Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Korea to Japan: DROP DEAD!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Shelton Lee Bumgarner

unread,
Mar 25, 2005, 9:47:15 AM3/25/05
to
By COY ASKEW
Ahssa! Copyeditor
http://ahssa.blogspot.com

Hanguks, PLEASE CALM DOWN!

Every culture has certain things they're touchy about. America has so
many that we should all collectively be sent to our nearest shrink for
some intensive psychotherapy. The South alone has been trying to work
out the issues associated with "the late unpleasantness" for about 140
years and the issues are still going strong! Wahoo!

A few times in my life, I've been in a country that gets so whipped up
over an issue that you can feel the Wheels of War being slowly be
turned. Because I was so young, late 1990 was the one that sticks in my
mind the most. The lead up to the Second Iraqi War was a lot like that,
too, but different because so many people were against it.

But anyway.

Right now, I honestly believe Koreans would go to war against Japan
over Dokdo Island if China, Russia and, uh, the United States would let
them.

To the uneducated outsider, the fight over Dokdo Island is rather,
well, odd. Korea and Japan are "friends" who are celebrating a
"Friendship Year" also known as "Sorry We Subjugated Your People for 50
Years and Made Your Women Whores For Our Inhuman Military Machine
During the War Year."

And the land at stake is painfully small. (Yes, I know about the
fishing rights, but humor me.)

But, the whole issue is not about the island, it's about how hurt the
Koreans still are about how shitty life was for them under the Japanese
during the 50 years before The War (as my mother would call it.)

The South is the same damn way, it's just we've had more time to get
over stuff. I mean, the entire city of Richmond, Va is dedicated to the
"Lost Cause," even though it's just nutty to be that way because the
South Was Wrong and It Was A Good Thing We Lost The War.

Korea.rox>Chan-Hee

unread,
Mar 25, 2005, 8:04:52 PM3/25/05
to
Hey, you, screw off!!! Who the !@#$ are you calling Hanguks? You want
us to calm down when Japan is trying to change our history by
convincing other countries?!
Go read history a little better on why we are tense before trying to
suppress our anger. Idiot...

Freddie

unread,
Mar 25, 2005, 8:58:52 PM3/25/05
to

"Korea.rox>Chan-Hee" <cheech...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1111799092....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Just exactly what "history" is Japan trying to change?


Shelton Lee Bumgarner

unread,
Mar 25, 2005, 9:00:51 PM3/25/05
to

You're right and I'm sorry.

bitter anko

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 2:10:36 AM3/26/05
to

"Shelton Lee Bumgarner" <rag...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111802451.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Do you think you are cool?

No Japanese is changing any history.

Anyway, even if someone trys to change it, it's none of Koreans' business.
This
is a free country and no one can force the historical ideology of Kim Jong
Il or Koreans.

bitter anko

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 2:08:46 AM3/26/05
to

"Korea.rox>Chan-Hee" <cheech...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1111799092....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hey, you, screw off!!! Who the !@#$ are you calling Hanguks? You want
> us to calm down when Japan is trying to change our history by
> convincing other countries?!

No Japanese is changing any history, moron.

Anyway, even if someone trys to change it, it's none of your business. This


is a free country and no one can force the historical ideology of Kim Jong
Il or Koreans.

Ernest Schaal

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 2:29:42 AM3/26/05
to
in article d2322o$2tvf$1...@nwall1.odn.ne.jp, bitter anko at an...@eater.com
wrote on 3/26/05 4:10 PM:

>
> "Shelton Lee Bumgarner" <rag...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1111802451.7...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> Korea.rox>Chan-Hee wrote:
>>> Hey, you, screw off!!! Who the !@#$ are you calling Hanguks? You want
>>> us to calm down when Japan is trying to change our history by
>>> convincing other countries?!
>>> Go read history a little better on why we are tense before trying to
>>> suppress our anger. Idiot...
>>
>> You're right and I'm sorry.
>
> Do you think you are cool?
>
> No Japanese is changing any history.

No, Kaz is merely trying to pass off fantasy as history.

bitter anko

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 8:38:30 AM3/26/05
to

"Ernest Schaal" <esc...@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote in message
news:BE6B3E76.E80B%esc...@max.hi-ho.ne.jp...

It seems you are the person trying to pass off fantasy as history. The US
approved the annexation of Korean peninsula at that time. Read history
correctly.

bitter anko

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 8:39:43 AM3/26/05
to

"Korea.rox>Chan-Hee" <cheech...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1111799092....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

STFU, Kimchee gook!

Ernest Schaal

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 2:42:04 PM3/26/05
to
in article d23oq4$1duo$1...@nwall1.odn.ne.jp, bitter anko at an...@eater.com
wrote on 3/26/05 10:38 PM:

Where is the proof that they "approved" the annexation? They tolerated it,
and did not go to war because of it, but there was no "approval."

bitter anko

unread,
Mar 26, 2005, 8:34:24 PM3/26/05
to

"Ernest Schaal" <esc...@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote in message
news:BE6BEA1C.E85E%esc...@max.hi-ho.ne.jp...

You try to revise it as of Roosevelt said nothing, but actually he said
something as shown below.

http://www.okazaki-inst.jp/okazaki-inst/hokazakius.dymaye.html
Later, however, Roosevelt supported Japan's outright annexation of Korea.
"Korea is absolutely Japanese," Roosevelt said, adding, "To be sure, by the
Treaty it was solemnly covenanted that Korea should remain independent. But
Korea is helpless to enforce the Treaty itself, and it is out of the
question to suppose that any other nation would attempt to do for the
Koreans what they are utterly unable to do for themselves."

Don't try to deny it. It only makes you look a liar.


Vernon North

unread,
Mar 27, 2005, 1:43:43 AM3/27/05
to
In article <d252od$7fl$1...@t-nwall01.odn.ne.jp>, an...@eater.com says...

> You try to revise it as of Roosevelt said nothing, but actually he said
> something as shown below.
>
> http://www.okazaki-inst.jp/okazaki-inst/hokazakius.dymaye.html
>
>
This all leads me to wonder why you can find backup for some statements,
but not for others; and how you steadfastly refuse to admit the dozens
of times you have lied on proven matters of fact.

You really are a lying piece of dung.

Verno

0 new messages