About this Measure No. 9
Paul Harvey
dav...@cascade.ens.tek.com (David Hatcher) writes:
>>Trivia Question Time:
> I know that this line was written with tongue in cheek. But I want to
>emphasis that many of the questions you brought are not trivial to
>many of us.
I don't know, seems pretty trivial, (in a fascist milieu), to me.
What do you mean exactly?
In article <1992Oct17.0...@wetware.com>
dri...@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
>Trivia Question Time:
>1. if We can Conclude that those who are Followers
>of a False Interpretation of the Bible, can we
>get them Designated as clearly 'HomoSexual' under
>the Above Statue? Or At Least clearly as:
>'abnormal, wrong, unnatural, and perverse' ....
Of course! A SINNER IS A SINNER IS A SINNER! Luke14:26 shall be THE LAW!
>2. Is there any Clarificatiion for Protecting
>RealHeteroSexuals who have been inappropriately
>labelled as 'HomoSexual' by persons who have
>fallen Prey to Ideological Deviationalism?
The consequence of a "well run" society is that some innocents will have to
pay for crimes they did not do, but they have the assurance they will go to
Christian Heaven if they are in fact not guilty. You've heard of trial by
fire? The guilty do not burn, the not guilty do, but they are assured of a
first class ticket to Christian Heaven, assuming they haven't done anything
else wrong. Generally, if you get into that kind of trouble, you have done
*something* wrong.
>3. Will this Statue Require the Creation of a Board
>of Moral Purity to Clarify which of the Theological
>Deviationalists have in fact not set out to engage in
>'abnormal, wrong, unnatural, and perverse' activities?
Certainly. The "liberal judges" are not pure enough to properly administer
this law. Are you now or have you ever been a homosexual? Just answer the
question! And have you ever been to San Francisco or New York City? Have you
ever been tested positive for ...
> 3.1: will said board also be qualified to
> designate which HeteroSexuals are Clearly
> Good HeteroSexuals, as opposed to BadHeteroSexuals?
Yes, for example, premarital sex is clearly EVIL!
> 3.2: Since the bible contains the string:
> "Spare the rod and spoil the child."
> Will Said Board be Generating a Version of the
> Bible which will NOT contain Clear Sadistic Trends.
Yes, a new covenant will be constructed as the law of the land but the Bible,
most likely KJV, will remain intact for "true Christians" to study. "True
Christians" know that KJV is not Sadistic. Deviants, heretics, pinks, false
prophets and other unnaturals will not be spared the rod nor the stark fist
of removal. Non-believers will be subject to the new covenant of federal law
since they are not capable of understanding the simple message of the Bible.
That is the only reason for federal law, to keep the non-believers in line.
"True Christians" are above federal law, they answer only to a higher law, the
Bible.
>4. Does this Regulation Include whether or NOT the
>public untilities will be allowed to be used by said
>persons designated as 'NotGoodPersons' by the aforementioned
>Board of Moral Purity, as:
> 4.1: Use of Public Utilities, by said persons will
> clearly VIOLATE the above statute.
That's right. Reading KJV by candle light will do them good.
> 4.2: By allowing Said Persons to Utilize such Public
> utilities, as roads, parks, public transports, the
> State will Be Held Liable for Tacitly supporting
> Said UnGoodPersons.
Such use will not be allowed. They will be strangers in the land as well as
strangers amongst men. They will forever be a cursed people, forced to eat
the meager grasses that grow in the parched dirt. They shall never know the
good life of low-cost, guilt-free Nukclear Utilities. They shall gaze at the
great fish-eating turbines of hydro-elektrik, unaware of the goodness all
around them. They shall be denied the oportunity to gorge themselves on
Alaskan salmon and partake of the Seattle grunge-rock scene. They shall no
longer remember the days of lawlessness and the finer details of oysters and
geoducks and fishing for octapus from the Edgewood. Indeed, the owl's are not
what they seem. [But, doesn't she look just like Laura?]
>ciao
>drieux
>ps: Has Anyone thought about starting one of these in
>California, as Clearly It would solve a lot of problems here....
KKKalifornia Uber Ales? I'm jus lettin' ya know, if ya plan to take a trip to
the bay, keep your hand on your clip, 'cause Kalifornia is just lyke Oregun,
they wannabe lyke Oregun. I thought you knew!
drieux, just drieux
] In article <1c1ucs...@cascade.ens.tek.com>
] >>Trivia Question Time:
] > I know that this line was written with tongue in cheek. But I want to
] >emphasis that many of the questions you brought are not trivial to
] >many of us.
]
] I don't know, seems pretty trivial, (in a fascist milieu), to me.
] What do you mean exactly?
So......
Basically we all agree that IF folks want measure 9 to pass,
that they should ALSO support my appointment as the
chairman of the Moral Purity Board which will resolve
any minor technical complicaitons that MIGHT arise
from underclarified sections of the Measure as they
need to be Promulgated as Actual Laws controlling the
Threat of Moral Perversion.
Did Anyone else Notice that of the four male leads in
the Movie 'GhostBusters' only ONE of them was in any
way alledged to be HeteroSexual! And that Character
was the ONE PERSON who KNEW that the EPA Operative
was Dickless.... and THUS clearly Establishing that
this was some BiSexual, and THUS OBVIOUSLY that
GhostBusters was a part of the HomoSexual Plot to
CORRUPT the MORALS of Decent Persons!!!!!
Also NOTICE that the ONLY OBVIOUS Cases of HeteroSexuality
were those Between the 'GateKeeper' and the 'KeyMaster'
who were CLEARLY DEMONIC FORCES!!!!!!
Need we say anything more?
ciao
drieux
ps: Its a Dirty Job, But SOMEONE has got to
protect US from the Hideous Influence of HeteroSexuality!!!!
--
Modern Day Problems:
ME? engage in Hyperbole?
I have rarely been more than a first Order Function!!!!