Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
PING: Jeanne (and Tom)
12 views
Skip to first unread message
News
Jan 24, 2013, 7:55:43 PM1/24/13
to
To Jeanne and her followers,
I suggest you stick to the topic of the Cardinals in your future posts here.
Your inane post about me culled from "information" someone in another ng
wrote in libel has no place in this ng.
Not only was it wrong on so many levels (including some "facts" about me
that were outrageously wrong), the post itself was filled with hate,
innuendo, lies, half-truths, and malicious gossip.
I pegged you as a better person than that, and better than another former
poster who could only muster inane name-calling on this ng.
Maybe I was wrong. Prove it to me from now on that you are a decent and good
person!
I'd be sad to have to plonk you again, because you frequently have
insightful things to say on baseball. I'm giving you one more chance to be a
responsible adult instead of a little child repeating inaccurate gossip from
a disreputable source.
If you want to believe that ridiculous gossip you posted, I can't stop you
from believing what you want to believe, however inaccurate it is in
reality.
But to somehow suggest I am "scary" or "dangerous" or other adjective, you
better think again.
My friends and relatives have never ever used any of those terms to describe
me, and they know me best.
I am a gentle person who has never advocated violence against anyone at any
time.
[I'll bet you can't say that about yourself, and the same from Tom who has
also fallen for the lies and myths someone else has posted about me.]
Indeed, my whole life has been predicated on exactly the opposite viewpoint
about violence.
I've opposed every no-win, nutty war since Vietnam in the '60s.
I'll bet you can't match that record, to pick just one example.
I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened anybody
in my entire life.
Maybe *you* have advocated or did physical violence against someone sometime
in your life.
I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" in the
slightest.
Maybe *you* beat-up some girl(s) in high school for calling you a name or
slander you knew was false.
Maybe *you* called them names or labeled them in some inappropriate (and
inaccurate) way because of what you heard in gossip and you couldn't resist
passing on that cruelty to innocent classmates.
Maybe *you* got called cruel names and felt like the only way to 'get even'
was to take out your anger on them in some way. I don't know, just sayin',
just like you did in your wildly-inaccurate slander to me!
Just because I believe in the philosophy of personal civil liberties (which
should be automatic for every so-called 'liberal' ranting about violence
today) and post articles about it, doesn't automatically make one a "scary"
person. Unless of course that is what you strongly want to believe in
reading what someone else may believe in their sick fantasies who have never
met or knows me personally.
To reiterate, you should stick to Cardinals' baseball and not use this ng as
your personal forum for your malicious and inaccurate gossip and rantings
about me that have no credibility whatsoever.
If you (or others who follow Jeanne's crazy thinking) want to resort to
attacking and libeling me without any real evidence to back-up your insane
claim, you will get a strong rebuttal from me demanding you stop the vicious
and unwarranted hate, the libel, and the name-calling.
Is that understood, or do I have to post a future post about you doing it
again (and again) on this ng until you finally get the message you are
completely wrong and need to stop believing the libel from one sick hater?
I suggest you stick to the topic of the Cardinals in your future posts here.
Your inane post about me culled from "information" someone in another ng
wrote in libel has no place in this ng.
Not only was it wrong on so many levels (including some "facts" about me
that were outrageously wrong), the post itself was filled with hate,
innuendo, lies, half-truths, and malicious gossip.
I pegged you as a better person than that, and better than another former
poster who could only muster inane name-calling on this ng.
Maybe I was wrong. Prove it to me from now on that you are a decent and good
person!
I'd be sad to have to plonk you again, because you frequently have
insightful things to say on baseball. I'm giving you one more chance to be a
responsible adult instead of a little child repeating inaccurate gossip from
a disreputable source.
If you want to believe that ridiculous gossip you posted, I can't stop you
from believing what you want to believe, however inaccurate it is in
reality.
But to somehow suggest I am "scary" or "dangerous" or other adjective, you
better think again.
My friends and relatives have never ever used any of those terms to describe
me, and they know me best.
I am a gentle person who has never advocated violence against anyone at any
time.
[I'll bet you can't say that about yourself, and the same from Tom who has
also fallen for the lies and myths someone else has posted about me.]
Indeed, my whole life has been predicated on exactly the opposite viewpoint
about violence.
I've opposed every no-win, nutty war since Vietnam in the '60s.
I'll bet you can't match that record, to pick just one example.
I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened anybody
in my entire life.
Maybe *you* have advocated or did physical violence against someone sometime
in your life.
I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" in the
slightest.
Maybe *you* beat-up some girl(s) in high school for calling you a name or
slander you knew was false.
Maybe *you* called them names or labeled them in some inappropriate (and
inaccurate) way because of what you heard in gossip and you couldn't resist
passing on that cruelty to innocent classmates.
Maybe *you* got called cruel names and felt like the only way to 'get even'
was to take out your anger on them in some way. I don't know, just sayin',
just like you did in your wildly-inaccurate slander to me!
Just because I believe in the philosophy of personal civil liberties (which
should be automatic for every so-called 'liberal' ranting about violence
today) and post articles about it, doesn't automatically make one a "scary"
person. Unless of course that is what you strongly want to believe in
reading what someone else may believe in their sick fantasies who have never
met or knows me personally.
To reiterate, you should stick to Cardinals' baseball and not use this ng as
your personal forum for your malicious and inaccurate gossip and rantings
about me that have no credibility whatsoever.
If you (or others who follow Jeanne's crazy thinking) want to resort to
attacking and libeling me without any real evidence to back-up your insane
claim, you will get a strong rebuttal from me demanding you stop the vicious
and unwarranted hate, the libel, and the name-calling.
Is that understood, or do I have to post a future post about you doing it
again (and again) on this ng until you finally get the message you are
completely wrong and need to stop believing the libel from one sick hater?
Tom
Jan 26, 2013, 5:52:51 PM1/26/13
to
On Jan 24, 6:55 pm, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
> To Jeanne and her followers,
>
> I suggest you stick to the topic of the Cardinals in your future posts here.
And what if we don't?
> To Jeanne and her followers,
>
> I suggest you stick to the topic of the Cardinals in your future posts here.
> Your inane post about me culled from "information" someone in another ng
> wrote in libel has no place in this ng.
> Not only was it wrong on so many levels (including some "facts" about me
> that were outrageously wrong), the post itself was filled with hate,
> innuendo, lies, half-truths, and malicious gossip.
> I pegged you as a better person than that, and better than another former
> poster who could only muster inane name-calling on this ng.
> Maybe I was wrong. Prove it to me from now on that you are a decent and good
> person!
so?
> I'd be sad to have to plonk you again, because you frequently have
> insightful things to say on baseball. I'm giving you one more chance to be a
> responsible adult instead of a little child repeating inaccurate gossip from
> a disreputable source.
> If you want to believe that ridiculous gossip you posted, I can't stop you
> from believing what you want to believe, however inaccurate it is in
> reality.
> But to somehow suggest I am "scary" or "dangerous" or other adjective, you
> better think again.
> My friends and relatives have never ever used any of those terms to describe
> me, and they know me best.
> I am a gentle person who has never advocated violence against anyone at any
> time.
> [I'll bet you can't say that about yourself, and the same from Tom who has
> also fallen for the lies and myths someone else has posted about me.]
> If you (or others who follow Jeanne's crazy thinking) want to resort to
> attacking and libeling me without any real evidence to back-up your insane
> claim, you will get a strong rebuttal from me demanding you stop the vicious
> and unwarranted hate, the libel, and the name-calling.
> Is that understood, or do I have to post a future post about you doing it
> again (and again) on this ng until you finally get the message you are
> completely wrong and need to stop believing the libel from one sick hater?
Tom
polnika
Jan 28, 2013, 2:07:43 PM1/28/13
to
"I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened anybody
in my entire life.
Maybe *you* have advocated or did physical violence against someone sometime
in your life.
I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" in the
slightest."
Hmmm....how about the time you OFFERED to supply the bullets to someone if they wanted to
in my entire life.
Maybe *you* have advocated or did physical violence against someone sometime
in your life.
I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" in the
slightest."
hurt a certian political person.....
what would you call that. I would take TAKE that as a DIRECT THREAT!
Tom
Jan 28, 2013, 7:43:56 PM1/28/13
to
BTW, what political person did he want harmed?
Tom
polnika
Jan 28, 2013, 10:25:36 PM1/28/13
to
NIn article <ba466e83-c463-4d1e-b3c8-
e2355e...@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, drs...@aol.com says...
>
>On Jan 28, 1:07=A0pm, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
>> "I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened any=
>ime
>> in your life.
>> I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" in =
>the
>> slightest."
>>
>> Hmmm....how about the time you OFFERED to supply the bullets to someone i=
e2355e...@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, drs...@aol.com says...
>
>On Jan 28, 1:07=A0pm, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
>> "I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened any=
>body
>> in my entire life.
>> Maybe *you* have advocated or did physical violence against someone somet=
>> in my entire life.
>ime
>> in your life.
>> I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" in =
>the
>> slightest."
>>
>> Hmmm....how about the time you OFFERED to supply the bullets to someone i=
>f they wanted to
>> hurt a certian political person.....
>>
>> what would you call that. I would take TAKE that as a DIRECT THREAT!
>
>
>
>Roy's too much of a coward to admit that he ever did that.
>
>BTW, what political person did he want harmed?
>
>To
Nope!
>> hurt a certian political person.....
>>
>> what would you call that. I would take TAKE that as a DIRECT THREAT!
>
>
>
>Roy's too much of a coward to admit that he ever did that.
>
>BTW, what political person did he want harmed?
>
>To
Message has been deleted
Tom
Jan 29, 2013, 5:50:14 PM1/29/13
to
On Jan 28, 9:25 pm, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
> NIn article <ba466e83-c463-4d1e-b3c8-
> e2355e7ab...@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, drso...@aol.com says...
Sorry, I'm not familiar with that person.
Tom
> NIn article <ba466e83-c463-4d1e-b3c8-
> e2355e7ab...@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, drso...@aol.com says...
Tom
Jeanne Douglas
Jan 29, 2013, 9:40:39 PM1/29/13
to
In article <QtadneCEioTufZrM...@earthlink.com>,
"News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "polnika" <pol...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ke6i9u$hal$1...@dont-email.me...
> Patently ridiculous to call that a serious threat, and even if I said
> it [prove it!] in jest, I still wouldn't be responsible if someone else did
> the deed.
> Can we get back to Cardinals baseball' (the topic of this ng, in case
> you forgot) and quit talking about me?
> Can we do that, or are you guys going to keep wasting more bandwidth
> on your OT posts?
> I don't know why Jeanne even posts here in the first place since the
> only thing she has in common with Cardinals' baseball today is Albert
> Pujols, and she doesn't mention him at all.
Bullshit. I'm still part of Lance's Cardinal fans fantasy league.
> Since A.P. is now a member of her real home team, she doesn't need to
> post here any longer.
Who died and made you god?
> Maybe she should confine herself to the Angels' baseball ng, but she
> is no angel herself.
> Does she post on all the other baseball teams' ng's, because she
> has/had the hots for someone (ex, Jim Edmonds) on each team, and can't stop
> posting her ridiculous ravings about each team or their fans?
Oh, poor poor pathetic baby drama queen.
If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
"News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "polnika" <pol...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ke6i9u$hal$1...@dont-email.me...
> it [prove it!] in jest, I still wouldn't be responsible if someone else did
> the deed.
> Can we get back to Cardinals baseball' (the topic of this ng, in case
> you forgot) and quit talking about me?
> Can we do that, or are you guys going to keep wasting more bandwidth
> on your OT posts?
> I don't know why Jeanne even posts here in the first place since the
> only thing she has in common with Cardinals' baseball today is Albert
> Pujols, and she doesn't mention him at all.
Bullshit. I'm still part of Lance's Cardinal fans fantasy league.
> Since A.P. is now a member of her real home team, she doesn't need to
> post here any longer.
Who died and made you god?
> Maybe she should confine herself to the Angels' baseball ng, but she
> is no angel herself.
> Does she post on all the other baseball teams' ng's, because she
> has/had the hots for someone (ex, Jim Edmonds) on each team, and can't stop
> posting her ridiculous ravings about each team or their fans?
Oh, poor poor pathetic baby drama queen.
If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
polnika
Jan 30, 2013, 2:43:05 AM1/30/13
to
In article <1b126d26-134f-4c46...@n2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
drs...@aol.com says...
>> >> "I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened =
>any=3D
>met=3D
>> >ime
>> >> in your life.
>> >> I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" =
>in =3D
>> >the
>> >> slightest."
>>
>> >> Hmmm....how about the time you OFFERED to supply the bullets to someon=
>e i=3D
drs...@aol.com says...
>
>On Jan 28, 9:25=A0pm, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
>> NIn article <ba466e83-c463-4d1e-b3c8-
>> e2355e7ab...@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, drso...@aol.com says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jan 28, 1:07=3DA0pm, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
>On Jan 28, 9:25=A0pm, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
>> NIn article <ba466e83-c463-4d1e-b3c8-
>> e2355e7ab...@u16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, drso...@aol.com says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> "I don't know about you, but I have never, ever physically threatened =
>any=3D
>> >body
>> >> in my entire life.
>> >> Maybe *you* have advocated or did physical violence against someone so=
>> >> in my entire life.
>met=3D
>> >ime
>> >> in your life.
>> >> I haven't, so you have no basis for calling me "scary" or "dangerous" =
>in =3D
>> >the
>> >> slightest."
>>
>> >> Hmmm....how about the time you OFFERED to supply the bullets to someon=
>e i=3D
>> >f they wanted to
>> >> hurt a certian political person.....
>>
>> >> what would you call that. I would take TAKE that as a DIRECT THREAT!
>>
>> >Roy's too much of a coward to admit that he ever did that.
>>
>> >BTW, what political person did he want harmed?
>>
>> >To
>>
>> Nope!
>
>Sorry, I'm not familiar with that person.
>
>Tom
Obama
>> >> hurt a certian political person.....
>>
>> >> what would you call that. I would take TAKE that as a DIRECT THREAT!
>>
>> >Roy's too much of a coward to admit that he ever did that.
>>
>> >BTW, what political person did he want harmed?
>>
>> >To
>>
>> Nope!
>
>Sorry, I'm not familiar with that person.
>
>Tom
Tom
Jan 30, 2013, 8:23:34 PM1/30/13
to
On Jan 30, 1:43 am, poln...@gmail.com (polnika) wrote:
> In article <1b126d26-134f-4c46-9636-b4e25e544...@n2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
Roy threatened the president?!?!
Why am I not surprised?
Tom
> In article <1b126d26-134f-4c46-9636-b4e25e544...@n2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
Why am I not surprised?
Tom
trol...@invalid.invalid.com
Mar 30, 2013, 7:55:19 PM3/30/13
to
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:55:43 -0600, "News" <m...@sb.net> shouted from the
highest rooftop:
>I am a gentle person who has never advocated violence against anyone at any
>time.
> There is something comforting in the idea that you get
> crazier and crazier each day. Although I must say that
> I do fear for your neighbors.
Proves yet again you are out of your mind--what remains of it.
They have nothing to fear from me.
It's vice versa, for a couple of them.
I'm a peaceful guy. (Unlike you.)
"Shooting is too good for her.
A slow, lingering, painful death--that would still be too kind after
what she did to both of them.
Why don't these psychotic people just kill themselves and leave their
kids (and/or spouse) alone [pun not necessarily intentional]?"
Would you have felt better if he was run over by an Army jeep?
> I don't know; just how slow can they make those things go?
What if it just stayed on top of him for an hour: first on
his hands, then his feet, then his d**k, then his stomach, then his rotten
neck-head?
DEATH to collectivists (and collectivist-thinking) of all stripes!
- From "The Sayings of Roy"
0 new messages