Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Andrew Jones

0 views
Skip to first unread message

sdrahcir

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:42:23 PM11/25/09
to
Great--a washed up .217 hitter. I would've rather had Thome back for a
year.
The owner is back in his "cheap" mode.
The Sox should be dominating this division every year, but the owner
keeps us small market.

Alfred

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 6:32:17 PM11/25/09
to

This is the first I've heard about Jones.
I'd watched Jones from the time he came up with the Braves and he in
fact eventually became a superstar in the N.L.
He's had a few bad seasons of late - and I don't know why (actually I
suspect that he had become a bit disinterested in the game, Bobby Cox,
the Braves Organization and also the big bucks messed his head up).
Sure, this may look like a "cheap" move on the part of KW, but if
Jones gets it back together - he can be a terror in the A.L. and carry
the team to another division championship. Like I said, I know nothing
about this - but if this works out favorably, the W.S. will have a
good season.

sdrahcir

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 8:26:53 PM11/25/09
to

He didn't have a good year in the A.L. last year hitting .217 for
Texas. I hope it works out, but as far as I'm concerned it's just
another example of them trying to hit the lotto.

mercutio

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 10:36:27 PM11/25/09
to
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:26:53 -0800 (PST), sdrahcir
<white...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Nov 25, 5:32ÔøΩpm, Alfred <behyndbluee...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Let's see a washed up old power hitter that can only DH for alot of $$
or a washed up younger power hitter that can play the outfield and DH
for very little $$ and alot of incentives His obp and slugging%
aren't that bad and if you project his numbers out for the season
while the average isn't great the rest of the numbers aren't bad.
You are right tho we are trying to patch holes on the cheap ( on the
other hand I like our bench better this year than I did last year)

JIm

Tom Benton

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 7:33:33 AM11/26/09
to


This is odd. Granted, he has always been a strikeout machine, but the
last three years, his entire production has crashed and burned. He is
an excellent outfielder. There isn't much downside to the move,
though. They got him cheap enough.

sdrahcir

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 10:08:58 AM11/26/09
to
On Nov 25, 9:36 pm, mercutio <jim013...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:26:53 -0800 (PST), sdrahcir
>
>
>
> <whitesox...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 25, 5:32Êpm, Alfred <behyndbluee...@hotmail.com> wrote:

If Jones had anything left, the Dodgers & Rangers wouldn't have let
him go in addition to the Braves. He can't play the outfield well
anymore.
Regarding Thome, no matter who he signs with he isn't going to get
alot of money anymore. He just wants to play and try to get close to
600 HRs. I'll bet whoever signs him will get him for a low base and
incentives. Remember Thome has already banked big dollars. He just
wants to play one more year.
A strong left handed bat is still needed in the everyday lineup
between Quentin and Konerko. If Thome isn't the guy that's fine, but
then they better find someone better than Jones.

Tom Benton

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 12:45:53 PM11/26/09
to
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:08:58 -0800 (PST), sdrahcir
<white...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Nov 25, 9:36�pm, mercutio <jim013...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:26:53 -0800 (PST), sdrahcir
>>
>>
>>
>> <whitesox...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> >On Nov 25, 5:32�pm, Alfred <behyndbluee...@hotmail.com> wrote:


Andrew is a little young to give up on but, as you point out, we have
no reason to expect him to put up Dye-like numbers (in previous years,
at least).

0 new messages