Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Holliday a Card

0 views
Skip to first unread message

O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - PIVOT, BARRY, PIVOT!!!

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 6:06:09 PM1/5/10
to
Thank Christ:

6:00pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman reports that the Cardinals and Matt
Holliday have finalized a seven-year, $120MM contract. Heyman says
the deal includes a full no-trade clause.

mlbtraderumors.com

MuahMan

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 6:24:03 PM1/5/10
to
On Jan 5, 6:06 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - PIVOT, BARRY, PIVOT!!!"

That guy is worth nearly 20 million a year?

S/B 954RR

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:50:11 PM1/5/10
to

"MuahMan" <mua...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a70df2b1-048e-4c2a...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

No but he is the best hitter in a weak off-season bunch.

S/B 954RR

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:49:32 PM1/5/10
to

"O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - PIVOT, BARRY, PIVOT!!!" <oneilsp...@aol.com>
wrote in message
news:319ad61d-28dd-4af8...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

These no-trade clause are no longer about offering a player some security or
stability but about offering the player leverage should he brought up in
trade talks.

Gary

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 8:02:43 PM1/6/10
to
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:50:11 -0500, "S/B 954RR" <jtib...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Still doesn't explain why the Cards negotiated against itself. When
Pujols becomes a free agent, he's going to want at least $25M per
year. How can the Cards afford both Holiday and the best hitter in
baseball when their two salaries would be $43M or more?

Plus paying Wainwright and Carpenter.

Dano

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 8:29:14 PM1/6/10
to

"Gary" <golfe...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:7hcak5hgc86aacnmj...@4ax.com...

Just be happy the Yanks didn't grab him. And that they shouldn't be in the
market for a Pujols either.


Wayback1918

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 7:16:17 AM1/7/10
to
On Jan 6, 8:02 pm, Gary <golfera...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:50:11 -0500, "S/B 954RR" <jtibb...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"MuahMan" <muah...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Plus paying Wainwright and Carpenter.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

They probably had to go seven years to get Holliday to agree to defer
two million a year.

$15 million per yr shouldn't be too much of a burden for St Louis.
They are not a small market team.

If the Cards decide they don't have enough money to put some good
players around Pujols their best bet would be to trade him.

BTT

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 5:02:25 PM1/7/10
to
On Jan 6, 8:29 pm, "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Gary" <golfera...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:7hcak5hgc86aacnmj...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 22:50:11 -0500, "S/B 954RR" <jtibb...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >"MuahMan" <muah...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> > >news:a70df2b1-048e-4c2a...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> > >> On Jan 5, 6:06 pm, "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - PIVOT, BARRY, PIVOT!!!"
> > >> <oneilsprost...@aol.com> wrote:
> > >>> Thank Christ:
>
> > >>> 6:00pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman reports that the Cardinals and Matt
> > >>> Holliday have finalized a seven-year, $120MM contract.  Heyman says
> > >>> the deal includes a full no-trade clause.
>
> > >>> mlbtraderumors.com
>
> > >> That guy is worth nearly 20 million a year?
>
> > >No but he is the best hitter in a weak off-season bunch.
>
> > Still doesn't explain why the Cards negotiated against itself. When
> > Pujols becomes a free agent, he's going to want at least $25M per
> > year. How can the Cards afford both Holiday and the best hitter in
> > baseball when their two salaries would be $43M or more?
>
> > Plus paying Wainwright and Carpenter.
>
> Just be happy the Yanks didn't grab him.  And that they shouldn't be in the
> market for a Pujols either.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

No, they shouldn't be, but that doesn't mean that they won't be.

BTT

Dano

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 5:23:40 PM1/7/10
to

Which do you suppose would be happy as a DH? Pujols or Teixeira? Do you
really think they're that nuts to pay the sick money it would take for a DH,
completely blowing up the salary structure of baseball? I think there might
be a point where the other team owners will reach the breaking point over
that type of fiscally irresponsible largesse.


black...@aol.com

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 1:42:09 AM1/8/10
to
Is St. Louis going to be able to resign Pujols next season as well?
Its pretty clear the Yankees are saving their money to put Pujols in
left next offseason

Giovanni Wassen

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 2:01:54 AM1/8/10
to
black...@aol.com wrote:

> Is St. Louis going to be able to resign Pujols next season as well?
> Its pretty clear the Yankees are saving their money to put Pujols in

> left next offseason.

In left? I guess St. Louis had a good reason to make him a first baseman.

--
Gio

http://www.watkijkikoptv.info
http://watkijkikoptv.info/animeblog


Ruben Safir

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 6:37:13 AM1/8/10
to

Who gives a shit. Go troll the Yankees news group with your crap.

Dano

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 8:45:09 AM1/8/10
to

Gee...and here I was thinking they'd convert him to catch.


Gary

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 5:19:43 PM1/8/10
to
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:45:09 -0500, "Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Nope. They'll want him to pitch.

0 new messages