Pre-made Personal Pan Pizzas offered in new square format ...
Stan de SD
"Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote in message
news:a3eaa964.03052...@posting.google.com...
> ... for better freezer compartment packing factor, but traditional
> round format still to be offered for the conservative crowd.
>
> "I'll have a P-to-the-fourth and a pitcher of Pilsner."
>
> "Do you want wheels with that?"
Hey, Kent, with all the time you spend posting about such trivial nonsense,
I guess you don't have time to look for a job, right?
>parr(*>
news:KyRFa.41008$rO.39...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
I really love it when one of the combatants arives early.
I'm sure that, once upon a time, you thought you had something
interesting to type, sTAN.
--
)>==notSTAN(ยบ> Parr
Kent Paul Dolan
> Hey, Kent, with all the time you spend posting about such trivial
> nonsense, I guess you don't have time to look for a job, right?
Oh, sorry, I was "obviously to the least intelligent observer"
trolling for humorless morons, and you were the only one that
bit. You don't meet the legal limit for minimum cranial
capacity (at least 2mm ear-to-ear), though, so back in the sewer
of your mind you go, NY'gator.
xanthian. Who says the homeless don't deserve a little fun in
life? _Somebody_ engendered Stan Rothwell just so I'd have a
defenseless whipping boy always ready to use when things got
a bit slow shoveling fish guts over the side for chum to catch
something at least as smart as a tuna. Catching Stan in a net
of words or with a cleverly barbed quip is like that scene in
one of the Crocodile Dundee movies where he's fishing off-shore
of Chicago with dynamite: too easy to be fun or legal, but it
does put meat in the cooler.
Stan de SD
> "Stan Rothwell" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Hey, Kent, with all the time you spend posting about such trivial
> > nonsense, I guess you don't have time to look for a job, right?
>
> Oh, sorry, I was "obviously to the least intelligent observer"
> trolling for humorless morons, and you were the only one that
> bit. You don't meet the legal limit for minimum cranial
> capacity (at least 2mm ear-to-ear), though, so back in the sewer
> of your mind you go, NY'gator.
Once again, Kent, with all the time you spend feeding your narcissism in
alt.society.homeless, you might take an hour or two a day to actually look
for work.
Kent Paul Dolan
<stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Once again, Kent, with all the time you
> spend feeding your narcissism in
> alt.society.homeless, you might take an
> hour or two a day to actually look
> for work.
Why? Job-searching in this market is for
me a 700-times proved total waste of time,
while trolling new ways to let you prove
yourself before Klortho and the universe
to be an utter imbecile has so far proven
to have a 100% success rate.
Between wasting my time foolishly on
something utterly and documentedly
guaranteed to fail, and spending my
time wisely on something _absolutely_
guaranteed to succeed, I know where
_I'm_ doing my investing, and any
broker you consult will give you the
same resoundingly unanimous advice
on such a choice: "don't throw good
money after bad".
xanthian, yo, ho, ho, again with glee:
"Stan Rothwell's just so _damned_ eas-ee!"
[Who could _possibly_ resist so
gullible a guppy? He nuzzles right up
to anything I post like a crotch
sniffing puppy.]
Stan de SD
> "Stan Rothwell, compulsive responder"
> <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Once again, Kent, with all the time you
> > spend feeding your narcissism in
> > alt.society.homeless, you might take an
> > hour or two a day to actually look
> > for work.
>
> Why? Job-searching in this market is for
> me a 700-times proved total waste of time,
Ever consider that you're not a fucking expert on everything, and that you
should rein in your ego a bit and speak to a qualified career counselor or
somebody at a temp agency who could find you employment? Of course, that
might mean taking a step or two down the ladder from your expectations (not
many people step into $100K/year positions off the streets), but you could
use the reality check...
Kent Paul Dolan
<stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Ever consider that you're not a fucking expert on
> everything, and that you should rein in your ego a bit and
> speak to a qualified career counselor or somebody at a
> temp agency who could find you employment? Of course, that
> might mean taking a step or two down the ladder from your
> expectations (not many people step into $100K/year
> positions off the streets), but you could use the reality
> check...
Hmm, ever consider that your compulsive lying might have once again
led you into creating an entirely false past history for me, and then
arguing as if it were true?
That "Internet Research" talent you falsely claim to have might have
led you to this little jewel:
http://www.well.com/user/xanthian/link_pages/general/JobsAndFreelance.html
which I built as a minor part of the fifteen months I spent using the
services of Workforce Connection, the local public job placement and
counseling service, and which is carried as an icon right on the
screen of each of their dozens of computers accessible to job-seekers
as a way to speed those job-seekers' access to available Internet job
placement information as pertaining to the local job market. I
continue to maintain that web page as useful new links encountered
dictate, and am contacted as a result of its existence by many new job
and resume sites as they come online, asking to be included. Since
most of them are pointless scams, most of them I decline to include.
You are _such_ a clueless idiot, but then that's hardly news to you
(or anyone else with a perceptible IQ, a class from which I explicitly
exclude you based on all available evidence, including this most
recent example).
xanthian.
Stan de SD
Once again, Kent, you're out on the street, when even those making niminum
wage find SOME way to keep a roof over their heads? What other possible
explanation is there other than the fact that besides putting on the
perfunctory acts necessary to establish one's PC credentials, nobody else
wants to have anything to do with you?
Kent Paul Dolan
> Once again, Kent, you're out on the street,
Well, technically, not just now, though my
chattels still are, and I hope to be again
as soon as possible. The cat here in my
friend's place is giving me nightlong
choking spells from breathing cat dander,
to which I am nearly fatally allergic.
I don't seem to thrive while housed any
more, and I'm better off staying out of
homes entirely; they're too polluted.
> when even those making niminum wage
That must be some new homeless-basher money
exchange standard, or could it just be you
confirming your status as a moron, or using
your Erskine-mode typing skills?
> find SOME way to keep a roof over their heads?
I guess you haven't checked out the income levels
eligible for housing supplemental income in the
west peninsula Bay area for a _really_ _long_
_time_, oh self proclaimed "skilled Internet
researcher". I'll leave it up to you to find out
what small whole number multiple of minimum wage
still leaves a family too poor to put a roof over
their heads without charity.
You will then of course come back and confess what
a lying weasel you are. In a pig's eye you will.
> What other possible explanation is there other
> than the fact
Funny how you keep making stuff up and then
calling it "fact", but of course, that's what a
compulsive pathological liar _has to do_, isn't
it, since dealing in truth would break your
iron-clad contract with your many admirers?
> that besides putting on the
> perfunctory acts necessary to establish one's
> PC credentials, nobody else wants to have
> anything to do with you?
Hmmm, funny that a fellow just this past evening
spent half of one of his only three days available
between Tokyo and Washington DC, stopped in this
little shack in the country I'm temporarily
reduced to sharing, just to enjoy my company,
bring me presents, ask my advice, and assure that
we would see each other again as soon as possible.
He could have saved himself several hundred
dollars with a direct flight, but to you, that's
just "being PC".
You are such a clueless lying moron.
But then, everyone knows that already.
xanthian.
Then again, Hideki is a friend of mine, and you,
sadly, remain a moron despite all you can do,
with no friends, only sycophants of equally low
mental prowess.
They Flock!
They Squawk!
They wiggle their butts in the air to attract
more of their kind!
They're the Famous Flocking, Squawing, Seats
Topmost, Stan Rothwell Butt Buddies!
Look quickly, their kind may never come again!
[All of Usenet is praying so.]
Stan de SD
> "Stan de SD" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote
>
> > Once again, Kent, you're out on the street,
>
> Well, technically, not just now, though my
> chattels still are, and I hope to be again
> as soon as possible. The cat here in my
> friend's place is giving me nightlong
> choking spells from breathing cat dander,
> to which I am nearly fatally allergic.
>
> I don't seem to thrive while housed any
> more, and I'm better off staying out of
> homes entirely; they're too polluted.
Thanks for confirming once again that you're truly a kook, Kent.
> > when even those making niminum wage
>
> That must be some new homeless-basher money
> exchange standard,
No, it's merely an accurate observation - most minimum wage-earners DO have
a roof over their head. Sure, they typically can't afford on on their own,
and require roommates, et. al., but they figure out how to manage, which is
more than you certainly are capable of..
> > find SOME way to keep a roof over their heads?
>
> I guess you haven't checked out the income levels
> eligible for housing supplemental income in the
> west peninsula Bay area for a _really_ _long_
> _time_, oh self proclaimed "skilled Internet
> researcher".
Actually, I have, which is why I strongly suggest that people who are unable
to afford the cost of living MOVE to a location that allows them to have an
acceptable standard of living. In fact, several people I know (not all of
them struggling on the bottom of the income ladder either) have found
employment and relocated to places such as AZ, NM, TX where the economy
hasn't gone through Gray-Out-itis and housing is far more affordable. Given
that many out-of-state companies will actually pay relocation costs if you
have suitable skills, it's nobody's fault but your own if you choose to keep
your ass planted in some place where you can't afford to keep a roof over
your head...
> I'll leave it up to you to find out
> what small whole number multiple of minimum wage
> still leaves a family too poor to put a roof over
> their heads without charity.
Once again, there's no law that stops anyone from moving if you can't make
it in one place.
> You will then of course come back and confess what
> a lying weasel you are. In a pig's eye you will.
Foaming again, huh? Well, I gather that's easier than dealing with the
issues... :O|
Kent Paul Dolan
<stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote:
>> "Stan Rothwell, intent on being self-proved
>> a moron" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> when even those making niminum wage
>> That must be some new homeless-basher money
>> exchange standard,
> No, it's merely an accurate observation -
Omigod!
How in the world does _anyone_ hold a conversation
with something as dull witted as a Stan Rothwell?
Adobe walls are better conversationalists.
Potted plants do more sparkling repartee.
Braille users would see the point more quickly.
Bricks are less thick.
xanthian, too amused even to be able to laugh;
doing a sort of a chokey-smothery thing instead,
lest I injure myself; sort of like trying to
suppress a sneeze after falling face first into
a field of goldenrod.
Some kind soul _please_ take him aside and explain
to him in words of one-or-fewer-syllables why he
is _once again_ self-depicted as the nether end
of a horse, the image that will forever linger in
the reader's mind when "Stan Rothwell" is mentioned.
Stan de SD
"Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote in message
news:a3eaa964.03070...@posting.google.com...
> "Stan Rothwell, none so blind as he"
> <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > "Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote:
> >> "Stan Rothwell, intent on being self-proved
> >> a moron" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >>> when even those making niminum wage
>
> >> That must be some new homeless-basher money
> >> exchange standard,
>
> > No, it's merely an accurate observation -
>
> Omigod!
>
> How in the world does _anyone_ hold a conversation
> with something as dull witted as a Stan Rothwell?
>
> Adobe walls are better conversationalists.
>
> Potted plants do more sparkling repartee.
>
> Braille users would see the point more quickly.
>
> Bricks are less thick.
Yet you're enthralled and obsessed with me... go figure.
Kent Paul Dolan
<stan...@earthlink.net> wrote in:
> Yet you're enthralled and obsessed with me... go figure.
You seem to suffer from these delusions on a regular basis,
Stan Rothwell:
Stan Rothwell calls James Keegan "obsessed with me":
Stan Rothwell calls George Kleinst "obsessed with me":
Stan Rothwell calls anonymous poster "dot" "obsessed with
me":
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8c5g8d%24i4t%241%40nntp9.atl.mindspring.net&output=gplain
Stan Rothwell calls anonymous poster "Aviator" "obsessed
with me":
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8c9csv%24q8m%241%40nntp9.atl.mindspring.net&output=gplain
And of course in those last two, Stan was _also_ calling
someone else titled "hc" "obsessed with me".
Quite the fan club ... in Stan Rothwell's mind.
Really, though, Stan Rothwell you aren't that interesting
except to yourself in your own "obsessed with me" mind.
Poor delusional Stan Rothwell forgets again that Usenet
has _persistence_ and so his making an idiot of himself
is there for all to see.
But that's okay, he's taken to going back and cancelling his
articles from the Google archives as a new method of
pathological lying, so perhaps these won't be around forever
either. Fortunately, muddlehead that he is, he forgets he
cannot possibly cancel all the ones quoting his idiocy, and
proving that he's been canceling his own postings to deny he
ever said what he said, when the back links go missing, so
the archives win again: Stan Rothwell is once more
self-outted as a pathological liar.
Here, Stan Rothwell, despite that he quotes the claim from
my articles, takes no exception to my noticing that he
described his research results as having been unpaid for by
a company that went bankrupt after using his work product:
While elsewhere, he has gotten very interested in "proof", having
cleverly cancelled the articles in his back trail:
One more win for Usenet's persistence, one more crushing
blow against compulsive sociopathic pathological liars
everywhere.
xanthian.
Stan de SD
Rev. 11D Meow!
History shows that 'Kent' is still pulling
the passive-aggressive projection and transferrence game.
Happy Over Twenty Years On Usenet 'Kent'!
Your Non-God Is So Pissed-Off At You NOW!!!
kirkus vomit
> Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
... i wish the cabal[tinc] would cum up eith one of these thingies
for me. i feel left out. don't panic, i can handle it.
call off the suicide watch, i'm gomma be ok.
b
Green Crush
> "Stan Rothwell, poster child for homeless-bashing morons"
> <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Ever consider that you're not a fucking expert on
>> everything, and that you should rein in your ego a bit and
>> speak to a qualified career counselor or somebody at a
>> temp agency who could find you employment? Of course, that
>> might mean taking a step or two down the ladder from your
>> expectations (not many people step into $100K/year
>> positions off the streets), but you could use the reality
>> check...
always plentiful. I never had enough time to work my job and so I was
sitting at one dollaer above no money. Sister Everate said that I
should never be a comedian because I would only succeed if I wore a
blind fold and put in earplugs.
Raistlin
GoGate /??//?
Green Crush
Might be.
._
Rbaiicsmtlminm I blow up a car. Stake it. ._
Ken Johnson
they could be packed exactly in a square box without being rotated to
fit. The boxes could then be stacked with 100% utilisation of volume.
After unpacking, the pizza would feed a family of seven. Or six, with
a dog.
Ken Johnson
That's mathematics! [Tom Lehrer]