Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Twins got hosed
0 views
Skip to first unread message
TB
Oct 11, 2009, 11:40:13 PM10/11/09
to
On Oct 9, 7:32 pm, "G" <G...@home.house> wrote:
> What a bad call. Could at least had one run in. Because of the ump missing
> that down the left line bounce out into the crowd...
> What a bad call. Could at least had one run in. Because of the ump missing
> that down the left line bounce out into the crowd...
The umpires can (at the request of a manager) review a home run or
foul call. Why can't they do the same for balls hitting near the foul
lines on the field?
nemo
Oct 23, 2009, 9:55:03 PM10/23/09
to
"TB" <tsbr...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:34994e93-41b4-4ff9...@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
You need a lot of cluck to review a foul call! And it must be exreeeemely
painful if your balls hit the fowl lines.
Darin Heinz
Oct 23, 2009, 11:43:48 PM10/23/09
to
"nemo" <ne...@naughtylass.wet> wrote in message
news:X7tEm.983$5w5...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
news:X7tEm.983$5w5...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
I would like a refund on the seven seconds it took to read this post.
Message has been deleted
T987654321
Oct 24, 2009, 6:13:27 PM10/24/09
to
On Oct 24, 8:59 am, Sir F. A. Rien <jaSP...@gbr.online.com> wrote:
> "Darin Heinz" <spacecoastph...@hotmail.com> found these unused words:
>
>
>
>
>
> >"nemo" <n...@naughtylass.wet> wrote in message
> >news:X7tEm.983$5w5...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> >> "TB" <tsbru...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> >>news:34994e93-41b4-4ff9...@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Oct 9, 7:32 pm, "G" <G...@home.house> wrote:
> >>>> What a bad call. Could at least had one run in. Because of the ump
> >>>> missing
> >>>> that down the left line bounce out into the crowd...
>
> >>> The umpires can (at the request of a manager) review a home run or
> >>> foul call. Why can't they do the same for balls hitting near the foul
> >>> lines on the field?
>
> >> You need a lot of cluck to review a foul call! And it must be exreeeemely
> >> painful if your balls hit the fowl lines.
>
> >I would like a refund on the seven seconds it took to read this post.
>
> Since it's free to post anyone can and usually will - you should thus learn
> how to use your newsreader's features and KILLFILE the OT Idiots!
>
> 10 seconds spent doing that will save you thousands of 7 second bits of crap
> from breuning.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
> "Darin Heinz" <spacecoastph...@hotmail.com> found these unused words:
>
>
>
>
>
> >"nemo" <n...@naughtylass.wet> wrote in message
> >news:X7tEm.983$5w5...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> >> "TB" <tsbru...@dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> >>news:34994e93-41b4-4ff9...@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Oct 9, 7:32 pm, "G" <G...@home.house> wrote:
> >>>> What a bad call. Could at least had one run in. Because of the ump
> >>>> missing
> >>>> that down the left line bounce out into the crowd...
>
> >>> The umpires can (at the request of a manager) review a home run or
> >>> foul call. Why can't they do the same for balls hitting near the foul
> >>> lines on the field?
>
> >> You need a lot of cluck to review a foul call! And it must be exreeeemely
> >> painful if your balls hit the fowl lines.
>
> >I would like a refund on the seven seconds it took to read this post.
>
> how to use your newsreader's features and KILLFILE the OT Idiots!
>
> 10 seconds spent doing that will save you thousands of 7 second bits of crap
> from breuning.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Google doesnt have a killfile, at least one i can find.
alie...@gmail.com
Oct 25, 2009, 4:03:15 PM10/25/09
to
Do you use Firefox?
http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html
You'll need Greasemonkey but you should beable to Google that for
yourself.
Mark l. Fergerson
nemo
Oct 27, 2009, 12:03:11 AM10/27/09
to
"Darin Heinz" <spaceco...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae277e5$0$5676$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
0 new messages