It's no good on the north shore at the Coral Princess Hotel (verified
in person by me in June 2006) and it's worse 20 miles south and mile
out to sea at the Palancar reef (verified in person by me in December
2006). The fancy colorful coral appendages are gone, and what remains
of the reef is an ugly, brownish green, dead stump. If you are an
experienced snorkeler/diver there is now absolutely no reason to go to
Cozumel. You should not trust anyone who says anything to the contrary.
For a good visual, do a Google image search for Coral Reef. Then
another one for Dead Coral Reef. If you are hoping to see the sort of
brilliant coral that shows up in the Coral Reef search, you won't find
it anymore in Cozumel.
--
Melissa Rodriguez
About Scuba Diving
http://scuba.about.com
www.About.com
About.com is part of The New York Times Company
On Dec 23, 6:36 pm, chrislar...@gmail.com wrote:
> Cozumel was once a world famous scuba/snorkel destination because it
> used to have the best reef in Mexico and maybe the best in the
> Caribbean. By best, I mean "colorful, alive, covered with colorful
> fans/tubes/fingers/appendges, and teeming with brilliantly colored
> fish." Hurricane Wilma killed the reef in 2005 and the scuba/snorkeling
> is now awfull.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Wilma
This was our first experience at Cozumel, but we plan to go back in a
couple of years. We had a great experience even with the diminished
coral reef at shallower depths. We were very impressed with the
abundant sea life. We saw several types of eels including giant moray
eels, lobsters, crabs, many types of colorful fish, barracuda sharks,
sea anemones, sea cucumbers, rays. It was lots of fun and the
visibility was great.
We've dived the Great Barrier reef in Australia, and the coral at
Cozumel was not as varied or as colorful as in Australia, but the fish
etc. in Cozumel were fantastic. Next we're going to dive Belize, so
we'll see how things are there.