Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Boise State Question

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Cats

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 6:54:47 AM11/28/09
to
On 27 Nov 2009, Alexander...@webtv.net (Alexander_ The_Great)
posted some news:17946-4B1...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net:

>
> Boise State Question
>
> Group: rec.sport.football.college Date: Fri, Nov 27, 2009, 11:49pm
> From: 8tr...@gmail.comNOSPAM (winnard)
> ��Whatever happened to the made for television, Oscar winning
> potential, blockbuster movie deal about the Boise State fluke victory
> vs. OU a few years ago?
> That's what I thought.
> winnard
> -----------------------------------------------------
> A lot of rsfcers in here are high on these pretenders like Boise,
> Cincy and TCU in here. TCU, "maybe" they pull some magic if they avoid
> UF, Bama, or Texas in a bowl game. Boise plays weak competition and
> can't stop anyone from scoring. Cincy better, but basically the same
> deal as Boise, good offense (against garbage opponents), but a swiss
> cheese defense.

Yeah well, Boise just can't find enough junior high school teams like
the Florida teams do or their record might be better than 67-4 over the
last 6 years or so. They keep inviting the SEC pussies to come play,
but you just keep turning them down.

I notice y'all wouldn't play Fresno State either. Pat Hill has a
standing invitation for any SEC team to come play them, but none will
take him up on it. Why is that? Chicken? Did it scare y'all when they
kicked the shit out of Georgia Tech?

BWAWK! BWAWK!

deem...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 11:19:31 AM11/28/09
to
On Nov 28, 6:54 am, Cats <c...@there.com> wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2009, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_ The_Great)
> posted somenews:17946-4B1...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Boise State Question
>
> > Group: rec.sport.football.college Date: Fri, Nov 27, 2009, 11:49pm
> > From: 8tra...@gmail.comNOSPAM (winnard)

> >   Whatever happened to the made for television, Oscar winning
> > potential, blockbuster movie deal about the Boise State fluke victory
> > vs. OU a few years ago?
> > That's what I thought.
> > winnard
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > A lot of rsfcers in here are high on these pretenders like Boise,
> > Cincy and TCU in here. TCU, "maybe" they pull some magic if they avoid
> > UF, Bama, or Texas in a bowl game. Boise plays weak competition and
> > can't stop anyone from scoring. Cincy better, but basically the same
> > deal as Boise, good offense (against garbage opponents), but a swiss
> > cheese defense.
>
> Yeah well, Boise just can't find enough junior high school teams like
> the Florida teams do or their record might be better than 67-4 over the
> last 6 years or so.


Their whole schedule is filled with those "junior high teams" you
hate...it's called the Mountain West Conference...not to mention Cal-
Davis and a couple MAC teams. Wow, what a schedule!


 They keep inviting the SEC pussies to come play,
> but you just keep turning them down.  
>
> I notice y'all wouldn't play Fresno State either.  Pat Hill has a
> standing invitation for any SEC team to come play them, but none will
> take him up on it.  Why is that? Chicken?   Did it scare y'all when they
> kicked the shit out of Georgia Tech?

Wow, pimping a team which played three teams with a pulse and
lost to them all?

>
> BWAWK! BWAWK!

Michael Press

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 10:53:28 PM11/28/09
to
In article
<1e7f4eaf-2a9e-45bb...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
"deem...@aol.com" <deem...@aol.com> wrote:

Oregon has a pulse.

--
Michael Press

deem...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 11:21:46 PM11/28/09
to
On Nov 28, 10:53 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <1e7f4eaf-2a9e-45bb-9316-5cb8825b0...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
> Michael Press-

That would be one of the three.

Michael Press

unread,
Nov 29, 2009, 4:07:45 PM11/29/09
to
In article
<672ce231-2a15-43ea...@9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
"deem...@aol.com" <deem...@aol.com> wrote:

> That would be one of the three.

Oh. Never mind.

--
Michael Press

0 new messages