FSGP RESULTS: OCT 31
01. Sean(4-0) ... 27.43 [192]
02. Plaidmoon(4-0) ... 26.57 [186]
03. Mike(4-0) ... 24.86 [174]
03. Eric(4-0) ... 24.86 [174]
05. Ernie(4-0) ... 23.71 [166]
06. Andrew(4-0) ... 23.14 [162]
07. Dano(4-0) ... 22.29 [156]
08. Bruce(4-0) ... 22.00 [154]
09. Fernando(4-0) ... 21.14 [148]
10. Kat(4-0) ... 20.86 [146]
11. Patrick(3-1) ... 18.86 [132]
12. Warren(3-1) ... 16.29 [114]
13. Jack(2-2) ... 16.00 [112]
14. Varl(3-1) ... 15.71 [110]
15. Don(3-1) ... 14.29 [100]
16. Bob(3-1) ... 13.57 [95]
17. Sam(3-1) ... 12.57 [88]
18. John(3-1) ... 11.43 [80]
ASCP(3-1) ... 18.86 [132]
FSGP SEASON STANDINGS : OCT 31
Eric leads, but Don and Kat are right there, and things are very,
very tight far down the standings; anybody's ball game.
01. Eric(43-11) ... 17.16 [1356]
02. Don(40-14) ... 16.92 [1337]
02. Kat(40-13) ... 16.92 [1320]
04. Dano(43-11) ... 16.84 [1330]
05. Plaidmoon(41-13) ... 16.82 [1329]
06. Bruce(35-10) ... 16.75 [1156]
07. Sean(41-13) ... 16.47 [1301]
08. John(44-9) ... 16.45 [1283]
09. Andrew(38-15) ... 16.40 [1279]
10. Mike(40-14) ... 15.63 [1235]
11. Ernie(41-13) ... 15.42 [1218]
12. Varl(39-14) ... 15.36 [1198]
13. Sam(34-15) ... 15.30 [1071]
14. Patrick(36-17) ... 15.21 [1186]
15. Jack(36-18) ... 15.11 [1194]
16. Bob(40-14) ... 15.00 [1185]
17. Warren(18-3) ... 14.55 [582]
18. Ricky(14-9) ... 13.44 [578]
19. Fernando(33-20) ... 13.06 [1019]
20. Murat(7-2) ... 3.80 [152]
ASCP(43-11) ... 15.72 [1321]
ASCP PIX n AVG SKORZ
WSU 13 ND 40 [27.82]
UCLA 17 OSU 32 [25.56]
CAL 32 ASU 21 [21.89]
USC 29 ORE 29 [8.56] *
* [USC picked as winner 29.2 - 28.7]
D1RT33 TH1RT33Z : OCT 31
38 : ASCP, Plaidmoon [WSU-ND]
36 : Andrew, Mike [UCLA-OSU], Warren, Patrick [WSU-ND]
34 : Sean, Plaidmoon, Bruce [UCLA-OSU], Ernie [WSU-ND]
32 : Eric [CAL-ASU], Mike [WSU-ND]
30 : Fernando [CAL-ASU], Kat, Ernie [UCLA-OSU], Dano, Fernando, Bruce
[WSU-ND]
next games Nov 7
http://fsgp.honeybuckit.org
Sean
>
> FSGP SEASON STANDINGS : OCT 31
> Eric leads, but Don and Kat are right there, and things are very,
> very tight far down the standings; anybody's ball game.
> 01. Eric(43-11) ... 17.16 [1356]
I'm thinking why not stop the season right now? I think I was 13th
overall 3 weeks ago but have had two very good weeks so just about
everybody has a good shot at winning the whole thing.
refixing it. Hope it works!
Wait a minute, I only picked three games. You are counting my Usc loss
twice:)
Jack
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:31:02 -0600, Sean S <seans_efn_dotorg> wrote:
>
>> Dominance in Eugene. Nobody thought it possible, but you'd
>> 13. Jack(2-2) ... 16.00 [112]
>
> Wait a minute, I only picked three games. You are counting my Usc loss
> twice:)
>
> Jack
Ah - you're right. The whole thing is automated, and automatically
calculates everything based on picking a full week's schedule. (hence the
"must pick all games" rule).
Tell ya what Jack, since you are an "original" prognosticator and
great guy, this one time I'll let it slide and remove the ND-WSU game from
your season score. (the weekly will have to stay as is to be fair, but it
didn't affect much anyways).
Sean
Never take me to Vegas... I could pick a winner, but I couldn't pick a
score to save my life :(
John
John,
This is my first go with FSGP, and the fact that I'm sitting in 6th
for the season is nothing short of miraculous. I'm much more of a
round-ball fan. Lump my standing into the broken clock/blind squirrel
bucket. I'll nose-dive by the end of the season.
Bruce
Same here for the most part. I do OK here. I do OK in the CFPOOL
which is just picking winners. I the Yahoo Pick Em group I'm in (which
is picked against the point spread), I'm about 30 games under .500.
It's so bad that I made all my picks for last weekend then
deliberately changed 3/4 of them on the theory that I was probably
wrong. It didn't help.
Plaidmoon
Clearly, the path to success in FSGP is to not use me as a sounding
board... :)
John
Your method is better than mine... :) Besides, if you do nosedive,
you'll have me to bounce off of (dead last isn't something done easily,
I had to really pull together my reserve of suckitude :)
John
>Your method is better than mine... :) Besides, if you do nosedive,
>you'll have me to bounce off of (dead last isn't something done easily,
>I had to really pull together my reserve of suckitude :)
>
>John
You have the best won-loss record in the group, which is the true test
of prognosticating skill. Picking accurate scores is pure chance, and
only the very lucky do well.
Bruce