NBA Top 10 Plays Of The Decade
VicXnews
Alson Wong
> I thought #2 was bigger than #1...
> http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4780831&categoryid=null
#4 gets the top spot IMO. If he doesn't make that shot, the Kings go on to
win the series and probably the championship. #1 (Kobe's shot) ended up
being a footnote when the Lakers lost the series, as did #3 (LeBron's shot).
Before the alley-oop to Shaq (#2), the Lakers were leading by four points
with 40 seconds left, so they probably still would have won without it.
VicXnews
news:LpN_m.15754$Gf3....@newsfe18.iad:
to me that shot(the oop) was the one that sealed that victory and lead to the
3 championships...perception is everything =8-)
of course you are right we probably would have won it anyways but that play
was the logo for the future
mayner
wrote:
>I thought #2 was bigger than #1...
>http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4780831&categoryid=null
How do they not have Fisher's .4 in that mix anywhere? I agree with
some that Harris' should have been up a little more. I think the Kobe
to Shaq lob was given more importance because it was the beginning of
the three-peat.
VicXnews
news:e8anj5hjejllim3nm...@4ax.com:
they already had too many Laker highlights but I agree it was a big shot and
should have been on there...I agree the oop was the start of it all(BShaws 3s
at the end of the 3rd/begining of the 4th was the real start)...but Kobe's
shot (the #1) was the most cut throat
greg brown
"VicXnews" <ne...@news.com> wrote in message
news:hhg59b$hfe$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
How the frack does Lebron's buzzer beater in game 2 of the East finals
qualify as one of the top plays of the decade (not to mention No.3? I could
see it maybe if they'd come back to win the series, but they didn't even do
that.
I guess ESPN felt obligated to include a Lebron play.
Greg
VicXnews
news:E5idneTXO7YmIKbW...@earthlink.com:
I'm sure that's what it was...