I'm done toying with Larnrod.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
fun for a while, but I'm probably boring the shit out of the rest of the
newsgroup. So, I plonked it.
Rev.SusietheFloozie
It's still fun to poke with sticks. I even indirectly pulled the radio
card to suggest that I'm not some isolated kook but someone who has a
following. LARNROD doesn't know it's a following of freaks and
weirdoes like us and I never draw the newsgroup stuff into the show--l
just let it draw the impression that it's outgunned, a lone nut
bleating in the wasteland.
The funny thing was that artie guy did a search early in the game and
when he realized I wasn't some flash-in-the-panties, he backed off,
haha. I figured I could use that as an advantage later, but it went on
so long that I could point out to Larney that artie had wised up OVER
FIVE HUNDRED POSTS AGO--thereby increasing Larnrod's know-nothing know-
it-all factor by 500 times.
Sure it's played out. But there's enough diversion for a bored girl
who doesn't care to reason with a fucked-up mind.
John Cook
I think we did good. I could just smell other ppl in alt.conspiracy
enjoying the kook inversion.
--
John Cook
Reality is not Democratic
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
I'll still read your posts, but I've got her/whatever plonked. I've run
out of ideas and it's just the same old shit over and over. She has to
WIN, whatever that means.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
wrote:
I capped off the thread with the idea that we've got the last word in
and that Larney is going to piss and moan and rage with baited headers
and no responses. Let's see that wish come true. She/it will have to
come and piss all over the taunting header I left on it--but there
will be nothing forthcoming, because we're down here having a better
time than that moron could ever imagine. That's the setup, and I'm
sticking to it. Living well is the best revenge. NOM NOM NOM
Iarnrod
> On 28/12/09 4:08 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>
> > He/she/it is of the opinion that whoever has the last word wins. It was
> > fun for a while, but I'm probably boring the shit out of the rest of the
> > newsgroup. So, I plonked it.
>
> I think we did good. I could just smell other ppl in alt.conspiracy
> enjoying the kook inversion.
Don't get so full of yourself; we have much better kooks than you
there day in and day out.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
Oh, give it up, you sad piece of shit. You have a hole over on
alt.conspiracy--go slide back down that like clots down a drain. We
encourage a higher quality of mindset here than you could ever
achieve, even with the wind at your back.
And you've got a lot of WIND, "dearie."
Rev. 11D Meow!
What? You must be huffin' the special brass paint.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
What "what?" Is LARNROD suddenly lucid and accepted here by its
betters? I think NOT.
John Cook
Glad you don't have a killFile Susie - else I wouldn't have known 'bout
it's latest plea.
Remember I mentioned how I was feeling blue yesterday? - I think it was
because when I was about to delete alt.conspiracy from my newsGrouplist
I went into it and read through IronRods' posts - it really depressed me.
It doesn't do ANYTHING positive. Just abuse and mockery.
The only way I could make a positive take on it was that theory I
posited that it was a gov employee. Outside of that scenario we just
have a person who gets pleasure from being ugly and hateful.
It's not stupid - but it does Nothing positive - was thinking bout a
person who plants a Mango tree... - bounty almost unlimited for the
future. But this thing just exudes Hate. Day in Day out.
I think it's more like pure evil than any of the other jerks in my killFile.
p.s. WTF U doing awake at this ungodly hour???
Rev. 11D Meow!
There is nobody on this "Bob"-forsaken planet more transparent than
Larnrawghd.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
> p.s. WTF U doing awake at this ungodly hour???
Just call me a CLOCK-TEASE.
I got bored with alt.slack last night and went to bed early. I'm still
living in the future--to me, it was 9:30pm, but to others on the East
Coast, it was 8:15. I was drowsy, so I figured what the fuck--I just
crashed. Now I'm going to get a couple hours of sound editing done
before I go to work. I did an hour yesterday morning and it was really
productive. I've been hitting the show computer after work and dozing
off in the chair, and I hate doing that.
This works out better.
John Cook
Welcome to 9.30pm oz time...
Zapanaz
>> Don't get so full of yourself; we have much better kooks than you
>> there day in and day out.
And yet you go back there, day in and day out. And you even follow
posts over here on alt.slack to get even more of it.
Do you ever wonder where exactly the fine line that separates people
from kooks is?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"I'm not really that mean, you're just really that stupid"
From ICEKNIFE, to anyone and everyone, as needed and where applicable
:: Currently listening to The Girl from Ipanema, 1963, by Antonio Carlos Jobim, from "Getz/Gilberto"
Iarnrod
<revsusiethefloo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2:37 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 27, 1:55 pm, John Cook <FunCoTech@Yahoodotcom> wrote:
>
> > > On 28/12/09 4:08 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>
> > > > He/she/it is of the opinion that whoever has the last word wins. It was
> > > > fun for a while, but I'm probably boring the shit out of the rest of the
> > > > newsgroup. So, I plonked it.
>
> > > I think we did good. I could just smell other ppl in alt.conspiracy
> > > enjoying the kook inversion.
>
> > Don't get so full of yourself; we have much better kooks than you
> > there day in and day out.
>
> Oh, give it up, you sad piece of shit.
BWAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!! I am the happiest chica on earth, kook.
> You have a hole over on
> alt.conspiracy--go slide back down that like clots down a drain.
Awww, is your widdle hiney hurting from the ass kicking I gave you?
> We
> encourage a higher quality of mindset here than you could ever
> achieve, even with the wind at your back.
Wow, the power of delusion!
So was I supposed to be fuckin' impressed that you allege to have a
radio show? I know many many people with radio shows, honeylamb. Most
of them are late-night filler chum and losers. I wouldn't squat to pee
on them if they were on fire.
If you're impressed by your own supposed credentials, you're a pretty
shallow skank.
Iarnrod
> On 30/12/09 8:19 PM, Rev. Susie the Floozie wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 30, 2:37 am, Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Dec 27, 1:55 pm, John Cook<FunCoTech@Yahoodotcom> wrote:
>
> >>> On 28/12/09 4:08 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>
> >>>> He/she/it is of the opinion that whoever has the last word wins. It was
> >>>> fun for a while, but I'm probably boring the shit out of the rest of the
> >>>> newsgroup. So, I plonked it.
>
> >>> I think we did good. I could just smell other ppl in alt.conspiracy
> >>> enjoying the kook inversion.
>
> >> Don't get so full of yourself; we have much better kooks than you
> >> there day in and day out.
>
> > Oh, give it up, you sad piece of shit. You have a hole over on
> > alt.conspiracy--go slide back down that like clots down a drain. We
> > encourage a higher quality of mindset here than you could ever
> > achieve, even with the wind at your back.
>
> > And you've got a lot of WIND, "dearie."
>
> Glad you don't have a killFile Susie - else I wouldn't have known 'bout
> it's latest plea.
>
> Remember I mentioned how I was feeling blue yesterday? - I think it was
> because when I was about to delete alt.conspiracy from my newsGrouplist
> I went into it and read through IronRods' posts - it really depressed me.
>
> It doesn't do ANYTHING positive. Just abuse and mockery.
It only appears that way to loser kooks like you. Sorry my
intellectual superiority cannot enlighten you, Johnny Kook.
Iarnrod
mail...@foo.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 30, 2:37 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Don't get so full of yourself; we have much better kooks than you
> >> there day in and day out.
>
> And yet you go back there, day in and day out. And you even follow
> posts over here on alt.slack to get even more of it.
Ummm, it's what I do.
> Do you ever wonder where exactly the fine line that separates people
> from kooks is?
Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
Satanic Conspiracy.
> Zapanaz
> International Satanic Conspiracy
> Customer Support Specialisthttp://joecosby.com/
Rev. Susie the Floozie
> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
> Satanic Conspiracy.
Shows what you know that you siezed on that red herring. You obviously
don't belong here, so get the fuck out, you clueless loser. You're
known here for what you are--a blowhard buffoon and a lazy-assed
troll. Not worth anyone's bother.
The door, your ass--feel free to let it hit it.
Zapanaz
>
>> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
>> Satanic Conspiracy.
You search out people talking about you on alt.slack in threads that
aren't even getting posted to your newsgroup, and you call me
narcissistic?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"again, the violet bows to the lily.
again, the rose is tearing off her gown!"--rumi
:: Currently listening to Eternity, 1982, by Ennio Morricone, from "The Thing"
Rev. Susie the Floozie
wrote:
> >On Dec 30, 2:40 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
> >> Satanic Conspiracy.
>
> You search out people talking about you on alt.slack in threads that
> aren't even getting posted to your newsgroup, and you call me
> narcissistic?
Not only that, but this thread is aimed at someone named LARNROD.
Gives the lie to this preening feeb's protestations that it doesn't
know who is meant by that.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> If you're impressed by your own supposed credentials, you're a pretty
> shallow skank.
She never brought up the radio show, asshole, I did. Why don't you go
somewhere where your boring masturbation act will impress someone.
Rev. Logan 714
wrote:
how about
a lone nut
bleating on a wastebasket with a stick in the middle of nowhere
logan
High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
Tá Iarnod Gaeilge do Fear ag caitheamh a máthar éadaí.
High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
Iarnrod
<revsusiethefloo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2:40 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
> > Satanic Conspiracy.
>
> Shows what you know that you siezed on that red herring. You obviously
> don't belong here, so get the fuck out, you clueless loser.
ESAD. I made you run away in fear, so I come back to pee on you here.
I pwn you, kook.
> You're
> known here for what you are--a blowhard buffoon and a lazy-assed
> troll. Not worth anyone's bother.
How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and
kooks like you all think of your intellectual betters like me? we are
laughing asses off at you.
> The door, your ass--feel free to let it hit it.
ESAD, Skank. Why would I want to leave such a fun place where I can
pwn a bunch of narcissistic know-knothing klowns, make them foam and
rant and laugh my ass off for FREE yet?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and kooks
> like you all think of your intellectual betters like me? we are laughing
> asses off at you.
I see you've made the jump to alt.slack. It's interesting that you need
to come onto our home turf. Who are you trying to convince? Trust me
Larnrod, you're out of your league here. There is so much subtext going
on here that you are totally oblivious to that you're making an
incredible ass of yourself. But if you prefer this stage to dance on,
feel free. We enjoy watching the monkey dance here.
Rev. 11D Meow!
>
> How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and
> kooks like you all think of your intellectual betters like me? we are
> laughing asses off at you.
>
If Larnrawghd had any, I'd say,
"SHOW US YOUR BOOBS!" to it...
Tu-whit, tu-who: a merry note,
While greasy Larnrawghd doth keel the pot.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
For all we know she might have a penis along with her boobs.
Rev. 11D Meow!
<e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> wrote:
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBS!!!
If Larnrawghd tucked 'her' weiner between 'her' legs and wore
control-top pantyhose, it'd reveal the fattest cameltoe ever.
Then a brisk application of Vaseline to seal the meal.
Rev. 11D Meow!
>
> I know many many people with radio shows, honeylamb. Most
> of them are late-night filler chum and losers. I wouldn't squat to pee
> on them if they were on fire.
>
You and Caroline Dean should schedule a coffee enema session if that's
how you treat your friends.
Now get back in your Tub-O-Lard and getz to slurpin'.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
full four-foot-nine-inch height and squawked wetly:
> ESAD. I made you run away in fear, so I come back to pee on you here.
> I pwn you, kook.
Oh, for fuck's sake, you're a sad parody of a human being. You can't
even do that right, can you? I made it crystal clear in no uncertain
terms that I flipped you off out of boredom, you common, braying
dumbass--and now you show up here looking. Another stalker to my
credit. I must be pretty powerful to attract a nemesis of your
caliber.*
> How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and
> kooks like you all think of your intellectual betters like me?
Hmmm...it apparently matters enough for you to sniff around here after
me like a bitch cur. Think for a second, IF you can--if you truly
thought that of us, we'd be so far beneath your contempt and wouldn't
even show up on your radar. But no, we handed you your fat loser ass
and you can't let it go. Your attentions only aggrandize all of
alt.slack, that we could produce this obvious overreaction in you. You
must still be stinging like a stuck sumbitch. Hahaha!!!
> we are laughing asses off at you.
Oh, you're all "laughing asses," all right. And And congratulations!
Describing yourself as a "laughing ass" is the first time you've been
right, Dude.**
Go back to your own turf and attention-whore yourself over there
around your own kind. We have no time for lameass wannabes here.
Love***,
Susie
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
** see above
*** What are you, BRAIN DEAD?!!
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Thanks for the footnotes. So that's what all that "BWAHAHAHA" was. It was
braying. That explains a lot .
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Tá Iarnod Gaeilge do Fear ag caitheamh a máthar éadaí.
I suspect that, despite the name, she doesn't speak teh Gaelic. But she
wants full credit for the obscure reference. It means she's multicultural
and stuff.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
wrote:
And stuff.
I took off the crosspost you'd picked up, Dok. That beeyotch gonna
give you the claprot if you're not careful. LARNROD just oozes
spirochetes.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Come on, I'm still feeling nauseous from the Smerker post.
Zapanaz
>>
>> How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and
>> kooks like you all think of your intellectual betters like me? we are
>> laughing asses off at you.
>>
Why are you reading the alt.slack newsgroup, again?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"MY LIFE IS NOT A CRITIQUE OF YOUR LIFE" - NENSLO
:: Currently listening to When Lights Are Low, 1955, by Miles Davis/John Coltrane, from "The Legendary Prestige Quintet Sessions"
thunder.willow
BUWAHAHAHAAHAAA!!!!!!!!!!
famus words...Give me the peace sign in your boobie shot too.
Iarnrod
wrote:
WAHHHH!!! WAHHHHHH!! Iarnrod made me look up an "obscure reference!"
WAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!
Plato
Whoah! Did you get up on the wrong side of the cheap motor car.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Iarnrod
wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:04:02 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and kooks
> > like you all think of your intellectual betters like me? we are laughing
> > asses off at you.
>
> I see you've made the jump to alt.slack. It's interesting that you need
> to come onto our home turf.
Get bent, kook. It ain't your "turf." This is usenet. It belongs to
anyone.
> Who are you trying to convince?
BWAHAHAHAHAA!!! You still don't get it.
> Trust me
> Larnrod, you're out of your league here.
I know. I am major league, you are Single-A. Yer a bunch of luzers.
> There is so much subtext going
> on here that you are totally oblivious to that you're making an
> incredible ass of yourself.
Holy CRAP, you think someone really cares about your "subtexts!" Too
fuckin' funny!!! Keep taking this seriously, show yourself to be an
ass!! I pwn you!
> We enjoy watching the monkey dance here.
Dream on, Fred Astaire. I got you ALL dancing to MY tune!!!
Iarnrod
wrote:
You'd like that, I suspect! How's THAT for a subtext, gayboi?
Iarnrod
Nah. I'd rather keep making you luzers dance. I enjoy your wriggling
and wranting!! Keep it up, kook! Amuse me!
Iarnrod
<revsusiethefloo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 8:04 pm, LARNROD <iarn...@yahoo.com> drew itself up to its
> full four-foot-nine-inch height and squawked wetly:
>
> > ESAD. I made you run away in fear, so I come back to pee on you here.
> > I pwn you, kook.
>
> Oh, for fuck's sake, you're a sad parody of a human being. You can't
> even do that right, can you? I made it crystal clear in no uncertain
> terms that I flipped you off out of boredom, you common, braying
> dumbass--and now you show up here looking. Another stalker to my
> credit. I must be pretty powerful to attract a nemesis of your
> caliber.*
PWNED!!!! THANK YOU, SKANKIE!!!
> Go back to your own turf and attention-whore yourself over there
> around your own kind. We have no time for lameass wannabes here.
If that were true, none of you lame-oes would be here in the first
place, you waste of flesh.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Holy CRAP, you think someone really cares about your "subtexts!" Too
> fuckin' funny!!! Keep taking this seriously, show yourself to be an
> ass!! I pwn you!
All right, you pwn me. What next?
Iarnrod
Projection.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> If that were true, none of you lame-oes would be here in the first
> place, you waste of flesh.
We have conversations here. You wouldn't know about that because it's not
something you know how to do.
Iarnrod
wrote:
> >On Dec 30, 5:04 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> How could it ever possibly matter what a collection of nutbags and
> >> kooks like you all think of your intellectual betters like me? we are
> >> laughing asses off at you.
>
> Why are you reading the alt.slack newsgroup, again?
Shut up and mind your own business, kooker. Are you under the
impression this was private here just among you luzers?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Ahhh, I knew you were homophobic.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Something you're an expert on.
Iarnrod
You mean him.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Shut up and mind your own business, kooker. Are you under the impression
> this was private here just among you luzers?
That's why the newsgroup is called "alt.slack" and not "alt.assholes"
because it's for people who appreciate slack, not slack-sucking vampires
like yourself.
Plato
Neil armstrong was the founder of the curtain, metaphorically speaking.
Zapanaz
> If that were true, none of you lame-oes would be here in the first
> place, you waste of flesh.
"Here" is my living room.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
I was told by a Professor of Education in class once that school
administrators cared about only two things: Image and Damage
control.
Any attempts to get their attention have to be translated into those
terms.
Satyr
:: Currently listening to Turkish Dance, 2005, by DJ Kermit, from
"Bedouin Café"
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> On Dec 31, 4:19 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> If that were true, none of you lame-oes would be here in the first
>> place, you waste of flesh.
>
> "Here" is my living room.
>
Take it back, I've got one of my own.
Iarnrod
<e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:20:12 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > On Dec 30, 7:00 pm, "Rev. Susie the Floozie"
> > <revsusiethefloo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Dec 30, 8:53 pm, "Rev.Dr. LoBotomy" <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:36:30 -0800, High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > Tá Iarnod Gaeilge do Fear ag caitheamh a máthar éadaí.
>
> >> > I suspect that, despite the name, she doesn't speak teh Gaelic. But
> >> > she wants full credit for the obscure reference. It means she's
> >> > multicultural and stuff.
>
> >> And stuff.
>
> >> I took off the crosspost you'd picked up, Dok. That beeyotch gonna give
> >> you the claprot if you're not careful. LARNROD just oozes spirochetes.
>
> > Projection.
>
> Something you're an expert on.
Only because I get to see it so much among you nutbags. I have learned
through observation.
Iarnrod
mail...@foo.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 30, 2:40 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
> >> Satanic Conspiracy.
>
> You search out people talking about you on alt.slack in threads that
> aren't even getting posted to your newsgroup, and you call me
> narcissistic?
Ummmm, look at the title of the thread, nutbag. You cowardly morons
think you can talk about me and I don't get to jump in?
Fuggedaboudit!!
Iarnrod
You keep replying.
Wow, you morons still don't get it.
Iarnrod
BWAHAHAAAHAH!!! HARDLY!
Hey, you're the one fantasizing that I have a penis.
Iarnrod
Wow. Uh, ok?
Iarnrod
<e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:19:43 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > If that were true, none of you lame-oes would be here in the first
> > place, you waste of flesh.
>
> We have conversations here.
Evidence is to the contrary, nutbag.
> You wouldn't know about that because it's not
> something you know how to do.
Evidence is to the contrary, nutbag.
Iarnrod
<e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:37:41 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > If you're impressed by your own supposed credentials, you're a pretty
> > shallow skank.
>
> She never brought up the radio show, asshole, I did.
And where, asswipe, did I ever make a claim that she did? And who
gives a flying fuck? Having a radio show is no distinction these days
when everyone's a fuckin' celebrity.
> Why don't you go
> somewhere where your boring masturbation act will impress someone.
Oh, I think I found the right place. You still don't get it. I pwn you
so much you can't help but reply to my every post!!! I got my little
puppy dog in you!! ROLL OVER!!
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Provide some evidence that you've actually had a civil conversation with
somebody on Usenet, and I'll take it back.
Here's what you'll do, rather than providing evidence, you'll say
something like "I already have." or "why should I care what you think" or
"Projection!" or some other lame response because you have no valid
response. That's because you don't have any friends. You're just a
friendless sad excuse for a human being who's sole purpose in life is to
try to make people feel as bad as you do.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Okay, I'm a moron and you pwn me, and I don't get it. Now what?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
You're posting to alt.slack. Do you know what slack is?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Yes, now take the next step in the logical process if that's not too
difficult for you. What is one of the things homophobes do? They call
other people "homos" or "fags" or "gaybois" as epithets because they
think homosexuality is something to be ashamed of. That makes you a
homophobe. QED
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
We can talk about you all we want. We weren't talking *to* you, we were
talking *about* you. You're the nutbag with the sensitive ego.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
You have learned through practice.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> I pwn you
> so much you can't help but reply to my every post!!!
Gee, that must mean that I pwn you, because you can't help but reply to
my every post.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
BTW, the thread is about "Larnrod", is that your name?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
>> She never brought up the radio show, asshole, I did.
>
> And where, asswipe, did I ever make a claim that she did? And who gives
> a flying fuck? Having a radio show is no distinction these days when
> everyone's a fuckin' celebrity.
She's had the radio show for at least 15 years, maybe longer, and she
never brought it up with you. You made the claim that she was trying to
impress you by claiming she had a radio show. That's a rather paranoid,
one might say "kooky" claim.
Again you won't come forward with a real response. Instead pick one out
of your bag of hackneyed cliches.
Zapanaz
>
>> On Dec 30 2009, 1:28�pm, Zapanaz <http://joecosby.com/code/
>> mail...@foo.com> wrote:
>>> >On Dec 30, 2:40�pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
>>> >> Satanic Conspiracy.
>>>
>>> You search out people talking about you on alt.slack in threads that
>>> aren't even getting posted to your newsgroup, and you call me
>>> narcissistic?
>>
>> Ummmm, look at the title of the thread, nutbag. You cowardly morons
>> think you can talk about me and I don't get to jump in? Fuggedaboudit!!
I didn't say you couldn't. Feel free.
I can see how the thought that people in some newsgroup you don't even
read are talking bad about you would be intolerable to you.
I'm just pointing out that that makes you a huge narcissist. Which
makes you calling me one pretty ironic.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"I can't understand why you don't get any mail from me. Perhaps
it's because I haven't been writing." Groucho Marx
:: Currently listening to Olugendo, 2006, by Samite, from "Embalasasa"
Iarnrod
wrote:
> >On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:48:24 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
>
> >> On Dec 30 2009, 1:28 pm, Zapanaz <http://joecosby.com/code/
> >> mail...@foo.com> wrote:
> >>> >On Dec 30, 2:40 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>> >> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
> >>> >> Satanic Conspiracy.
>
> >>> You search out people talking about you on alt.slack in threads that
> >>> aren't even getting posted to your newsgroup, and you call me
> >>> narcissistic?
>
> >> Ummmm, look at the title of the thread, nutbag. You cowardly morons
> >> think you can talk about me and I don't get to jump in? Fuggedaboudit!!
>
> I didn't say you couldn't. Feel free.
>
> I can see how the thought that people in some newsgroup you don't even
> read are talking bad about you would be intolerable to you.
Wow, again you still don't get it. Amazing. Are you people really this
dumb?
> I'm just pointing out that that makes you a huge narcissist. Which
> makes you calling me one pretty ironic.
Klueless Kooks, all of you! I LUV it!
Pisces
Strange, nothing is his point seemed irrational or clueless at all.
You might want to speak to someone about your projection issues.
John Cook
Last century, just after I discovered this haunt of kooks, someone
posted an analogy between certain usenet behaviour and primates pissing
on things to claim them. It's stuck with me and now I'm thinking that
that's what "pwn" means....
Did I get it right?
--
John Cook
Reality is not Democratic
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Klueless Kooks, all of you! I LUV it!
Keep on repeating that to yourself while you are driven to come back and
vindicate yourself. I LUV it! I LUV it! I LUV it!
The reason I'm doing this is because you're such an obnoxious asshole
that you have to insult people you don't even know and keep on coming
back to make sure you get the last word. Well, Larnrod, you won't get the
last word here. At some point you're going to have to quit this
narcissistic endeavor and admit defeat. Trust me I AM MORE STUBBORN THAN
YOU!!! Kooks like me have extra staying power.
Pisces
bingo.
Iarnrod
To you, nutbag. For obvious reasons.
> You might want to speak to someone about your projection issues.
Projection.
Iarnrod
No. Of course not. You haven't gotten anything right yet, John Kook.
Iarnrod
wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:01:18 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > Klueless Kooks, all of you! I LUV it!
>
> Keep on repeating that to yourself while you are driven to come back and
> vindicate yourself. I LUV it! I LUV it! I LUV it!
Of course you do! You are obsessively and obediently posting multiple
replies to all my posts!! You are my puppy dog!!
> The reason I'm doing this is because you're such an obnoxious asshole
> that you have to insult people you don't even know and keep on coming
> back to make sure you get the last word.
No, the reason you're doing it is because like the rest of the clods
in here you are an insecure self-absorbed poser with an inflated view
of yourself. I have exposed that and you have to cover each and every
post of mine with a reply to try to keep yourself from seeing the
truth.
> Well, Larnrod, you won't get the
> last word here.
Holly SHIT!! I KNOW that!! What the fuck do you THINK I am doing?
BWAHAAAHAHAHAAAAHAHAAA!!!!!
> At some point you're going to have to quit this
> narcissistic endeavor and admit defeat.
OH the PROJECTION!!!! BWAAHAHAAAA!!!! You just said it all, and you're
too stupid to realize it!!! BWAHAHAHAAA!!!
OH MY GOD, my sides are now splitting from laughter at this klueless
krazy kook!!
> Trust me I AM MORE STUBBORN THAN
> YOU!!! Kooks like me have extra staying power.
Ummm, I knew that would be true when I started toying with you
colleciton of nutbags. Most seem to have caught on. But you apparently
are the stupidest among them!!
Now, pwned little doggie, put your next dozen replies here
===========>
BWAHAAAHAHAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!!!
Iarnrod
Hold on, nutter, let's check your card first...! BWAHAAAHAHAHAA!!!
Iarnrod
wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:48:50 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > On Dec 31 2009, 5:19 pm, "Rev.Dr. LoBotomy" <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net>
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:16:20 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> >> > Holy CRAP, you think someone really cares about your "subtexts!" Too
> >> > fuckin' funny!!! Keep taking this seriously, show yourself to be an
> >> > ass!! I pwn you!
>
> >> All right, you pwn me. What next?
>
> > You keep replying.
>
> > Wow, you morons still don't get it.
>
> Okay, I'm a moron and you pwn me, and I don't get it. Now what?
Now you post again.
Catching on, nutbag?
Iarnrod
wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:50:16 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > On Dec 31 2009, 5:23 pm, "Rev.Dr. LoBotomy" <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net>
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:21:16 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> >> > Shut up and mind your own business, kooker. Are you under the
> >> > impression this was private here just among you luzers?
>
> >> That's why the newsgroup is called "alt.slack" and not "alt.assholes"
> >> because it's for people who appreciate slack, not slack-sucking
> >> vampires like yourself.
>
> > Wow. Uh, ok?
>
> You're posting to alt.slack. Do you know what slack is?
Do I give a shit?
Iarnrod
Wrong, gayboi. YOU brought up your fantasy that I had a penis.
Fantasize on!!!
Iarnrod
wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:48:24 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> > On Dec 30 2009, 1:28 pm, Zapanaz <http://joecosby.com/code/
> > mail...@foo.com> wrote:
> >> >On Dec 30, 2:40 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> Nice projection from a narcissistic klown whose sig is International
> >> >> Satanic Conspiracy.
>
> >> You search out people talking about you on alt.slack in threads that
> >> aren't even getting posted to your newsgroup, and you call me
> >> narcissistic?
>
> > Ummmm, look at the title of the thread, nutbag. You cowardly morons
> > think you can talk about me and I don't get to jump in? Fuggedaboudit!!
>
> We can talk about you all we want.
And I can talk about you nutbags all I want.
> We weren't talking *to* you,
You're stupid, I can tell. You apparently didn't realize you were
posting to USENET. It's on this internets thingy, you see, and it's
visible to the whole world. HTH!!
Iarnrod
Nope, observation. It only seems like practice to you since you are
the one doing it all the time; you think everyone else does. It's a
common psychological trap for morons like you.
Iarnrod
wrote:
BWAHAHAHHAHAA!!! TWO replies to my one post!!! I WIN!!
Iarnrod
wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:52:51 -0800, Iarnrod wrote:
> >> She never brought up the radio show, asshole, I did.
>
> > And where, asswipe, did I ever make a claim that she did? And who gives
> > a flying fuck? Having a radio show is no distinction these days when
> > everyone's a fuckin' celebrity.
>
> She's had the radio show for at least 15 years,
She must be pretty bad since she can't get promoted after that long.
> maybe longer, and she
> never brought it up with you.
And did I say she did, gayboi?
> You made the claim that she was trying to
> impress you by claiming she had a radio show.
I did no such thing of course, not in dispute. You merely cannot read
for comprehension.
Try again, Pussy Boy.
> That's a rather paranoid,
> one might say "kooky" claim.
On your part, since it's a lie.
> Again you won't come forward with a real response.
I just did. You constructed a straw man and cannot read what I
actually said.
> Instead pick one out
> of your bag of hackneyed cliches.
PWNED!
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
>> maybe longer, and she
>> never brought it up with you.
>
> And did I say she did, gayboi?
>
>> You made the claim that she was trying to impress you by claiming she
>> had a radio show.
>
> I did no such thing of course, not in dispute. You merely cannot read
> for comprehension.
You see the difficulty you have when you have to actually respond, you
get caught in lies:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.slack/msg/fd3cd3f38311e18c
Let me direct you to the section where you made the claim that she was
trying to impress you by claiming she had a radio show:
"So was I supposed to be fuckin' impressed that you allege to have a
radio show?"
You see when you lie about posts to usenet you make the mistake that all
your posts have been archived by Google Groups.
Now back to what I was saying. You claimed that she alleged to have a
radio show and she did no such thing. You are deluded and paranoid.
> > Again you won't come forward with a real response.
> I just did. You constructed a straw man and cannot read what I
> actually said.
And as I have documented here you are a liar.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Of course you do! You are obsessively and obediently posting multiple
> replies to all my posts!! You are my puppy dog!!
And you are obsessively replying to all my posts, and since I started
this thread without responding to you, you are the one following me.
Therefore you are my puppy dog and I pwn you. How does it feel Larnrod?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
>> We weren't talking *to* you,
>
> You're stupid, I can tell. You apparently didn't realize you were
> posting to USENET. It's on this internets thingy, you see, and it's
> visible to the whole world. HTH!!
It's visible if you go out of your way to look for it, which you
obviously did. Usenet has things called "newsgroups" (tell me if I'm
going too fast). These "newsgroups" have names which describe the kinds
of subjects that people who hang around those newsgroups talk about. This
newsgroup is called alt.slack and is the official newsgroup of the Church
of the SubGenius. It is a place where subgenii and people interested in
the CotSG congregate and talk with each other. It is also a place invaded
by people we refer to as "kooks", whose sole purpose seems to be to
disrupt the newsgroup with their own ego problems. You are one of these
kooks, and I am a kook-baiter. So welcome to alt.slack.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Another non-response. I'm going to start counting them. I'll won't go
back and count all your previous non-responses but I'll use those to
categorize them. Then each time you use one I'll count and categorize it,
just for fun.
A. The "your a kook" non-response
B. The "I pwn you" non-response - 1
C. The "Projection!" non-response
Those are the categories I'll start with, more to be added when necessary.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
I'm going to have to add another category. The non-sequitur non response.
You see whether or not I claimed you had a penis has nothing to do with
whether or not you are a homophobe. So.
A. Kook - 0 (thus far)
B. Pwn - 1
C. Projection - 0 (thus far)
D. Non-sequitur - 1
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
I don't know, do you?
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
What, that I can keep you responding to me even though we're talking
about nothing? I caught on a long time before you did.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
And using your logic the same could be said of you. Now if someone tends
to project their own character flaws they will reveal it by projecting
the same flaws onto a lot of different people. I generally don't accuse
people of projection, but you do it all the time. So the evidence seems
to indicate that you are the Projector Queen.
Pisces
You do realize that if one has one's own radio show, there is not a
"promotion", right?
I mean I cannot imagine that you, in all your supposed glories, are
too ignorant to understand the concepts of media syndication.
My, what a strange mentally ill birdlike thing you are. I meant to ask
if you are pre or post.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Two non-responses in one post:
1.Kook - 1
2.Pwn - 1
3.Projection - 1
4.Non-sequitur - 1
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
Another Kook non-response.
1.Kook -2