ERECTION: WHY ALLISON McCABE WAS RIGHT
rich...@my-deja.com
Here is my argument against Kleber saying she winked and snuck in on
Chewy. Both sides agree that the time spent in the bathroom together
was in the range of 60-90 seconds. If Kleber is right, Ally caught
Chewy by surprise either changing his clothes or on the pot. In either
case he supposedly is "totally" surprised to see this girl appear. And
remember that Chewy was drinking all day long which will have some
affect on sexual performance. I would argue that it would be very
difficult for a married man to be not thinking about sex whatsoever in
a bathroom; then to be shocked by a CLOTHED teen girl appearing in the
bathroom; then to quickly shift gears and get erect and assault the
girl in a few seconds and then get off and change into his clothes when
the other teens started pounding on the door. That the defense never
discussed this "can't get it up that quick" scenerio leads me to
believe Ally and not Kleber. Chewy never said anything about his
actions in the bathroom. Here is where the erection expert says the
odds are. 1) Chewy was already very horny. 2) He had only a towel
rapped around his waist and nothing else. 3) He was half erect and
looking for Ally and not fat Kleber. 4) He entices Ally into the
bathroom and immediately begins to kiss and fondle the drunk teen until
he has her on the ground with her pants down and his cock fully erect
and ready for action.
So my argument is that Chewy had to have SEXUAL DESIRES ALREADY IN
MOTION BEFORE the girl ever got into the bathroom, or the assault she
claims never could have occurred. If Kleber is right, then you would
have to say 15-30 seconds were wasted in Chewy's shock and his thoughts
of what to do next. Even Chewy would have enough class to ask "now
Ally are you sure this is what you want." In the remaining time
Chewy/Kleber/Boyle would have you believe that a) nothing happened and
the clothes stayed on both participants or b) Chewy got excited, went
with Ally's advances and quickly got erect while getting her pants down
for some consensual sex. That is some mighty quick work for a married
man who was drunk, totally shocked by a girl he barely knew nor
desired, and his having NO sexual thoughts upon entering the bathroom.
Advantage to Allison McCabe's story.
If Kleber is right then the clothes probably never came off in the
limited time available. If Ally was right then the stud had plans and
was ready to go the moment he enticed her in and did not waste one
second. So the Chewy supporters are left with a timeline that would
not allow consensual sex. Unless you want to argue that Chewy is the
worlds fastest thinker about whether or not to have sex with an
underage teen. Or your other option is that nothing happened at all
and the bitch is an outright liar. One look at Chewy's tearful post
trial statement "that this will never happen again," tells you that
something sexual definately happened. So I rest my case. The man is
GUILTY OF RAPE AND ENTICEMENT due to my "couldn't get it up that quick
unless the girl is right" prosecution.
Hell, you know as well as I that had the fuse not blown on the hot tub,
Chewy and Mr. Gessert would of been insisting the girls go "tops off."
The Chewy defense holds up fine in our court system but crumbles when
you factor in common sense.
If the girl was so hungry to get "done" by Chewy, why did she go
upstairs and put her clothes back on when a bathing suit would have
been perfect for a quick bang? Chewy was supposed to stay at the house
overnight (for an early morning tee time...uh huh, sure). If he did
nothing to the girl and was unaware at that time that she would report
this supposed "non-incident," why did he return home that night to flex
his muscles at the cops? Kleber obviously had a crush on this girl and
had been rejected, so when he got a chance to stick it back to her with
a little slanted testimony to save his idol, he figured why not.
In conclusion, I feel the DA missed a great opportunity to hammer at
the common sense realities that the agreed upon timeline offered.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
SWM4Chely
Chewy by surprise either changing his clothes or on the pot. In either
case he supposedly is "totally" surprised to see this girl appear.<<
Or Chewy had already finished changing his clothes and it was no big deal to
him when Allison walked in. Remember, others witnesses said when she opened
the door back up, that they were both fully dressed. If you take her word for
it that he was only wearing a towel when she walked in, the 60 to 90 second
timeline doesn't seem nearly long enough for him to briefly rape her and then
get fully dressed when the door was opened again.
Timothy
Brian Curley
> In conclusion, I feel the DA missed a great opportunity to hammer at
> the common sense realities that the agreed upon timeline offered.
You need to go watch some more Perry Mason. If you expect a DA to argue
inference, imagination, and "common sense" in front of a jury, then
you're more delusion than Allison McCabe.
You want a conviction, bring evidence, not half-baked theories about male
erectile response from "erection experts."
--
Brian Curley
Notorious BKC
Brian Curley
swm4...@aol.comnothanks says...
Now... now... he clearly doesn't want to hear facts. They just get in
the way of his nice fantasy about seeing Mark Chmura naked.