PATRICK L. HUMPHREY
ZORRO
insults, and accusations.
Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
to free speech?
During the Revolution, in which the United States won it's independence from
Brittain, Anonymity was crucial to promoting the exchange of ideas. The
principles of government, on which this nation was founded, were presented
in a brilliant discourse entitled "The Federalist Papers". Newspapers of the
time printed editorials without disclosing the identity of the author. This
was necessary to protect them from police action by the Tories.
Anonymous writings, publication with pen names, is still legal in the United
States. It is crucial to preserving our right to free speech which is the
first protection of all our other rights and freedoms.
We allow you the freedom to disagree. You are free to write why you believe
free speech should be abolish. However; You are not free to use the tactics
you have been using.
There is a tort called "Public disclosure of private facts". You and Logan
Villa have utilized this in your attempts to stiffle my exercise of my free
speech. You persist in disclosing my name and my employment without my
permission to do so. My posts have always associated me with INFORMED
CITIZENS. Which is a distinct and seperate entity from my employer. I have
never disclosed my employment in any of my posts.
Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
to free speech. It is obvious this is the reason you harrass and
continually post nothing but insulting names in response to anyone posts
outside your small little circle of approved friends. Friends who used the
same tactics as you.
It is sad but true that you and logan villa have been very effective in
utilizing these tactics to kill participation in this newsgroup by all but a
few. It is obvious to me this is your objective.
Please tell us, what is something you picked up in your Russian Studies
classes? Free Speech was never allowed there until recently. We have seen
the results of this. A nation with by far the greatest wealth in the most
abundant resources of any nation. A nation that has many brilliant minds as
evident by the literature of their writers, writings the people there could
not read. A nation where all people have had access to an excellent
education but at the same time have been taught to not think for themselves.
Is a nation in ruins with people starving because of a long history of
stiffling free speech.
Why do you want to bring this to the United States of America? Is is because
you hate America?
You have proudly disclosed in your posts that you work for Rice University.
Is this what Rice is promoting in their classes? Is this their policy on
free speech? We see from the return address on your posts and the times of
the posts that you monitor these newsgroups and post to them during your
free time. Yet you call the employers of others to ask them if they are
aware their employees are posting during their work hours. Tell us; Are
these postings on behalf of the University?
A review of the speakers Rice has brought to town, noticing Rice University
was the only place in town where people could see "Waco - The Rules of
Engagement", indicates this is not the type of attitude and behavior this
University would want to be associated with.
So tell us; Why do you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
to free speech?
Patrick L Humphrey <pat...@is.rice.edu> wrote in message
news:layog8b...@is.rice.edu...
> "ZORRO" <in...@informed.org> writes:
>
> Looks like Ed's meds are wearing off again...
> >I have been to Austin many times to lobby against some proposed changes
made
> >to this code.I have done so on my own time and at my own expense.
>
> Riiiiight, Ed. Like MCI will let you do that. I don't think too many
> corporations would allow their employees all that free time to go
> politicking...and if you've been doing it outside of work time, then you
> obviously don't have much else of a life.
>
>
> --PLH, how many of Ed's candidates won in the primaries? None. Connect
the
> dots.
Jeremy Goodwin
nothing
Aaron R. Kulkis
>
> Patrick, you never contribute to the debate. All you present is braggadocio,
> insults, and accusations.
That's why he and Jet are such good friends...
>
> Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
> to free speech?
Wanna-be Tyrants are always threatened by opposing opinions.
>
> During the Revolution, in which the United States won it's independence from
> Brittain, Anonymity was crucial to promoting the exchange of ideas. The
> principles of government, on which this nation was founded, were presented
> in a brilliant discourse entitled "The Federalist Papers". Newspapers of the
> time printed editorials without disclosing the identity of the author. This
> was necessary to protect them from police action by the Tories.
It also insured that the arguments would be evaluated upon their
intrinsic merit, not upon the identity of the speaker...
thus eliminating ad homineim attacks.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
Professor Vonroach
<aku...@alt.net> wrote:
>> Patrick, you never contribute to the debate. All you present is braggadocio,
>> insults, and accusations.
>
>That's why he and Jet are such good friends...
>
>> Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
>> to free speech?
>
>Wanna-be Tyrants are always threatened by opposing opinions.
>
Now don't be too harsh on Patty, he's just one of those queer academic
birds that pals around with the owls in the trees out on South Main
St. watching whores stroll by the crumbling halls of ivy. He is a
bragging Bachelor by choice and holds a Masters in baiting. Just one
of many strange birds that seek sustenance on the venerable campus
where Kathy Witmire and Lee Brown once lurked and dispensed their
alleged `wisdom'.
I have always thought that the area cleared of architectural debris
would make a good corn field, since they have withdrawn from a serious
pursuit of truth and excellence. Poor Wm. Marsh, all his hopes, now
just an educational debris and aviary for queer academic birds who
build a lifelong nest and accomplish nothing else except hooting at
the serious people who happen by. There are a million stories in the
naked city, and this one just another queer tragedy, where academics
slouch around sifting the dead ashes of the past.
An atavistic academic enclave where strange birds dash about spraying
each other with shaving cream and screaming `what a good boy am I'.
Professor Vonroach
wrote:
Voltai'29, you dignify this friendless Master Baiter with titles such
as spandex biker. He is just a typical example of the debris that
collects in the halls of academia with time, fearful of entering the
real world and fearful of losing their government subsidized pittance.
They live in fear and draw courage from hooting at others who don't
choose the security of their academic nest.
He fits the moldy mold of the odd irishman, lurking about hooting at
others and accomplishing nothing and adding nothing to any discussion.
Inner pain born of envy of the successful adult world. As their nanny
the English has found, the breed is flawed and hopeless.
>On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 19:29:10 GMT, "ZORRO" <ku...@dotplanet.com> wrote:
>
>>Patrick, you never contribute to the debate. All you present is braggadocio,
>>insults, and accusations.
>
>He is the Spandex Biker!
>
>>Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
>>to free speech?
>
>The Spandex Biker is very insecure
>
>>During the Revolution, in which the United States won it's independence from
>>Brittain, Anonymity was crucial to promoting the exchange of ideas. The
>>principles of government, on which this nation was founded, were presented
>>in a brilliant discourse entitled "The Federalist Papers". Newspapers of the
>>time printed editorials without disclosing the identity of the author. This
>>was necessary to protect them from police action by the Tories.
>
>We can just call him Lord Spandex Biker!
>
>>Anonymous writings, publication with pen names, is still legal in the United
>>States. It is crucial to preserving our right to free speech which is the
>>first protection of all our other rights and freedoms.
>
>But it makes it hard for Lord Spandex Biker to stalk his prey!
>
>>We allow you the freedom to disagree. You are free to write why you believe
>>free speech should be abolish. However; You are not free to use the tactics
>>you have been using.
>>
>>There is a tort called "Public disclosure of private facts". You and Logan
>>Villa have utilized this in your attempts to stiffle my exercise of my free
>>speech. You persist in disclosing my name and my employment without my
>>permission to do so. My posts have always associated me with INFORMED
>>CITIZENS. Which is a distinct and seperate entity from my employer. I have
>>never disclosed my employment in any of my posts.
>
>Whoops.
>
>Looks like you Loons messed with the wrong person.
>
>>Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
>>to free speech. It is obvious this is the reason you harrass and
>>continually post nothing but insulting names in response to anyone posts
>>outside your small little circle of approved friends. Friends who used the
>>same tactics as you.
>
>Like they have any friends?
>
>>It is sad but true that you and logan villa have been very effective in
>>utilizing these tactics to kill participation in this newsgroup by all but a
>>few. It is obvious to me this is your objective.
>
>Their objective is to be the biggest assholes they can be.
>
>They are very effective at that.
>
>>Please tell us, what is something you picked up in your Russian Studies
>>classes? Free Speech was never allowed there until recently. We have seen
>>the results of this. A nation with by far the greatest wealth in the most
>>abundant resources of any nation. A nation that has many brilliant minds as
>>evident by the literature of their writers, writings the people there could
>>not read. A nation where all people have had access to an excellent
>>education but at the same time have been taught to not think for themselves.
>>Is a nation in ruins with people starving because of a long history of
>>stiffling free speech.
>>
>>Why do you want to bring this to the United States of America? Is is because
>>you hate America?
>
>They are anarchists. They love only themselves.
>
>>You have proudly disclosed in your posts that you work for Rice University.
>>Is this what Rice is promoting in their classes? Is this their policy on
>>free speech? We see from the return address on your posts and the times of
>>the posts that you monitor these newsgroups and post to them during your
>>free time. Yet you call the employers of others to ask them if they are
>>aware their employees are posting during their work hours. Tell us; Are
>>these postings on behalf of the University?
>
>Be certain to complain to Rice University about the Spandex Biker's
>stalking activities. You will not the first to do so and he has
>already been warned by their legal department not to do what he is
>doing to you.
>
>>A review of the speakers Rice has brought to town, noticing Rice University
>>was the only place in town where people could see "Waco - The Rules of
>>Engagement", indicates this is not the type of attitude and behavior this
>>University would want to be associated with.
>>
>>So tell us; Why do you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
>>to free speech?
>
>Are you going to stalk him now Lord Spandex Biker or wait a while?
>>
>>Patrick L Humphrey <pat...@is.rice.edu> wrote in message
>>news:layog8b...@is.rice.edu...
>>> "ZORRO" <in...@informed.org> writes:
>>>
>>> Looks like Ed's meds are wearing off again...
>>
>>> >I have been to Austin many times to lobby against some proposed changes
>>> >made to this code.I have done so on my own time and at my own expense.
>>>
>>> Riiiiight, Ed. Like MCI will let you do that. I don't think too many
>>> corporations would allow their employees all that free time to go
>>> politicking...and if you've been doing it outside of work time, then you
>>> obviously don't have much else of a life.
>>>
>>>
>>> --PLH, how many of Ed's candidates won in the primaries? None. Connect
>>> the dots.
>
>
>Ecrasons l'infame
>
>Join the War on Right Wing Ignorance
>http://clusterone.home.mindspring.com/
>
>Campaign 2000
>http://clusterone.home.mindspring.com/campaign2000.html
>
>==============================================================
>"I certainly do not in any way think my husband's blood is on your hands, and I applaud your efforts."
>
> --Sherialyn Byrdsong in a letter to President Clinton
>==============================================================
Aaron R. Kulkis
>
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:44:06 -0500, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>
> >> Patrick, you never contribute to the debate. All you present is braggadocio,
> >> insults, and accusations.
> >
> >That's why he and Jet are such good friends...
> >
>
> >> Please tell us why you feel so threatened when others exercise their right
> >> to free speech?
> >
> >Wanna-be Tyrants are always threatened by opposing opinions.
> >
> birds that pals around with the owls in the trees out on South Main
> St. watching whores stroll by the crumbling halls of ivy. He is a
> bragging Bachelor by choice and holds a Masters in baiting. Just one
> of many strange birds that seek sustenance on the venerable campus
> where Kathy Witmire and Lee Brown once lurked and dispensed their
> alleged `wisdom'.
>
> I have always thought that the area cleared of architectural debris
> would make a good corn field, since they have withdrawn from a serious
> pursuit of truth and excellence. Poor Wm. Marsh, all his hopes, now
> just an educational debris and aviary for queer academic birds who
> build a lifelong nest and accomplish nothing else except hooting at
> the serious people who happen by. There are a million stories in the
> naked city, and this one just another queer tragedy, where academics
> slouch around sifting the dead ashes of the past.
>
> An atavistic academic enclave where strange birds dash about spraying
> each other with shaving cream and screaming `what a good boy am I'.
You are both an excellent writer, AND a fine wit.
clapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclap
Aaron R. Kulkis
>
> Thanks for a useless cross post about some one of whom we know
> nothing
Well....now you DO know something about someone new.
consider yourself ... enlightened.
TomsQ
ZORRO <ku...@dotplanet.com> wrote in message
news:a4QB4.850$4a.3...@pm01news.wcom.com...
| Patrick, you never contribute to the debate. All you present is
braggadocio,
| insults, and accusations.
|
| to free speech?
|
from
| Brittain, Anonymity was crucial to promoting the exchange of ideas. The
| principles of government, on which this nation was founded, were presented
| in a brilliant discourse entitled "The Federalist Papers". Newspapers of
the
| time printed editorials without disclosing the identity of the author.
This
| was necessary to protect them from police action by the Tories.
|
United
| States. It is crucial to preserving our right to free speech which is the
| first protection of all our other rights and freedoms.
|
believe
| free speech should be abolish. However; You are not free to use the
tactics
| you have been using.
|
| There is a tort called "Public disclosure of private facts". You and Logan
| Villa have utilized this in your attempts to stiffle my exercise of my
free
| speech. You persist in disclosing my name and my employment without my
| permission to do so. My posts have always associated me with INFORMED
| CITIZENS. Which is a distinct and seperate entity from my employer. I have
| never disclosed my employment in any of my posts.
|
| continually post nothing but insulting names in response to anyone posts
| outside your small little circle of approved friends. Friends who used the
| same tactics as you.
|
| utilizing these tactics to kill participation in this newsgroup by all but
a
| few. It is obvious to me this is your objective.
|
| classes? Free Speech was never allowed there until recently. We have seen
| the results of this. A nation with by far the greatest wealth in the most
| abundant resources of any nation. A nation that has many brilliant minds
as
| evident by the literature of their writers, writings the people there
could
| not read. A nation where all people have had access to an excellent
| education but at the same time have been taught to not think for
themselves.
| Is a nation in ruins with people starving because of a long history of
| stiffling free speech.
|
| Why do you want to bring this to the United States of America? Is is
because
| you hate America?
|
University.
| Is this what Rice is promoting in their classes? Is this their policy on
| free speech? We see from the return address on your posts and the times of
| the posts that you monitor these newsgroups and post to them during your
| free time. Yet you call the employers of others to ask them if they are
| aware their employees are posting during their work hours. Tell us; Are
| these postings on behalf of the University?
|
University
| was the only place in town where people could see "Waco - The Rules of
| Engagement", indicates this is not the type of attitude and behavior this
| University would want to be associated with.
|
| to free speech?
|
| Patrick L Humphrey <pat...@is.rice.edu> wrote in message
| news:layog8b...@is.rice.edu...
| > "ZORRO" <in...@informed.org> writes:
| >
| > Looks like Ed's meds are wearing off again...
|
| > >I have been to Austin many times to lobby against some proposed changes
| made
| > >to this code.I have done so on my own time and at my own expense.
| >
| > Riiiiight, Ed. Like MCI will let you do that. I don't think too many
| > corporations would allow their employees all that free time to go
| > politicking...and if you've been doing it outside of work time, then you
| > obviously don't have much else of a life.
| >
| >
| > --PLH, how many of Ed's candidates won in the primaries? None. Connect
| the
| > dots.
|
Subject: 101 Ways to be Obnoxious on Usenet
From: ame...@nickel.ucs.indiana.edu (alan meiss)
Date: 01 Aug 1995 00:00:00 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.humor
Message-ID: <3vm96v$n...@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu^gt;
by Alan Meiss
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note to the profoundly impaired: this list is intended as humor, and
consists mostly of things that you should NOT do. NOT NOT NOT do. Once
more, slowly, d-o-n-'-t d-o t-h-e-s-e t-h-i-n-g-s. If you do, you're a
bad, naughty person. Bad person! Naughty! Naughty, *bad* person! Ok, now
that *that's* out of the way, without further ado...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Post a message asking how to post messages.
2. Lead a tireless crusade for the creation of newsgroups with silly
names like alt.my.butt.is.hairy.
3. Put 4 addresses, 5 lines of "Geek Code", 6 ASCII-art bicycles, a PGP
key, and your home phone in your signature.
4. Reinvigorate a discussion by switching attributions in followups.
5. Post recipes on rec.pets.cats.
6. Post a compendium of old articles from a thread that died months ago
with a title such as "*** HAS JOE SMITH FORGOTTEN HIS LIES? ***"
7. Post a 56-part binary MPG file of your dog throwing up to
news.answers. Announce that you screwed it up and repeat.
8. On the MST3K groups, ask what happened to Joel.
9. Ask readers of rec.music.misc to post their favorite Zeppelin tune
"for a poll".
10. Reacquaint the readers of rec.humor with the "two-strings-go-in-a-bar"
joke.
11. Determine a perversion so bizarre or obscure that it doesn't yet
have its own sex group.
12. Post your new "War Heroes of India" FAQ to soc.culture.pakistan.
13. Start this week's new AOL virus rumor.
14. Format your posts for 90 columns (or 20).
15. Provide a valuable public service by notifying the eager readers of
roughly 1,200 newsgroups of your new "HOOTERAMA" phone sex service or
"PorqWhiffe" pheramone cologne.
16. Post elaborate conspiracy theories to talk.politics.misc detailing
how ATF agents under the control of Chelsea Clinton and Socks have
implanted invisible microchips in your genitals.
17. Fill that empty mailbox, make new friends, delight your postmaster,
and selflessly lead others to riches with a few "MAKE MONEY FAST"
posts.
18. Attempt to sell your sweaty underwear in alt.clothing.lingerie.
19. Follow up a 200-line post to add only your signature.
20. Crosspost Amiga articles to the Mac and PC newsgroups for a valuable
interchange of provocative ideas.
21. Announce a mailing list for Bill Gates' VISA card number.
22. Inform the readers of alt.sex that your friend at a particular
address is taking a penis length survey, and the first 1000 people to
send him their measurements will receive free naked pictures of Cindy
Crawford.
23. Correct every spelling mistake you encounter, but misspell the word
"imbecile" in your followup flames.
24. Flame yourself, and complain to your own postmaster.
25. Ask readers of the Star Trek groups when they last had dates.
26. Post personal ads on groups such as alt.sex.diapers listing your work
phone number.
27. Post under the name Dave Rhodes.
28. Followup every post in a newsgroup ranking them on a scale from 1 to
10.
29. Establish your own little Usenet niche by writing a Wink Martindale
FAQ.
30. Advise other readers to ftp to 127.0.0.1 for "really cool nudie pics".
31. Post daily word searches to rec.puzzles.
32. Post your trig homework to sci.math and ask the readers to e-mail you
the answers, since you "don't read the group".
33. Provoke insightful and productive debates on fresh new topics such as
abortion, gun control, the existence of God, penile circumcision, and
the relative superiority of Mac or PC operating systems.
34. Pick a cutesy handle that inspires vicarious embarrassment in other
readers, such as "SoHot4U", "SokSnifer", or "WetNWild".
35. Maintain a high-level of constructive decorum by addressingsomeone
with whom you disagree as "monkey boy".
36. Inform the readers of the sex groups that they're "going straight to
hell", and then proceed to followup a variety of titillating posts.
37. Post to alt.folklore.urban that this guy that a friend of your
uncle's ex-girlfriend's boss knew received the donated heart of River
Phoenix.
38. Relentlessly inform the readers of groups such as rec.pets.iguanas
or sci.agriculture of your UFO, JFK, OJ, NRA, NSA, Nutrasweet, and
Azeri genocide theories. Relate them all to sunspot activity and
ancient astronauts.
39. Post instructions telling other readers how to put you in their
killfile.
40. Post whining, misspelled, and vaguely creepy personal ads in wildly
inappropriate newsgroups, and followup to berate the readers for not
responding.
41. Announce that a particular site has opened up a new combination OJ
Jury Info/Homemade Bombs/Kiddie Porn/Scientology Documents/Computer
Subliminal Hypnosis ftp archive.
42. Construct a device that lets your pets post to Usenet by pawing or
pecking a feeder bar.
43. Post the Niemann Marcus cookie recipe to rec.food.recipes.
44. Eliminate nearly all meaningful traffic on a newsgroup for weeks by
challenging its readership to come up with as many synonyms as
possible
for the word vomit.
45. Accuse other posters of being AI experiments, Perl scripts, or Emacs
macros.
46. Claim that you can see "hidden images" in another person's posting
when you cross your eyes.
47. Ask Austrian readers about kangaroos.
48. Ask Australian readers about alpine skiing.
49. Include Rush lyrics or Rush quotes in all your posts.
50. Accuse female posters of being male.
51. Make an anonymous posting accusing others of cowardice.
52. Accuse a fellow AOL or Prodigy subscriber of being a "newbie" because
their 3 months on the net are dwarfed by your own span of 4.
53. Insist that anyone objecting to your compulsive fascination with
consuming the flesh of strangled disabled minors is "judgemental".
54. If you've grown tired of typing, effectively end a thread by accusing
others of being Nazis.
55. Ask readers of soc.culture.nordic whether the Swedish Chef has a
Sampo.
56. Write and regularly post a FAQ about yourself.
57. Post graphic descriptions of your bowel movements, genital sores,
and various suppurating wounds to alt.tasteless.
58. Ask readers of sci.med for urgent, step-by-step instructions on
removing arrows, or inquire why all your extremities have turned dark
purple.
59. Insist that there's no such state in the U.S. as "New Mexico".
60. Post only in Esperanto.
61. Claim a copyright on the word "Usenet", and followup with a bill all
posts you encounter that contain it.
62. Sell "posting permits" in news.announce.newusers.
63. Post single-part text messages in MIME format.
64. Ask the readers of rec.sewing whether any of them want to be the
drummer for your new band, "Death Monkeys".
65. Claim to be an amorous highschool cheerleader while posting under a
name such as "Robert Bradley Smith, Jr."
66. In the spirit of purest optimism, ask other readers to followup with
their account passwords and credit card numbers.
67. Why use a single question mark or exclamation point when you can use
at least thirty?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
68. List a cute organization name in your header, such as "Canadians for
Global Warming".
69. Insult a poster from another nation based on his country's performance
in World War II.
70. Post vitriolic, frothing, hair-trigger flames in polite newsgroups, as
if you were a testosterone-crazed adolescent debating which shotgun is
superior in alt.games.doom.
71. Followup spam posts in the belief that the originator, who probably
follows the group closely and is desperately curious about receiving
feedback, will see your impassioned plea and be so moved by your
lengthy, point-by-point indictment of their conduct that they pledge
to desist from such activity for all time.
72. Regardless of its accuracy, followup another post with the line
"BZZZT! Wrong answer!" or "Hello! McFly!"
73. Use a 120-line ASCII graphic of Spock as your signature.
74. Post to soc.culture.women asking "what's your favorite brand of oven
mitt, little ladies?"
75. Post to news.annnounce.newusers asking if there are any nurses in
Portland willing to spank you. Followup with an apology. Followup
again
with the original article.
76. Post with a newsreader that replaces punctuation marks with strange,
non-ASCII characters.
77. Steer all debates to your own pet subjects of expertise, regardless of
their relevance.
78. Make it clear from your postings that you've a profound inability to
distinguish "The X Files" as fiction.
79. Insist that another poster is really Serdar Argic or Kibo.
80. Post 20-part encoded image files from NASA ftp archives that you claim
show clear evidence of alien settlements.
81. Insinuate vague conspiracies in all your posts.
82. Spam post alarming ten-year-old files about Congressional bills to tax
modem usage "in the name of freedom".
83. Claim that unidentified government agencies are censoring your posts.
84. Ask readers to collect aluminum pop-tops on behalf of Craig Shergold.
85. Ask readers of comp.sci.algorithms how to get Super Mario to the
castle.
86. POST IN ALL CAPS
87. omit all punctuation
88. omitallspaces
89. DOALLTHREEOFTHEABOVE
90. Ask the readers of alt.current-events.net-abuse where to purchase
Cantor and Siegel's book.
91. Post the phone number of the Michigan Militia to alt.conspiracy as the
"Classified ATF Secret Hotline".
92. Compose an exhaustively researched 15-part FAQ detailing the favorite
movie musicals of relatives of the Deep Space Nine cast. Post it
weekly
in its entirety.
93. Strive to ensure that no two consecutive words in your posts are
correctly spelled.
94. Enrich the lives of thousands with a thoughtful and impassioned debate
on the topic "AOL users suck".
95. Dispense essential and priceless financial advice, such as the
assertion that no one is legally required to pay taxes.
96. Demand that others cease using the letter e, as you find it "dply
offnsiv".
97. Post to rec.music.misc insisting that "Curt Kobain should leave Pearl
Jam since they'll never tour again."
98. Assume that the entire Usenet hierarchy shares your interest in
helping lonely Ukrainian lasses find love.
99. Followup another person's posts every twelve minutes to accuse them of
"obsessing".
100. Followup two dozen of another person's posts to accuse them of
harassing you. Send copious e-mail if you're ignored.
101. Start pointless debates over topics such as whether Whoopi Goldberg
has eyebrows, what happens when you cross the International Dateline,
and whether the bad guy in Popeye cartoons was named "Bluto" or
"Brutus".
--
/ Alan Meiss, ame...@indiana.edu, IU CS Grad Student \
|--- Visit Alan's archive of his humor files at: ----|
\ http://www.cs.indiana.edu/hyplan/ameiss/humor.html /
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Return to the Right Loop
Crossthreads
To the Left Loop
Web site contents are Copyright © 1999 Captain Infinity Productions.
All Usenet posts reproduced herein are the copyrighted intellectual property
of the original author.
Jeremy Goodwin
TomsQ
Jeremy Goodwin <jeremy...@hypercon.com> wrote in message
news:38DC18B0...@hypercon.com...
Doc Tavish
Patrick is like the energizer bunny in that he keeps on stalking and stalking
and stalking.
Tavish
----Patrick Lee Humphrey = Documented Self Confessed Peeping Tom----
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/86c39fd4970f0712
(Archived locally as: PLHadmitsPEEPING_1)
Subject: Re: Fred Rutherford, can you fill me in about Patrick Humphrey?
From: The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com>
Date: 30 Jun 2005 12:33:16 -0500
Message-ID: <szk7jgb...@eris.io.com>
> <Shawn...@NoEmail4Me.com> writes:
>
>:Patrick Humphrey hasn't changed a bit. He is still there with insult after
>:insult and I bet he still peeks into people's windows after the sun goes down.
Bet your life on it...that way, I'll own you.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.feminism/msg/729ac178ff1f8660
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/c8c204cbc1bd2a74
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper_Ssmith)
From: "S. Shawn S."
Subject: Re: Thornberry's Weekend Outing: Mark Shaw Need His Diaper Changed!
Date: 1996/03/12
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.96031...@DasKapital.ccsi.com>
On 11 Mar 1996, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
> That figures, what with your reputed standing out in the driveway waving a
> 12-gauge around...
>
> --Patrick L. "looks like Dave didn't mind the Freudian slip" Humphrey
Hey stalker was that you the other night peeping in my window?
************************************************************************
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit to
Austin :-) Humphrey
Sad, but true...but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to encounter
"Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month -- if I'm out at night, just look for
anyone peeking into windows... --Patrick L. Humphrey
**************************************************************************
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
(Archived locally as: PLH_Voyeur)
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END> Try: http://tinyurl.com/8jj6w
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919)
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.pdf
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919.resp.pdf)
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner... During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
md
"Doc Tavish" <rhc-tavish@tavish-central> wrote in message
news:ja79c1luqqjhe7eda...@4ax.com...