jkle...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:58:48 PM UTC-4, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Please don't top post.
>>>Not a rural route - I'm about a 20 minute drive from NYC.
>>Plenty of areas that are suburban today still have rural routes, even if the
>>area has been converted to street addressing. Just because the farms have
>>all been subdivided doesn't mean the post office has to convert the area
>>to city delivery.
>I guess I don't know what a rural route is then - I meant it's not a
>rural area. What's a rural route? . . .
dbriggs gave you an answer on the rest of it.
Some quick postal history, just from
about.usps.com
City delivery began in 1863. An experiment in rural delivery was authorized
in 1890. There were several small experiments over the years. It didn't
become a permanent service until 1902. Rural delivery service has never
been universal.
Rural carriers work under a different contract than city carriers and have
a separate union. There's also the weirdness that city carriers work five
of six days each with, with a different non-scheduled day each week and
a full-time substitute who carriers five different routes over five weeks,
but rural carriers work five days each week with a part time substitute
on Saturday who carries just the one route.
Rural carriers can use their own vehicles or they might own approved
vehicles that they purchase themselves. I'm not sure how it works.
Rural carriers are sort of independent contractors.
One major difference: You can buy postage from a rural carrier.
The post office converted suburbanizing rural areas to city delivery only
if it would save money, which wasn't necessarily the case. City delivery
conversions have become quite rare.
dbriggs had some different ideas about delivery in your area, and you could
very well have city delivery. Rural delivery was just a guess on my part.
You'll have to ask your postmaster.