Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

smirking ban proposed in SF

0 views
Skip to first unread message

harley

unread,
Apr 9, 2003, 7:29:45 PM4/9/03
to
Proposed smirking ban raises eyebrows
Wed Apr 9, 5:22 AM ET

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A raised eyebrow, loud guffaw, smirk or other
facial expressions could all be banned in future political debate under new
rules proposed for the city council in Palo Alto, California.

In a bid to improve civility in the town's public discourse, a committee on
the city council has spent hours debating guidelines for its own behaviour.

"Do not use body language or other nonverbal methods of expression,
disagreement or disgust," a new list of proposed conduct rules reads.

Another rule calls for council members to address each other with titles
followed by last names, a formality not always practised in laid-back
California.

"I don't want to muzzle my colleagues," councilwoman Judy Kleinberg, who
headed the committee that drafted the rules, told the San Jose Mercury News.
But, she added: "I don't think the people sitting around the cabinet with
the president roll their eyes."


Joel Olson

unread,
Apr 10, 2003, 12:20:55 PM4/10/03
to
harley chucked::

What she aims to say is that they're hypnotized?
RME

harley

unread,
Apr 10, 2003, 4:07:07 PM4/10/03
to

"Joel Olson" <jeo...@webzone.net> wrote in message
news:b745fo$un3$1...@slb9.atl.mindspring.net...

Perhaps she means they are Mesmerized.

http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~dylanwad/morganic/bio_mesmer.htm


0 new messages