Codex of Reason
Alexander Ernst
Concept of the structure of a reasonable society
A goal: Development of a new model of the society.
Alexander Ernst
www.geistesfeinde.de
Contents
1. Society 1
2. Identity of the society 2
3. Goals of the society 2
5. Creative force of the society 3
6. Freedom of the society 3
7. Creation of the society 4
8. Existence of the society 4
9. Passing of the society 5
10. Administration of the society 5
11. Votes in the society. Value democracy. 6
1. Society
The term of the society is introduced by the following postulates.
1.1. Human is actually a society on him self.
1.2. A society has identity differentiating it from other ones.
1.3. Carrier of the identity can be only one member of the society.
1.4. Following attributes belong to characteristics of a society:
1.4.a. Identity
1.4.b. Goals
1.4.c. Measure of the freedom
1.4.d. Functions
1.4.e. Measure of the creative force
1.5. Measure of the society is number of its members.
1.6. Society functions refer to roles, which it plays, and obligations
and objectives, which should be done.
1.7. Creative force of the society relates to its ability to fulfil
functions successfully.
1.8. Freedom of the society is connected with its obligations and
responsibility.
2. Identity of the society
Identity of the society is a mandatory tribute of its determinate being.
A society without identity cannot exist.
2.1. The nature of the society identity can be implemented due to 1.4.
2.2. A carrier of the identity may be only a member of the society.
2.3. Carrier of the identity can be elected or voted out each time by all
members directly.
2.4. The carrier of the social identity receives personally delegated and
co-ordinated authority, in order to fulfil goals of the society.
2.5. Carrier of the social identity may decide only in frame of him
delegated authority.
2.6. Other decisions than in 2.5 can be made by voting of all members
directly.
3. Goals of the society
Goals of the society can be choose or set up.
3.1. Division of goals on internal and external is mandatory.
3.2. External of goals of a society consist mainly in communication,
delegation of authority and take over of responsibility.
3.3. External of goals contribute to the development of the society as
such.
3.4. A goal of the society continuity maintenance can be pursued only if
it does not contradict other goals.
3.5. Internal goals serve the fulfilling of the obligations of the
society towards members.
3.6. Well-being and development of each individual member belong to
mandatory internal goals of society.
4. Functions of the society
Functions of a society can be acquired or delegated.
4.1. There are internal and external functions to the society.
4.2. Internal functions are dedicated continuity of the society being and
being of members.
4.3. External functions relate to society identity and its obligations
towards other societies.
4.4. Functions of the society may not have a destructive character.
Definition. Destructive force is a form of the force, which destroys
identity of a society. Destructive force is opposite to creative force.
5. Creative force of the society
Creative Kraft of the society is result of its development.
5.1. Creative force of the society is result of the creative abilities of
its members.
5.2. External effect of the creative force:
5.2.a. Identity continuity maintenance
5.2.b. Fulfilling of the outside obligations
5.2.c. Fulfilling of society functions and roles
5.3. Internal effect of the creative force:
5.3.a. Fulfilling of obligations towards members
5.3.b. Well-being and development of members
5.3.c. Maintenance of the internal life of the society.
6. Freedom of the society
6.1. Freedom of the society is determined by delegation of the basic
conditions from outside and from above.
6.2. Freedom serves for to the existence and development of the society.
6.3. Society delegates freedom of the own members.
6.4. No member can have more freedom than the society.
6.5. Society is free to accept new members.
6.6. A member is free to leave the society.
7. Creation of the society
7.1. A new society can be created if at least two other societies decided
to found a new one consisting of them as members.
7.2. Enter a new member doesn’t lead automatically to creating a new
society.
7.3. Prerequisites for developing a new society consist in principles of
the internal unity, goals of the development and attributes of the
identity: Freedom, creative Force and Functions.
7.4. A society cannot be created, if its concept and identity can’t be
unacceptable from outside.
7.5. All humans are irrevocable members of the society called
civilization.
8. Existence of the society
8.1. Existence of the society has always two sides: internal and
external.
8.2. External existence of the society is connected with the determinate
being of its identity.
8.3. Internal existence of the society consists in well-being and the
development of each individual member.
8.4. Internal and external existence of the society is connected with
each other; each one affects and cannot exist without another one.
Isolation of a society means its death.
8.5. Development of the society has in result dialectic changes of the
identity and characteristics of the society.
9. Passing of the society
9.1. A society ceases to be if
9.1.a. A last but one member leaves the society.
9.1.b. The society dissolves self.
9.1.c. The identity of the society ceases to be.
9.1.d. Internal or external existence of the society is no
longer possible.
9.2. Member leaving of the society doesn’t lead automatically to
dissolving the society.
9.3. Join or disjoin a comprehensive society does not lead to dissolving
the society.
9.4. It is not upon humans to decide if civilization must be terminated
obligation-moderately or voluntarily.
9.5. A society can be obligation-moderately dissolved, if its identity is
not more acceptable by the environment.
9.6. If a member is a carrier of the key function of the society, his
withdrawal means also dissolution of the society.
10. Administration of the society
10.1. The carrier of the social identity represents the society in
external environment.
10.2. He takes freely decisions, which belong to his authority.
10.3. Other decisions need a vote of all other members of the society.
10.4. Administration of the society, which is responsible for all internal
questions, will be elected or voted out directly.
10.5. A member stands over the whole society. Two members mean less each
of them.
Value a society can be calculated in such a way
W=d(FC/N)
F - Measure of the freedom
C - Measure of the creative force
N - Number of members
d - coefficient
11. Votes in the society. Value democracy.
11.1. Whole society is divided by predicates on groups.
11.2. The most important predicate F of the society relates to functions,
which have vital meaning for existence of the society. Two members are F
equivalent, if they are exchangeable under the same function. Each vital
function determines a group (predicate class). Voices in a predicate
class are equal and can be used democratically. The whole predicate class
has right of veto. The whole society needs no to vote further, if a
predicate class took its decision. But authority of the predicate class
belong only to his function.
11.3. If by predicate F the thing remains indefinite, then predicate C is
used - creative force. Two members are C equivalent, if they have
comparable creative force. Members from a predicate class have equal
voices. Whole predicate class has a voice corresponding creative force of
the class.
One can develop further such voting idea or value democracy. Equivalent
voices can have only members or groups, which are comparable with each
other. In order to understand the idea better, we would like to consider
a metaphorical example. I am carrier of the identity of a biological
society which is my body. Members of this society are biological organs.
Two kidneys form a predicate class, where there are two equal voices. If
both decided against me, - then all day with. The heart actually is a
predicate class and has therefore right of veto. If heart sad No, then
good-bye. Biological organism is not a society, where can be decides
using heads counting like in democracy. One must count not heads, but
values. And I call this value democracy. Optimally conceived value
democracy is critical for a society. Each society can have own value
democracy. The main thing is that it presents clear Yes or No to outside
world. Value democracy is internal affaire of the society.