Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
Plubius
ethereal "Cloud Nine". Now, stupidity is yet another matter, one which zona
also seems to be on a good working basis with.
Respect <sta...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v6Rl3.971$r5....@news.flash.net...
>
> Could someone define hate talk?
>
> -----Respect-----
>
>
xona
wondering what type of funeral and send-off Rush will have when the
garrulous fat one kicks-the-bucket.
We should not have too long to wait as Limbaugh's body is surely in
rapid decay. One can only imagine how clogged his arteries are and
what terrible condition his kidneys, liver, and stomach must be in for
all the work they have to do to handle and dispose of the vast amounts
of fats and other poisons that LIMBAUGH consumes on a daily basis.
I can see it now. The KKK will hold rallies and probably burn down a
few black churches in his memory. Some of his more bigoted fans will
probably go out and hunt down gays in his name, and probably rape a
few feminist to add to their mourning. Various militias will hold
weekend war-games in his honor. Pat Robertson, Don Wildmon, Gary
Bauer, and Mr. Dobson will come up with some creative fund-raising
scams in Rush's memory to rip off their moronic followers.
However, the biggest tribute will probably be be the countless,
unknown common people and wild animals who in the years to come will
quietly and without much fanfare go and visit his grave where they
will shit and piss on it as the most most fitting tribute to the dead
and gone fat bigot who inspired so much hate in those morons who
looked up to this human piece of shit like toilet paper to a running
asshole.
xona
Respect
Nighthawk
Rush can't even be considered "heavy" now. He's in better shape than either
Clinton, who are starting to look like pears... that much is certain.
Now let's get back to Respect's observation. Why do you hate so much? Why
do you think you're "cute" with this obscene observation?
xona wrote in message <7n8luf$lr5$1...@nnrp02.primenet.com>...
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: Could someone define hate talk?
Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
for 3 hours per day.
Any more questions?
--
Buddy K
Reverend Powerlib
>From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
>Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
>Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
Yes. A couple more:
Could someone define hate talk?
Who played Lumpy in Leave it to Beaver?
Paul Ambro
Paul
Paul Ambro
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote in message <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>...
>Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
>: Could someone define hate talk?
>
>Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
>for 3 hours per day.
>
>Any more questions?
>
>Buddy K
>
Paul Ambro
Respect wrote in message ...
>
>Could someone define hate talk?
>
>
>
cw...@ret.cpo.usn
KILPATRICK JR.) wrote:
>Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
>: Could someone define hate talk?
>
>Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
>for 3 hours per day.
>
>Any more questions?
No Buddy, but I have an answer or two. Hate talk is anything posted
by xona.............and you. Both liberals. Now, any questions??
Regards,
>
>--
>Buddy K
>
MSLU123
>Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
>From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
>Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
>Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
>
>
>: Could someone define hate talk?
>
>Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
>for 3 hours per day.
>
>Any more questions?
>
>Buddy K
I agree, I tried to listen to him in the car the other day and I lasted 5
minutes. My husband said, "turn the bastard off," He is really bad and I
wonder how he can get away with the lies and insinuations he constantly puts
out and still be such a favorite?
Lucile
John Smith
news:19990723163652...@ng-fb1.aol.com...
You're talking about Clinton, right?
slant_eyed_louie
>
> You claim Rush is fat. If you know so much, how much does he weigh now?
well I don't have any idea of what the FAT(YES
FAT!!)-MIDDLE-AGED-WHITE-MALE-PIECE-OF-SHIT-RIGHT-WING-ASSHOLE looks or
weighs anymore, but that **R-E-A-L-L-Y** tells US what an "independent
thinking" person YOU ARE that you can tell us "what rush looks like".
btw NOT-einstein: part of **THINKING** involves unplugging the radio and
TV.
>
> Paul
>
<snip>
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: >Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
: >From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
: >Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
: >Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
: >
: >Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
: >
: >: Could someone define hate talk?
: >
: >Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
: >for 3 hours per day.
: >
: >Any more questions?
: >
: >--
: >Buddy K
: I agree, I tried to listen to him in the car the other day and I lasted 5
: minutes. My husband said, "turn the bastard off," He is really bad and I
: wonder how he can get away with the lies and insinuations he constantly puts
: out and still be such a favorite?
Dittoheads are dumber than stumps.
--
Buddy K
Screamin Jay Hawkins
Buddy: as you are another of the has-beens on this NG, it's probably fruitless
to ask, but I will:
WHAT lies????
Respect
What do you think of the nice post xona posted?????
some people grow up in the sticks like yourself maybe????
then all people are Bastards in your view of the world....
all ya need is your straw in your crooked rotten teeth and to bitch about
all those rich bastards.... Hey? when does Hee Haw come on???? wouldn't
want you to miss it.... hahahahahaha
funny thing about you dumpocrats...... you can find a way to bitch about
anything but then when one of your own posts a truly hateful post you look
the other way and continue on with your lemonade and your bitchin about
Rarsh Limbo.
Happy trailer living :)
wayne mann
>
>>Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
>>From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
>>Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
>>Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
>>
>>Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>: Could someone define hate talk?
>>
>>Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
>>for 3 hours per day.
>>
>>Any more questions?
>>
>>--
>>Buddy K
>
>
>I agree, I tried to listen to him in the car the other day and I lasted 5
>minutes. My husband said, "turn the bastard off," He is really bad and I
>wonder how he can get away with the lies and insinuations he constantly puts
>out and still be such a favorite?
>Lucile
L8ulu, just list ONE lie you heard that day. Also tell us
what day it was. If you can't, just admit you lied about it, OK?
\\/ayne //\ann
"The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend
to be something they're not."
-- Hillary Clinton - 1992 60 Minutes interview
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.) shot off his yap, as follows:
: >MSLU123 (msl...@aol.com) wrote:
: >
: >: >Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
: >: >From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
: >: >Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
: >: >Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
: >: >
: >: >Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
: >: >
: >: >: Could someone define hate talk?
: >: >
: >: >Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
: >: >for 3 hours per day.
: >: >
: >: >Any more questions?
: >: >
: >: >--
: >: >Buddy K
: >
: >
: >: I agree, I tried to listen to him in the car the other day and I lasted 5
: >: minutes. My husband said, "turn the bastard off," He is really bad and I
: >: wonder how he can get away with the lies and insinuations he constantly
: >puts
: >: out and still be such a favorite?
: >
: >Dittoheads are dumber than stumps.
: >
: >--
: >Buddy K
: >
: >
: >
: Buddy: as you are another of the has-beens on this NG, it's probably fruitless
: to ask, but I will:
: WHAT lies????
All of them.
--
Buddy K
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: Hey Lucile,,,, don't know how old you are,,, 7 year's old or so????
: Happy trailer living :)
Another compassionate conservative.
--
Buddy K
Nighthawk
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote in message <7nchqm$6...@portal.gmu.edu>...
Let's see, Clinton has lied to the nation in virtually everything he's said,
starting with telling the people of Arkansas that if the re-elected him
governor he would not run for president (while putting together his first
presidential campaign), and going on to hit highlights in: The "middle
class tax cut" promised in the '92 campaign, and not delivered because "the
deficit is so much larger than we expected" (it was smaller than he claimed
it was when he promised the middle class tax cut, but the news media
conveniently forgot the numbers); didn't have anything to do with that
woman (Flowers, proven); the church burnings in Arkansas (never happened);
"... just a SNAFU..." in reference to the 900+ FBI files; Waco; Billy Dale
was an "embezzler" (who was acquitted in two hours by the jury... and why
were the other six Travel Office employees unceremoniously kicked out if
Dale was supposedly the "problem"??? Clinton had the right to fire the
Travel Office, but there are proper ways to handle the firing of civil
servants, and the Arkansas Pigs broke every protocol!)... and this is just
the first couple of years of the first term, and I'm sure I've missed a lot
of his BS. You want me to go on? It gets worse and worse :/.
Name ONE lie Rush has told. Just one. Specify. And prove that it is a
"lie" and not just a difference of opinion. "Global warming"??? This is the
one that is most often stated to be a "lie, but there IS a difference of
opinion coming from genuine climatologists, and not the gang of social
scientists and environment teachers who are pushing the idea of "global
warming". The major news media isn't reporting this because "...nothing's
wrong..." just isn't "news", especially when all of the major networks have
put so much effort into pushing the "crisis" without looking at all sides or
even the credentials of the clowns pushing "global warming"... possibility
of a major embarrassment on their part! That is one of the things that has
been said to be a "lie" and it IS honest reporting of a difference of
opinion among scientists. What else can you name to be a lie?
Be specific, or be GONE!
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote in message <7nchqm$6...@portal.gmu.edu>...
Get your nose out of the fat, lying demagogue's ass before he makes a
sharp turn and breaks it. He lies constantly. He doesn't know the
difference between truth and fiction anymore. I don't even bother to
listen to his lies these days because I got so tired of his constant
lying.
Turn him on for 5 minutes and you'll hear at least 1 lie. Guaranteed.
--
Buddy K
John H. Schneider II
And of course, you couldn't be specific. you couldn't name a single
lie. Looks like the person who has their nose up someone's ass is you
and yours. You've yet to point out a single lie. If Rush lies as much as
you say he does, you should be able to document lie after lie after lie.
You haven't documented a single one.
As the man said: Be specific. or be GONE!
John II
D. Ferrel
>>: >Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh, practices
>>: >for 3 hours per day.
>Buddy: as you are another of the has-beens on this NG, it's probably fruitless
>to ask, but I will:
>WHAT lies????
There was a magazine article a couple of years ago which went on
for about 3 pages listing the outright lies Rush had told on his program. IF
you will promise to read it, I'll look it up and give you the reference. I
filed it away because I knew there would be dittoheads like you claiming he
never lies. //// F
Torres-Astacio
HELO222
Just read the Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's analysis of just one month
of Rush's shows and Limbaughs pathetic response to their report.
(http:www.fair.org is the address)
Just last week I heard him claim the the President can make an exception for
burial at Arlington. That is not true. He let a caller claim that JFK, jr was
buried with full military honors. That is not true.
Limbaugh is on almost 15 hours a day, doesn't have an editor or fact checker,
NEVER appears anywhere unless it is a controlled environment. His appearance
on Letterman is a classic. First he bombed with a Hillary joke and he was
unprepared when Letterman went in for the kill. You almost felt sorry for him.
I am still trying to get a tape of when he guest hosted Pat Sajaks show. He
went into classic flop sweat, the show was so bad it never aired. He is a
classic bully; he can dish it out but he can't take it. If he is so bright and
so mentally limber, why don't we see him anywhere anymore? Why doesn't he take
calls without screeners? He has his Telos, he can dump any profanity. Just see
what happens, let him truly match wits with his "public." It will never happen.
Nighthawk
Name ONE lie that was perpetrated by Rush. And I do NOT mean by one of his
callers, I mean by Rush himself
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote in message <7ncn1f$i...@portal.gmu.edu>...
>Nighthawk (nigh...@email.msn.com) wrote:
>
>: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote in message <7nchqm$6...@portal.gmu.edu>...
>: >Screamin Jay Hawkins (plon...@aol.comMAPSON) wrote:
>: >: hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.) shot off his yap, as
>: follows:
>: >
>: >: >MSLU123 (msl...@aol.com) wrote:
>: >: >
>: >: >: >Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
>: >: >: >From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
>: >: >: >Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
>: >: >: >Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
>: >: >: >
>: >: >: >Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>: >: >: >
>: >: >: >: Could someone define hate talk?
>: >: >: >
>: >: >: >Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh,
>: practices
>: >: >: >for 3 hours per day.
>: >: >: >
>: >: >: >Any more questions?
>: >: >: >
>: >: >: >--
>: >: >: >Buddy K
>: >: >
>: >: >
>: >: >: I agree, I tried to listen to him in the car the other day and I
>: lasted 5
>: >: >: minutes. My husband said, "turn the bastard off," He is really bad
>: and I
>: >: >: wonder how he can get away with the lies and insinuations he
>: constantly
>: >: >puts
>: >: >: out and still be such a favorite?
>: >: >
>: >: >Dittoheads are dumber than stumps.
>: >: >
>: >: >--
>: >: >Buddy K
>: >: >
>: >: >
>: >: >
>: >
>: >: Buddy: as you are another of the has-beens on this NG, it's probably
>: fruitless
>: >: to ask, but I will:
>: >
>: >: WHAT lies????
Nighthawk
right wing?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
I hope you're kidding, because only a real idiot thinks the media is
controlled by the right!
HELO222 wrote in message <19990724160017...@ng-fe1.aol.com>...
Nighthawk
However, if the article was written by FAIR, don't even think about it!
This group is one of the worst bunch of liars in the country!
D. Ferrel wrote in message ...
>In article <19990723220801...@ng-fi1.aol.com>
plon...@aol.comMAPSON (Screamin Jay Hawkins) writes:
>>>: >Glad you asked. It's what the fat, lying demagogue, Limbaugh,
practices
>>>: >for 3 hours per day.
>>>: >Buddy K
>>Buddy: as you are another of the has-beens on this NG, it's probably
fruitless
>>to ask, but I will:
>
>>WHAT lies????
>
>
Nighthawk
HELO222 wrote in message <19990724160017...@ng-fe1.aol.com>...
>Limbaughs lies, distortions and just idiotic statements are well
documented.
>Just read the Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's analysis of just one
month
>of Rush's shows and Limbaughs pathetic response to their report.
>(http:www.fair.org is the address)
>Just last week I heard him claim the the President can make an exception
for
>burial at Arlington. That is not true. He let a caller claim that JFK, jr
was
>buried with full military honors. That is not true.
MOST of what FAIR reports as "lies" is just a difference of opinion. They
report on everyone who has a difference of opinion with their own agenda as
"lying", and THAT is a FACT, my friend :/.
I went to one of Arlington's websites and asked about Presidential waivers
for burial. This is the reply I received from one of their employees:
"The President has authorized a number of burials at Arlington, in fact over
100 people who were not authorized to be buried at Arlington. He does have
the authority to do this. Pending legislation in Congress would codify into
law the standard requirements for burial and disallow exemptions."
So where is Rush's lie? BTW, burial at sea from an aircraft carrier IS
close enough to full military honors that whatever difference there might be
is irrelevant when there are hundreds of Navy families who've been waiting 6
months or more for their own loved ones to be buried at sea. The Kennedy
family is rich enough to use one of their own boats, or get one from the
Onasis family (remember that Aristotle Onasis was JFK Jr's stepfather, and a
shipping magnate). Besides, that comment came from a caller.
So, be specific about another of Rush's "lies" and I'll check that one out,
too.
D. Ferrel
>Please do.
>However, if the article was written by FAIR, don't even think about it!
>This group is one of the worst bunch of liars in the country!
Try again; it wasn't. /// F
Nighthawk
D. Ferrel
>OK, so give me a link to find it.
Better than that, I'll quote it, lie by lie, night by night. //// F
Nighthawk
telling the truth? LOL! Tell me what the article is and I'll go to the
library and look it up.
Or does the article not exist at all?
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote:
: >
: >
: > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. wrote in message <7nchqm$6...@portal.gmu.edu>...
: > : >Screamin Jay Hawkins (plon...@aol.comMAPSON) wrote:
: > : >: hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.) shot off his yap, as
: > : follows:
: > : >
: > : >: >MSLU123 (msl...@aol.com) wrote:
: > : >: >
: > : >: >: >Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh's Funeral
: > : >: >: >From: hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.)
: > : >: >: >Date: Fri, 23 July 1999 08:40 AM EDT
: > : >: >: >Message-id: <7n9nrs$2...@portal.gmu.edu>
: > : >: >: >
: > : >: >: >Respect (sta...@hotmail.com) wrote:
: > : >: >: >
: > : >: >: >: Could someone define hate talk?
: > : >: >: >
: > : practices
: > : >: >: >for 3 hours per day.
: > : >: >: >Any more questions?
: > : >: >: >
: > : >: >: >--
: > : >: >: >Buddy K
: > : >: >
: > : >: >
: > : >: >: I agree, I tried to listen to him in the car the other day and I
: > : lasted 5
: > : >: >: minutes. My husband said, "turn the bastard off," He is really bad
: > : and I
: > : >: >: wonder how he can get away with the lies and insinuations he
: > : constantly
: > : >: >puts
: > : >: >: out and still be such a favorite?
: > : >: >
: > : >: >Dittoheads are dumber than stumps.
: > : >: >
: > : >: >--
: > : >: >
: > : >: >
: > : >: >
: > : >
: > : >: Buddy: as you are another of the has-beens on this NG, it's probably
: > : fruitless
: > : >: to ask, but I will:
: > : >
: > : >: WHAT lies????
: > : >All of them.
: > : >
: > : >--
: > : >Buddy K
: >
: > : Let's see, Clinton has lied to the nation in virtually everything he's said,
: > : starting with telling the people of Arkansas that if the re-elected him
: > : governor he would not run for president (while putting together his first
: > : presidential campaign), and going on to hit highlights in: The "middle
: > : class tax cut" promised in the '92 campaign, and not delivered because "the
: > : deficit is so much larger than we expected" (it was smaller than he claimed
: > : it was when he promised the middle class tax cut, but the news media
: > : conveniently forgot the numbers); didn't have anything to do with that
: > : woman (Flowers, proven); the church burnings in Arkansas (never happened);
: > : "... just a SNAFU..." in reference to the 900+ FBI files; Waco; Billy Dale
: > : was an "embezzler" (who was acquitted in two hours by the jury... and why
: > : were the other six Travel Office employees unceremoniously kicked out if
: > : Dale was supposedly the "problem"??? Clinton had the right to fire the
: > : Travel Office, but there are proper ways to handle the firing of civil
: > : servants, and the Arkansas Pigs broke every protocol!)... and this is just
: > : the first couple of years of the first term, and I'm sure I've missed a lot
: > : of his BS. You want me to go on? It gets worse and worse :/.
: >
: > : Name ONE lie Rush has told. Just one. Specify. And prove that it is a
: > : one that is most often stated to be a "lie, but there IS a difference of
: > : opinion coming from genuine climatologists, and not the gang of social
: > : scientists and environment teachers who are pushing the idea of "global
: > : warming". The major news media isn't reporting this because "...nothing's
: > : wrong..." just isn't "news", especially when all of the major networks have
: > : put so much effort into pushing the "crisis" without looking at all sides or
: > : even the credentials of the clowns pushing "global warming"... possibility
: > : of a major embarrassment on their part! That is one of the things that has
: > : been said to be a "lie" and it IS honest reporting of a difference of
: > : opinion among scientists. What else can you name to be a lie?
: >
: > : Be specific, or be GONE!
: >
: > Get your nose out of the fat, lying demagogue's ass before he makes a
: > sharp turn and breaks it. He lies constantly. He doesn't know the
: > difference between truth and fiction anymore. I don't even bother to
: > listen to his lies these days because I got so tired of his constant
: > lying.
: >
: > Turn him on for 5 minutes and you'll hear at least 1 lie. Guaranteed.
: >
: > --
: > Buddy K
: And of course, you couldn't be specific. you couldn't name a single
: lie. Looks like the person who has their nose up someone's ass is you
: and yours. You've yet to point out a single lie. If Rush lies as much as
: you say he does, you should be able to document lie after lie after lie.
: You haven't documented a single one.
: As the man said: Be specific. or be GONE!
The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all you
ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
--
Buddy K
Nighthawk
>Have you ever read it their report? Yes or no? They re basic argument is
that
>the media is a corporate media. Is Rupert Murdoch liberal? General Electric
>liberal? Disney liberal? I defy you to show me something that they have
>published that says the media is controlled by the right wing. You can't do
it.
As a matter of fact I went to the website YOU gave the link to...
www.fair.org, and found in the "What's FAIR?" section the following comment:
"Articles examine biased reporting, censored news, media mergers,
press/state cronyism, the power of corporate owners and advertisers, and
right-wing influences in the media."
If they are NOT looking for LIBERAL influences in the media with equal
fervor, and they don't mention that they are, then they obviously think the
right wing controls the media. Or are you too stupid to deduce that from
their own comment? WHY aren't they looking for left-wing influence?
Because that's THEIR agenda.
>Is Rupert Murdoch liberal? General Electric
>liberal? Disney liberal?
Rupert Murdoch? He doesn't exercise editorial control over his papers.
There is a Murdoch paper in Australia that is most definitely one of the
most liberal rags in existence. Other papers he owns are also not
controlled by him. He stands back and lets his editors have controlling
authority over what's published. For a conservative Australian group's
viewpoint
on "Murdoch's Australian" see the link www.newaus.com/au
General Electric? I don't know. ARE they a liberal organization? Their
news media certainly are, but the same conditions that apply to Murdoch
might also apply to GE.
Disney? Yes, they absolutely ARE a liberal organization. No question. I
worked at Disney World when I was going to college and know that to be a
fact. I've been exposed to their bullshit first hand. Oh, and by the
way... while mouthing the liberal line and forcing employees into liberal
boxes, they ALSO behave as one of the stingiest corporations to their
employees that I've ever seen. It USED to be a great place to work,
politically neutral with great employment conditions, but when Eisner took
over, they started cutting back on employee benefits, getting into political
correctness, and they totally destroyed the good working relationship that
Roy Disney and Card Walker established with their employees. Eisner is a
well-known Democrat supporter. I was there to see the changes he brought
about... and promptly resigned. From what I've heard from friends who
stayed there longer than I did, it was the best thing I ever did.
>Read the report for yourself. For once will you guys back up your
statements
>with fact?
OK, I read it. Most of what they complain about is difference of opinion
among experts. There ARE expert opinions on the other side, but FAIR only
want the experts that tout THEIR views quoted in the news. Their version of
the "facts" are mostly in a manner of reading what statistics are available,
and what they mean. Figures lie and liars figure.
The Global Warming and Ozone crap, for
instance, is challenged by climatologists all over the world, while being
supported by people who are basically social scientists and environment
teachers (ie: people with a social agenda, with books to sell, and money to
be made from grants! Follow the money, pal! The scientists who say it's
all crap are NOT selling books or demanding grants!), and not themselves
climate
scientists.The fact that the NASA satellites that were so loudly proclaimed
by the global warming crowd when they went up have proven that the planet
has actually COOLED a tiny bit in the last 20 years is a case in point...
the
global warming crowd never mentions them these days and continue using
faulty computer models to predict climate behavior (by the way, a computer
model is only as good as the person who created it, and these seem to be
seriously wanting!). Funny thing is that if you set them for 20 or 30 years
in the past with the conditions of the time and try to predict what the
climate is today, they're generally so far off they're preposterous!
They're also using sensors that are mostly located in cities and/or near
airports, and as these areas grow the ambient temperatures reflected from
the pavement are, of course, getting hotter. But they never mention THAT
little detail, of course... they'd probably lose their grants for doing
something that stupid ;). And there's a great deal of evidence that the
hole in the ozone layer is being caused by solar flares. There's a team of
scientists in Sweden who are studying that very question. Stay tuned...
their results aren't in yet.
By the way, in FAIR's own documentation on Rush, I found the following:
"A U.S. News & World Report piece (8/16/93) by Steven Roberts declared, 'The
information Mr. Limbaugh provides is generally accurate.'" They gave that
quotation as evidence that the media is controlled by the right wing.
So where does that leave FAIR? U.S. News and World Report is one of the
most UNbiased publications-- in either direction-- in the country. They
very studiously check into stories before they publish them. If they appear
biased to FAIR, that puts FAIR so far to the left that they fell off the
planet!
Don't talk to me about FAIR... those clowns are outright socialists :/
Kurt Nicklas
news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
> The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all you
> ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
>
> --
> Buddy K
One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
He has 20 Million listeners and you're still working in The Little Red
Schoolhouse.
--
Kurt Nicklas
My Leftwing Usenet Hate Page:
http://tiberias.home.sprynet.com/leftwinghate.htm
-
'There is a serious tendency toward capitalism
among the well-to-do peasants.'
- Mao Tse-tung
MSLU123
Sorry, I did not grow up in the sticks. You would be surprised where I grew
up....big city gal.
I got all my beautiful white pearlys and they are not crooked.
Funny thing about you Republicraps,
you can hand it out but you can't take it. You are grasping at straws. I
ignore people that use filthy language, by the way.
LK
Do you ignore people who think they are cute by using silly little names for
political parties?
Chris
subversionary concept. ANYTHING...
Remember conjecture is not referable to lies. He conjectures often. But he
also denotes that directly.
Obviously you are a tad subverted and need to ground yourself with facts..
Good luck!
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HELO222 wrote in message <19990725020534...@ng-cq1.aol.com>...
: >Have you ever read it their report? Yes or no? They re basic argument is
: that
: >the media is a corporate media. Is Rupert Murdoch liberal? General Electric
: >liberal? Disney liberal? I defy you to show me something that they have
: >published that says the media is controlled by the right wing. You can't do
: it.
: As a matter of fact I went to the website YOU gave the link to...
: www.fair.org, and found in the "What's FAIR?" section the following comment:
: "Articles examine biased reporting, censored news, media mergers,
: press/state cronyism, the power of corporate owners and advertisers, and
: right-wing influences in the media."
: If they are NOT looking for LIBERAL influences in the media with equal
: fervor, and they don't mention that they are, then they obviously think the
: right wing controls the media. Or are you too stupid to deduce that from
: their own comment? WHY aren't they looking for left-wing influence?
: Because that's THEIR agenda.
Uh, dunce, there is a group called AIM that looks for liberal bias. So
you have at least one group on each side.
: >Is Rupert Murdoch liberal? General Electric
: >liberal? Disney liberal?
: Rupert Murdoch? He doesn't exercise editorial control over his papers.
Proof?
: There is a Murdoch paper in Australia that is most definitely one of the
: most liberal rags in existence.
Proof?
: Other papers he owns are also not
: controlled by him. He stands back and lets his editors have controlling
: authority over what's published. For a conservative Australian group's
: viewpoint
: on "Murdoch's Australian" see the link www.newaus.com/au
A far right opinion is hardly evidence.
: General Electric? I don't know. ARE they a liberal organization? Their
: news media certainly are, but the same conditions that apply to Murdoch
: might also apply to GE.
Proof?
: Disney? Yes, they absolutely ARE a liberal organization.
Proof?
: No question. I
: worked at Disney World when I was going to college and know that to be a
: fact.
You wouldn't know a fact if it bit your ass.
: I've been exposed to their bullshit first hand. Oh, and by the
: way... while mouthing the liberal line and forcing employees into liberal
: boxes, they ALSO behave as one of the stingiest corporations to their
: employees that I've ever seen.
Rightwingers like stingy corporations - or is that just when they're
stingy to everyone else?
: It USED to be a great place to work,
: politically neutral with great employment conditions, but when Eisner took
: over, they started cutting back on employee benefits, getting into political
: correctness, and they totally destroyed the good working relationship that
: Roy Disney and Card Walker established with their employees. Eisner is a
: well-known Democrat supporter. I was there to see the changes he brought
: about... and promptly resigned. From what I've heard from friends who
: stayed there longer than I did, it was the best thing I ever did.
Sounds like a good rightwing organization to me.
: >Read the report for yourself. For once will you guys back up your
: statements
: >with fact?
: OK, I read it. Most of what they complain about is difference of opinion
: among experts. There ARE expert opinions on the other side, but FAIR only
: want the experts that tout THEIR views quoted in the news. Their version of
: the "facts" are mostly in a manner of reading what statistics are available,
: and what they mean. Figures lie and liars figure.
So what is AIM doing?
: The Global Warming and Ozone crap, for
: instance, is challenged by climatologists all over the world, while being
: supported by people who are basically social scientists and environment
: teachers (ie: people with a social agenda, with books to sell, and money to
: be made from grants!
Proof?
Follow the money, pal! The scientists who say it's
: all crap are NOT selling books or demanding grants!),
Proof?
You really are dumber than a stump, aren't you?
: and not themselves
: climate
: scientists.The fact that the NASA satellites that were so loudly proclaimed
: by the global warming crowd when they went up have proven that the planet
: has actually COOLED a tiny bit in the last 20 years is a case in point...
: the
: global warming crowd never mentions them these days and continue using
: faulty computer models to predict climate behavior
Proof?
: (by the way, a computer
: model is only as good as the person who created it, and these seem to be
: seriously wanting!). Funny thing is that if you set them for 20 or 30 years
: in the past with the conditions of the time and try to predict what the
: climate is today, they're generally so far off they're preposterous!
: They're also using sensors that are mostly located in cities and/or near
: airports, and as these areas grow the ambient temperatures reflected from
: the pavement are, of course, getting hotter. But they never mention THAT
: little detail, of course... they'd probably lose their grants for doing
: something that stupid ;). And there's a great deal of evidence that the
: hole in the ozone layer is being caused by solar flares. There's a team of
: scientists in Sweden who are studying that very question. Stay tuned...
: their results aren't in yet.
Proof?
: By the way, in FAIR's own documentation on Rush, I found the following:
: "A U.S. News & World Report piece (8/16/93) by Steven Roberts declared, 'The
: information Mr. Limbaugh provides is generally accurate.'" They gave that
: quotation as evidence that the media is controlled by the right wing.
: So where does that leave FAIR? U.S. News and World Report is one of the
: most UNbiased publications-- in either direction-- in the country.
Proof?
: They
: very studiously check into stories before they publish them.
Proof?
Why do they run only rightwing columnists?
: If they appear
: biased to FAIR, that puts FAIR so far to the left that they fell off the
: planet!
: Don't talk to me about FAIR... those clowns are outright socialists :/
You're an outright fascist.
--
Buddy K
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all you
: > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
: >
: > --
: > Buddy K
: One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
: He has 20 Million listeners
Proof?
Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
: and you're still working in The Little Red
: Schoolhouse.
Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you should
believe anything you hear on CNN.
--
Buddy K
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: Silence would be your best avenue. Less you can provide a lie.. or a
Translation: "my head is so far up limbaugh's butt I can see his tonsils."
--
Buddy K
Kurt Nicklas
> Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
> : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
> : news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
> : > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all
you
> : > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
> : >
> : > --
> : > Buddy K
>
> : One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
>
> : He has 20 Million listeners
>
> Proof?
>
> Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
> He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
> numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
If he has 1/10 the listeners he claims - and you have no proof he does -
then he still has more than you, Henry.
>
> : and you're still working in The Little Red
> : Schoolhouse.
>
> Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you should
> believe anything you hear on CNN.
Rush still has more listeners than you -
and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse, Henry.
--
Kurt Nicklas
My Leftwing Usenet Hate Page:
http://tiberias.home.sprynet.com/leftwinghate.htm
-
"Mr. Clinton, we have you surrounded.
Put down the cigar, step away from the
intern, and come out with your pants up."
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: news:7nhk19$3...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
: > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: > : news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > : > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all
: you
: > : > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
: > : >
: > : > --
: > : > Buddy K
: >
: > : One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
: >
: > : He has 20 Million listeners
: >
: > Proof?
: >
: > Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
: > He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
: > numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
: If he has 1/10 the listeners he claims - and you have no proof he does -
I have no proof that he has 1/1000000 of the listeners he claims. I
wouldn't believe anything that fat, lying demagogue says.
: then he still has more than you, Henry.
More than you also. But so what? Adolf Hitler had lots of listeners.
Lots of lying demagogues have listeners.
: >
: > : and you're still working in The Little Red
: > : Schoolhouse.
: >
: > Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you should
: > believe anything you hear on CNN.
: Rush still has more listeners than you -
: and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse, Henry.
I have more than you & you're still whining.
--
Buddy K
LK
>Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
>: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
>: news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
>: > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all you
>: > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
>: >
>: > --
>: > Buddy K
>
>: One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
>
>: He has 20 Million listeners
>
>Proof?
>
>Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
>He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
>numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
And your proof?
Kurt Nicklas
news:7nht5l$5...@portal.gmu.edu...
> Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
>
> : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
> : > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
> : > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
> : > : news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
> : > : > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for
all
> : you
> : > : > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
> : > : >
> : > : > --
> : > : > Buddy K
> : >
> : > : One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
> : >
> : > : He has 20 Million listeners
> : >
> : > Proof?
> : >
> : > Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
> : > He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
> : > numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
>
>
> I have no proof that he has 1/1000000 of the listeners he claims. I
> wouldn't believe anything that fat, lying demagogue says.
Of course you wouldn't. That would be too unpleasant for you.
> : then he still has more than you, Henry.
>
> More than you also. But so what? Adolf Hitler had lots of listeners.
> Lots of lying demagogues have listeners.
>
> : >
> : > : and you're still working in The Little Red
> : > : Schoolhouse.
> : >
> : > Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you
should
> : > believe anything you hear on CNN.
>
> : Rush still has more listeners than you -
> : and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse, Henry.
>
> I have more than you & you're still whining.
Really? You counting all those happy, little smiling faces in The Little Red
Schoolhouse that you work in, Henry?
rose...@idt.net
>In article <7nhk19$3...@portal.gmu.edu>, hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu (HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.) wrote:
>>Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
>>: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
>>: news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
>>: > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all you
>>: > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
>>: >
>>: > --
>>: > Buddy K
>>
>>: One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
>>
>>: He has 20 Million listeners
>>
>>Proof?
>>
>>Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
>>He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
>>numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
>
>And your proof?
You don't "prove" negatives, idiot.
Besides, gauging from the number of idiots, it cant be more than a
few.
J G DeBerry
MSLU123 wrote:
> Funny thing about you Republicraps,
> you can hand it out but you can't take it. You are grasping at straws. I
> ignore people that use filthy language, by the way.
You lie like a rug Lucille! You often applaud that lying good for
nothing foul mouthed maggot that goes by the name of Roselle.
Caught you in another lie didn't I. It's not the first time and it
won't be the last. With you it's like Clinton and Hillery it's
congenital.
JdB
LK
Your the one who said he never haid 20 million...prove it, jackass.
>Besides, gauging from the number of idiots, it cant be more than a
>few.
Well, there certainly are more than a handful of liberals, so there goes that
theory.
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: news:7nht5l$5...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
: >
: > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: > : > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
: > : > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: > : > : news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > : > : > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for
: all
: > : you
: > : > : > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > --
: > : > : > Buddy K
: > : >
: > : > : One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
: > : >
: > : > : He has 20 Million listeners
: > : >
: > : > Proof?
: > : >
: > : > Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many anymore.
: > : > He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on the
: > : > numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
: > : If he has 1/10 the listeners he claims - and you have no proof he does -
: >
: > I have no proof that he has 1/1000000 of the listeners he claims. I
: > wouldn't believe anything that fat, lying demagogue says.
: Of course you wouldn't. That would be too unpleasant for you.
I wouldn't want to believe the lies you dumbass dittos believe.
: > : then he still has more than you, Henry.
: >
: > More than you also. But so what? Adolf Hitler had lots of listeners.
: > Lots of lying demagogues have listeners.
: >
: > : >
: > : > : and you're still working in The Little Red
: > : > : Schoolhouse.
: > : >
: > : > Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you
: should
: > : > believe anything you hear on CNN.
: >
: > : Rush still has more listeners than you -
: > : and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse, Henry.
: >
: > I have more than you & you're still whining.
: Really? You counting all those happy, little smiling faces in The Little Red
: Schoolhouse that you work in, Henry?
All of them. Now quit whining and get your own audience.
--
Buddy K
Pappy357
>
>Proof?
>
>: No question. I
>: worked at Disney World when I was going to college and know that to be a
>: fact.
>
>You wouldn't know a fact if it bit your ass.
>
A corporation that gives 'benefits' to same sex partners not liberal? You
abviously won't admit a fact while it IS biting you in the ass.
Kurt Nicklas
You believe every lie that comes out of the DNC and the Wagfinger White
House. Hows that for a dumbshit?
>
> : > : then he still has more than you, Henry.
> : >
> : > More than you also. But so what? Adolf Hitler had lots of listeners.
> : > Lots of lying demagogues have listeners.
> : >
> : > : >
> : > : > : and you're still working in The Little Red
> : > : > : Schoolhouse.
> : > : >
> : > : > Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you
> : should
> : > : > believe anything you hear on CNN.
> : >
> : > : Rush still has more listeners than you -
> : > : and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse, Henry.
> : >
> : > I have more than you & you're still whining.
>
> : Really? You counting all those happy, little smiling faces in The Little
Red
> : Schoolhouse that you work in, Henry?
>
> All of them. Now quit whining and get your own audience.
Do people really PAY to hear what you have to say?
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
Mark Balcom
retarded 5 year old that he is:
>
> John H. Schneider II wrote:
> :
> : lie. Looks like the person who has their nose up someone's ass is you
> : and yours. You've yet to point out a single lie. If Rush lies as much as
> : you say he does, you should be able to document lie after lie after lie.
> : You haven't documented a single one.
> : As the man said: Be specific. or be GONE!
>
> ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
>
> --
> Buddy K
Notice how that buddy k responds with insults when challenged to document
his claims?
Every word that comes from buddy k is either a lie, an insult, or both.
He and the gdyot must be related.
Mark
Anynone
> GMU's most infamous idiot, HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
(hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu) wrote:
> >Nighthawk (nigh...@email.msn.com) wrote:
> >: HELO222 wrote in message <19990725020534...@ng-cq1.aol.com>...
> >: >Have you ever read it their report? Yes or no? They re basic argument is
> >: that
> >: >the media is a corporate media. Is Rupert Murdoch liberal? General
Electric
> >: >liberal? Disney liberal? I defy you to show me something that they have
> >: >published that says the media is controlled by the right wing. You
can't do
> >: it.
> >
> >: As a matter of fact I went to the website YOU gave the link to...
> >: www.fair.org, and found in the "What's FAIR?" section the following
comment:
>
> There is nothing fair about FAIR. They are yet another left-wing
> extremist group that is not to be trusted by any rational person.
> Not that anyone would accuse you of being rational, KKKilpatrick.
>
what's worse they are copycating AIM, "Accuracy in Media," who have been
around forever, but are not the darlingdingdongs of the left...
--
All comments are my own!
Mark Balcom
>
buddy k admits that he is a retarded 5 year old who can NOT back up
anything that he says.
Mark
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: >: Disney? Yes, they absolutely ARE a liberal organization.
Did you ever hear of Coors, pops? They offer the same benefits. Are you
claiming the Coors family is liberal? You have something up your ass -
something with ears.
--
Buddy K
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: news:7niji2$f...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
: > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: > : news:7nht5l$5...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > : > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in message
: > : > : news:7nhk19$3...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > : > : > Kurt Nicklas (knic...@SPAMLESSrocketmail.com) wrote:
: > : > : > : HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. <hkil...@mason2.gmu.edu> wrote in
: message
: > : > : > : news:7nf195$c...@portal.gmu.edu...
: > : > : > : > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt
: for
: > : all
: > : > : you
: > : > : > : > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
: > : > : > : >
: > : > : > : > --
: > : > : > : > Buddy K
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : One big difference between you and Rush Limbaugh, Henry:
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : He has 20 Million listeners
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Proof?
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Maybe 2-3 million actual people listen to him if that many
: anymore.
: > : > : > He's never had 20 million - it's just another dishonest play on
: the
: > : > : > numbers that limbaugh and his dittos do so well.
: > : >
: > : > : If he has 1/10 the listeners he claims - and you have no proof he
: does -
: > : >
: > : > I have no proof that he has 1/1000000 of the listeners he claims. I
: > : > wouldn't believe anything that fat, lying demagogue says.
: >
: > : Of course you wouldn't. That would be too unpleasant for you.
: >
: > I wouldn't want to believe the lies you dumbass dittos believe.
: You believe every lie that comes out of the DNC and the Wagfinger White
: House. Hows that for a dumbshit?
Get your nose out of limbaugh's butt, knickers.
: >
: > : > : then he still has more than you, Henry.
: > : >
: > : > More than you also. But so what? Adolf Hitler had lots of listeners.
: > : > Lots of lying demagogues have listeners.
: > : >
: > : > : >
: > : > : > : and you're still working in The Little Red
: > : > : > : Schoolhouse.
: > : > : >
: > : > : > Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means you
: > : should
: > : > : > believe anything you hear on CNN.
: > : >
: > : > : Rush still has more listeners than you -
: > : > : and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse, Henry.
: > : >
: > : > I have more than you & you're still whining.
: >
: > : Really? You counting all those happy, little smiling faces in The Little
: Red
: > : Schoolhouse that you work in, Henry?
: >
: > All of them. Now quit whining and get your own audience.
: Do people really PAY to hear what you have to say?
They sure do.
--
Buddy K
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
Did your mama ever explain that red light on your front porch?
--
Buddy K
Kurt Nicklas
Wear-out those Presidential Knee-pads yet, HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
>
> : >
> : > : > : then he still has more than you, Henry.
> : > : >
> : > : > More than you also. But so what? Adolf Hitler had lots of
listeners.
> : > : > Lots of lying demagogues have listeners.
> : > : >
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > : and you're still working in The Little Red
> : > : > : > : Schoolhouse.
> : > : > : >
> : > : > : > Ted Turner has a much larger audience. So I guess that means
you
> : > : should
> : > : > : > believe anything you hear on CNN.
> : > : >
> : > : > : Rush still has more listeners than you -
> : > : > : and you're still just working in The Little Red Schoolhouse,
Henry.
> : > : >
> : > : > I have more than you & you're still whining.
> : >
> : > : Really? You counting all those happy, little smiling faces in The
Little
> : Red
> : > : Schoolhouse that you work in, Henry?
> : >
> : > All of them. Now quit whining and get your own audience.
>
> : Do people really PAY to hear what you have to say?
>
> They sure do.
They need a refund.
Kurt Nicklas
http://tiberias.home.sprynet.com
wayne mann
>Limbaughs lies, distortions and just idiotic statements are well documented.
>Just read the Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's
This from Norman Lear's financed Left Wing Liberal group! You
are even dumber than it appears if you really mean to claim FAIR is
unbiased or actually is fair. They are a Left Wing Liberal Group that
will lie and distort thing all out of shape and reality to try to
distort facts into something else. FOLKS, do NOT accept FAIR as
NON-BIASED! They are VERY BIASED! And people that tout them KNOW it,
yet they tout them knowing they are either lying or distorting the
facts.
\\/ayne //\ann
"The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend
to be something they're not."
-- Hillary Clinton - 1992 60 Minutes interview
Pull My Finger..
>
> On 24 Jul 1999 20:00:17 GMT, hel...@aol.com (HELO222) wrote:
>
> >Limbaughs lies, distortions and just idiotic statements are well documented.
> >Just read the Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's
>
> This from Norman Lear's financed Left Wing Liberal group! You
> are even dumber than it appears if you really mean to claim FAIR is
> unbiased or actually is fair. They are a Left Wing Liberal Group that
> will lie and distort thing all out of shape and reality to try to
> distort facts into something else. FOLKS, do NOT accept FAIR as
> NON-BIASED! They are VERY BIASED! And people that tout them KNOW it,
> yet they tout them knowing they are either lying or distorting the
> facts.
>
> \\/ayne //\ann
Yeh, BIASED meaning that they caught Limbaugh in a few of his
lies and his devoted herd of right wing dufuses refuse to accept
anything adverse to the sorry jerk..
Folks, Limbaugh is not just biased, he's a blatant LIAR.
Mark Balcom
Nicholas Manousos
>
> On 24 Jul 1999 20:00:17 GMT, hel...@aol.com (HELO222) wrote:
>
> >Limbaughs lies, distortions and just idiotic statements are well documented.
> >Just read the Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting's
>
> This from Norman Lear's financed Left Wing Liberal group! You
> are even dumber than it appears if you really mean to claim FAIR is
> unbiased or actually is fair. They are a Left Wing Liberal Group that
> will lie and distort thing all out of shape and reality to try to
> distort facts into something else. FOLKS, do NOT accept FAIR as
> NON-BIASED! They are VERY BIASED! And people that tout them KNOW it,
> yet they tout them knowing they are either lying or distorting the
> facts.
True. Fair is part of that early 1970's everything is big business's
fault group. One thier patron saints is Ralph Nader. (there are others)
They are no better or no worse than other groups. Or, groups that
represent a group of people in American Society. Rush also represent a
group that agree on, let's say 75% of the issues, and they are also no
better or no worse.
Are these not the groups, or the way marketeers and political
sleazebags( don't know technical term) segment population?
But, the Fair group is getting old and fading away.
Pappy357
>: abviously won't admit a fact while it IS biting you in the ass.
>
>Did you ever hear of Coors, pops? They offer the same benefits. Are you
>claiming the Coors family is liberal? You have something up your ass -
>something with ears.
>
>--
>Buddy K
>
>
Any group/family/organization that gives same sex partners benefits has got to
be considered liberal. What would you consider it? Conservative?
But don't take my word for it. Ask your husband.
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
> "my head is so far up limbaugh's butt I can see his tonsils."
Don't belabor the obvious, mark edward.
--
Buddy K
GHouck
>
> HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. responded in his normal manner, like the
> retarded 5 year old that he is:
> >
> > John H. Schneider II wrote:
> > :
> > : And of course, you couldn't be specific. you couldn't name a single
> > : lie. Looks like the person who has their nose up someone's ass is you
> > : and yours. You've yet to point out a single lie. If Rush lies as much as
> > : you say he does, you should be able to document lie after lie after lie.
> > : You haven't documented a single one.
> > : As the man said: Be specific. or be GONE!
> >
> > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
> >
> > --
> > Buddy K
>
> his claims?
>
> Every word that comes from buddy k is either a lie, an insult, or both.
>
> He and the gdyot must be related.
>
> Mark
Notice how (that) Markie Balcom responds with the same old shit
time after time, regardless of the topic?
Every word that comes from Markie Balcom is either a tedious bore, an
insult, or both.
He and the Anti-Christ must be related.
ghouck
Plubius
with truth. When all else fails, attack the messenger and poo-poo the
message. I would bet a huge sum of $$$ that Rush is much more truthful than
Clinton is...in fact, $90,000 to be exact. (Clinton's fine for Perjury!)
GHouck <hk...@teleport.com> wrote in message
news:37A151...@teleport.com...
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: This is a classic example of Liberals resorting to name calling when faced
: with truth. When all else fails, attack the messenger and poo-poo the
: message.
We learned it from the fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh.
: I would bet a huge sum of $$$ that Rush is much more truthful than
: Clinton is...in fact, $90,000 to be exact. (Clinton's fine for Perjury!)
Speaking of lying, you're no more honest that the fat, lying demagogue,
limbaugh.
--
Buddy K
: GHouck <hk...@teleport.com> wrote in message
Mark Balcom
>
> : This is a classic example of Liberals resorting to name calling when faced
> : with truth. When all else fails, attack the messenger and poo-poo the
> : message.
>
> We learned it from the fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh.
>
"proof?"
> : I would bet a huge sum of $$$ that Rush is much more truthful than
> : Clinton is...in fact, $90,000 to be exact. (Clinton's fine for Perjury!)
>
> Speaking of lying, you're no more honest that the fat, lying demagogue,
> limbaugh.
>
> --
> Buddy K
Is buddy k denying that BJ Clinton was fined $90,000.00 by Judge Susan
Webber Wright for committing perjury and obstruction of justice in her
court?
He never did see a fact that he liked.
He has lost all touch with reality.
Mark
>
> : GHouck <hk...@teleport.com> wrote in message
> : news:37A151...@teleport.com..
Mark Balcom
>
> Mark Balcom wrote:
> >
> > HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. responded in his normal manner, like the
> > retarded 5 year old that he is:
> > >
> > > John H. Schneider II wrote:
> > > :
> > > : And of course, you couldn't be specific. you couldn't name a single
> > > : lie. Looks like the person who has their nose up someone's ass is you
> > > : and yours. You've yet to point out a single lie. If Rush lies as much as
> > > : you say he does, you should be able to document lie after lie after lie.
> > > : You haven't documented a single one.
> > > : As the man said: Be specific. or be GONE!
> > >
> > > The fat, lying demagogue, limbaugh, must have one huge butt for all you
> > > ditto sycophants to get your noses up there.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Buddy K
> >
> > Notice how that buddy k responds with insults when challenged to document
> > his claims?
> >
> > Every word that comes from buddy k is either a lie, an insult, or both.
> >
> > He and the gdyot must be related.
> >
> > Mark
>
>
> Every word that comes from Markie Balcom is fact.
>
>
> ghouck
Mark Balcom
> "my head is so far up limbaugh's butt I can see his tonsils."
>
> --
> Buddy K