The New Wesrminster Tennis Club AAA Calander of Events Aug Update
Broughtons...@yahoo.com
720 Sixth St Unit 160
New Westminster, BC V3L 3C5
Org Phone: (604) 951-9546
Director Phone: 604-522-6022
So much more posting ahead.
Toilet paper will be no longer be supplied by the club
in the rest rooms!
Men's and Women's room will have a phone installed to
Broughton's office. At the completion of your duty, just call him
for some asswipe. He will supply it all, as he has been to the usenet
groups for quite a few years now.
Contact information
Phone is 604-951-9546 or the club 604-522-6022. Email djc...@shaw.ca
www.nwtennis.com
see him here
This site is still in the development stage: http://www.corruptgacourts.com
SHAME
Club Presidents Trolling Internet to harass smokers groups
are the way forward for the future.
The Westminster Tennis Club Internet Troll phone 604 522-6022
Irratating smokers groups for years now.
Do you trust a man that abuses people in groups
that has complete disrespect for their forum.?
Robert Broughton # 2 Third Street & Royal Avenue Phone 604 522-6022
New Westminster Tennis Club, Tipperary Park, Third Street and Royal
Avenue,
New Westminster, British Columbia. Phone: (604) 522-6022
Usenet Troll Make's a Good President, Eh?
Can't this club find a better man for their representative.
A club president and internet troll Robert Broughton will make
quite a clown image for the management there.
Maybe they'll enjoy the advertisement then.
Be careful If you are a member! This guy finds a cigarette
in your possession, he' ll probably write about you and use
you name as his assault on your persona. The Voguls
must be unaware their name is being used in his vendetta
against smokers.
It isn't a far leap for a troll to go into a netstalker
and pedophilia mode. If your a member and have
kids watch out!
For you non believer's Use the google Search
Engine
Alt.Smokers is not your playtoy group.
10 plus years of insults and swearing at smokers
will result in this hitting and sitting right in your adverts.
Alt.Smokers will not tolerate your antics any longer
as you keep the sway of public opinion to the right.
Or what ever your motive's truely are.
You want open and candid...Here it is.
Feel Better Now?
POSTED TRUTH Of USENET ABUSE EXCERPTS
> >Junkie thinking: Nicotine addiction = Americana.
>
> Americana = freedom, pride, self-reliance and a sense of community.
All human emotions, which tobacco industry asswipes never experience.
That's "Anti Smoker Illuminati" (ASI), asswipe. You should have been
able to figure this out by now.
> >Why don't you put a date on this prediction, asswipe?
>
> Two or three years. Let's say by the end of 2010.
Noted, asswipe.
>
> >Oh yeah, I forgot: you're a sniveling coward.
>
> Swaggering on Usenet is pathetic.
Tell us about it, asswipe.
> Since you brought it up, entertain us with stories of
> your courage. We know about your losses in provincial elections.
I think that the story of how you have been embittered for your entire
life because of your failure to get elected hall monitor in the fifth
grade would be far more entertaining.
> Where else did you get
> your head kicked?
Courage, asswipe, is primarily a human trait, although horses and dogs
occasionally display it. Asswipes have no concept of courage, and you
just re-validated this.
No media story could possibly alter the fact that Second Hand Indoor
Tobacco Smoke has the same chemical makeup as first-hand tobacco
smoke, asswipe.
> Antismokers
That's "Anti Smoker Illuminati", asswipe.
> should move to Niger.
Here's a better idea; you move to Mars.
Message-ID: <50795381-99ad-4dea-
ab65-840...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.71.66.189
That didn't stop all three of these states from passing laws
restricting where smokers can smoke. Suck on it, asswipe
Breathing is a right, asswipe. We'll keep on passing smoking bans, and
we will not be asking for your approval when we do so, asswipe.
.
The tobacco industry has made many well-financed attempts to organize
smokers. Every one of them failed.
If you don't stay out of there...Plenty more coming!
Open your mouth sucker
Pahauuktouuiiii let's feed those tonsils.
Just the google search results show quite a legacy.
Proud president here's your troll record.
search google groups
Query
idiot: Robert Broughton 29 pages of results
http://tinyurl.com/2hzsbg
you are an idiot: Robert Broughton 24 pages
http://tinyurl.com/ys83kw
bull#@($ Robert Broughton 11 pages
http://tinyurl.com/2e8ez4
you are a total moron: Robert Broughton 15 pages
http://tinyurl.com/2f4ke5
Liar: Robert Broughton 10 pages
http://tinyurl.com/ysjynk
mentally ill: Robert: Broughton 9 pages
http://tinyurl.com/26dfwo
truthful (always in jest): Robert Broughton 8 pages
http://tinyurl.com/yugtxg
your an a$$hole: Robert Broughton 7 pages
http://tinyurl.com/2xr9qs
Asswipe: Robert Broughton 20 pages
http://tinyurl.com/yvdyth
So to all those that are members and investors,
owners of this tennis club, let's have some
exposure of the TRUTH
Why on earth the tennis club wants this??who Knows?
Several alias names are also used by this Guy in
his lifelong mission of making a fool of himself.
How come you haven't tried to organize smokers, asswipe?
PROOF Read it Here!
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:49:10 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >On Jun 16, 10:14 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >> The problem is, there's no one to organize smokers.
>
> >The tobacco industry has made many well-financed attempts to organize
> >smokers. Every one of them failed.
>
> >How come you haven't tried to organize smokers, asswipe?
>
> It's more difficult than organizing antismokers, because smokers are not followers like
> antis.
>
1. So, you're not interested in taking on anything that is difficult.
2. As I've pointed out previously, you don't know shit about "antis",
asswipe.
>
> >>>>>The tobacco industry has made many well-financed attempts to organize
> >>>>>smokers. Every one of them failed.
>
> >>>>>How come you haven't tried to organize smokers, asswipe?
>
> >>>> It's more difficult than organizing antismokers, because smokers are not
> >>>> followers like
> >>>> antis.
>
> >>>Or maybe they just don't get along well with others.
>
> >>>> It's not a one man job.
>
> >>>Surely you're not the only one left interested in changing the course?
>
> >>>> We need an organization, other than Big Tobacco,
>
> >>>Why?
>
> >> Antis took away their freedom of speech in the Master Settlement
> >> Agreement, which
> >> prohibits " limiting or suppressing research into smoking and health".
> >> They're not
> >> allowed to call junk science what it is.
>
> >You'll need to give that a little more context before I believe thats what
> >it means. As written it says you can't stand in the way of research, ie
> >buying off scientists or the like. Nothing about commenting on existing
> >research.
>
> The MSA is deliberately vague on this.
That's not what you wrote seven hours earlier, asswipe.
As I pointed out, you don't know shit about the Master Settlement
Agreement.
On Jun 17, 10:58 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >> We need an organization, other than Big Tobacco,
>
> >Why?
>
> Antis took away their freedom of speech in the Master Settlement Agreement, which
> prohibits " limiting or suppressing research into smoking and health". They're not
> allowed to call junk science what it is.
So, you're not talking about an organization to stick up for smokers.
You want an organization to stick up for the tobacco industry. That's
why you've been outed as a tobacco industry asswipe.
And once again, asswipe, you've demonstrated that you don't know shit
about "antis". You don't know shit about the Master Settlement
Agreement, either.
> >>>>>Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >>>>>>On Jun 12, 6:34 pm, anon3...@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >>Nonsmokers weren't bold enough to lie like that.
>
> >So you have always been a raving lunatic.
>
> You don't see many lunatic smokers.
No, and Bruce implied no such thing. He wrote that YOU have always
been a raving lunatic. And you just reconfirmed it, asswipe.
> Antis
It's become well established here that you don't know shit about
"antis", asswipe.
Is that a threat, asswipe?
You seem to have forgotten your obligation to address and refer to us
as the Anti Smoker Illuminati (ASI). Learn some respect, asswipe.
They were SCIENTISTS, asswipe. If you believe that tobacco industry
scientists were guilty of "junk science", they why don't you stop
being a tobacco industry asswipe and say so?
> Antismokers should be ashamed of themselves, if they had any
> consciences.
1. Tobacco industry asswipes don't tell human beings which emotions
they should experience or not experience.
2. Since you're an asswipe, you have no comprehension of the meaning
of the word "shame". Shame is a human emotion.
When you fail to attack the message, attack the messenger. Thanks for
the admission of failure, asswipe.
That's right, asswipe, extracting money from your pockets into mine.
As usual, you're reading from the tobacco industry's talking points
for this week. The fact is, if the managers at BCIMC had invested in
Bre-X or Enron, they would be good candidates for getting fired. This
should also be the case for the ones responsible for the tobacco
industry investments.
1) As you know, asswipe, two of the companies BCIMC invested in were
found guilty of civil RICO in 2006. Reynolds American and BAT have
direct corporate involvement in cigarette smuggling.
2) Next year, the US government will have to start paying back the $3
trillion that the Bush Administration has added to the national debt.
A stiff increase in federal taxes on cigarettes will certainly be part
of the plan. And if all goes well, we might see a tearing up of the
Master Settlement Agreement, on the grounds that neither the tobacco
companies nor the state governments have abided by the terms.
Right now would be an excellent time for BCIMC to dump those tobacco
stocks.
On May 18, 12:23 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> At risk of being Godwined,
You don't have anything to lose. You've already outed yourself as a
serial liar and a tobacco industry asswipe
> >>>Ask the smokers here what it is about smoking they enjoy.
> >>>You'll get extremely vague, irrelevant and confused responses.
> Fraud means deception, in other words lying. Antismokers are notorious liars, as has been
> shown here many times.
HAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHO
HEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHE
HEHEHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHO
David "Asswipe" MacLean
Anna Buxton
Rumi Khambata
Crapwoman (aka "Catwoman")
Fumin bin Lyin (aka "Fuming Mad")
Mary Herrin (aka "spinner8")
>>
>>No, I didn't ignore it at all.
>
>
> You may not have ignored it,
That's correct, asswipe.
>>
>>> Nice try deflecting the argument, but
>>> I won't play that game.
>>
>>Oh, yes, you will.
>>
>>> Oh, and by the way....you might not have heard about it, but the
>>Allies defeated the Nazis.
>>
>>And, by the way, the Allies weren't cowards like you.
>
>
> Your argument was that smokers are cowards.
You have told a lie, asswipe. I wrote "cowards like you" and
"creatures like
yourself", not "smokers".
>
> I have shown that you think Adolf Hitler should be considered a good
> person because of his anti-tobacco stance
No, you have shown that you are a coward by introducing Hitler to this
discussion..
>
> If you won't discuss the subject like an adult, I'm done with you.
And another example of cowardice.
--
Bob Broughton (asswipe)
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
On Apr 18, 6:15 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >She told me that its common knowledge that casino workers have a high
> >rate of lung cancer and other ailments that have been attributed to
> >second hand smoke.
>
> She's a lawyer, right? Did she also talk about chasing ambulances?
>
What part of "its common knowledge that casino workers have a high
rate of lung cancer and other ailments that have been attributed to
second hand smoke" did you fail to understand, asswipe?
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:39:07 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
>
> >> >We all have our reasons why we hate tobacco.
>
> >> No, you antismokers all have the same reason.
> Is Eric Hoffer a liar too?
Did Eric Hoffer lie about the addictiveness of tobacco? No, he didn't.
You did, liar, and if you were a human being instead of a tobacco
industry asswipe, you would be ashamed of yourself.
>>>> >So, then when do you anticipate those smoking bans being reversed?
>>>> They already were in Allegheny County.
>>>The public smoking ban in Allegheny County will probably be replaced by
>>>a state-wide ban within the next year.
> No one cares if you live longer, asswipe.
>
> Robert Broughton <rbro...@broug8hton.ca> wrote in news:fiuslc$gp1$1
> @venn.venn.bc.ca:
>> We don't tell any lies at all, asswipe.
> That's exactly what a liar would say, asswipe.
>
>> Do you believe that cigarettes are addictive?
>
> Wouldn't know;
There seems to be a lot that you don't know, asswipe.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
For this type of study, a cohort of "one" would be sufficient,
asswipe.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Chuck Wright wrote:
> Robert Broughton wrote:
>>>That's a lie. If these people don't want to breath second-hand smoke,
>>>they don't have to. Nobody is forcing them to breath secondhand smoke.
>>>They can go somewhere else (including the workers).
>>
>> Tobacco industry asswipes such as yourself
>
> Civility and truthfulness aren't your trademarks.
Actually, truthfullness IS one of my trademarks. And Losertarian
tobacco
industry asswipes are not entitled to civility from anyone, asswipe.
>> "These are bars and restaurants where people ? including workers ? who
>> don't want to breathe second-hand smoke shouldn't have to."
>
>
> That's a lie. If these people don't want to breath second-hand smoke,
> they don't have to. Nobody is forcing them to breath secondhand smoke.
> They can go somewhere else (including the workers).
Tobacco industry asswipes such as yourself don't tell non-smokers
where they
can and cannot go.
No, I don't vote for any candidate who opposes public education. I
wouldn't
support this guy for dogcatcher.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
On Apr 8, 1:01 pm, "Malcolm" <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> > Consensus on the streets shows most people don't give a --RATS ASS-- about
> > the smokers ban.
> Bans on smokers? On which streets? In which town?
> If there are indeed places that have bans on smokers, and it's true
> that most people don't give a rat's ass about it, you should be
> extremely worried, asswipe.
I' ll bet you can't make 10 posts without bringing your asswipe
along.
You up to the challange malcom broughton..
$10 against every pound of your horseshit...
and you can hold the stakes in your mouth.
It's so easy... See if you can troll with out asswipe...
You may shit your pants...but no asswipe.
Couldn't find a post declaring you had a brain...
bring the link... Man up.
Post up...
Lets show your buddies what ya got.
Robert Broughton wrote:
> CamachoMan wrote:
>> So Bobby Boy! Should we start complaining to your ISP as suggested you
>> stupid Twit!?
> And what might be basis of such a complaint be, CamaroBoy?
You could try complaining that reading my postings turns you into a
stammering simpleton. The difficult part is, you'll have to convince
them
that you're not a stammering simpleton the rest of the time.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Talk is cheap, asswipe.
HAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHO
HEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHE
HEHEHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHOHOHOHEHEHEHAHAHAHO
On Aug 9, 8:48 pm,
> Malcolm wrote:
>
> > I learned in school that "of course" and "probably" have different
> > (and, in this case, contradictory) meanings, asswipe.
>
>
> I just find it a little unimaginative that people of your ilk seem to
> have a vocabulary limited to "asswipe".
And what you think matters because...?
Actually, there's a long list of synonyms for asswipe. "Lickspittle"
is a good one. There's also "lackey" and "sycophant". However,
"asswipe" is the word that most effectively describes what you and
your fellow asswipes are.
>
>
> >>>Got any evidence to back this claim?
>
> >>Yes.
>
> > Then let's see it, asswipe.
>
> Offered by me and ignored by you.
You offered nothing whatsoever that could possibly be classified as
"evidence", asswipe.
> If you can't figure out how to parse simple English sentences, then go
> back to school.
I learned in school that "of course" and "probably" have different
(and, in this case, contradictory) meanings, asswipe.
> > Got any evidence to back this claim?
>
> Yes.
Then let's see it, asswipe.
How about this? Add a line to form 1040 for "Enjoyment of humiliation
of
tobacco industry asswipes tax". We could keeps track of the number of
times
we've experienced this, multiply that number by $0.25, and fill in the
amount.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:49:33 GMT, Robert Broughton
> <rbro...@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>>
>>Then why not apply the same principle to the WHO, BAT, and Chris Proctor?
>
> We have
No, you haven't, asswipe.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Well, I give Chavez full marks for taking advantage of the Bush
Administration having all of their resources tied down in Iraq, but to
answer your question, full (not limited) smoking bans in bars and
restaurants os a policy that ALL countries should emulate. The
continuation
of cigarette production is a policy that all countries should NOT
emulate.
Hope this clears things up, asswipe.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Marc Schneiderman wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 07:20:41 GMT, Robert Broughton
> <rbro...@broug8hton.ca> wrote:
>
>> Is there any more reason why there should be more people that don't
>>> smoke start to wake up to the fact that this isn't about smoking
>>> anymore?
>>
>>Again, don't be silly. It's about smoking, and it's about a criminal
>>industry that kills off their loyal customers.
>
>
> Don't be stupid.
Don't be an asshole.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
> I'm sure there are quite a few anti-smokers who litter.
And I'm sure there are a lot more that don't, asswipe.e.
> Robert Broughton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LEE COUNTY: NBC2 investigators went undercover with the Lee County
>>>>>>Sheriff's Office to watch them catch drivers tossing cigarette butts
>>>>>
>>>>>>from car windows. We even saw one man put into handcuffs after
>>>>>
>>>>>>throwing his butt out the window.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>NBC2 went along with Lee County Corporal Steve Cart to Lehigh Acres
>>>>>>on Wednesday. He was looking for smokers breaking the law by flipping
>>>>>>cigarettes out the window.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I have no problem with that AS LONG AS they enforce laws against
>>>>>people who litter things besides cigarettes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>See many people besides asswipe tobacco-addicts tossing BURNING OBJECTS
>>>>out the window,
>>>
>>>Yes, I do. In fact, I see a lot more litter from non-smokers than I do
>>>from smokers.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Your perception is distorted by your addiction, then, unless you live in
>> Bhutan.
> Or perhaps your hatred of smokers has distorted your perception.
This "hatred of smokers" you refer to is further proof that your
perception
is distorted by your addiction.
I don't hate smokers at all. I dislike litterbugs. I hate tobacco
industry
executives and tobacco industry asswipes.
Litterbugs and tobacco industry executives have very few friends.
(Except,
in the case of tobacco industry executives, friends that they have
bought.)
Tobacco industry asswipes don't have any friends at all.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
> Robert Broughton wrote:
>> nightlight wrote:
>>
>> > Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection
>> > Act, S. 3546 passes US Senate:
>> >
>>
>> Earth to asswipe: tobacco is not an "herbal remedy".
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Earth to asswipe: tobacco is not an "herbal remedy".
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Report this post for offensive content
site map | disclaimer | privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004
Report this post for offensive content
site map | disclaimer | privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004