These are obviously conditional grades. Miami's picks 'should be' A
quality. Will they? Ask me in December. For now, the grade is based
on filling needs with bodies and the amount 'spent' on each pick.
I'm going by a combination of FAs and draft picks compared against
needs, but, as above, conditional grades. Wallace, Gibson, Grimes, and
Taylor, WR and CB have been significantly upgraded. Ellerbe, Wheeler,
Jordan, and Jenkins appear to upgrade the pass rush and coverage. Run D
gets mixed reviews. TE still concerns me. Miami has ONE TE and he is
a below average blocker (do you REALLY have faith in Clay, Egnew,
Sims?). OT? All indications are Miami is still searching for one -
left or right - so this grade is incomplete. Those, IMO, are/were the
top needs. CB, pass rush, WR . . . check. OL incomplete. TE gets a
D+. Playmakers? Unquestionable improvement.
Now for safety. Jones and Clemons were in the top 1/4 of the league so
this isn't in dire need of a talent upgrade. It "IS* in need of a
playmaker upgrade. I'm uncertain on OG since I don't know the quality
of Louis and Thomas but replacing Jerry has to be a plus. RB? I
honestly don't know. I'll not miss Reggie bouncing everything outside.
I have little faith in Thomas but Gray was supposed to be the power
back THIS year. Now Gillisle(sp) has been added so I'm cautiously
optimistic. What grade does that equate to? I'm gonna say a
conditional B-/B, assuming an OT FA is signed.
Finally, I'm VERY interested in seeing the development of the kids -
Martin, Gray, Shelby, Vernon, Kaddu, Wilson - all of whom received
constant praise and, excepting Gray, showed flashes of talent last year
(although we saw little of Wilson at safety). If half of these guys
step up and the new guys play as expected, I can get quite optimistic.