"he had a gay affair with Rush Limbaugh" -- St. Louis Post Dispatch
The Big Weasel
St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
St. Louis Post Dispatch - Dec. 8, 2002
A 46 year old music store owner from the St. Louis area, Elliot
Sanders, is claiming that while a college student at Southeast
Missouri University in 1971, he had an affair with Rush Limbaugh.
Sanders claims that he and Limbaugh, the well known talk radio star,
had an affair that went on for about 3 months in the fall of 1971.
Sanders stated that he met Limbaugh in a class he was taking, but it
was only after meeting his sister, who was openly gay at that time,
that he found out Rush himself was gay. "Rush was a charming man
privately," says Sanders, "I met him in a class I was taking, and got
on a first name basis with him. I didn't realize he was gay until his
sister came to visit him. She was gay, and like, we hit it off, and
she seemed shocked that I didn't know Rush was gay as well. When I
found out I was like ... wow!"
Sanders says that privately, Limbaugh was very sensitive and caring
man, but that he was furiously angry that KFBK, the top 40 radio
station he worked while still in high school would not offer him a
full time job.
"He was furious about that," said Sanders, "And he often told me that
he was really going to show them." According to Sanders, Rush's
politics at the time were somewhat middle of the road. "Rush said that
he though most people are incredibly gullible, and he felt that the
key to radio programming was to reach that crowd, and that it would be
really, really easy. He thought he thought he could get anyone to
believe anything he said, and the more outrageous is was, the more
they would beleive it."
When asked when he thought Limbaugh "went straight," Sanders replied,
"What are you talking about? I mean, he's been married four times now,
do people really not get why he doesn't stay married? I guarantee none
of those marriages was ever consummated."
Sanders would not divulge any further details, but when asked if he
feared retaliation from Limbaugh for his revelations, he stated, "No,
Rush wouldn't do that, he's really a sweetie at heart, but some of the
people who listen to him might. I think most of them are psychotic. I
don't think these people realize he's just pandering to them for
ratings, but if they find out, I wouldn't want to be there."
******************
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
Not dead, in jail or a slave? Thank a liberal!
For the finest in leftist/liberal commentary, visit
http://www.zeppcommentaries.com
Christopher Morton
<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
The next thing you know, Zepp will claim he's a Jew.
"If she's elected, I'll make a point of putting "D-Israel" after her
name." - Brian Zepp Jamieson referring to Black liberal Democrat,
Denise Majette.
--
"sure an a nigger is going to use denigrate." - Glen Yeadon
"Who gives an FF what anyone says about the jooz." - Judy Diarya
"Jews mean nothing to me." - Judy Diarya
"Everyone but you knows the jews were behind 9-11." - Judy Diarya
"Stop using that term homophobia, you idiot. Normal people don't fear
the queers. We just don't like them. Call me a homobigot." - Judy Diarya
"When will you idiot pugs learn that 9-11 was america's fault??" - Judy Diarya
Eyewitness
Maybe this music store owner could confirm those nasty cysts on
Limpball's anal area.
On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
Death-th...@kickbeck.com
<chr...@ameritech.net> wrote like a right wing scumbag:
><ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>
>>St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>
>And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
>right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
No, Mostly just to prove what a dumb bastard you are McMortonloon
Now go back to whatever rock you were hiding under.
====================================================
"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
<C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
I got a project for you. Look up how many times I called you and the other
low down and dirty libs "nigger".
I use the word "nigger" to describe those who degrade others so ugly no
other word comes close in character recognition.
If there were a scale that measured my use of the word nigger to Rossell's
use of the word "cunt", "maggot infested" what ever, there's no comparison.
Landrieu Votes WITH Bush 85 % of the time
===============
How can a paid Democrat liar who never saw Rush in person , know anything
? Dashole said last month that " we need to find a way to counter Rush
Limbaugh" so they go out and hire liars to slander & smear him.
The Big Weasel
wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:10:06 -0500, Christopher Morton
><chr...@ameritech.net> wrote like a right wing scumbag:
>>On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
>><ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>>
>>And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
>>right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
>
>No, Mostly just to prove what a dumb bastard you are McMortonloon
>
>Now go back to whatever rock you were hiding under.
It wouldn't make Limbaugh bad. He's already bad.
It would just make him a liar and a hypocrite.
But then, he's already those, isn't he?
>
>====================================================
>"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
><C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
>
>
>I got a project for you. Look up how many times I called you and the other
>low down and dirty libs "nigger".
>
>I use the word "nigger" to describe those who degrade others so ugly no
>other word comes close in character recognition.
>
>If there were a scale that measured my use of the word nigger to Rossell's
>use of the word "cunt", "maggot infested" what ever, there's no comparison.
******************
The Big Weasel
If the reports aren't true, all Rush has to do is deny them.
Ninure Saunders
Morton <chr...@ameritech.net> wrote:
-On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
-<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
-
->St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
-
-And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
-right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
No, he posted it to show what an incedible hypocrite Rush is....if the
story is true.
-
-The next thing you know, Zepp will claim he's a Jew.
He could be.....his family is, after all from Eastern Europe.
And it is the only minority he has never made fun of, dispataged,
ridiculed and/or mocked.
Now that's you've done your good "attack dog rountine", you can go to
sleep till your "massas" need you again.
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://www.geocities.com/ninure
The world's second most subversive document
http://www.geocities.com/ninure/declaration.html
My Online Diary
http://www.ninure.deardiary.net
-
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.ufmcc.com
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
John Starrett
>
> From my email:
>
> St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
> St. Louis Post Dispatch - Dec. 8, 2002
>
As much as I would like to believe this, there are two
misspellings in this story, one in the headline. It is
highly unlikely that a paper would print this.
--
John Starrett
dafujama
The latest article mentioning Limbaugh was dated 11/27/02.
Lets see a URL ...
The Big Weasel <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote
xofpi
I hate to throw cold water on this, but there's no record of a story about
Limbaugh being in the Post-Dispatch this week, and no record of a story about
Elliot Sanders ever. It's also not likely that Rush's hometown paper would
publish what is basically unverifiable gossip about him. This sounds like a
hoax.
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
I don't see anything in a Google Search for Elliot Sanders, either.
Just one of those net hoaxes, I guess.
Bert Hyman
news:QOpJ9.445$15....@www.newsranger.com:
> This sounds like a hoax.
The weasel will post anything that conforms to his interesting world
view.
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | be...@visi.com
Jack Ball
From the International Desk
Published 12/10/2002 12:00 PM
View printer-friendly version
WASHINGTON, Dec. 10 (UPI) -- The Air Force is naming its 100th C-17
airlifter after the Senate's only centenarian, Strom Thurmond, R-S.C.
Thurmond turned 100 on Dec. 5.
The 100th C-17 Globemaster III to come off the production line will be
dubbed The Spirit of Strom Thurmond.
The C-17, built by Boeing, is the Air Force's largest strategic airlifter
and can land on runways as short as 3,000 feet.
Thurmond is a decorated World War II army veteran who at age 41 landed a
glider at Normandy on D-Day with the 82nd Airborne Division.
********************************************************
"landed a glider at Normandy on D-Day" was quite a feat, considering the
gliders were launched the evening before. I'll bet the o' boy was going for
an elapsed time record, and would have set it down D + 365 if there had been
favorable winds and enough food on board...lol
J
Landrieu Votes WITH Bush 85 % of the time
>
> >
> >How can a paid Democrat liar who never saw Rush in person , know anything
> >? Dashole said last month that " we need to find a way to counter Rush
> >Limbaugh" so they go out and hire liars to slander & smear him.
>
> If the reports aren't true, all Rush has to do is deny them.
> >
> >
>
=============================
Why even dignify the accusation with a response ? Liars like the guy that wrote
the book of smears on Bush was found dead from a suicide last week. Liars
always get what's coming to them.
Ninure Saunders
<be...@visi.com> wrote:
-nos...@newsranger.com (xofpi) wrote in
-news:QOpJ9.445$15....@www.newsranger.com:
-
-> This sounds like a hoax.
-
-The weasel will post anything that conforms to his interesting world
-view.
-But the most intetesting thing is..is that how upset you guys get over
the very implication that Rush might be gat.
Because if you didn't HATE homosexuals so much, it wouldn't make a damn
bit of difference either way...just as it souldn't make a damn bit of
difference if he was a Jew or not...or a Luheran or not.....or anm atheist
or not.
xofpi
the time" <"Landrieu Is a Republican says...
When is your number up, Richee?
Death-th...@kickbeck.com
>Thurmond is a decorated World War II army veteran who at age 41 landed a
>glider at Normandy on D-Day with the 82nd Airborne Division.
Must have been an "all-white" Glider, then?
=============================================================
Beck writes :
>Buy yourself a quality pistol. (I recommend the Beretta 92F, but
>that's just me. Aesthetic considerations have been admirably served
>in my own case with the FS - stainless steel - and custom black walnut
>grips, but all that is your lookout.) Get yourself qualified to
>handle it. Make damned sure you know what you're doing. Once that's
>done, get yourself a bunch of dry-fire rounds in your caliber.
>They're usually available at any quality gun shop in bubble-packs of
>five for less than about fifteen dollars. (The ones I use are
>transparent red plastic, with the pad spring visible above the brass,
>inside.) Keeping one in the chamber at all times, never watch the
>TEEVEE without your dry-fire pistol near at hand. Whenever The Lying
>Bastard appears, exploit the opportunity and your visceral reaction
>for purposes of target acquisition training and full-grip squeeze
>conditioning.
>Billy
>VRWC Fronteer
>http://www.mindspring.com/~wjb3/promise.html
Bill Bonde
Ninure Saunders wrote:
>
> In article <kmtavusk44c1hh5ph...@4ax.com>, Christopher
> Morton <chr...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> -On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
> -<ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
> -
> ->St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
> -
> -And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
> -right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
>
> No, he posted it to show what an incedible hypocrite Rush is....if the
> story is true.
>
Why would this make Rush a hypocrite in any way?
Bill Bonde
And then what?
Bill Bonde
There are some obvious clues including:
"Rush said that
he though most people are incredibly gullible, and he felt that the
key to radio programming was to reach that crowd, and that it would be
really, really easy. He thought he thought he could get anyone to
believe anything he said, and the more outrageous is was, the more
they would beleive it."
Notice 'believe' is misspelled once although it is used twice. Most
people are incredibly gullible and the more outrageous the claim is, the
more they will believe it.
Jack Ball
"Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChri...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:RainbowChristiannoh...@user-11218jh.dsl.mindspring.com
...
> In article <Xns92E078B3E79...@news.visi.com>, Bert Hyman
> <be...@visi.com> wrote:
>
> -nos...@newsranger.com (xofpi) wrote in
> -news:QOpJ9.445$15....@www.newsranger.com:
> -
> -> This sounds like a hoax.
> -
> -The weasel will post anything that conforms to his interesting world
> -view.
> -But the most intetesting thing is..is that how upset you guys get over
> the very implication that Rush might be gat.
>
> Because if you didn't HATE homosexuals so much, it wouldn't make a damn
> bit of difference either way...just as it souldn't make a damn bit of
> difference if he was a Jew or not...or a Luheran or not.....or anm atheist
> or not.
We are not talking about having distain for gay people. Our outrage is about
Rush's apparent hipprocracy, his practice in private of that which he
persecutes in public.
J
Bill Bonde
xofpi wrote:
>
> In article <7sravukv2g99cig6b...@4ax.com>, The Big Weasel says...
> >
> >From my email:
> >
> I hate to throw cold water on this, but there's no record of a story about
> Limbaugh being in the Post-Dispatch this week, and no record of a story about
> Elliot Sanders ever. It's also not likely that Rush's hometown paper would
> publish what is basically unverifiable gossip about him. This sounds like a
> hoax.
>
Of course it's a hoax but it should show once again the level of
verification and integrity that Zepp uses before posting things. Notice
all the crap he posts from the World Socialist site as if it were true.
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Because Rush is famous for his gay bashing.
I'm of the opinion that the story is probably a hoax, now that I've
had a chance to check it out, but there is the rumor still making the
rounds that Rush got popped for "cruising" in Pittsburgh in the early
70s.
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Notice how this technoturd can dish it out, but can't take it? This
same clown has played up the ludicrous Broadderick story, the recent
"Kerry hair cut" story, and likes to falsely claim that Clinton was a
perjurer.
But boy, he sure comes unwound when someone says something about his
pet radio pig, doesn't he?
>
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Still waiting for you -- or anyone -- to invalidate anything from that
site, Billy. Can you DOOOOO that for us?
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:16:42 -0800, "Jack Ball"
>
>>Thurmond is a decorated World War II army veteran who at age 41 landed a
>>glider at Normandy on D-Day with the 82nd Airborne Division.
>
>Must have been an "all-white" Glider, then?
Did Germany have an 82nd Airborne Division, too?
Quirt Evans
this crap for what it is. It's not even creative. Gawd.
Landrieu Votes WITH Bush 85 % of the time
>
> Notice how this technoturd can dish it out, but can't take it? This
> same clown has played up the ludicrous Broadderick story, the recent
> "Kerry hair cut" story, and likes to falsely claim that Clinton was a
> perjurer.
>
> But boy, he sure comes unwound when someone says something about his
> pet radio pig, doesn't he?
> >=========================
You forgot to mention this Racist Democrat Senator Byrd saying " Nigger " story .
http://www.blackelectorate.com/articles.asp?ID=337
http://www.huntingtonnews.net/columns/reed/snreed55.html
http://www.africana.com/Column/bl_views_41.htm
John Steed
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Excuse me while I get some sedatives to stop the crazed laughing.
I am originally from South Carolina and ladies and gentleman Strom Thurmond was Darth Vader!
Thurmond had a bi-racial child in the 1930's
Which of course was a major secret because you could never have sex with a black woman in SOUTH CAROLINA while black people were still called colored or niggers or worse.
Thurmond's secretary was the first female to ever be put to death in the chair (He was conviently out of state the day of the excucution)
and of course you don't want me to get started on the truth behind his daughter's death and the fact that she was drunk at the time and that she was on her way across the street to have an affair with the married then Lt. Gov.
Bill Bonde
The Big Weasel wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:33:57 GMT, Death-th...@kickbeck.com
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:10:06 -0500, Christopher Morton
> ><chr...@ameritech.net> wrote like a right wing scumbag:
> >>On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
> >><ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
> >>
> >>And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
> >>right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
> >
> >No, Mostly just to prove what a dumb bastard you are McMortonloon
> >
> >Now go back to whatever rock you were hiding under.
>
> It wouldn't make Limbaugh bad. He's already bad.
>
> It would just make him a liar and a hypocrite.
>
> But then, he's already those, isn't he?
>
If Limbaugh were a homosexual, how would that make him a 'liar' and a
'hypocrite'? I'm pretty sure that he doesn't attack homosexuals for
being homosexual on his radio show.
David L. Moffitt
"xofpi" <nos...@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:QOpJ9.445$15....@www.newsranger.com...
%%%% Actually it is one of zippy's typical lies. The sociofascist left quake
and fear Rush so much he has to fabricate lies about him!! How long did you
and your fellow losers ruminate over this in your circle jerk yahoo group
before you posted it zippy? :-)
>
>
David L. Moffitt
"Landrieu Votes WITH Bush 85 % of the time" <"Landrieu Is a Republican Plant
"@Washington.gov> wrote in message news:3DF6418D...@Washington.gov...
%%%% Hummmmm-----Sounds like a Klinton type of justice!! :-)
>
>
David L. Moffitt
"Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush" <ze...@zeppscommentaries.com> wrote in message
news:bplcvugv74ntv269b...@4ax.com...
%%%% Trying to back out of your fabricated lies zippy? My how weasel of you.
Hitler would have been proud!!! :-)
>
David L. Moffitt
%%%% "I didn't have sex with that woman--------Monica Lewinsky" That wasn't
a lie when he later admitted he did lie? Hitler would have been proud of
you zippy!!! :-)
David L. Moffitt
"The Big Weasel" <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote in message
news:qd1cvug5f4hkfhmcm...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:33:57 GMT, Death-th...@kickbeck.com
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:10:06 -0500, Christopher Morton
> ><chr...@ameritech.net> wrote like a right wing scumbag:
> >><ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
> >>
> >
> >
> >Now go back to whatever rock you were hiding under.
>
> It wouldn't make Limbaugh bad. He's already bad.
>
> It would just make him a liar and a hypocrite.
>
> But then, he's already those, isn't he?
%%%% That would put him in the same category as you wouldn't it zippy!!!
:-)
> >
> >====================================================
> >"Unfrozen Caveman Politician Gore":
> ><C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >I got a project for you. Look up how many times I called you and the
other
> >low down and dirty libs "nigger".
> >
> >I use the word "nigger" to describe those who degrade others so ugly no
> >other word comes close in character recognition.
> >
> >If there were a scale that measured my use of the word nigger to
Rossell's
> >use of the word "cunt", "maggot infested" what ever, there's no
comparison.
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Some one else came up with this one. (Weasels wouldn't have made the
spelling mistakes).
It -is- fun watching you clowns flap and whirl over your radio pig's
reputation. Sure didn't slow you down any when you were smearing
Clinton, did it?
>
>>
>>
>
Jack Ball
I read that Limbaugh once screwed a pitbull and that was the beginning of
the Teacup Chihuahua breed.
J
Yukon
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:07:36 GMT, "Landrieu Votes WITH Bush 85 % of
> the time" <"Landrieu Is a Republican Plant "@Washington.gov> wrote:
>
> >Eyewitness wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe this music store owner could confirm those nasty cysts on
> >> Limpball's anal area.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >How can a paid Democrat liar who never saw Rush in person , know
anything
> >? Dashole said last month that " we need to find a way to counter Rush
> >Limbaugh" so they go out and hire liars to slander & smear him.
>
> If the reports aren't true, all Rush has to do is deny them.
> >
> >
>
> Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
>
> Not dead, in jail or a slave? Thank a liberal!
>
> For the finest in leftist/liberal commentary, visit
> http://www.zeppcommentaries.com
>
What I want to know is why all you gays always have to try to make others
out to be gay? Are you that insecure about your own gay lifestyle?
David Hartung
"Jack Ball" <p...@philhendrieshow.com> wrote in message
news:uvcfcpl...@corp.supernews.com...
> C-17 to be named for Strom Thurmond
> From the International Desk
> Published 12/10/2002 12:00 PM
> View printer-friendly version
>
>
> WASHINGTON, Dec. 10 (UPI) -- The Air Force is naming its 100th C-17
> airlifter after the Senate's only centenarian, Strom Thurmond, R-S.C.
>
> Thurmond turned 100 on Dec. 5.
>
> The 100th C-17 Globemaster III to come off the production line will be
> dubbed The Spirit of Strom Thurmond.
>
> The C-17, built by Boeing, is the Air Force's largest strategic airlifter
> and can land on runways as short as 3,000 feet.
Is the C-17 larger than the C-5?
David Hartung
<Death-th...@kickbeck.com> wrote in message
news:3df64629....@news.enetis.net...
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:16:42 -0800, "Jack Ball"
>
> >Thurmond is a decorated World War II army veteran who at age 41 landed a
> >glider at Normandy on D-Day with the 82nd Airborne Division.
>
> Must have been an "all-white" Glider, then?
Now who is being racist?
Bill Bonde
I've replied to your posts considering each line and you just ignore
them.
DrPostman
accordance with The Prophecy and "For Entertainment Purposes Only" availed us of
their wisdom with:
>Is the C-17 larger than the C-5?
Not larger, but much better. Do a comparison:
http://www.af.mil/news/factsheets/C_5_Galaxy.html
http://www.af.mil/news/factsheets/C_17_Globemaster_III.html
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: jamie_eckles(at)hotmail.com
"Your name is "Bruce," and my first name is also "Bruce.""
-Idiot The Bruce
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
How are your efforts on Juanita Broaderrick and Mena coming along,
little miss muppet?
>
>>
>
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
<sst...@backpacker.com> wrote:
On the WSWS? Wow! I had no idea. Give me a link, Bill. I would love
to see your mind at work.
Darkwing Duck
"John Steed" <freaky...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:G0tJ9.816$Pm2....@feed2.centurytel.net...
> THURMOND A WAR HERO????
> and of course you don't want me to get started on the truth behind his
daughter's death and the fact that she was drunk at the time and that she
was on her way across the street to have an affair with the married then Lt.
Gov.
>
>
Sounds like you already told it all to me.
---------------------------------
The Duck
"As of now I bet you got me wrong" - Alice in Chains
Why doesn't the universe have a name?
"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools.
Let's start with typewriters."
- Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)
George Patton
> glider at Normandy on D-Day with the 82nd Airborne Division.
Wouldn't it be nice if our president was a war hero ... or anything
approaching that... or a one noted for bravery or courage... Oh well,
some just ain't got it. He ain't much of a president, but he is the
only president we got at this time. You win some and you loose some.
That is life. Next time let us elect a woman with a military record
tha she can be proud of.
Darkwing Duck
"George Patton" <gpa...@bayou.com> wrote in message
news:e21a560a.02121...@posting.google.com...
He may of "only" went to the National Guard but at least he wasn't a
motherfucking draft dodging liberal.
xofpi
says...
You've been guilty of more than a few lies yourself, about the Clintons and
Gore's. You're just as happy to pass along half-chewed rumor as long as it's
potentially damaging to public figures you hate. So quit the hypocrisy. Zepp at
least has the class to admit he now agrees this is probably a hoax. When have
you ever backed down from an official RNC lie?
xofpi
Bush says...
That's why I hated to throw cold water over it. It *is* fun to watch.
Quirt Evans
Please list "official RNC" lies.
Quirt Evans
spelling mistakes)."
Actually, "Some one" should be spelled "Someone", Weasel.
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Zepp post's more lies!
kgreenbaum writes "Please remove any mention of the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch in connection with the article on your home page, "Rush
Limbaugh Homosexual? (St. Louis Post-Dispatch Breaks Story)." The
story is also available at the URL on your site,
http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=419.
The Post-Dispatch has written no such story and I ask that you remove
the story or, at least, any suggestion that it was published by us. I
would also ask that you correct the error by alerting your readers
that the story was incorrectly attributed to the Post-Dispatch.
I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.
--------------------------------------
Kurt Greenbaum
Online News Director
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>On 10 Dec 2002 09:14:27 -0800, dafu...@mail.com (dafujama) wrote:
>
>>A site search of the Stl Post Dispatch website shows no such article.
>>The latest article mentioning Limbaugh was dated 11/27/02.
>>
>>Lets see a URL ...
>>
>>The Big Weasel <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote
>>> From my email:
>>>
>>> St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>>> St. Louis Post Dispatch - Dec. 8, 2002
>>>
>>> A 46 year old music store owner from the St. Louis area, Elliot
>>> Sanders, is claiming that while a college student at Southeast
>>> Missouri University in 1971, he had an affair with Rush Limbaugh.
>>> Sanders claims that he and Limbaugh, the well known talk radio star,
>>> had an affair that went on for about 3 months in the fall of 1971.
>
>I don't see anything in a Google Search for Elliot Sanders, either.
>Just one of those net hoaxes, I guess.
Then you are simply lying or inept.
JSL
>
The Big Weasel
You're a bit late, Jeffy. I already posted that in my opinion, the
stroy was a hoax.
>
>
>--------------------------------------
>Kurt Greenbaum
>Online News Director
>St. Louis Post-Dispatch
>
>
>
******************
The Big Weasel
Are you saying it's not a hoax, jeffy? Or are you just whirling madly
biting your tail in one of your usual conversational gambits?
>
>JSL
The Big Weasel
No, he was something far worse: a "fortunate son" who traded family
position and wealth for a cushy safe stateside assignment so he could
look good while others died.
>---------------------------------
>The Duck
>
>"As of now I bet you got me wrong" - Alice in Chains
>
>Why doesn't the universe have a name?
>
>"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools.
>Let's start with typewriters."
>- Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)
>
>
>
>
******************
Jim Alder
news:3df75bf3....@nntp.service.ohio-state.edu:
Re: Zepp post's more lies!
Not exactly a "Man Bites Dog" headline you've got there, Jeff.
And why the exclamation point?
--
Congress is so strange. A man gets up to speak and says nothing.
Nobody listens - and then everybody disagrees. ~Boris Marshalov
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:42:45 GMT, linde...@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott
>Linder) wrote:
>
>>"Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush" <ze...@zeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 10 Dec 2002 09:14:27 -0800, dafu...@mail.com (dafujama) wrote:
>>>
>>>>A site search of the Stl Post Dispatch website shows no such article.
>>>>The latest article mentioning Limbaugh was dated 11/27/02.
>>>>
>>>>Lets see a URL ...
>>>>
>>>>The Big Weasel <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote
>>>>> From my email:
>>>>>
>>>>> St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>>>>> St. Louis Post Dispatch - Dec. 8, 2002
>>>>>
>>>>> A 46 year old music store owner from the St. Louis area, Elliot
>>>>> Sanders, is claiming that while a college student at Southeast
>>>>> Missouri University in 1971, he had an affair with Rush Limbaugh.
>>>>> Sanders claims that he and Limbaugh, the well known talk radio star,
>>>>> had an affair that went on for about 3 months in the fall of 1971.
>>>
>>>I don't see anything in a Google Search for Elliot Sanders, either.
>>>Just one of those net hoaxes, I guess.
>>
>>Then you are simply lying or inept.
>
>Are you saying it's not a hoax, jeffy? Or are you just whirling madly
>biting your tail in one of your usual conversational gambits?
No Zepp. A search of Elliot Sanders and Rush Limbaugh came up with
this....and it took all of 10 seconds.
==============================
Post-Dispatch did not write story
kgreenbaum writes "Please remove any mention of the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch in connection with the article on your home page, "Rush
Limbaugh Homosexual? (St. Louis Post-Dispatch Breaks Story)." The
story is also available at the URL on your site,
http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=419.
The Post-Dispatch has written no such story and I ask that you remove
the story or, at least, any suggestion that it was published by us. I
would also ask that you correct the error by alerting your readers
that the story was incorrectly attributed to the Post-Dispatch.
I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.
--------------------------------------
Kurt Greenbaum
Online News Director
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
314-340-8123 (o) 314-803-7726 (c)
kgree...@post-dispatch.com
STLtoday.com
"
==========================================
I know you're a liar so my guess is that on this one you were just
inept.
JSL
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Why did you even post it Zepp? It took but 10 seconds to find it in
google. You're and incompetant boob then right?
JSL
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>linde...@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote in
>news:3df75bf3....@nntp.service.ohio-state.edu:
>
>Re: Zepp post's more lies!
>
> Not exactly a "Man Bites Dog" headline you've got there, Jeff.
>And why the exclamation point?
I'm sorry. You're right.
JSL
yossarian
"Christopher Morton" <chr...@ameritech.net> wrote in message
news:kmtavusk44c1hh5ph...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
> <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>
> >St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>
>
>
> "If she's elected, I'll make a point of putting "D-Israel" after her
> name." - Brian Zepp Jamieson referring to Black liberal Democrat,
> Denise Majette.
Anti-Isreal not = to antisemite. If you are concerned about antisemitism
then ask those pro-Isreal evangelical Christians to stop the funding of the
Isreali military machine. Their only purpose is to turn Isreal into a
parking lot for their sick Armageddon fantasies. Supposedly all those Jews
in Isreal will either convert to Christians or go to hell for denying Jesus
for 2000 years after Isreal goes up into a mushroom cloud. In that sense
Denise Majette is worse for the health of Jews in the Middle East than
McKinney could have ever have been.
--
Yossarian
I feel we should all compliment President Bush for his example to
other people with disabilities. Being the first president to be
mentally retarded he has opened new opportunities for this suppressed
group of citizens.
Quoted from Anand in alt.fan.noam-chomsky
Watch Bush smirk while precious minutes pass.
http://www.outcastradio.com/911short.html
Check out www.meria.net
The following timeline is only an extract of the website below. This web
site used to appear on all the major search engines, but now it has been
delisted from them.
> --
>
> "sure an a nigger is going to use denigrate." - Glen Yeadon
>
> "Who gives an FF what anyone says about the jooz." - Judy Diarya
>
> "Jews mean nothing to me." - Judy Diarya
>
> "Everyone but you knows the jews were behind 9-11." - Judy Diarya
>
> "Stop using that term homophobia, you idiot. Normal people don't fear
> the queers. We just don't like them. Call me a homobigot." - Judy Diarya
>
> "When will you idiot pugs learn that 9-11 was america's fault??" - Judy
Diarya
AntisDoLie
> Because if you didn't HATE homosexuals so much, it wouldn't make a damn
> bit of difference either way...
Perhaps you should address this to the weasle that posted the article.
Jim
Chris Morton
>
>
>"Christopher Morton" <chr...@ameritech.net> wrote in message
>news:kmtavusk44c1hh5ph...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:38:49 -0800, The Big Weasel
>> <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>>
>> And if Limbaugh WERE gay, that would make him an evil, dirty person,
>> right? That is why you posted that, RIGHT?
>>
>> The next thing you know, Zepp will claim he's a Jew.
>>
>> "If she's elected, I'll make a point of putting "D-Israel" after her
>> name." - Brian Zepp Jamieson referring to Black liberal Democrat,
>> Denise Majette.
>
>Anti-Isreal not = to antisemite. If you are concerned about antisemitism
Anti-Israel does not HAVE to be anti-Semitic. It however often is. McKinney,
her father and Zepp are anti-Semites.
>then ask those pro-Isreal evangelical Christians to stop the funding of the
>Isreali military machine. Their only purpose is to turn Isreal into a
I don't have an imaginary friend, so there's not much to be gained from my
talking to them. They are of course completely irrelevant to whether the
persons previously named are bigots.
>for 2000 years after Isreal goes up into a mushroom cloud. In that sense
>Denise Majette is worse for the health of Jews in the Middle East than
>McKinney could have ever have been.
McKinney is bad for Jews HERE, nevermind bad for Black people. If we're going
to imitate White people, I suggest that we imitate a better class of White
people than David Duke.
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with 210lb.
rapists.
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Linder) wrote:
So what ARE you whining about. I declared it a hoax, you agree with
me, and yet you are still whining.
Now, why is that, Jeffy?
Jeffrey Scott Linder
You sound downright disappointed Zepp.
>Now, why is that, Jeffy?
JSL
Jack Ball
"Darkwing Duck" <spac...@spamzoneyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:GhyJ9.27075$NV.5...@news.direcpc.com...
Where he missed over half of the meetings, then refused to make himself
available for a physical after they started random drug screening, thus
wasting the millions of dollars of training he received....
J
Bill Bonde
yossarian wrote:
>
Yossarian? What the hell kind of name is Yossarian?
Thomas Andrews
>
> yossarian wrote:
>
> Yossarian? What the hell kind of name is Yossarian?
Are you that ignorant, Bill, and are you that incapable of doing a web
search?
Hint: It's a literary reference.
--
=thomas andrews ( www.thomaso.com )
=tho...@best.com
1948 Mississippi Sample Ballot, Trent Lott's pride:
http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/features/feature7/ms_demo_ballot.html
David L. Moffitt
%%%% It was a lie from the first sentence and zippy knew it and only backed
down when called on it. You didn't answer the question: How long did you and
your fellow losers ruminate over this in your circle jerk yahoo group before
zippy posted it?
>
>
David L. Moffitt
%%%% I don't listen to Rush but, I do get a big kick out of the sociofascist
who do listen to him whining over what he said that particular day!!! :-)
>
>
Jack Ball
"David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:JuPJ9.14200$RF....@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
I don't know about anyone else, I just enjoy seeing the header keep coming
up...
J
Yukon
Like I said before, why do all you gays feel you have to advertise your
lifestyle? Are you all that insecure?
David L. Moffitt
fabricating this story??? ;-)
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linde...@osu.edu> wrote in message
news:3df75bf3.4134700965@nntp.service.ohio-state.edu...
Bill Bonde
Thomas Andrews wrote:
>
> Bill Bonde wrote:
> >
> > yossarian wrote:
> >
> > Yossarian? What the hell kind of name is Yossarian?
>
> Are you that ignorant, Bill, and are you that incapable of doing a web
> search?
>
I could say the same about you.
> Hint: It's a literary reference.
>
My comment certainly was.
--
You see, it's turned out very well.
Let's travel together, you and I.
You cast bells, I'll paint icons.
We'll go to the Trinity Monastery together.
What a feast day for the people.
You've brought them such joy and you're crying.
-+"Andrei Rublev", Andrei Tarkovsky
Talkin Horse
> approaching that... or a one noted for bravery or courage... Oh well,
> some just ain't got it. He ain't much of a president, but he is the
> only president we got at this time. You win some and you loose some.
> That is life. Next time let us elect a woman with a military record
> tha she can be proud of.
I take it you voted for Bob Dole over Bill Clinton and also supported
Richard Nixon over Hubert Humphrey?
The Big Weasel
Dole was a war hero. But Nixon was just a quartermaster in Hawaii. No
heroics there.
I don't think military service has much bearing on ability to be
president -- Jefferson, Lincoln, FDR and Reagan had no military
backgrounds to speak off -- but the character of a man who is a
chickhawk is questionable, at best.
I see he's been engaging in nuclear saber-rattling again today.
David Hartung
"The Big Weasel" <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote in message
news:9kpevu8hjj813ehbt...@4ax.com...
> >He may of "only" went to the National Guard but at least he wasn't a
> >motherfucking draft dodging liberal.
> >
> No, he was something far worse: a "fortunate son" who traded family
> position and wealth for a cushy safe stateside assignment so he could
> look good while others died.
Brian, please provide proof of your accusation. The mere fact that The
President served in the Guard during VietNam is not proof.
David Hartung
"Talkin Horse" <davidrolfeN0SP&A...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:LMRJ9.1298$MV5.1...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
yes and Too young, but I would have voted for Nixon.
David Hartung
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 01:38:51 GMT, "Talkin Horse"
> <davidrolfeN0SP&A...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >"George Patton" <gpa...@bayou.com> wrote in message
> >news:e21a560a.02121...@posting.google.com...
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it be nice if our president was a war hero ... or anything
> >> approaching that... or a one noted for bravery or courage... Oh well,
> >> some just ain't got it. He ain't much of a president, but he is the
> >> only president we got at this time. You win some and you loose some.
> >> That is life. Next time let us elect a woman with a military record
> >> tha she can be proud of.
> >
> >
> >I take it you voted for Bob Dole over Bill Clinton and also supported
> >Richard Nixon over Hubert Humphrey?
>
> Dole was a war hero. But Nixon was just a quartermaster in Hawaii. No
> heroics there.
>
> I don't think military service has much bearing on ability to be
> president -- Jefferson, Lincoln, FDR and Reagan had no military
> backgrounds to speak off -- but the character of a man who is a
> chickhawk is questionable, at best.
Based on the content of your posts, you are on no position to take someone
to task over matters of character.
Brain Death
<ze...@zeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
>On 10 Dec 2002 09:14:27 -0800, dafu...@mail.com (dafujama) wrote:
>
>>A site search of the Stl Post Dispatch website shows no such article.
>>The latest article mentioning Limbaugh was dated 11/27/02.
>>
>>Lets see a URL ...
>>
>>The Big Weasel <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote
>>> From my email:
>>>
>>> St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
>>> St. Louis Post Dispatch - Dec. 8, 2002
>>>
>>> A 46 year old music store owner from the St. Louis area, Elliot
>>> Sanders, is claiming that while a college student at Southeast
>>> Missouri University in 1971, he had an affair with Rush Limbaugh.
>>> Sanders claims that he and Limbaugh, the well known talk radio star,
>>> had an affair that went on for about 3 months in the fall of 1971.
>
>I don't see anything in a Google Search for Elliot Sanders, either.
>Just one of those net hoaxes, I guess.
You mean one of Zepp's net hoaxes. You should know it was bullshit the
moment you posted it with the glaring header. I knew it was bullshit
the moment you said you got it in an e-mail giving you an out.
This quote should have alerted you to the bullshit nature of what you
were posting:
"Rush said that he though most people are incredibly gullible, and he
felt that the key to radio programming was to reach that crowd, and
that it would be really, really easy. He thought he thought he could
get anyone to believe anything he said, and the more outrageous is
was, the more they would beleive it."
If you believed the story and posted it as true, this is the joke on
you--whoever "e-mailed" it to you can say that you believed anything
he said, and the more outrageous it was, the more they would beleive
(sic) it.
If you didn't believe the story, of course you tried to post a nasty
bit of obvious nonsense about somebody via your header. Of course,
who am I to blame somebody for that?
Haha.
BD
David L. Moffitt
"Brain Death" <jgl...@letsroll.com> wrote in message
news:42jgvu43s8nv0een1...@4ax.com...
%%%% Zippy should be prosecuted to the fullest extent o the law for
authoring this net hoax piece of slander against the man. If the law does as
they should I'll be spending the next month ROTFLMAO. I bet his circle jerk
Yahoo group of weasels are all in a titter in fear!!!! :-)
Thomas Andrews
> Thomas Andrews wrote:
> >
> > Bill Bonde wrote:
> > >
> > > yossarian wrote:
> > >
> > > Yossarian? What the hell kind of name is Yossarian?
> >
> > Are you that ignorant, Bill, and are you that incapable of doing a web
> > search?
> >
> I could say the same about you.
>
>
> > Hint: It's a literary reference.
> >
> My comment certainly was.
Doh!
I've never seen the movie, and read the book many years ago.
Sorry.
[ Thomas slinks away, muttering to himself. "I'll get you next time,
though, you can count on it." Mumble, mumble. ]
Ninure Saunders
<jgl...@letsroll.com> wrote:
-On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:54:26 -0800, "Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush"
-<ze...@zeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
-
->On 10 Dec 2002 09:14:27 -0800, dafu...@mail.com (dafujama) wrote:
->
->>A site search of the Stl Post Dispatch website shows no such article.
->>The latest article mentioning Limbaugh was dated 11/27/02.
->>
->>Lets see a URL ...
->>
->>The Big Weasel <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote
->>> From my email:
->>>
->>> St. Louis Man Claims Affiair
->>> St. Louis Post Dispatch - Dec. 8, 2002
->>>
->>> A 46 year old music store owner from the St. Louis area, Elliot
->>> Sanders, is claiming that while a college student at Southeast
->>> Missouri University in 1971, he had an affair with Rush Limbaugh.
->>> Sanders claims that he and Limbaugh, the well known talk radio star,
->>> had an affair that went on for about 3 months in the fall of 1971.
->
->I don't see anything in a Google Search for Elliot Sanders, either.
->Just one of those net hoaxes, I guess.
-
-You mean one of Zepp's net hoaxes. You should know it was bullshit the
-moment you posted it with the glaring header. I knew it was bullshit
-the moment you said you got it in an e-mail giving you an out.
-
-This quote should have alerted you to the bullshit nature of what you
-were posting:
-
-"Rush said that he though most people are incredibly gullible, and he
-felt that the key to radio programming was to reach that crowd, and
-that it would be really, really easy. He thought he thought he could
-get anyone to believe anything he said, and the more outrageous is
-was, the more they would beleive it."
-
-If you believed the story and posted it as true, this is the joke on
-you--whoever "e-mailed" it to you can say that you believed anything
-he said, and the more outrageous it was, the more they would beleive
-(sic) it.
-
-If you didn't believe the story, of course you tried to post a nasty
-bit of obvious nonsense about somebody via your header. Of course,
-who am I to blame somebody for that?
-
-Haha.
O hope Zepp can track you down and sue for you slander and libel....
-BD
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://www.geocities.com/ninure
The world's second most subversive document
http://www.geocities.com/ninure/declaration.html
My Online Diary
http://www.ninure.deardiary.net
-
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.ufmcc.com
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
He'll just convince the judge that he's insane and legally
incompetent. He's got thousands of posts to support that.
Quirt Evans
media is arguing that it does not matter what Lott MEANT to say, the
issue is what he said. Translation; it is abundantly clear that Lott
did not mean to imply what was implied, but perhaps, as Bush stated, he
should apologize for the obvious implication. In the heat of a praising
moment for a mans 100'th birthday, he put his foot in his mouth by not
thinking before speaking. Yet, HE'S under attack to not only apologize,
but to step down.
Now, Zepp MEANT to imply that Rush was a hypocrit when it comes
to homosexuality, even though not only was it an obvious hoax, Zepp has
confessed that it was a hoax. At the very least, Zepp "put his foot in
his mouth" by not researching the story before posting it. Though,
personally, I think Zepp knew it was a hoax all along, it doesn't
matter.
Zepp needs either to apologize for fueling an obvious hoax or take
back his posted statements about Lott. Of course, he'll do neither,
because, as this case scenario shows, he's the real hypocrit, not Rush.
Scott Erb
considering.
"Quirt Evans" <gore...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2466-3DF...@storefull-2215.public.lawson.webtv.net...
Dana
Being Alive; August 1996
Ferd Eggan
Most of you readers of Being Alive are, like me, already infected and living
with HIV/AIDS. We know how devastating the disease is, and we generally act
as best we can to prevent others from catching it, from us or others. And
the preponderance of Being Alive's readers are-like me-gay, living in the
context of a very diverse, often segregated set of gay communities or
subcultures. It is in the area of AIDS prevention for gay men that some of
the most radical developments were discussed in Vancouver.
In the past two years, there has been increasing attention to the fact that
HIV+ and HIV- men have different views of sexual transmission, and different
behaviors based on our experience of AIDS. Campaigns have been developed to
encourage HIV- men to remain negative. Some of these, like the very sexy,
MTV-style ads just produced by APLA, aim mainly at validating the esteem and
vitality of young gay men. Some have unfortunately left the implication that
HIV+ men are to blame.
But it is clear that we need to develop prevention strategies that take into
account that we are not all the same, and that condom protection is not just
the easy, fun thing that everybody can do with the same goals in mind.
In Vancouver, all the Europeans and Australians said their data showed that
new HIV cases among young gay men were going down, and they couldn't believe
our US data that show they are going up. What they don't know is how our US
society is so stratified by race and economics, and that it is young gay
African-American, Latino, Asian/Pacific and Native American men who are now
most at risk. Prevention workers in South Central LA or East LA know this.
The City AIDS Coordinator's office and County AIDS Programs will sponsor a
week-long technical assistance in January where many national experts from
communities of color will spend time with community-based agencies helping
them to improve programs where they matter the most.
Vancouver hosted a number of brilliant presentations about the gay
communities of Australia and other homogeneous gay communities in Europe.
Despite the differences between them and us, there are some very important
lessons. In Australia, the government of New South Wales (Sydney) is
sponsoring a program which they see as just catching up to where gay men
have successfully figured out how to live in time of epidemic. That is, they
teach gay men that if they are in a relationship, they can test for HIV
twice, three months apart, and (if they have the same status) they can agree
to have unprotected sex together.
This unprotected (but safe) sex must be only within the relationship;
anytime one of them has a sexual encounter with a person outside the
relationship, they must use condoms. HIV- men are thus assured they can stay
negative, while enjoying what we all know is more enjoyable, that is, sex
that allows full skin contact without endangering either partner. When
people objected, the Australians argued that gay men are already doing this,
and they were just advising them how to do it most safely.
Under this concept, HIV+ pairings can do what they are already doing, having
condomless sex. I ask HIV+ readers, do you use condoms when you have sex
with another HIV+ man? Do you usually ask about sero-status? If the Being
Alive socials are any indication, many HIV+ gay men actively seek other HIV+
partners, and often express the desire to have an HIV+ life partner because
they share some of the same central life concerns.
The long and the short of this is that the Australians make a distinction
between unprotected (no condoms) and unsafe (no transmission) sex. The
question of re-infection, they say, has never been answered. There is no
proof that re-infection occurs, and no proof that it would matter if it did.
The HIV+ gay men I talk to in LA say that, despite the possibility of more
HIV or hepatitis, or the like, they do not always use condoms for their
sexual encounters with other HIV+ men.
--
Conservatives believe IN America, liberals believe in and worry about
what other countries SAY about America.
Julian D
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Evans) wrote:
> Let's compare this implication to Lotts implication. The left wing
>media is arguing that it does not matter what Lott MEANT to say, the
>issue is what he said. Translation; it is abundantly clear that Lott
>did not mean to imply what was implied, but perhaps, as Bush stated, he
>should apologize for the obvious implication. In the heat of a praising
>moment for a mans 100'th birthday, he put his foot in his mouth by not
>thinking before speaking. Yet, HE'S under attack to not only apologize,
>but to step down.
> Now, Zepp MEANT to imply that Rush was a hypocrit when it comes
>to homosexuality, even though not only was it an obvious hoax, Zepp has
>confessed that it was a hoax. At the very least, Zepp "put his foot in
>his mouth" by not researching the story before posting it. Though,
>personally, I think Zepp knew it was a hoax all along, it doesn't
>matter.
Acknowledged, Squirt. The word you want is "acknowledged". Confessed
suggest I knowingly perpetuated or invented the hoax, and I did
neither.
Now, let's compare that to your use of "From Rage to Responsibility"
as being an unbiased view of affirmative action. THAT was a hoax!
> Zepp needs either to apologize for fueling an obvious hoax or take
>back his posted statements about Lott. Of course, he'll do neither,
>because, as this case scenario shows, he's the real hypocrit, not Rush.
Take your apology and pound it up your ass.
So anyway: are you for or against racial segregation? I seem to be
having trouble getting a straight answer out of people on that one,
and we might as well all get a good look at what we're dealing with
here.
Unknown
<ze...@zeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
>Did Germany have an 82nd Airborne Division, too?
you think ole strom and robert byrd flew in together?
WHOOPS Robbie never did recant his membership in the Klan did he?
Zepp, you are still a moronic socialist sack of snot.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Quirt Evans
worth considering."
So, by that rationale, if you aren't someone in high political
standing, then your hypocrisy and lies, intentional or not, are
excuseable, and integrity isn't necessary. That explains a lot of what
I see in the left wing posts on this newsgroup. Thank you for the
input.
(Unless of course you commit perjury and you are a Democrat, then
it's excusable even for someone in high political standing. Or you are
a KKK member who enjoys using the "n" word and are a Democrat, then
someone in high political standing is excused. Or if you are....)
Sheesh. You libs are confusingly fickle when it comes to issues of
integrity.
Christopher Morton
You mean like this:
"If she's elected, I'll make a point of putting "D-Israel" after her
name." - Brian Zepp Jamieson referring to Black liberal Democrat,
Denise Majette.
No wait, that's YOU....
--
"sure an a nigger is going to use denigrate." - Glen Yeadon
"Who gives an FF what anyone says about the jooz." - Judy Diarya
"Jews mean nothing to me." - Judy Diarya
"Everyone but you knows the jews were behind 9-11." - Judy Diarya
"Stop using that term homophobia, you idiot. Normal people don't fear
the queers. We just don't like them. Call me a homobigot." - Judy Diarya
"When will you idiot pugs learn that 9-11 was america's fault??" - Judy Diarya
Studebaker Hawk
wrote:
>
>
>The Big Weasel wrote:
>> It wouldn't make Limbaugh bad. He's already bad.
>>
>> It would just make him a liar and a hypocrite.
>>
>> But then, he's already those, isn't he?
>>
>If Limbaugh were a homosexual, how would that make him a 'liar' and a
>'hypocrite'? I'm pretty sure that he doesn't attack homosexuals for
>being homosexual on his radio show.
You seem to have forgotten his "Gay Updates?"
The theme music was "My Boy Lolipop."
...right along side his "Gorbasms?" (Anti-Gorbechev)
theme music: Darth Vader's military marching music,
the birthmark on his forehead, an expanding Red map of Europe. .
...and femiNazi Updates?
...and "on-demand" "Caller Abortions?"...theme music: loud vacuum cleaner
and tiny baby voice screaming...
Evironmental Updates?" Theme music: chainsaw, crashing trees.
etc etc.
Seems you forget why the asshole is so hated.
...because he is hateful, pure and simple.
He hates everybody but his own kind...hates
most of the world, and attacks them for money,
thus, a mean little whore.
tcc-1
"Studebaker Hawk" <Nospa...@home.edu> wrote in message
news:3df90c7b...@news.prodigy.net...
Scott Erb
> "If Zepp were the Senate Majority leader, perhaps your post would be
> worth considering."
>
> So, by that rationale, if you aren't someone in high political
> standing, then your hypocrisy and lies, intentional or not, are
> excuseable, and integrity isn't necessary. That explains a lot of what
> I see in the left wing posts on this newsgroup. Thank you for the
> input.
He acknowledged it was a hoax. That's enough. It's also enough for me for
Lott to acknowledge he's wrong, and apologize. But in my book the
"responsibility" of a Senate majority leader is much more than someone who
posts in newsgroups!
> (Unless of course you commit perjury and you are a Democrat, then
> it's excusable even for someone in high political standing. Or you are
> a KKK member who enjoys using the "n" word and are a Democrat, then
> someone in high political standing is excused. Or if you are....)
> Sheesh. You libs are confusingly fickle when it comes to issues of
> integrity.
You're not making any sense. Even Bush condemned Lott's statement. Are you
going to attack Bush
Quirt Evans
suggest I knowingly perpetuated or invented the hoax, and I did
neither."
Fair enough. Now, if you acknowledge that it was a hoax, (a lie)
then what is the true authors' motive for that hoax (lie)? Whatever the
motive for the lie, you have now fueled that lie with your post. By
posting it, you "perpetuated" it. Whether you "perpetuated" it
intentionally or not, it was done. In other words, like Lott, you spoke
before you thought, something that all of us are guilty of. No big
deal. However, if you aren't liable to apologize for your mistake, then
why should Lott have been?
"Now, let's compare that to your use of "From Rage to Responsibility" as
being an unbiased view of affirmative action. THAT was a hoax!"
Jesse Lee Peterson is biased. He's a right winger through and through
and never hesitates to characterize himself as such. I never even
implied otherwise. However, his book only has a couple short references
to Affirmative Action. You asked me to explain the conditions within
minorities when it came to unemployment and other issues. I told you to
read up on it, and gave you one of many sources to check. The book by
Jesse Lee Peterson, "From Rage to Responsibility", goes into great
detail in answering your question. (So, naturally, you labelled him an
"Uncle Tom").
"Take your apology and pound it up your ass."
Cool down, Bryan. You're a pacifist, remember?
"So anyway: are you for or against racial segregation? I seem to be
having trouble getting a straight answer out of people on that one, and
we might as well all get a good look at what we're dealing with here."
Racial segregation has no place in our country. But, though everyone
with an inkling of self respect knows that, I understand why the left
wing is constantly bringing racial segregation up as an issue. They
need to quiet all the right wing whackos out there in our country who
are for racial segregation. All six of them.
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
>On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:17:19 -0800, "Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush"
><ze...@zeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
>
>>Did Germany have an 82nd Airborne Division, too?
>you think ole strom and robert byrd flew in together?
>WHOOPS Robbie never did recant his membership in the Klan did he?
Yes, he did.
Here's what he said:
"I abhor the Klan," the Senate Democrat said. "Every time I see on
television men wearing robes, it turns me off. I look upon the Klan
as a silly, asinine group that tries to act outside the law, and uses
violence and intimidation as their currency."
>Zepp, you are still a moronic socialist sack of snot.
Coming from an ignorant jackass like you, that's a real compliment!
Zepp, No Weasels in the Bush
Evans) wrote:
>"Acknowledged, Squirt. The word you want is "acknowledged". Confessed
>suggest I knowingly perpetuated or invented the hoax, and I did
>neither."
>
> Fair enough. Now, if you acknowledge that it was a hoax, (a lie)
>then what is the true authors' motive for that hoax (lie)? Whatever the
>motive for the lie, you have now fueled that lie with your post. By
>posting it, you "perpetuated" it. Whether you "perpetuated" it
>intentionally or not, it was done. In other words, like Lott, you spoke
>before you thought, something that all of us are guilty of. No big
>deal. However, if you aren't liable to apologize for your mistake, then
>why should Lott have been?
I would guess the true author was taking a swing at Rush. Would that
be a fair assumption?
>
>"Now, let's compare that to your use of "From Rage to Responsibility" as
>being an unbiased view of affirmative action. THAT was a hoax!"
>
>Jesse Lee Peterson is biased. He's a right winger through and through
>and never hesitates to characterize himself as such. I never even
>implied otherwise. However, his book only has a couple short references
>to Affirmative Action. You asked me to explain the conditions within
>minorities when it came to unemployment and other issues. I told you to
>read up on it, and gave you one of many sources to check. The book by
>Jesse Lee Peterson, "From Rage to Responsibility", goes into great
>detail in answering your question. (So, naturally, you labelled him an
>"Uncle Tom").
>
Naturally. Look at who his "critics" praising the book were. The
AEI?
>"Take your apology and pound it up your ass."
>
>Cool down, Bryan. You're a pacifist, remember?
Who said that?
>"So anyway: are you for or against racial segregation? I seem to be
>having trouble getting a straight answer out of people on that one, and
>we might as well all get a good look at what we're dealing with here."
>
>Racial segregation has no place in our country. But, though everyone
>with an inkling of self respect knows that, I understand why the left
>wing is constantly bringing racial segregation up as an issue. They
>need to quiet all the right wing whackos out there in our country who
>are for racial segregation. All six of them.
Ever heard of a guy named Trent Lott? He's the reason we're talking
about segregation this week. Really, you need to get out more...
Bill Bonde
I pointed this out to Zepp as well. There is a misspelling in there too:
"beleive". Clearly the point is that Zepp is incredibly gullible and
more outlandish the claim, the more likely he is going to at least
spread it around. In a few years, he will start citing, out of context,
this thread as information about the Rush Limbaugh gay sex rumour.
> If you believed the story and posted it as true, this is the joke on
> you--whoever "e-mailed" it to you can say that you believed anything
> he said, and the more outrageous it was, the more they would beleive
> (sic) it.
>
> If you didn't believe the story, of course you tried to post a nasty
> bit of obvious nonsense about somebody via your header. Of course,
> who am I to blame somebody for that?
>
> Haha.
>
Haha.
Quirt Evans
for Lott to acknowledge he's wrong, and apologize."
I agree that under normal circumstances acknowledging it as a hoax
should be enough. But in light of his attitude toward Lott, I tend to
disagree. Zepp either has no problem with the fact that it is a hoax
(lie), or he has a double standard with the Lott situation, or both.
If Zepp acknowledges it as a hoax, shouldn't he acknowledge also
that perhaps it was a mistake in posting it? Or is it okay to post
hoaxes?
The key also is, as you say, Lott acknowledged he was wrong. Zepp
still hasn't done that. Zepp simply acknowledged that it was a lie, but
seems so far to have no problem with the fact that he helped spread that
lie. And as you say, Lott apologized for being wrong, and Zepp has not.
So, either Zepp doesn't think it's wrong to lie even accidentally, or he
knows it's wrong, but doesn't care enough to apologize the way he feels
that Lott should. That makes him either a pathological liar or a
hypocrit, or both.
"But in my book the "responsibility" of a Senate majority leader is
much more than someone who posts in newsgroups!""
Clearly true, in anyones' book. So, if I'm not a Senate majority
leader or someone of equal or even somewhat lesser importance, does that
somehow mean that if I decide to fuel a hoax upon the people of this
newsgroup that it would be okay? Where's the integrity in that mindset?
I personally don't care if Zepp apologizes or even acknowledges his
double standard with the Lott situation. I just want the readers to see
the ingrained and natural hypocracy of the left for what it is.