Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

fj.rec.sports.golf

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ron...@fj.rec.sports.golf

unread,
Jul 23, 2007, 10:43:38 PM7/23/07
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

that
> this is exactly what happened. He made multiple trips to Easton and
> convinced the local authorities to lock Cummings up as if he were the
> most sadistic of killers.
>
> On Friday, Cummings' probation officer did an aboutface and told the
> court that he thought Cummings represented a very great danger to the
> community. Outside the courtroom, he and the other local law enforcement
> people crowded around Varney like kids surrounding a rock star. He was
> their hero and maybe one day they would be just like him.

Well, isn't that strange: the Secret Service taking a strong interest in
the probation violation hearing of Ed Cummings for taking batteries out
of a tone dialer.

Not only were they interested, they testified against him!

> HERE WE GO AGAIN
>
> 1/12/96. In addition to the judge, Northampton County probation officer
> Scott Hoke, Secret Service agent Tom Varney, and Haverford Township
> detective John Morris were in attendance. Varney and Morris arrived
> in the same car.
>
> Tom Varney of the Secret Service then told the judge that he believed
> Cummings to be a major threat to society and that he was concerned
> because of the upcoming presidential campaign. It was unclear if he
> was actually implying that Cummings would somehow be a threat to the
> president but the judge and the police listened intently.
>
> This was the first time a Secret Service agent had come to their town.
> Varney continued to describe the thr


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.2.3

v1XU/N3YXD8E6lrrHU7s+OkML/G8PqN5HLx5WqMUsnSYQ5Y7uqsRuDlNjjrVgUCm
w6PyofE8TdM+4XWk+OJIBoNRy4tgyteDvL6qaC2bkeJuMnyGh08y1iKv+7sv+unU
dNaNdC2BC0zZ7z1K6zQEqHpJcp2oG9OVT8f2LvJRJl3COkFJorFfIB6sjskJUyI2
lfXiIqgFoIoCwh3++XfsO4x35IsyeABTPtBqK2kXrp==
=+rLI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Ron...@fj.rec.sports.golf

unread,
Jan 23, 2008, 5:09:26 PM1/23/08
to
caprice, be described or even conceived as inexcusable
over wife, concubine, child, or purchased or inherited
slave?'--the quotations I made being up to this time undisputed
... what I said was necessary to introduce the expression of my
conviction ... that none of the elements of the system of _patria
potestas_ exist in Hong Kong, including of course adoption. It is
to this conviction that I point as the moral ground for enforcing
English law against kidnaping and buying and selling human beings.
The gravamen of all my complaints is, that the pauper kidnapers
and sellers are punished, while the rich buyers go free. No case
can come on for trial in this Court except upon an information by
the Attorney-General. I have called on the Attorney-General of the
day to prosecute a man against whom there was evidence that the
boy he was keeping as a servant had been bought by him direct from
a kidnaper. The then Attorney-General exercised his discretion,
and did not prosecute." "There are no difficulties in the way of
carrying out the punishment of kidnaping, and sellers and buyers
of children, or of keeping children by the purchasers, or in
selling and buying of women for brothels, or in dealing with
cases of brutal bondage." "I have spoken from criminal facts and
circumstances deposed to in Court; the Chinese and Dr. Eitel have


0 new messages