Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Day 5 Since The Terrorist Attack In London, And Harper Still Refuses To Send In The Police To Drag Muslims From Their Beds and Ship Them To The Deportation Camps
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Gunner
May 25, 2013, 8:29:58 AM5/25/13
to
And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister
has also refused to do the same.
If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the
fucking Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the
way to the deportation camps.
You see, the problem with British Conservative PM Cameron and
Canadian Conservative PM Harper is that they aren't right wing
enough.
has also refused to do the same.
If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the
fucking Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the
way to the deportation camps.
You see, the problem with British Conservative PM Cameron and
Canadian Conservative PM Harper is that they aren't right wing
enough.
abelard
May 25, 2013, 9:23:27 AM5/25/13
to
Peter Abelard
May 25, 2013, 9:37:03 AM5/25/13
to
On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
Vous êtes un imbécile qui est à la retraite et ne contribue en rien à
l'économie. Vous prenez le yoga n'est pas pour la santé, mais pour
vous faire une fellation!
> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
Vous êtes un imbécile qui est à la retraite et ne contribue en rien à
l'économie. Vous prenez le yoga n'est pas pour la santé, mais pour
vous faire une fellation!
abelard
May 25, 2013, 9:40:20 AM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:37:03 -0700 (PDT), Peter Abelard
<gare...@ymail.com> wrote:
>On May 25, 9:23�am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
>Vous �tes un imb�cile qui est � la retraite et ne contribue en rien �
<gare...@ymail.com> wrote:
>On May 25, 9:23�am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>
>> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
>l'�conomie. Vous prenez le yoga n'est pas pour la sant�, mais pour
>vous faire une fellation!
learn inglish you mad frog
Zepp
May 25, 2013, 10:48:02 AM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:40:20 +0200, abelard wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:37:03 -0700 (PDT), Peter Abelard
> <gare...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>>
>>> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing
>>> problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
>
>>Vous êtes un imbécile qui est à la retraite et ne contribue en rien à
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:37:03 -0700 (PDT), Peter Abelard
> <gare...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>>On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>>
>>> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing
>>> problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
>
>>l'économie. Vous prenez le yoga n'est pas pour la santé, mais pour vous
>>faire une fellation!
>
> learn inglish you mad frog
Yeah, learn 'inglish' so you can be an ignorant right wing American moron!
>
> learn inglish you mad frog
Andy
May 25, 2013, 11:26:08 AM5/25/13
to
On May 25, 9:40 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:37:03 -0700 (PDT), Peter Abelard
>
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 06:37:03 -0700 (PDT), Peter Abelard
>
> <garekm...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>
> >> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
> >Vous tes un imb cile qui est la retraite et ne contribue en rien
> >l' conomie. Vous prenez le yoga n'est pas pour la sant , mais pour
> >vous faire une fellation!
>
> learn inglish you mad frog
Peter Abelard was a Frenchman, you dope!
> >On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>
> >> of course you mean left wing enough. Tolerance is a left wing problem. That's why Hitler was a Liberal.
> >Vous tes un imb cile qui est la retraite et ne contribue en rien
> >l' conomie. Vous prenez le yoga n'est pas pour la sant , mais pour
> >vous faire une fellation!
>
> learn inglish you mad frog
And though the keyboard wasn't invented in his times, I'm confident
that unlike you, he was acquainted with English and French enough to
use capitals to start a sentence.
Why is that a mystery to you?
Andy
May 25, 2013, 11:36:07 AM5/25/13
to
And I don't think that he's an American. He uses the "u" in "color"
for instance.
I imagine that he probably extends his suffixes ending in "oro" with
"orough"
Not American. And since he posts in a UK news group. It's an easy
guess.
Hmmm! French eh? Something about learning Yoga to attend to ones
masturbatory needs by a self made blow job!
And that flew right over 'abelard' and his tiny tête.
saracene
May 25, 2013, 11:52:32 AM5/25/13
to
Andy
May 25, 2013, 12:05:08 PM5/25/13
to
Regnant James I of England , they're probably outcasts.
That old stuff is so 16th century! Everyone is into the 17th century
version these days.
Bert
May 25, 2013, 12:10:51 PM5/25/13
to
Andy brought next idea :
The King James Version (KJV), commonly known as the Authorized Version
(AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the
Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed
in 1611.[2] First printed by the King's Printer Robert Barker,[3][4]
this was the third translation into English to be approved by the
English Church authorities. The first was the Great Bible commissioned
in the reign of King Henry VIII, and the second was the Bishops' Bible
of 1568.[5] In January 1604, King James I of England convened the
Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in
response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as
detected by the Puritans,[6] a faction within the Church of England.[7]
James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the
new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal
structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained
clergy.[8] The translation was done by 47 scholars, all of whom were
members of the Church of England.[9] In common with most other
translations of the period, the New Testament was translated from
Greek, the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew text, while the
Apocrypha were translated from the Greek and Latin. In the Book of
Common Prayer (1662), the text of the Authorized Version replaced the
text of the Great Bible – for Epistle and Gospel readings – and as such
was authorized by Act of Parliament.[10] By the first half of the 18th
century, the Authorized Version was effectively unchallenged as the
English translation used in Anglican and Protestant churches. Over the
course of the 18th century, the Authorized Version supplanted the Latin
Vulgate as the standard version of scripture for English speaking
scholars. Today, the most used edition of the King James Bible, and
often identified as plainly the King James Version or King James
Version, especially in the United States, remains the standard text of
1769, edited by Benjamin Blayney and Francis Sawyer Parris at Oxford.
> If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
> Regnant James I of England , they're probably outcasts.
>
> That old stuff is so 16th century! Everyone is into the 17th century
> version these days.
Another dumbass.
> Regnant James I of England , they're probably outcasts.
>
> That old stuff is so 16th century! Everyone is into the 17th century
> version these days.
The King James Version (KJV), commonly known as the Authorized Version
(AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the
Christian Bible for the Church of England begun in 1604 and completed
in 1611.[2] First printed by the King's Printer Robert Barker,[3][4]
this was the third translation into English to be approved by the
English Church authorities. The first was the Great Bible commissioned
in the reign of King Henry VIII, and the second was the Bishops' Bible
of 1568.[5] In January 1604, King James I of England convened the
Hampton Court Conference where a new English version was conceived in
response to the perceived problems of the earlier translations as
detected by the Puritans,[6] a faction within the Church of England.[7]
James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the
new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal
structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained
clergy.[8] The translation was done by 47 scholars, all of whom were
members of the Church of England.[9] In common with most other
translations of the period, the New Testament was translated from
Greek, the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew text, while the
Apocrypha were translated from the Greek and Latin. In the Book of
Common Prayer (1662), the text of the Authorized Version replaced the
text of the Great Bible – for Epistle and Gospel readings – and as such
was authorized by Act of Parliament.[10] By the first half of the 18th
century, the Authorized Version was effectively unchallenged as the
English translation used in Anglican and Protestant churches. Over the
course of the 18th century, the Authorized Version supplanted the Latin
Vulgate as the standard version of scripture for English speaking
scholars. Today, the most used edition of the King James Bible, and
often identified as plainly the King James Version or King James
Version, especially in the United States, remains the standard text of
1769, edited by Benjamin Blayney and Francis Sawyer Parris at Oxford.
DVH
May 25, 2013, 12:20:22 PM5/25/13
to
On 25/05/2013 17:05, Andy wrote:
> If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
> Regnant James I of England
James dictated the whole Bible?
> If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
> Regnant James I of England
>, they're probably outcasts.
Or dead.
Andy
May 25, 2013, 12:36:14 PM5/25/13
to
a place in the sky full of clouds where everybody speaks American and
wears white robes.
Zepp
May 25, 2013, 12:39:44 PM5/25/13
to
abelard
May 25, 2013, 3:15:57 PM5/25/13
to
and i'm not peter
abelard
May 25, 2013, 3:18:42 PM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 17:20:22 +0100, DVH <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
>On 25/05/2013 17:05, Andy wrote:
>
>> If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
>> Regnant James I of England
>
>James dictated the whole Bible?
he just signed it...he's be dun for copyright and plagiarism now
>On 25/05/2013 17:05, Andy wrote:
>
>> If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
>> Regnant James I of England
>
>James dictated the whole Bible?
Dänk 42Ø
May 25, 2013, 5:29:52 PM5/25/13
to
are FASCISTS -- just as in American politics. Like Hitler vs. Stalin,
there are some minor technical differences between their ideologies, but
the end result -- a tyrannical Orwellian police state -- is the same.
To any Brits reading this, remember that when Eric Arthur Blair aka
George Orwell wrote "1984," he intended it to be a WARNING to his people,
not a BLUEPRINT.
abelard
May 25, 2013, 5:48:06 PM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 16:29:52 -0500, Dänk 42Ø <da...@sourdiesel.net>
>To any Brits reading this, remember that when Eric Arthur Blair aka
>George Orwell wrote "1984," he intended it to be a WARNING to his people,
>not a BLUEPRINT.
orwell was reacting in part to his experiences with stalinists in the
spanish civil war...his defining experience
i read the following words just this day...:-
"to anyone with any eye whatever for political institutions it is
obvious that mussolini and hitler found their model in russia....
but, viewed by an english democrat, there is nothing to choose between
them."
104
written in 1945...
in those days, everyone intelligent understood what hitler and
mussolini were...after nearly 70 years of leftist propaganda....most
people do not know the reality.
wrote:
>On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:23:27 +0200, abelard wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 May 2013 12:29:58 +0000 (UTC), Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister has
>>>also refused to do the same.
>>>
>>>If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the fucking
>>>Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the way to the
>>>deportation camps.
>>>
>>>You see, the problem with British Conservative PM Cameron and Canadian
>>>Conservative PM Harper is that they aren't right wing enough.
>>
>> of course you mean left wing enough
>
>In British politics there is no "left" or "right," both ruling parties
>are FASCISTS -- just as in American politics. Like Hitler vs. Stalin,
>there are some minor technical differences between their ideologies, but
>the end result -- a tyrannical Orwellian police state -- is the same.
no it isn't...not by a long chalk...yet
>On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:23:27 +0200, abelard wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 May 2013 12:29:58 +0000 (UTC), Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister has
>>>also refused to do the same.
>>>
>>>If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the fucking
>>>Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the way to the
>>>deportation camps.
>>>
>>>You see, the problem with British Conservative PM Cameron and Canadian
>>>Conservative PM Harper is that they aren't right wing enough.
>>
>> of course you mean left wing enough
>
>In British politics there is no "left" or "right," both ruling parties
>are FASCISTS -- just as in American politics. Like Hitler vs. Stalin,
>there are some minor technical differences between their ideologies, but
>the end result -- a tyrannical Orwellian police state -- is the same.
>To any Brits reading this, remember that when Eric Arthur Blair aka
>George Orwell wrote "1984," he intended it to be a WARNING to his people,
>not a BLUEPRINT.
spanish civil war...his defining experience
i read the following words just this day...:-
"to anyone with any eye whatever for political institutions it is
obvious that mussolini and hitler found their model in russia....
but, viewed by an english democrat, there is nothing to choose between
them."
104
written in 1945...
in those days, everyone intelligent understood what hitler and
mussolini were...after nearly 70 years of leftist propaganda....most
people do not know the reality.
Bill
May 25, 2013, 7:57:18 PM5/25/13
to
On Sat, 25 May 2013 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT), Andy
<andrewr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 25, 11:52�am, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 25, 1:29�pm, Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister
>> > has also refused to do the same.
>>
>> > If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the
>> > fucking Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the
>> > way to the deportation camps.
>>
>> > You see, the problem with British Conservative PM Cameron and
>> > Canadian Conservative PM Harper is that they aren't right wing
>> > enough.
>>
>> What do you �feel about sub-Saharan Christians?
>
>If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
>Regnant James I of England
Are you insane?
<andrewr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 25, 11:52�am, saracene <john....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 25, 1:29�pm, Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister
>> > has also refused to do the same.
>>
>> > If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the
>> > fucking Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the
>> > way to the deportation camps.
>>
>> > You see, the problem with British Conservative PM Cameron and
>> > Canadian Conservative PM Harper is that they aren't right wing
>> > enough.
>>
>> What do you �feel about sub-Saharan Christians?
>
>If they read the pre-1611 version of the Bible as dictated by King
>Regnant James I of England
You sound it.
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 4:51:07 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 5:29 AM, Gunner wrote:
--
==================================================================
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS &/OR COUNTRY
==================================================================
--
==================================================================
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT NEWSGROUPS &/OR COUNTRY
==================================================================
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 4:54:27 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 6:23 AM, abelard wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 12:29:58 +0000 (UTC), Gunner
> <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister
>> has also refused to do the same.
>>
>> If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the
>> fucking Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the
>> way to the deportation camps.
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 12:29:58 +0000 (UTC), Gunner
> <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And it should be noted that the UK's Conservative Prime Minister
>> has also refused to do the same.
>>
>> If Dutch Geert Wilders was in charge of the UK and Canada, the
>> fucking Muzzies would already be in the cattle carriers and on the
>> way to the deportation camps.
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 4:54:59 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 6:37 AM, Peter Abelard wrote:
> On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>
--
> On May 25, 9:23 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote:
>
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 4:56:15 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 7:48 AM, Zepp wrote:
> Path: not-for-mail
> From: Zepp <de...@gone.com>
> Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.society.liberalism,uk.politics.misc
> Subject: Re: Day 5 Since The Terrorist Attack In London, And Harper Still
> Refuses To Send In The Police To Drag Muslims From Their Beds and Ship Them
> To The Deportation Camps
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 17
> Message-ID: <knqiv1$dje$8...@dont-email.me>
> References: <XnsA1CB566B...@94.75.214.39>
> <0qe1q8ls14eni7qt9...@4ax.com>
> <2848d514-5226-4c4c...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
> <sof1q8l2fok5433nk...@4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3c82da719c8ce4b0b3deec9b9acd42d";
> logging-data="13934"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sY9J/ejNyW0Ukp5XUTGjVQsCjd5VdPkU="
> User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 926a150
> git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:IYQp32PdRt6QBv2Q/kESreSWN+0=
> X-Received-Bytes: 2016
> Xref: Hurricane can.politics:1467132 alt.society.liberalism:5540837 uk.politics.misc:2121021
> Path: not-for-mail
> From: Zepp <de...@gone.com>
> Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.society.liberalism,uk.politics.misc
> Subject: Re: Day 5 Since The Terrorist Attack In London, And Harper Still
> Refuses To Send In The Police To Drag Muslims From Their Beds and Ship Them
> To The Deportation Camps
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 17
> Message-ID: <knqiv1$dje$8...@dont-email.me>
> References: <XnsA1CB566B...@94.75.214.39>
> <0qe1q8ls14eni7qt9...@4ax.com>
> <2848d514-5226-4c4c...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
> <sof1q8l2fok5433nk...@4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3c82da719c8ce4b0b3deec9b9acd42d";
> logging-data="13934"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sY9J/ejNyW0Ukp5XUTGjVQsCjd5VdPkU="
> User-Agent: Pan/0.136 (I'm far too busy being delicious; GIT 926a150
> git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:IYQp32PdRt6QBv2Q/kESreSWN+0=
> X-Received-Bytes: 2016
> Xref: Hurricane can.politics:1467132 alt.society.liberalism:5540837 uk.politics.misc:2121021
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 4:57:36 PM5/26/13
to
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 5:01:42 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 8:52 AM, saracene wrote:
> X-Received: by 10.224.42.141 with SMTP id s13mr11114301qae.3.1369497152489;
> Sat, 25 May 2013 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Received: by 10.49.71.97 with SMTP id t1mr2017691qeu.0.1369497152402; Sat,
> 25 May 2013 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Path: not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.society.liberalism,uk.politics.misc
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> Injection-Info: i4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.104.61.73; posting-account=qYyRKwoAAAAXWpFZjRXi8xZS0OCXdCHt
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.104.61.73
> References: <XnsA1CB566B...@94.75.214.39>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36
> (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.94 Safari/537.36,gzip(gfe)
> Message-ID: <fae8a74f-dc8a-4856...@i4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
> Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 15:52:32 +0000
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Received-Bytes: 1900
> Xref: Hurricane can.politics:1467147 alt.society.liberalism:5540862 uk.politics.misc:2121032
> X-Received: by 10.224.42.141 with SMTP id s13mr11114301qae.3.1369497152489;
> Sat, 25 May 2013 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Received: by 10.49.71.97 with SMTP id t1mr2017691qeu.0.1369497152402; Sat,
> 25 May 2013 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Path: not-for-mail
> Newsgroups: can.politics,alt.society.liberalism,uk.politics.misc
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 08:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> Injection-Info: i4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.104.61.73; posting-account=qYyRKwoAAAAXWpFZjRXi8xZS0OCXdCHt
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.104.61.73
> References: <XnsA1CB566B...@94.75.214.39>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36
> (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.94 Safari/537.36,gzip(gfe)
> Message-ID: <fae8a74f-dc8a-4856...@i4g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: Day 5 Since The Terrorist Attack In London, And Harper Still
> Refuses To Send In The Police To Drag Muslims From Their Beds and Ship Them
> To The Deportation Camps
> From: saracene <john...@gmail.com>
> Refuses To Send In The Police To Drag Muslims From Their Beds and Ship Them
> To The Deportation Camps
> Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 15:52:32 +0000
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Received-Bytes: 1900
> Xref: Hurricane can.politics:1467147 alt.society.liberalism:5540862 uk.politics.misc:2121032
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 5:04:22 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 9:20 AM, DVH wrote:
> On 25/05/2013 17:05, Andy wrote:
>
>
> On 25/05/2013 17:05, Andy wrote:
>
>
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 5:08:42 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 2:29 PM, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:23:27 +0200, abelard wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 15:23:27 +0200, abelard wrote:
uster@nyet.ca SpamБuster
May 26, 2013, 5:19:54 PM5/26/13
to
On 5/25/2013 9:10 AM, Bert wrote:
> Andy brought next idea :
> Andy brought next idea :
0 new messages