Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Is Joe Smith worth it?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

????????

unread,
Oct 29, 2001, 3:56:13 PM10/29/01
to
is joe smith worth the trouble the t-wolves got into with the future
draft picks being taken away?He is the only overall #1 pick in the NBAto
have played with more than 4 teams and he s only been in the league less
than 7 yrs so to all is he worth getting penalized?and he s not an all
-NBA type player at thatso imo he wasn t worth it and then they resign
him mymymy.

Ikrushlots

unread,
Oct 29, 2001, 4:39:47 PM10/29/01
to
>From: the_cu...@webtv.net (????????)
>Date: 10/29/2001 2:56 PM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: <10921-3B...@storefull-294.iap.bryant.webtv.net>

he's not worth what was taken away, although it's likely that none of the
players drafted from the wolves low draft positions would pan out.

He is a good player that will give the wolves what they need from him, tough
defense and rebounding along with some points. I'd much rather have him than
not have him. He gives the wolves a formidable presence at PF.

Matt

unread,
Oct 29, 2001, 9:42:05 PM10/29/01
to
In article <10921-3B...@storefull-294.iap.bryant.webtv.net>,
the_cu...@webtv.net (????????) wrote:

> is joe smith worth the trouble the t-wolves got into with the future
> draft picks being taken away?

No, but what's done is done. They can't change that now, so there's no
additional harm in re-signing him.


> He is the only overall #1 pick in the NBAto
> have played with more than 4 teams and he s only been in the league less
> than 7 yrs so to all is he worth getting penalized?

As I said, what's done is done. The Wolves' front office fucked up. But
that had nothing to do with bringing him back this year. The secret deal
was ass-stupid. But bringing him back was good, IMHO.


> and he s not an all
> -NBA type player at thatso imo he wasn t worth it and then they resign
> him mymymy.

What's wrong with re-signing him? He's an excellent defender and a good
role player. He's an asset to the team.

Matt

ChrSan24

unread,
Oct 30, 2001, 4:26:22 PM10/30/01
to
he's no reggie slater

Matt

unread,
Oct 30, 2001, 4:57:45 PM10/30/01
to
In article <20011030162622...@mb-dd.aol.com>, chrs...@aol.com
(ChrSan24) wrote:

> he's no reggie slater

LOL

I was going to flame you, but that was actually pretty funny. Now go away.

Matt

0 new messages