tEh nEw tIpPeR g0re Re: and I say Hey again and again and again
jet
>Here is proof that ą isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
>
>> jet wrote:
>> >
>> > In article <3cf4...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
>> > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Here is proof that jet isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
>> > >
>> > > > In article <3cf4...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
>> > > > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > Here is proof that jet isn't the brightest bulb in the
>> > > > > fitting :
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > In article <ad14r6$arq$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>,
>> > > > > > Bort Flancrest <hotrev...@hawaii.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > They all laughed when morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net
>> > > > > > > (jet) said:
>> > > > > > > > In article
>> > > > > > > > <ad1239$92c$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>, Bort
>> > > > > > > > Flancrest
>> > > > > > > <hotrev...@hawaii.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > They all laughed when morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net
>> > > > > > > > > (jet) said:
>> > > > > > > > > > In article
>> > > > > > > > > > <ad0qi4$n8t$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>, Bort
>> > > > > > > > > > Flancrest
>> > > > > > > <hotrev...@hawaii.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > They all laughed when
>> > > > > > > > > > > morr...@pyrophore.ogoense.net (jet) said:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > In article <3cf36090$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Leyland"
>> > > > > > > > > > > > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > [...]
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > ari has posted that someone with a mindspring
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > account has been trolling in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > alt.support.manic.depression. and my post
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > about this still remains unanswered, jet... I
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > cannot prove a negative FFS, and I stress
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > again that my civility towards you is
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > becoming increasingly frail after being
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > falsely accused of dishonesty.... I think you
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > know my opinions on trolling in support
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > froups already, jet. If not, google me. You
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > are just too fucking obstinate to retract.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > If you expect apologies, I suggest you
>> > > > > > > > > > > > immediately leave alt.flame and I have no
>> > > > > > > > > > > > reason to believe in your honesty. Quite the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > contrary.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Grow a spine, Jet.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I already have one
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Then act like it, you tiresome little quiff. Did
>> > > > > > > > > Leyland make that post, or didn't he?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I have no idea
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > You retract, then, do you?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > If Steve wants a forced, insincere apology, he's got it.
>> > > > > > Too bad he forfeited the sincere one he was going to get
>> > > > > > after I read Ari's post.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I forfeited it how, exactly?
>> > > > > by posting my objections to your false accusations?
>> > > > >
>> > > > What does it matter to you? You get your insincere apology and
>> > > > I get to laugh at you.
>> > >
>> > > he who laughs last laughs longest....and I don't think it'll be
>> > > you! I will accept nothing but teh so-called *sincere* apology.
>> > >
>> > Cool! Then I can count on you making a horses ass of yourself, in
>> > alt.flame, for some time to come.
>> >
>> > > and still await your proof of my alleged dishonesty.
>> > >
>> > and I told you to read your posts in alt.config about Christina and
>> > tell me if they were true. They should be right there on your drive,
>> > somewhere.
>>
>> Whoa, wait a second!
>>
>> WTF does this have to do with the fact that you claim Steve made that
>> post to support groups?
>>
>> Why do you always pull shit out of your ass when the truth hits you
>> square in the face?
>
>methinks possibly coz she's afraid to admit a new-meower ie. *non netcop &
>protector of the sacred fucking network* like me has her backed into a
>corner?
>
You have it backwards Steve. It's the new-meowers, like you, who think
meow is about destruction.
>I must admit, its fun to watch her squirming...
>
In your dreams, net abuser.
±
Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv".
Oh, and this:
"I don't believe everything I think, much less everything I post."
Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
--
Ready to create a new newsgroup? It's easier than ever.
Download control message program and maybe find out
what Snuh means at spiffy new Snuh site.
~NEW~
Snuh web mail:
http://www.404company.com/snuh
-
From: en_mog <en_...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.simpsons
Subject: Goodbye :-)
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 08:05:45 -0500
If I have any integrity at all, I must leave.
I welcome others to do so as well if they refuse to be led by a group
of unthinking drones that are stuck in such a mindnumbingly predictable
pattern of snuh/attack/snuh/attack/penises/attack/snuh/rectum/attack/.
-
From: TGOS <tg...@spamcop.net>
Newsgroups: alt.hentai.sailor-moon
Subject: Re: Great Newsgroup!
Date: 27 Nov 2000 02:23:19 -0600
Nobody can control the snuh.
ad88888ba 88 ad88888ba
d8" "8b 88 d8" "8b
Y8, 88 "" a8P
`Y8aaaaa, 8b,YHBTba, 88 88 88,dPPYba, ,a8P"
`"""""8b, 88P' `"8a 88 88 88P' "8a d8"
`8b 88 88 88 88 88 88 ""
Y8a a8P 88 88 "8a, ,a88 88 88 88
"Y88888P" 88 88 `"YbbdP'Y8 88 Get Snuhy!
------------------------------------------------------->news:alt.snuh
------------------------------------------------->news:alt.swnet.snuh
------------------------------------------------->news:alt.music.snuh
---------------------------------------------->news:alt.binaries.snuh
---------------------------------------------->news:alt.ozdebate.snuh
---------------------------------------------->news:alt.folklore.snuh
------------------------------------------->news:alt.tv.simpsons.snuh
----------------------------------------->news:alt.snuh-made-cascades
jet
>jet wrote:
>>
>> In article <3cf6c98b$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
> <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >Here is proof that ą isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
>Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv".
>
>Oh, and this:
>
>"I don't believe everything I think, much less everything I post."
>
adult, you stop thinking all your beliefs are cast in stone.
>Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
>
I -told- him I was a troll, quite some time ago. I'm certainly not
-actively- trolling, and it's kind of late for you to be telling him
what to do, when he's already boasted about running News Agent.
--
jet mhm 32x30 |
wee saul disciple #32 |
±
>
> In article <3CF6CFEC...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?= <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> >jet wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <3cf6c98b$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
> > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Here is proof that ą isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
> [...]
> >Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv".
> >
> >Oh, and this:
> >
> >"I don't believe everything I think, much less everything I post."
> >
> Do you, Dean? T
I sure do.
I mean what I say, cause that tends to build trust with readers.
And when I'm wrong, I admit it.
> that's kind of interesting.
The truth is intersting?
> Usually, when you become an
> adult, you stop thinking all your beliefs are cast in stone.
Where do you get that?
I certainly don't believe it.
> >Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
> >
> I -told- him I was a troll, quite some time ago. I'm certainly not
> -actively- trolling,
Oh, right now you're not trolling.
Can you please somehow indicate to all when it is that you *are*
trolling?
Like maybe some smoke signals.
> and it's kind of late for you to be telling him
> what to do, when he's already boasted about running News Agent.
Huh?
You just quit Meow for the second time today.
Said something that if Meow is about bot running, then you consider
yourself a Flonker.
He's a Meow'er, doing things that Meow'ers do.
>
> --
> jet mhm 32x30 |
> wee saul disciple #32 |
Rev. Meowentelburgstein
<h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
That's 1 week.
jet
>jet wrote:
>>
>> In article <3CF6CFEC...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?=
> <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>> >jet wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <3cf6c98b$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
>> > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >Here is proof that ą isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
>> [...]
>> >Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv".
>> >
>> >Oh, and this:
>> >
>> >"I don't believe everything I think, much less everything I post."
>> >
>> Do you, Dean? T
>
>I sure do.
>
>I mean what I say, cause that tends to build trust with readers.
>
If you mean some of the things you've been saying, this week, I doubt
you've built much trust.
>And when I'm wrong, I admit it.
>
Liar.
>> that's kind of interesting.
>
>The truth is intersting?
>
>> Usually, when you become an
>> adult, you stop thinking all your beliefs are cast in stone.
>
>Where do you get that?
>
From adults.
>I certainly don't believe it.
>
That's interesting, too.
>> >Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
>> >
>> I -told- him I was a troll, quite some time ago. I'm certainly not
>> -actively- trolling,
>
>Oh, right now you're not trolling.
>
I'm -always- trolling. I'm a troll. I'm just not actively trolling.
>Can you please somehow indicate to all when it is that you *are*
>trolling?
>
I doubt you'd be able to understand it and "all" don't need to be told.
>Like maybe some smoke signals.
>
>
>> and it's kind of late for you to be telling him
>> what to do, when he's already boasted about running News Agent.
>
>Huh?
>
He's already boasted about running News Agent.
>You just quit Meow for the second time today.
>
No, I quit a couple days ago. I was just agreeing with what's his name,
today.
>Said something that if Meow is about bot running, then you consider
>yourself a Flonker.
>
God, I wish you would learn to read. I still think reading and writing
skills are essential to text communication. Little variances in words,
matter. That's why there are so many words.
>He's a Meow'er, doing things that Meow'ers do.
>
Yep, according to you and Zen (and I think Mosnar/Meowwhatsit and Steve,
if I'm understanding what they're saying, which I can't guarantee) Meowers
are pro abuse of the net and support bot-running. I guess that makes Steve
a member in good standing.
I'll believe it more when I hear it from someone I actually respect
but, for the time being, you're the only ones saying anything.
Steve Leyland
that's what she thinks!
I'm trolling her ;-)
now then, I wonder what net abuse I can do this fine evening.... mheh.
--
Steve
mhm32x16 Smeeter#35
news:england.chat *psot of teh month* April 02:
Message-ID: <10191050...@eos.uk.clara.net>
flower: three 6 four 9 five 8 eight 9
"What are you doing out of my killfile, you trolling c*nt?
*plonk*"
=^MEOW^=
Though we travel the world over to find the beautiful, we must carry it with
us or we find it not. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
ält.ĒøņfïgŪĐ ïz ņøw trøll øwņęd äņd øþęrätęd.
Steve Leyland
> In article <3CF6D6C8...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-
FYI Jet, I only support bot-running in extreme circumstances, which I don't
need to plod through again, I hope FFS?
I was personally disgruntled when a bot was run through a fav warez froup of
mine...yes, I'm a software thieving net-abuser too!
--
Steve
mhm32x16 Smeeter#35
news:england.chat *psot of teh month* April 02:
Message-ID: <10191050...@eos.uk.clara.net>
flower: three 6 four 9 five 8 eight 9
"What are you doing out of my killfile, you trolling c*nt?
*plonk*"
=^MEOW^=
Marvin: Life. Loathe it or ignore it. You can't like it.
jet
>I'm trolling her ;-)
>
Cool! I love being trolled.
>now then, I wonder what net abuse I can do this fine evening.... mheh.
>
Fuck that. Explain to me why it's acceptable to netcop for forgery but
not for other abuse of the net. I need to know these things so I can
be a real meower, like you, again.
jet
Snuhwolf thinks it's okay when it's something important like flooding
a group into submission.
>I was personally disgruntled when a bot was run through a fav warez froup of
>mine...yes, I'm a software thieving net-abuser too!
>
Downloading warez isn't abuse of the net, lackwit.
Steve Leyland
> In article <3cf6e21a$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
> <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Here is proof that jet isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
> >
> > > In article <3CF6D6C8...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-
> > > 1?Q?=B1?= <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > jet wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In article <3CF6CFEC...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-
> > > > > 8859- 1?Q?=B1?=
> > > running. I guess that makes Steve a member in good standing.
> > >
> > > I'll believe it more when I hear it from someone I actually
> > > respect but, for the time being, you're the only ones saying
> > > anything.
> >
> > FYI Jet, I only support bot-running in extreme circumstances, which
> > I don't need to plod through again, I hope FFS?
> >
> I understand, Steve. You're a net abuser when you think it's okay.
so tell me what you would prefer in a froup such as alt.fan.air then, oh
mighty holy protector of the network?
innocent usenet browser clicks on a post and sees a man's cock up a 3 year
old boy's anus, or a little hipspew sporge and a few hundred mp3s?
I know which option I prefer.
--
Steve
mhm32x16 Smeeter#35
news:england.chat *psot of teh month* April 02:
Message-ID: <10191050...@eos.uk.clara.net>
flower: three 6 four 9 five 8 eight 9
"What are you doing out of my killfile, you trolling c*nt?
*plonk*"
=^MEOW^=
You will always be lucky if you know how to make friends with strange
cats. - Colonial American proverb
±
>
> In article <3CF6D6C8...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?= <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> >jet wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <3CF6CFEC...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1?=
> > <h0plib...@WHATISSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >jet wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In article <3cf6c98b$1...@edsnews.cjb.net>, "Steve Leyland"
> >> > <steveleyland20...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Here is proof that ą isn't the brightest bulb in the fitting :
> >> [...]
> >> >Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv".
> >> >
> >> >Oh, and this:
> >> >
> >> >"I don't believe everything I think, much less everything I post."
> >> >
> >> Do you, Dean? T
> >
> >I sure do.
> >
> How sad.
Why is saying what you believe sad?
> >I mean what I say, cause that tends to build trust with readers.
> >
> If you mean some of the things you've been saying, this week, I doubt
> you've built much trust.
For once you used the word "I".
Good doggie!
> >And when I'm wrong, I admit it.
> >
> Liar.
Prove it.
But first prove how I flooded ARNA.
> >> that's kind of interesting.
> >
> >The truth is intersting?
> >
> >> Usually, when you become an
> >> adult, you stop thinking all your beliefs are cast in stone.
> >
> >Where do you get that?
> >
> From adults.
Really.
At this point in time, I will welcome others that are more eloquent and
qualified than I to post how stupid that statement is.
> >I certainly don't believe it.
> >
> That's interesting, too.
A closed mind is a dead mind.
Now, all sorts of things are adding up about why you post the stupid
things you do.
> >> >Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
> >> >
> >> I -told- him I was a troll, quite some time ago. I'm certainly not
> >> -actively- trolling,
> >
> >Oh, right now you're not trolling.
> >
> I'm -always- trolling. I'm a troll. I'm just not actively trolling.
Man: Yes I have. If you're arguing, I must have paid.
Mr Vibrating: Not necessarily. I could be arguing in my spare time.
> >Can you please somehow indicate to all when it is that you *are*
> >trolling?
> >
> I doubt you'd be able to understand it and "all" don't need to be told.
Backpedal and evasion noted.
> >Like maybe some smoke signals.
> >
> >
> >> and it's kind of late for you to be telling him
> >> what to do, when he's already boasted about running News Agent.
> >
> >Huh?
> >
> He's already boasted about running News Agent.
And?
> >You just quit Meow for the second time today.
> >
> No, I quit a couple days ago. I was just agreeing with what's his name,
> today.
Are you telling the truth this time or jus' trollin'?
> >Said something that if Meow is about bot running, then you consider
> >yourself a Flonker.
> >
> God, I wish you would learn to read. I still think reading and writing
> skills are essential to text communication. Little variances in words,
> matter. That's why there are so many words.
Are you saying things you don't mean again?
It's going to be hard to know when you're speaking from the heart or
jus' trollin'.
> >He's a Meow'er, doing things that Meow'ers do.
> >
> Yep, according to you and Zen (and I think Mosnar/Meowwhatsit and Steve,
> if I'm understanding what they're saying, which I can't guarantee) Meowers
> are pro abuse of the net and support bot-running. I guess that makes Steve
> a member in good standing.
I haven't said anything - *you* have said that Meow'ers don't run bots.
They do.
> I'll believe it more when I hear it from someone I actually respect
> but, for the time being, you're the only ones saying anything.
What do you make of IRS Agent's massive bot flooding?
Is he not a *real* Meow'er?
>
> --
> jet mhm 32x30 |
> wee saul disciple #32 |
±
>
> No, that's what Dean thinks.
> Cool! I love being trolled.
No problem.
I'm now going to start to collect my residuals.
> --
> jet mhm 32x30 |
> wee saul disciple #32 |
Jack Webb
>
> Exactly who is it that you are quoting, right there, with those
> quotation marks, please?
Well?
> Did I miss seeing a post from Jet, somewhere, I wonder? I don't recall
> seeing Jet posting that comment you appear to be quoting, above. I also
> don't recall seeing any post where Jet used the term "Guv", either, but
> it sure looks to me like you _must_ be quoting Jet, right up there,
> since that's the only "she['s]" who you've been fussing and fighting
> with here, of late, that I know of.
>
> And I have been trying real hard to watch real carefully and follow all
> those > > angle thingies, (attribution lines?) and all. Just trying to
> keep up with all these conversations, here, yanno?
>
> I'm quite certain that you would never deliberately attempt to try to
> make it look like anyone said anything that they didn't actually _say_,
> right, Deano? (I feel like I know this about you because that would be
> sort of, well, dishonest, and you've been sort of braggin' on your own
> honesty, just a bit, and about truth, and credibility, and all ... so I
> sort of feel like I ought to be able to trust that when I see you quote
> someone, that means that they actually did say what you're quoting,
> right?) You know, credible, like.
>
> So, is it Jet who you're quoting there, please?
Well?
> Here, here's the exact quote I'm asking about: You just said to Steve
> (and I'm quoting you now), quote: "Remember, Steve, she's "Jus'
> trollin', Guv"." ... (and that ends my quote of what you said to
> Steve). So within my quote of what _you_ said, was a quote from you,
> quoting someone apparently saying (quote): "Jus' trollin', Guv". (close
> quote), which actually looks to me a whole lot more like the kind of
> hillbilly-type writing (typing, to be really precise) that Liberalminded
> Dana does when he's not off 'resting' somewhere than the way Jet usually
> writes, ... but hey! If you're quoting Jet, (and it sure looks to me
> like you must be) then, by gosh, she _must_ have said that, because
> you're a really honest guy, right? And if so, I'll just have to go back
> over each and every one of the posts she made, to see where I might have
> missed her having said that.
>
> So, who is that, please, who you are quoting, up there, where you tell
> Steve (quote): ""Remember, Steve, she's "Jus' trollin', Guv"."?
Well?
> It can get so confusing, what with so many of these "new asshole"[s]
> you're trying to "tear" Jet every day. (That's me, quoting _you_, here,
> Dean, about "tearing [...] a new asshole", because I recall in another
> article you did say something about how much you enjoy "tearing [Jet] a
> new asshole [....] twice a day", remember?) Gosh, what with you trying
> to tear all those new 'ones' (pardon my euphimism) so many times every
> single day, it makes it kind of hard for a simple torll just to keep up
> with it all. It gets pretty tiring to read, but hey! No-one is making me
> or anyone else read anything, right? We could just all ignore you.
>
> > Just ignore her, she's trolling you.
>
> I must have missed Jet's 'troll alert' (I refer to them as 'troll
> alerts'(1), those things to make sure we all know when someone is
> trolling) on her post to Steve, too, and I'm sure sorry about that.
> Dang! I'll just have to pay closer attention.
>
> <me leans forward intently>
>
> Thanks in advance for your kind understanding.
>
> That nice big sigline down here, must be what's called UPA[rt], yes?
> Just look at all that! My, my!
>
> Oh, and BTW, I have one little footnote down below your nice sigline,
> from 5 paragraphs up (well, 6 paragraphs, if you're counting this one).
>
> Oh, ... (and this is so sort of petty that I almost hesitate to mention
> it)... but, if you don't help set this little confusion straight, here,
> it would look pretty silly for you if it looked like you're avoiding
> answering a direct little question, and maybe might end up getting
> spanked for that by someone who just entered this thread, right?
>
> [....]
>
> > Nobody can control the snuh.
>
> (1)One could also use the term 'smoke signals' instead of 'troll alerts'
> if one wanted to, but speaking strictly for my own self(2) I find that
> using the term 'troll alerts' when one is happening makes things real
> clear, so there's no possible misunderstanding.
> (2)Which, after all, is all I(3) can really do, isn't it?
> (3)That's usually pretty much true for everyone else, too, eh?(4)
> (4)Not that I am presuming to speak for everyone else. (See (2))