On 04/10/2013 11:21 AM, Robert wrote:
> I would be very leery of using 'Who Made That Pipe' for a reference
material. While some of their information may be accurate I have
found
that in more than one instance where they simply latched onto a name
and any and every pipe under that name got branded as being what
it wasn't.
You misunderstand the nature of "Who Made That Pipe." I would
suggest a re-read of pages 2-4 of the Introduction on how the
names were obtained.
The book is simply a compendium of pipe name/manufacturer or
seller/country for pipes listed in a variety of sources (see
pages 2-4 cited above) or the name found on a pipe plus its
origin (when known).
Excluding typos and errors not caught in proof-reading (few,
given the many editions the book went through), for every line
there was a pipe, anufactured or sold, of country of origin, that
matches.
There was never an attempt made to ensure that all instances of a
particular pipe name were listed, nor was there an attempt made
to ensure that all pipes by any manufacturer or seller were included.
You may look up a pipe name and find one or more listings, none
of which correspond to a pipe you have in hand or have found in a
shop somewhere. This is not surprising, and it is not an
inaccuracy. It is simply a reflection that the work is
incomplete, which was declared plainly by the authors.