Ticketmaster??
Hoover
FSogol
> Why no Nationals' tickets on this site?
>
MLB moved the concession to Tickets.com which they own.
--
FSogol
rufref
"FSogol" <fso...@nomorespamplease.nu> wrote in message
news:Xns97A0D8A1CDD5399...@70.168.83.30...
Now isn't that nice, they charge you to use them and they make more
money.....but the question is....do you get your tickets in time for the
game, and have they fixed the bugs....more money for the rich. Best seeing
Frederick, Bowie, and Prince William....inexpensive tickets, good seats, and
the players mingle.
FSogol
>
> "FSogol" <fso...@nomorespamplease.nu> wrote in message
> news:Xns97A0D8A1CDD5399...@70.168.83.30...
>> "Hoover" <Hoov_...@yahoo.com>Sputtered:
>>
>>> Why no Nationals' tickets on this site?
>>
>> MLB moved the concession to Tickets.com which they own.
>
> Now isn't that nice, they charge you to use them and they make more
> money.....but the question is....do you get your tickets in time for
> the game,
In my case, I did. However mlb paid for 2 day delivery and got 5 day
delivery. So essentially, they are paying more to piss off customers.
--
FSogol
rufref
"jimstevens" <jimst...@forgetthemail.com> wrote in message
news:02jk32pcv80ilvcqt...@4ax.com...
>
> They have a service where you can sell unused tickets and then charge
> you a fee as well. Jeeeeez.
I am glad to see they fixed the printing problem. And they charge you less
to print your own tickets, using YOUR INK and PAPER!
rufref
> ticket and damn thing cost 21 bucks and I printed it too.
>
> That really is bullshit and that will be a factor in discouraging
> going to extra games this year! 21 bucks for cheapest ticket in house
> jacked up 9 bucks for fees.
Reminds me of when I saw the movie "Titanic" advertised for $9.95 which was
about $9 less than in the store and shipping was $11....duh!
George Grapman
A few years ago I bought playoff tickets for a game that never
happened. I used a debit card and was told that I would get credit
within 5 days. Two weeks later tickets.com said they had sent the
reversal but blamed my bank for the delay. This, of course, was not true.
--
To reply via e-mail please delete 1 c from paccbell
Bill
jimstevens wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:24:11 -0400, "rufref" <tbil...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >I am glad to see they fixed the printing problem. And they charge you less
> >to print your own tickets, using YOUR INK and PAPER!
I bought Mets tickets this year and printed them at home. It did
cost less than having them mailed to me. Compare this to
Ticketmaster, who actually charges an extra $2.50 for the
convenience of printing your own tickets. But mailing is free
(of course you still pay their normal usurious charges)! So
there, you really do pay extra to use your own ink and paper.
> I think it was two bucks for the privelege. I got one 12 dollar
> ticket and damn thing cost 21 bucks and I printed it too.
>
> That really is bullshit and that will be a factor in discouraging
> going to extra games this year! 21 bucks for cheapest ticket in house
> jacked up 9 bucks for fees.
Do you think that Ticketmaster is any better??? Given that this
was the original question here. I'd bet that fees of a
comparable ticket at TM would be the same or higher. They all
suck.
Bill