Re: How to slow down the rush to buy guns

[Rudy Canoza]

On 6/23/2022 8:12 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> One wonders just how much of the current firearm buying frenzy is being driven
> by the fact that every time there is a "mass public shooting" the media and the
> left demand ever more restrictions on our natural right to keep and bear arms.

It's being driven by the fact that right-wingnut gun fondlers *want* to be able
to engage in mass shootings.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:18:13 -0700, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

So you're a right-wingnut gun fondler now?



You *need* to be culled, and I am just the person to cull
you. Francis Mark Hansen, Hartung, kleine klauschen "no-foreskin"
Schittenkike, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, BlueGirl, Gak, Kremlin Girl / Bit
of Nothingness — they all need to be machine-gunned and buried with
a backhoe.
-Rudy, feelng brave
Message-ID: <DbZlK.95058$JVi....@fx17.iad>


-

[Rudy Canoza]

On 6/23/2022 8:58 AM, Shades of ? wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:18:13 -0700, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>

> Yet you can't prove that.

It's common knowledge.

[Yak]

It's driven by gun-grabbing lunatics like you.

[max headroom]

In news:jb59bhljjhieh3250...@4ax.com, Shades of ?
<rudyk...@invalid.invalid> typed:

> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:19:49 -0700, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>> On 6/23/2022 8:58 AM, Shades of ? wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:18:13 -0700, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 6/23/2022 8:12 AM, David Hartung wrote:

>>>>> One wonders just how much of the current firearm buying frenzy is being
>>>>> driven by the fact that every time there is a "mass public shooting" the
>>>>> media and the left demand ever more restrictions on our natural right to
>>>>> keep and bear arms.

>>>> It's being driven by the fact that right-wingnut gun fondlers *want* to be
>>>> able to engage in mass shootings.

>>> Yet you can't prove that.

>> It's common knowledge.

> Show us how. You saying it does not make it so.

Rudy displays a personality flaw common to liberals.

"Liberals have a lot of trouble understanding conservatives because
conservatives pay a great deal of attention to moral areas that liberals don't
care much about or may even see as a negative. Because of this, liberals have a
great deal of trouble intellectually understanding the conservative view of the
world...."

Why Most Liberals Are Intellectually Incapable of Understanding Conservatives
https://www.culturcidal.com/p/why-most-liberals-are-intellectually

[Siri Cruise]

In article <t92dbu$ejk$5...@dont-email.me>,

"max headroom" <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

> Why Most Liberals Are Intellectually Incapable of Understanding Conservatives

Understand? Yes? Want to lower ourselves to your level? No. I
understand you live in constant fear and anger but I don't want
to empathise.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
I am an Andrea Chen sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed

[Just Wondering]

Exactly. The next time gun grabbers make serious noise about
banning AR-15s I just might go out and buy one as a symbolic
"in your face". I don't even like AR-15s because I think
they're ugly.

I did something similar before. When Obama tried to ban
M855 5.56 NATO ammo I bought a couple of hundred rounds as
a symbolic protest. I didn't even own a gun that could use it.
It was definitely the antics of the Gun Grabber in Chief that
pushed my into buying it.

Maybe I'll compromise by getting an AR-15 SCR with wooden stock.
https://i.imgur.com/fc7x9Wy.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/73/26/a9/7326a9540ac0c11c0312ef5f0681499c.png

[max headroom]

In news:chine.bleu-D9221...@news.eternal-september.org, Siri Cruise
<chine...@yahoo.com> typed:

> In article <t92dbu$ejk$5...@dont-email.me>, "max headroom"
> <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

>> Why Most Liberals Are Intellectually Incapable of Understanding Conservatives

> Understand? Yes? Want to lower ourselves to your level? No. I
> understand you live in constant fear and anger but I don't want
> to empathise.

You should have read the citation *before* confirming its conclusions.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

That looks safe! LOL

[governo...@gmail.com]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:00:04 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

>"Liberals have a lot of trouble understanding conservatives because
>conservatives pay a great deal of attention to moral areas that liberals don't
>care much about or may even see as a negative. Because of this, liberals have a
>great deal of trouble intellectually understanding the conservative view of the
>world...."

Conservatives look back at how much better what was then than what is
now and so don't want to change anything.

Liberals look forward at how much better they hope what will be is
than what is so they expect pretty much constant change.

And what is the only thing in life you can depend on?

Change.

Swill
--
Fostergate, CattleFuturesgate, Travelgate,
Filegate, Troopergate, Whitewater, BenghaziGate,
EmailGate, Uraniumgate - the list of GOP manufactured "scandals"
involving Hillary that have never amounted to
anything goes back for decades. The rightwing fear
of her just goes on and on............
- On "Hillarygate" from Usenet poster

[Scout]

"Siri Cruise" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-D9221...@news.eternal-september.org...

> In article <t92dbu$ejk$5...@dont-email.me>,
> "max headroom" <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> Why Most Liberals Are Intellectually Incapable of Understanding
>> Conservatives
>
> Understand? Yes? Want to lower ourselves to your level? No. I
> understand you live in constant fear and anger but I don't want
> to empathise.

Thus proving Max's point perfectly.......

[Scout]

<governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5moabhpvmamj5jm73...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:00:04 -0700, "max headroom"
> <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>>"Liberals have a lot of trouble understanding conservatives because
>>conservatives pay a great deal of attention to moral areas that liberals
>>don't
>>care much about or may even see as a negative. Because of this, liberals
>>have a
>>great deal of trouble intellectually understanding the conservative view
>>of the
>>world...."
>
> Conservatives look back at how much better what was then than what is
> now and so don't want to change anything.
>
> Liberals look forward at how much better they hope what will be is
> than what is so they expect pretty much constant change.

IOW.. Conservatives are driven by facts (It's good as things are now, so
there is no need to change unless it will actually improve things)
Liberals are driven by fantasy (We hope our vision we will make it better)

The real problem with liberals is they never acknowledge their policies made
things worse.. it's always they didn't do ENOUGH to get the result they were
hoping for.. so they continue to double down hoping that this time it will
suddenly be different.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

One survival gun like an AR-15 in a disaster that you can use for
multiple tasks is a good thing to have, even if you never use it or like it.

The little AR-7 is a cool gun too but, it's just NOT as versatile and
useful in a survival situation when there's no one coming to rescue you.
The AR-15 will will be better suited if you're without any support but
hey, buy both and then decide when the SHTF.


--
-That's karma-

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

I'd rather have an AR-7 than nothing at all, I suppose. But if I could
only carry one rifle it would be an AR-15

[Siri Cruise]

In article <t94fet$dt7$8...@dont-email.me>,

And in your world a half inch puddle is deep.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 6/24/22 12:37 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article <t94fet$dt7$8...@dont-email.me>,
> "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> "Siri Cruise" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:chine.bleu-D9221...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> In article <t92dbu$ejk$5...@dont-email.me>,
>>> "max headroom" <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why Most Liberals Are Intellectually Incapable of Understanding
>>>> Conservatives
>>>
>>> Understand? Yes? Want to lower ourselves to your level? No. I
>>> understand you live in constant fear and anger but I don't want
>>> to empathise.

Odd that you would suggest that Conservatives are in constant fear and
anger when it's the Democrats who think there's a racists behind every
bush and that someone is always out to enslave them or use them.

Meanwhile Democrats are grooming children, burning, looting, aborting
and stealing elections and lying about it all.

You seem to have put the shoe on the wrong foot.

>> Thus proving Max's point perfectly.......
>>
>>
>
> And in your world a half inch puddle is deep.
>


--

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-

*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html

*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
39 - The problem with so many Democrat scams is that, like a bowl of
ice-cream, it only takes a little dab of bullshit in it to ruin the
whole bowl.

[governo...@gmail.com]

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:10:19 -0400, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>> Conservatives look back at how much better what was then than what is
>> now and so don't want to change anything.
>>
>> Liberals look forward at how much better they hope what will be is
>> than what is so they expect pretty much constant change.
>
>IOW.. Conservatives are driven by facts (It's good as things are now, so
>there is no need to change unless it will actually improve things)
>Liberals are driven by fantasy (We hope our vision we will make it better)

Um, no. Not at all.

>The real problem with liberals is they never acknowledge their policies made
>things worse.. it's always they didn't do ENOUGH to get the result they were
>hoping for.. so they continue to double down hoping that this time it will
>suddenly be different.

Just like conservatives.

Swill
--
Lock 'im up!

[max headroom]

In news:ik7fbhdlndrfu5els...@4ax.com, governo...@gmail.com
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:

> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:10:19 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>>> Conservatives look back at how much better what was then than what is
>>> now and so don't want to change anything.

>>> Liberals look forward at how much better they hope what will be is
>>> than what is so they expect pretty much constant change.

>> IOW.. Conservatives are driven by facts (It's good as things are now, so
>> there is no need to change unless it will actually improve things)
>> Liberals are driven by fantasy (We hope our vision we will make it better)

> Um, no. Not at all.

Um, yeah. Look how much better everything is since Biden took office. Food,
fuel, border, Russia, China, stock market, real wages,....

>> The real problem with liberals is they never acknowledge their policies made
>> things worse.. it's always they didn't do ENOUGH to get the result they were
>> hoping for.. so they continue to double down hoping that this time it will
>> suddenly be different.

> Just like conservatives.

Why are they called "conservatives"? Because they resist change, maybe?

[Siri Cruise]

In article <t98s91$3q9qa$1...@dont-email.me>,
"max headroom" <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

> real wages

Real wages. Reagan stomped those down. Republicans ensure their
constituents are miserable, because it is by blaming others for
the misery the get elected.

[max headroom]

In news:ik7fbhdlndrfu5els...@4ax.com, governo...@gmail.com
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:

> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:10:19 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>>> Conservatives look back at how much better what was then than what is
>>> now and so don't want to change anything.

>>> Liberals look forward at how much better they hope what will be is
>>> than what is so they expect pretty much constant change.

>> IOW.. Conservatives are driven by facts (It's good as things are now, so
>> there is no need to change unless it will actually improve things)
>> Liberals are driven by fantasy (We hope our vision we will make it better)

> Um, no. Not at all.

Um, yeah. Look how much better everything is since Biden took office. Food,
fuel, border, Russia, China, stock market, real wages,....

>> The real problem with liberals is they never acknowledge their policies made
>> things worse.. it's always they didn't do ENOUGH to get the result they were
>> hoping for.. so they continue to double down hoping that this time it will
>> suddenly be different.

> Just like conservatives.

[max headroom]

In news:chine.bleu-20939...@news.eternal-september.org, Siri Cruise
<chine...@yahoo.com> typed:

> In article <t98s91$3q9qa$1...@dont-email.me>, "max headroom"
> <maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

>> Um, yeah. Look how much better everything is since Biden took office. Food,
>> fuel, border, Russia, China, stock market, real wages,....

> Real wages. Reagan stomped those down....

Nope.

> ... Republicans ensure their constituents are miserable, because it is by

> blaming others for the misery the get elected.

Real wages were rising under Trump until the Democrat governors locked their
states down. All races and ages were taking home more pay and *more purchasing
power* in 2019.

Hispanics are realizing which party wants them miserable and are switching
parties in droves.

[governo...@gmail.com]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:57:36 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

>Real wages were rising under Trump until the Democrat governors locked their
>states down. All races and ages were taking home more pay and *more purchasing
>power* in 2019.

So covid was actually a Democrat conspiracy to push wages down?

[max headroom]

In news:lt5sbhd1kmstds6f4...@4ax.com, governo...@gmail.com
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:

That's an interesting theory. It's too bad Art Bell is no longer with us.

[governo...@gmail.com]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 22:14:23 -0700, "max headroom"
<maximus...@gmx.com> wrote:

>> So covid was actually a Democrat conspiracy to push wages down?
>
>That's an interesting theory. It's too bad Art Bell is no longer with us.

Too bad he and Alex Jones can't be together.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

And it's working as middle America is being wiped out by Democrat policies.


--
-That's karma-

[Alann Donald]

We are licensed arm dealers located in Colorado USA. And we have a variety of GUNS & AMMUNITIONS.
Visit our website by hitting the link.

https://rageammostore.com/