some of us actually find email
>> integration useful (that was before "Sarah" confirmed that Agent indeed
>> was
>> deficient when it came to that feature).
>
> Anything not done out of a terminal is useless. HTH ;)
>
> That goes for email too!

Heh, good point. And when I telnet in and use pine, I still get email
integration.


ndy

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 4:27:34 PM12/12/07
to

talking about idiots????

do a full header view and talk to me again.

apparently a superior newsreader is only as good as the person who runs it!

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 4:35:40 PM12/12/07
to

I use Agent. OE is for people not smart enough to load a program.

ndy

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 4:41:58 PM12/12/07
to
who'sthat wrote:
>> apparently a superior newsreader is only as good as the person who runs it!
>
> I use Agent. OE is for people not smart enough to load a program.

f*@k OE, again, do a full header view numbnut before you make a further
fool of yourself.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 12, 2007, 4:56:48 PM12/12/07
to

X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com

Is this what you're looking for?

Message has been deleted

ndy

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 3:34:14 PM12/13/07
to

hey 'box of rocks', I know you have Forte, like I said, I know how to
use my newsreader. do you know how to read your "superior" newsreader???

you keep with this lamea$$ condescending attitude towards me because of
your OE hangup. do a full header view on me and you will see I don't use
OE - screw Wintell and their death grip on us. btw, I have never used OE
as a newsreader or a emailer .... ever in 10 years of Usenet, or IE
btw. also, tried Forte years ago but it wasn't inviting enough to get
me to change. I like what I know and works well.

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 4:28:15 PM12/13/07
to
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:34:14 GMT, ndy <goa...@fusionnet.com> wrote:

>who'sthat wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:41:58 GMT, ndy <goa...@fusionnet.com> wrote:
>>> who'sthat wrote:
>>>> OE is for people not smart enough to load a program.
>>
>>> f*@k OE, again, do a full header view numbnut before you make a further
>>> fool of yourself.
>>
>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.0/32.1071
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
>>
>> Is this what you're looking for?
>
>hey 'box of rocks', I know you have Forte, like I said, I know how to
>use my newsreader. do you know how to read your "superior" newsreader???

Uhh...hey "box of rock"..the one making the 'superior newsreader'
comments in a troll using my nick Go back to one of those posts and
take a look. You fucked up asshole


>
>you keep with this lamea$$ condescending attitude towards me because of
>your OE hangup. do a full header view on me and you will see I don't use
>OE - screw Wintell and their death grip on us. btw, I have never used OE
>as a newsreader or a emailer .... ever in 10 years of Usenet, or IE
>btw. also, tried Forte years ago but it wasn't inviting enough to get
>me to change. I like what I know and works well.

I've never used OE in 20 years out here dipshit.

ndy

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 7:09:36 PM12/13/07
to
who'sthat wrote:
> Uhh...hey "box of rock"..the one making the 'superior newsreader'
> comments in a troll using my nick Go back to one of those posts and
> take a look. You fucked up asshole

hey, I can't keep track of the lunacy that your online silliness ('oh I
am greater than all of you') attracts .

who'sthat

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 8:14:59 PM12/13/07
to

You're quoting the trolls again.

0 new messages