CHD is still a bastard... and a GAY loser
Jolly Rogers
prefence known to the group, or are you ashamed? A lot of people suspect
that your homosexuality is not latent, but active.
Jolly Rogers
Jolly Rogers
news:afaber-30961B....@reader2.panix.com...
> In article <537ba.189574$4F3.11...@news2.east.cox.net>,
> posting of copyrighted material as anyone else. But that in no way
> justifies casting aspersions. Sheesh.
Well, I'm not down on the posting of copyright materials. In fact, you may
be the only one here who is opposed to posting copyrighted material, except
for Gregg, and we all know how he thinks.
BUT LET'S NOT CONFUSE THE ISSUE....
This group is totally destoyed, Alice. If you don't like what I post, block
me, or ignore me, or report me. I honestly don't care which.
YOU CAN'T HAVE MULTIPLE SETS OF RULES! YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
You can't hypocritically chastise my off-topic posts and simultaneously
condone and defend what CHD and Gregg are doing!
This group is now a "post what you want, whenever you want" group... There
are no rules, only freedom of speech! No structure.... No self-discipline
or respect for others.
It used to be a braves group but it isn't anymore... Got it? That means
posting anything is okay!
I'm sure I won't be the last one to question CHD about his choice of
lifestyle. He has never denied it. I am not saying he is gay, but why
won't he at least deny it?
And you're right! It doesn't have anything to do with anything. I just
wanted to ask the question and it is my right to ask that question, just
like it is his right to post political messages in a baseball group, and
Gregg's right to post political messages in a baseball group, and your right
to ask me why I am doing asking CHD about his lifestyle, and my right to rep
ly and tell you because I felt like it.
Why are you worried about why I asked him that anyway? It is my right also
to ask you why that concerns you and why you can't mind your own business.
Isn't this childish and fun, exercising our rights to do anything we want to
do with absolutely no measure of self-control??? What if everyone behaved
like this? What if the world were filled with undisciplined people like CHD
and Gregg? What if the world were filled with people like me who say
something about it, or people like you who say something to me for saying
something about it?
It kind of ruins the fun of the group, but that is the way CHD and his chums
and supporters want it, so why fight it. No one else here has the desire to
see it end, so just ignore me, hon. I'm just following the crowd and doing
what the groups wants.
Have a nice day... :-)
Jolly Rogers
Kenneth Williams
> condone and defend what CHD and Gregg are doing!
My mother always told me, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
This just puts you on the same lvl as CHD.
So.. are you gay?
Jolly Rogers
news:uB7ba.40153$jP2.6...@twister.neo.rr.com...
You too... You replied.
> So.. are you gay?
No, I am a heterosexual. You?
Jolly Rogers
Kenneth Williams
Yea, you know me, I'm all about posting off-topic and pushing my views on
everyone else. Seriously, if you don't want people to prove the flaws in
your theories, don't put them out there.
> No, I am a heterosexual. You?
Sure, but do remember, you are the one who started questioning someone
else's sexuality.
BTW Slice and dice my post some more, but this time, show me how 2 wrongs
make a right.
JJM1954
>Well, I'm not down on the posting of copyright materials. In fact, you may
>be the only one here who is opposed to posting copyrighted material, except
>for Gregg, and we all know how he thinks.
Add me to the list, too, Jolly. You know, I just love it when I end up
diametrically opposed to you in an argument. It just confirms my general sense
of well-being.
>BUT LET'S NOT CONFUSE THE ISSUE....
What issue is that, chump? The sexual orientation of someone you don't like?
If that's the case, why don't we all speculatre a little on your love for
animals?
>
>This group is totally destoyed, Alice.
Not as much as your so-called brain.
> If you don't like what I post, block
>me, or ignore me, or report me.
Or maybe just call you what you are: an ignorant asshole. Ignorant asshole.
>YOU CAN'T HAVE MULTIPLE SETS OF RULES! YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
Says the anarchist. Christ.
>You can't hypocritically chastise my off-topic posts and simultaneously
>condone and defend what CHD and Gregg are doing!
>
>
Who are you to say what we can or cannot do, you frigging moron? Do you ever
even think about the shit you type before you type it.
The humor, while clearly unintentional, is first rate. I congratulate you on
your complete lack of self-awareness.
>It used to be a braves group but it isn't anymore... Got it? That means
>posting anything is okay!
Only to your impaired brain.
>I'm sure I won't be the last one to question CHD about his choice of
>lifestyle. He has never denied it. I am not saying he is gay, but why
>won't he at least deny it?
>
Why don't you just fuck off to that little group you "created" and talk about
the Braves to yourself.
Clearly, the problem here is that nobody followed you and you're pissy about
it.
Jolly Rogers
> > You too... You replied.
>
> Yea, you know me, I'm all about posting off-topic and pushing my views on
> everyone else. Seriously, if you don't want people to prove the flaws in
> your theories, don't put them out there.
Well, what fun would that be? I like people pointing out their perceptions
of the flaws in my theories. ;-)
> > No, I am a heterosexual. You?
>
> Sure, but do remember, you are the one who started questioning someone
> else's sexuality.
Okay. I'll remember. :-)
> BTW Slice and dice my post some more, but this time, show me how 2
wrongs
> make a right.
They don't. They never have and never will. I think you missed the point.
Isn't it ironic that you were willing to condone CHD, but eventually, you
had to begin to say "no" too? Others will still remain silent and tolerate
even more. If a few more CHDs show up, increasing numbers of people will
speak out about it, or disengage entirely. The point is that everyone has a
different level of tolerance.
(Sorry, Kenneth. I don't mean to pick on you here, because I have
considered you a valuable poster over the years. No hard feelings.)
Jolly Rogers
Jolly Rogers
news:20030310164608...@mb-de.aol.com...
> >From: "Jolly Rogers" jolly...@nospam.org
>
> >Well, I'm not down on the posting of copyright materials. In fact, you
may
> >be the only one here who is opposed to posting copyrighted material,
except
> >for Gregg, and we all know how he thinks.
>
> Add me to the list, too, Jolly. You know, I just love it when I end up
> diametrically opposed to you in an argument. It just confirms my general
sense
> of well-being.
Sorry, but you've already made the "Roman Empire Expert" and "World History
Expert" list. Only two list appearances per qualified user.
> >BUT LET'S NOT CONFUSE THE ISSUE....
>
> What issue is that, chump? The sexual orientation of someone you don't
like?
> If that's the case, why don't we all speculatre a little on your love for
> animals?
LOL! Or maybe your love of whips and chains and devices?
> >This group is totally destoyed, Alice.
>
> Not as much as your so-called brain.
Or yours.
> > If you don't like what I post, block
> >me, or ignore me, or report me.
>
> Or maybe just call you what you are: an ignorant asshole. Ignorant
asshole.
Yes, and you're quite an asshole yourself.
> >YOU CAN'T HAVE MULTIPLE SETS OF RULES! YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
>
> Says the anarchist. Christ.
I wouldn't know. I am Agnostic.
> >You can't hypocritically chastise my off-topic posts and simultaneously
> >condone and defend what CHD and Gregg are doing!
> >
> >
> Who are you to say what we can or cannot do, you frigging moron?
Exactly. Do anything you like.
> Do you ever even think about the shit you type before you type it.
If I want to, otherwise, I don't.
> The humor, while clearly unintentional, is first rate. I congratulate you
on
> your complete lack of self-awareness.
<Takes a bow.>
> >It used to be a braves group but it isn't anymore... Got it? That means
> >posting anything is okay!
>
> Only to your impaired brain.
Why are you upset then? Isn't this what you want? We can still squeeze in
a few Braves-related posts in our free time. No one will pressure you to if
you don't want to though. Post what you wish, friend. Say what you want
to. "Freedom of speech!" Right? Be happy! By God, no one can tell YOU
what you can or can't post here. :-)
> >I'm sure I won't be the last one to question CHD about his choice of
> >lifestyle. He has never denied it. I am not saying he is gay, but why
> >won't he at least deny it?
> >
> Why don't you just fuck off to that little group you "created" and talk
about
> the Braves to yourself.
Because I don't want to, nor do I have to. Just ignore me. Isn't that the
universal solution here (even though it doesn't work flawlessly?)
> Clearly, the problem here is that nobody followed you and you're pissy
about
> it.
Yes, clearly, that's the problem.
Jolly Rogers
Kenneth Williams
point.
I know what your point is Jolly, and I dispise all the OT non MLB related
posts in this group. I agree, it has not a thing to do with free speech,
simply becuase the speech in this group is MEANT to be about baseball.
The difference between me and you, I have the ability to not even look at or
read the OT posts. You on the other hand are the type of person when
something bothers you, it bothers and bothers you til it rubs a hole in
your head. I have no problem with your objection to what's going on . I
just merely think you are making a mistake becuase of course as I said, 2
wrongs don't make a right.
> (Sorry, Kenneth. I don't mean to pick on you here, because I have
> considered you a valuable poster over the years. No hard feelings.)
Definately no hard feelings, becuase I know how you are feeling.
2 things.
1. Hope no one reports your OT posts as spam.
2. At least put OT in the subject, if you are following this method.
Jolly Rogers
Absolutely nothing will happen even if 100 people complained. The only
response will be a letter from my ISP asking me to please review their rules
of conduct. They would send this letter for about a year or more before
even calling me on the telephone and warning me of the consequences if I
persist. It's a shame, but no one's ISP cares about SPAM in a newsgroup or
even email SPAM. It has become accepted, unfortunately. The ISP only wants
a steady, monthly income from me, and I send them a steady, automatic 40
bucks a month for full cable modem access. In fact, if they get too ancy, I
would explain my side of the story and then threaten to dump them for not
protecting me from CHDs SPAM (heh), and further threatening to go with one
of a dozen of their competitors.
That's why it is so hard to stop someone like CHD and Gregg, but I
appreciate your point, Kenneth.
Jolly Rogers
Sam Hutcheson
wrote:
>In article <537ba.189574$4F3.11...@news2.east.cox.net>,
> "Jolly Rogers" <jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>
>What the *hell* does this have to do with anything? I'm as down on the
>posting of copyrighted material as anyone else. But that in no way
>justifies casting aspersions. Sheesh.
Surely you don't expect rationality from the racist, homophobic
fucking loon?
s/
*****
"...because democracies do not wage aggressive wars." - Richard Perle, Feb. 23, 2003 (MTP)
JJM1954
>> Add me to the list, too, Jolly. You know, I just love it when I end up
>> diametrically opposed to you in an argument. It just confirms my general
>sense
>> of well-being.
>Sorry, but you've already made the "Roman Empire Expert" and "World History
>Expert" list. Only two list appearances per qualified user.
OKayyyyy.
>> What issue is that, chump? The sexual orientation of someone you don't
>like?
>> If that's the case, why don't we all speculatre a little on your love for
>> animals?
>LOL! Or maybe your love of whips and chains and devices?
>
>
Okayyyyyy.
>> >This group is totally destoyed, Alice.
>>
>> Not as much as your so-called brain.
>
>Or yours.
Okayyyyyyy,
>> > If you don't like what I post, block
>> >me, or ignore me, or report me.
>>
>> Or maybe just call you what you are: an ignorant asshole. Ignorant
>asshole.
>Yes, and you're quite an asshole yourself.
I guess this is about enough.
There's a serious echo in hear. I can swear, in fact, that someone has neither
the brains nor guts for actual debate (or perhaps on some level deep down
inside realize they're getting their ass soundly kicked. Yet again.) so can
only parrot the reply to their original crazy-ass statement in slightly altered
words.
>> >YOU CAN'T HAVE MULTIPLE SETS OF RULES! YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
>>
>> Says the anarchist. Christ.
>
>I wouldn't know. I am Agnostic.
Well, blow me down. Jolly makes a stab at originality. I just can't decide if
he's trying to be funny here, or he's just whacked. Any opinions?
>Why are you upset then?
I'm not upset, dumbass. I'm contemptuous. If only there were a glyph for
contemptuosity. Perhaps then you'd understand.
>Isn't this what you want?
It isn't about me and what I want. It's about what people want to talk about.
You'll notice I don't respond to each and every thread. Why, I don't even READ
each and every thread. That's why they have HEADERS. It's so you can read
them and DECIDE WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO READ AND WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO IGNORE.
Understand any better since I emphasized it for you?
>By God, no one can tell YOU
>what you can or can't post here. :-)
That's about right, Jolly. I make my posts and take my chances. If I say
something stupid, people have the perfect right to call me out on it and say
I've been stupid.
Only, it doesn't happen to me nearly as much as it happens to you. I wonder
why?
>> Clearly, the problem here is that nobody followed you and you're pissy
>about
>> it.
>
>Yes, clearly, that's the problem.
Thanks for confirming my insight.
Sam Hutcheson
<jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>LOL! Or maybe your love of whips and chains and devices?
All you're doing is sharing your porn preferences with the world,
Joey.
Jolly Rogers
> OKayyyyy.
Ummmm... Okay.
> Okayyyyyy.
Hmmm... Okay.
> Okayyyyyyy,
Yep.
> I guess this is about enough.
>
> There's a serious echo in hear. I can swear, in fact, that someone has
neither
> the brains nor guts for actual debate (or perhaps on some level deep down
> inside realize they're getting their ass soundly kicked. Yet again.) so
can
> only parrot the reply to their original crazy-ass statement in slightly
altered
> words.
Yeah, well, it's pretty hard to debate rationally with someone who attacks
with "getting your ass kicked soundly" Cowboy remarks. I think you do a
nice job of defeating yourself whithout me having to engage you at all, so I
am conent to stand back and let you dismantle yourself.
> Well, blow me down. Jolly makes a stab at originality. I just can't
decide if
> he's trying to be funny here, or he's just whacked. Any opinions?
Only one. Thanks for helping me make my point.
> >Why are you upset then?
>
> I'm not upset, dumbass. I'm contemptuous. If only there were a glyph for
> contemptuosity. Perhaps then you'd understand.
It's pretty hard to top "dumbass," but I'll try. First, get out your
mirror, then look into it. The figure you see in the glass is the first
person to blame when things go wrong.
> >Isn't this what you want?
>
> It isn't about me and what I want. It's about what people want to talk
about.
> You'll notice I don't respond to each and every thread. Why, I don't even
READ
> each and every thread. That's why they have HEADERS. It's so you can
read
> them and DECIDE WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO READ AND WHAT YOU'D LIKE TO IGNORE.
Great, but then why are you responding to me? This is most interesting!
> Understand any better since I emphasized it for you?
Okay, but whay respond to me? Why get upset? You seem to have it all
worked out. Just practice what you preach and ignore me. It's that easy,
right?
> Only, it doesn't happen to me nearly as much as it happens to you. I
wonder
> why?
Maybe it's because they are also on the Roman Empire Expert list?
> Thanks for confirming my insight.
You're welcomed.
Have a nice day.
Jolly Rogers
Jolly Rogers
> Surely you don't expect rationality from the racist, homophobic
> fucking loon?
Sam capitalized the first word of a sentence!!! Plus! :-)
But... He used the "f" word. Minus. :-(
Jolly Rogers
Jolly Rogers
news:du3q6vkj6dhqma34b...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:58:47 GMT, "Jolly Rogers"
> <jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>
> >LOL! Or maybe your love of whips and chains and devices?
>
> All you're doing is sharing your porn preferences with the world,
> Joey.
It is interesting to note that you related that sentence to "porn," Sam. I
made no reference to "porn," yet you drew a conclusion about this. Quite
interesting.
Jolly Rogers
Mark
the company (ie. MLB.com, ESPN.com ect) that has the rights to the article
as well as the ISP. Most companies charge anywhere from $75 - $125 or so
per article that is posted on the internet via web (newgroup would
constitute web). If the ISP or the poster refused to cease action, at that
point the company can sue both the user and the ISP. With today's easy
access to archives via http://groups.google.com , you could probly estimate
CHD has posted at least 4,000 articles over a 5 or so year span. Using the
cheapest cost per article at $75, the total amount he owes to the companies
involved is equal to about $300,000 .
Jolly Rogers
> When users post full text articles violating copyright laws, you can email
> the company (ie. MLB.com, ESPN.com ect) that has the rights to the article
> as well as the ISP. Most companies charge anywhere from $75 - $125 or so
> per article that is posted on the internet via web (newgroup would
> constitute web). If the ISP or the poster refused to cease action, at
that
> point the company can sue both the user and the ISP. With today's easy
> access to archives via http://groups.google.com , you could probly
estimate
> CHD has posted at least 4,000 articles over a 5 or so year span. Using
the
> cheapest cost per article at $75, the total amount he owes to the
companies
> involved is equal to about $300,000 .
Hey, Mark, I don't think that would work, man. He always references the
owner in some way, like (AP) or (AJC). There is a fair-use clause in the
law, and he isn't profitting from it, as far as we know.
I normally post a link to actual Braves' articles and a brief excerpt along
with my comments. That's perfectly legal.
I'm not sure how this releates to posting entire articles. I wish you were
right.
Jolly Rogers
JJM1954
>Yeah, well, it's pretty hard to debate rationally with someone who attacks
>with "getting your ass kicked soundly" Cowboy remarks
Jesus, Jolly, what do you want me to say? When you're getting your ass kicked,
you're getting your ass kicked. There's no other way to describe it.
If you're too dense to realize you're getting your ass kicked, that's not my
problem. It's yours. I sense you have to deal with this kind of thing a lot
as you wander through life.
>I think you do a
>nice job of defeating yourself whithout me having to engage you at all, so I
>am conent to stand back and let you dismantle yourself.
That's right. Much like the "Rome Incident." When you're getting totally
dismantled stand there with your hands in your pockets humming, then declare
victory. It's not much of a strategy, but at this point I agree with you.
It's all you have left.
>It's pretty hard to top "dumbass," but I'll try. First, get out your
>mirror, then look into it. The figure you see in the glass is the first
>person to blame when things go wrong.
What things are going wrong, Jolly? Elucidate.
>Great, but then why are you responding to me? This is most interesting!
Because I'm killing a few minutes while reading e-mail, writing e-mail,
checking on various things, and otherwise delaying getting ready to work.
Why are you responding to me?
>Why get upset?
You don't understand English very well, do you?
> Just practice what you preach and ignore me. It's that easy,
>right?
It is, Jolly. It's very easy. In fact, I ignore you the vast majority of the
time. Don't you realize that? It's only when you act like a total scumbag
asshole that I feel motivated enough to tell you that you're acting like a
total scumbag assholes. And I do that as kind of a public service, because
it's my experience that if you let scumbag assholes slide ALL THE TIME then
eventually start to feel like they're right.
>> Only, it doesn't happen to me nearly as much as it happens to you. I
>wonder
>> why?
>
>Maybe it's because they are also on the Roman Empire Expert list?
No, I think it's because you're a real moron.
>Have a nice day.
I always do.
Jolly Rogers
> If you're too dense to realize you're getting your ass kicked, that's not
my
> problem. It's yours. I sense you have to deal with this kind of thing a
lot
> as you wander through life.
LOL! Do you honestly believe I attribute any real weight to your
single-witted electronic "voice" here in cyberspace? Heh. All you manage
to do is jump up and down and swear. You never debate. You just rant,
rave, and swear a lot.
> It is, Jolly. It's very easy. In fact, I ignore you the vast majority of
the
> time. Don't you realize that?
LOL! JJM, I have to really break something to you. I have never noticed if
you are ignoring me or not. I never have considered it, actually. I'll
watch for that more in the future. If I forget, please remind me you are
ignoring me, just so I'll know. Thanks. ;-)
> And I do that as kind of a public service,
You're so very noble.
Jolly Rogers
Mark
Journal-Constitution is reporting that "Marcus Giles has left the team due
to family matters". The AJC went on to say...............
Posting the full text articles as is, even when providing a link, title and
author is still illegal.
Copyright issues has actually forced several newsgroups to to be removed due
to posters posting copyrighted articles, pictures ect. Here's a link to a
story of such a shutting down.
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-268899.html?tag=rn
"The move is an increasingly popular decision for ISPs, which are on the
hook for subscriber activities when it comes to copyrighted material that is
illegally swapped through their services."
Jolly Rogers
> Fair use is uxing excerpt from the articles such as: The Atlanta
> Journal-Constitution is reporting that "Marcus Giles has left the team due
> to family matters". The AJC went on to say...............
>
> Posting the full text articles as is, even when providing a link, title
and
> author is still illegal.
>
> Copyright issues has actually forced several newsgroups to to be removed
due
> to posters posting copyrighted articles, pictures ect. Here's a link to a
> story of such a shutting down.
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1023-268899.html?tag=rn
>
> "The move is an increasingly popular decision for ISPs, which are on the
> hook for subscriber activities when it comes to copyrighted material that
is
> illegally swapped through their services."
Thanks for pointing this out, Mark. Perhaps it's time for us to call CHD on
his nonsense and turn him in? Enough of his shenanigans.
I wonder why he went loony tunes last summer? He was never like that
before, AFAIK.
Jolly Rogers
Sam Hutcheson
<jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>"Sam Hutcheson" <sigma.alpha...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:du3q6vkj6dhqma34b...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:58:47 GMT, "Jolly Rogers"
>> <jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>>
>> >LOL! Or maybe your love of whips and chains and devices?
>>
>> All you're doing is sharing your porn preferences with the world,
>> Joey.
>
>It is interesting to note that you related that sentence to "porn," Sam. I
>made no reference to "porn," yet you drew a conclusion about this. Quite
>interesting.
It takes a very twisted mind to associate the internet with porn, I
tells ya.
Jolly Rogers
> It takes a very twisted mind to associate the internet with porn, I
> tells ya.
Heck, my sweet wife won't even let me bring a Sport's Illustrated swimsuit
edition into the house. heh
Jolly Rogers
Sam Hutcheson
Sexual repression in your house? I'd have never guessed.
Jolly Rogers
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:45:46 GMT, "Jolly Rogers"
> <jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>
> >"Sam Hutcheson" <sigma.alpha...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >> It takes a very twisted mind to associate the internet with porn, I
> >> tells ya.
> >
> >Heck, my sweet wife won't even let me bring a Sport's Illustrated
swimsuit
> >edition into the house. heh
>
> Sexual repression in your house? I'd have never guessed.
LOL. Hardly. She just wants to be my everything... and she is. :-)
Jolly Rogers
JJM1954
>You never debate.
You're in absolute denial. When facts are called for, I showered you with
facts. (IE, "The Rome Incident."). Of course, when that happened you also
proved that you couldn't distinguish a fact from a fart.
When contemptuous dismissal is called for, you're contemptuously dismissed
because if you think your blathering nonsense speculating on and baiting CHD on
his supposed sexuality is somewhere in the category of "debatable behavior"
you're a loon. No, wait. Make that a fucking loon.
>JJM, I have to really break something to you. I have never noticed if
>you are ignoring me or not.
BZZZT. Do your eyes blink when your brain makes these mental disconnects?
CHD tbdm
>CHD... When are you going to come out of the closet and make your sexual
>prefence known to the group, or are you ashamed? A lot of people suspect
>that your homosexuality is not latent, but active.
>
Your comments are based on a fallacy; I am not gay. But your obsession with
the issue leads to the inevitable conclusion that you've got some sexual issues
of your own to resolve.
Get some professional help, loser.
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
"I THINK ... therefore, I am not a Tar Heel."
http://www.goduke.com
"Rip 'em up, tear 'em up, GIVE 'EM HELL, DUKE!"
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Jolly Rogers
> Your comments are based on a fallacy; I am not gay. But your obsession
with
> the issue leads to the inevitable conclusion that you've got some sexual
issues
> of your own to resolve.
>
> Get some professional help, loser.
LOL! Whatever, sphincter boy. Loser.
Jolly Rogers
Rob Wynne
>In article <537ba.189574$4F3.11...@news2.east.cox.net>,
> "Jolly Rogers" <jolly...@nospam.org> wrote:
>
>> prefence known to the group, or are you ashamed? A lot of people suspect
>> that your homosexuality is not latent, but active.
>
>posting of copyrighted material as anyone else. But that in no way
>justifies casting aspersions. Sheesh.
>
--
Rob Wynne / The Autographed Cat / d...@america.net
Gafilk 2004: Jan 9-11, 2004, Atlanta, GA -- http://www.gafilk.org/
CoolHandDuke tbdm
Hmmmm. "Sphincter boy." Very interesting. It appears that your obsession
with homosexual sex continues to manifest itself.
You've really got problems, and until you face them, you'll never become a
fully-functioning adult.
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Duke Blue Devils: '99, '00, '01, '02 & '03 ACC Champions
"We don't compete -- we WIN." http://www.goduke.com
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
mark
>This group is now a "post what you want, whenever you want" group... There
>are no rules, only freedom of speech! No structure.... No self-discipline
>or respect for others.
Why, it's ... it's ... ANARCHY!!!@!!!
-- Mark
"Cease, cows, life is short!" -- Aureliano Segundo Buendia
mark
>Thanks for pointing this out, Mark. Perhaps it's time for us to call CHD on
>his nonsense and turn him in? Enough of his shenanigans.
You're the sorriest fucking anarchist who ever lived.
Jolly Rogers
news:b5dl2...@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <bs7ba.189742$4F3.11...@news2.east.cox.net>, "Jolly says...
>
> >This group is now a "post what you want, whenever you want" group...
There
> >are no rules, only freedom of speech! No structure.... No
self-discipline
> >or respect for others.
>
> Why, it's ... it's ... ANARCHY!!!@!!!
You kids really should subscribe to a service that gives you messages in a
timely manner. This is all extremely anti-climatic. I mean, really.
Jolly Rogers
Jolly Rogers
> In article <rb9ba.191726$4F3.11...@news2.east.cox.net>, "Jolly says...
>
> >Thanks for pointing this out, Mark. Perhaps it's time for us to call CHD
on
> >his nonsense and turn him in? Enough of his shenanigans.
>
> You're the sorriest fucking anarchist who ever lived.
Bah... Whatever suites me at the time. Fuck the system.
Jolly Rogers
Colin William
CoolHand, please stop changing your address. At least give people a fighting
chance to filter you.
Colin
Jolly Rogers
news:b5e3om$283er6$1...@ID-109505.news.dfncis.de...
Does anyone still think he is here for any reason other than causing
trouble? He is absolutely no better than Alex.
Jolly Rogers
Dick Sidbury
You're wasting your breath Colin. He's been doing this on other
USENet groups for several years despite pleading from other individuals.
You might as well use a mental filter and let it go.
dick
Jolly Rogers
news:3E7A98C1...@hotmail.com...
> You're wasting your breath Colin. He's been doing this on other
> USENet groups for several years despite pleading from other individuals.
> You might as well use a mental filter and let it go.
I suspected as much. Thanks for confirming, Doc.
Jolly Rogers
CoolHandDuke tbdm
My address remains the same. It is my spam filter that changes, and I'll
change it as the mood strikes.
CoolHandDuke tbdm
Incorrect on both counts.
(And what purpose do YOU serve -- to be the group's resident paranoid,
pessimistic ass?)
Jolly Rogers
"CoolHandDuke tbdm" <cbw...@aol.comGoDancin> wrote in message
news:20030321004039...@mb-ct.aol.com...
> colint...@hotmail.com said:
>
> >"CoolHandDuke tbdm" <cbw...@aol.comGoDancin> wrote ...
> >
> >CoolHand, please stop changing your address. At least give people a
fighting
> >chance to filter you.
>
> My address remains the same. It is my spam filter that changes, and I'll
> change it as the mood strikes.
Yeah, Colin! No one, but NO ONE, will EVER tell CHD what to do! Got it?
He will post what he wants, where he wants, and under what pseudonym he
wants, in whatever asshole way he wants, when he wants.
Jolly Rogers
Ben
> > change it as the mood strikes.
why? because if the people who are trying to filter you out don't acknowledge
you, there will be nothing left of your personality?
>
> Yeah, Colin! No one, but NO ONE, will EVER tell CHD what to do! Got it?
> He will post what he wants, where he wants, and under what pseudonym he
> wants, in whatever asshole way he wants, when he wants.
jolly, i tried hard to write a reply to this, but i couldn't do it without
agreeing with you. so i gave up.
--
Ben
Jon Richardson
"CoolHandDuke tbdm" <cbw...@aol.comGoDancin> wrote in message
news:20030321004039...@mb-ct.aol.com...
>
> >"CoolHandDuke tbdm" <cbw...@aol.comGoDancin> wrote ...
> >
> >CoolHand, please stop changing your address. At least give people a
fighting
> >chance to filter you.
>
> My address remains the same. It is my spam filter that changes, and I'll
> change it as the mood strikes.
Is this some Internet way of compensating for a limp pinkie?
Jon
CoolHandDuke tbdm
Some of us don't need to compensate for anything. My condolences to you if you
do.
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Duke Blue Devils: '99, '00, '01, '02 & '03 ACC Champions
The United States -- "Wham, Bam - Goodbye, Saddam!"
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+