A couple of pipe ID questions if I'm not tiring out the
kapnismological cognoscenti:
I acquired a couple of pipes from a friend this week, both stamped
"Intenational Selection" and London Briar. Actually one is stamped
"Unique International Selection."
The friend says that Int'l Selection is a brand that is a Dunhill
second. Is this accurate? They are definitely nice pipes, excellent
finishes, and the stems have that hard gloss that Dunhill stems seem
to have.
And while I'm hounding you has anyone heard of these two:
Lombarda (Italy)
Duncan (Made in England)
Geez at this rate of collecting if I die the estate pipe market is
going to experience a glut.
Henry McGrattan:
E-mail: h...@globalserve.net
or: henry.m...@ablelink.org
Web page: http://www.globalserve.net/~hm
Well, that's a new one on me. As far as I know Dunhill's only second
outlet for decades was Parker. Not quite a Dunhill y'unnerstand. In other
words, I got a blank on it...
Ivy K. Ryan
Henry McGrattan <henry.m...@ablelink.org> wrote in article
<33738a13...@news.globalserve.net>...
I have one Duncan. They are a quite common pipe in the UK. I would call
them 'medium' quality. T
--
David L Chambers
>Hi Henry,
>
>Well, that's a new one on me. As far as I know Dunhill's only second
>outlet for decades was Parker. Not quite a Dunhill y'unnerstand. In other
>words, I got a blank on it...
>
>Ivy K. Ryan
>
>Henry McGrattan <henry.m...@ablelink.org> wrote in article
><33738a13...@news.globalserve.net>...
>>
>> A couple of pipe ID questions if I'm not tiring out the
>> kapnismological cognoscenti:
>>
>> I acquired a couple of pipes from a friend this week, both stamped
>> "Intenational Selection" and London Briar. Actually one is stamped
>> "Unique International Selection."
>>
>> The friend says that Int'l Selection is a brand that is a Dunhill
>> second. Is this accurate? They are definitely nice pipes, excellent
>> finishes, and the stems have that hard gloss that Dunhill stems seem
>> to have.
Ivy, for what it's worth, the currently made Sasieni's are actually
made in France under the auspices of Dunhill. So in a manner of
speaking, Sasieni's are now Dunhill seconds.
Steve Smith
^
~~ ~~ ^
@ ~ @~~ ^
^
\/ ^
~~ ~~ ^
<>-------0
\/
-A portrait of the pipe smoker as a young man-
"taking up a glowing cinder with the tongs and lighting with it the
long cherry-wood pipe which was wont to replace his clay when he was
in a disputacious rather than a meditative mood" -- Dr. John H. Watson
>Once upon a time, Parker was a marque unto itself. Dunhill acquired the
>firm and the name and used it as a vehicle for marketing "seconds".
<snip>
>I have in my collection a 1937 Parker (dated with the same patent numbers
>and date stamps we have all come to know and love) which, apart from the
>lack of a white spot and Dunhill stams is indistinguishable from the Genuine
>Article (TM). No flaws, no fills, beautiful grain, excellent stemwork, &c.
>I'd hardly call this pipe a "second", though it lacks the oil-curing of
>Dunhills from that era. I'd call it an alternative marque!
I've had the pleasure to meet Mike Reschke, the Chicago based Parker
collector, on two occasisions. He told me that Dunhill actually
created Parker as a marketing label for a line of less expensive, yet
still First quality, pipes. It was only in later years that the idea
of using the Parker name to market seconds came into being. FWIW.