info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
90 loss season
34 views
Skip to first unread message
Ruben Safir
Dec 3, 2023, 3:28:45 PM12/3/23
to
This team looks like a 90 loss seson team this year. If the rookies
perform, which they didn't last season, they can reach 85 loses.
Why?
Well, there is no pitching. When they released Louis they released one
of their best pitchers. Megill is a loss and probably not a Major
Leaguer. Same with Peterson and Lucchino. Butto is a middle releiver
at best. So who is pitching?
On the offense, a lot of hoping is an pineing seems to be in order.
If you like teams with low contact and lots of whiffs, this is the team
for you...
Baty had 109Ks and a 275 OBP
Alvarez had 110Ks and a 284 OBP (and a 209 BA)
Alonso 151Ks and 318 OBP
Marte is washed up
Vientos a 253 OBP
Mauricio a 296 OBP
Navaez 283 OBP
Nido - I'm not even looking
The cubbard is bare...
This team has all the punch of the 1969 Mets without a pitching staff.
All these players, slated for regular playing time, are in the Al Weiss
zone of hitting.
There is no point in going over the ballpen.. there is none.
perform, which they didn't last season, they can reach 85 loses.
Why?
Well, there is no pitching. When they released Louis they released one
of their best pitchers. Megill is a loss and probably not a Major
Leaguer. Same with Peterson and Lucchino. Butto is a middle releiver
at best. So who is pitching?
On the offense, a lot of hoping is an pineing seems to be in order.
If you like teams with low contact and lots of whiffs, this is the team
for you...
Baty had 109Ks and a 275 OBP
Alvarez had 110Ks and a 284 OBP (and a 209 BA)
Alonso 151Ks and 318 OBP
Marte is washed up
Vientos a 253 OBP
Mauricio a 296 OBP
Navaez 283 OBP
Nido - I'm not even looking
The cubbard is bare...
This team has all the punch of the 1969 Mets without a pitching staff.
All these players, slated for regular playing time, are in the Al Weiss
zone of hitting.
There is no point in going over the ballpen.. there is none.
*ernie
Dec 3, 2023, 7:29:04 PM12/3/23
to
>
> There is no point in going over the ballpen.. there is none.
>
>
an assessment. I'm not expecting miracles.
Stewart
Dec 15, 2023, 2:49:44 PM12/15/23
to
90 is on the bright side. It will be hard to score runs with 2/3 of the
lineup with <.300 OBP and a combined .220 BA.
On 12/3/2023 3:28 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
lineup with <.300 OBP and a combined .220 BA.
On 12/3/2023 3:28 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
Popping Mad
Dec 17, 2023, 12:27:01 AM12/17/23
to
On 12/15/23 14:49, Stewart wrote:
> 90 is on the bright side. It will be hard to score runs with 2/3 of the
> lineup with <.300 OBP and a combined .220 BA.
Without some support behind he, Alonso is going to end up with Kingman
> 90 is on the bright side. It will be hard to score runs with 2/3 of the
> lineup with <.300 OBP and a combined .220 BA.
like number.
Popping Mad
Dec 17, 2023, 12:28:50 AM12/17/23
to
I never agree with Joe Beningo, but he is spot on with this...
poppingmad ontherun
Dec 23, 2023, 2:36:49 AM12/23/23
to
On 12/15/23 14:49, Stewart wrote:
> 90 is on the bright side. It will be hard to score runs with 2/3 of the
> lineup with <.300 OBP and a combined .220 BA.
>
Not just that, it will be painful to watch. They might as well do a
> lineup with <.300 OBP and a combined .220 BA.
>
complete breakdown and trade all the assets.
0 new messages