Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Newsgroup text porn author charged with distributing obscene materials

68 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

obbz...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 17, 2008, 11:09:43 AM1/17/08
to
On Jan 17, 6:19 am, Modemac <mode...@modemac.com> wrote:

>  I listed my financial
> situation: I have *just* enough money to pay my bills and not get into
> debt.  I *don't* have any extra.  

You make repeated noise about your marginal financial situation. So
rather than focus your energies on securing additional income, you
spend all your spare time writing daddy does his daughter stories.

Elsewhere in you saga you say you long hoped the Gestapo would come
banging on your door. Happy now?

obbz...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 17, 2008, 11:12:17 AM1/17/08
to


Wait, nevermind, the Frank McCoy group isn't even in the list.

Modemac

unread,
Jan 17, 2008, 11:29:13 AM1/17/08
to

That's because I'm not the guy in question. I caught wind of the
situation, and thought, "Wait a second...Frank McCoy...that name
sounds familiar." [Google search] "Oh yeah, I remember - that guy
used to be all over the place in the days way back before the Web
became popular. So, if I understand right, he's been arrested because
one guy in Georgia didn't like a story he posted to Usenet, fifteen
years ago." That's my only concern about it; I don't know the guy,
and personally I think his stories are enormously boring and
repetitive. (The subject matter doesn't turn me on, either.)
However, because the guy is well-known in Usenet circles (at least
certain parts of Usenet), then the news should be of interest to some
folks.

--
The High Weirdness Project
http://www.modemac.com

Message has been deleted

Charlie Wilkes

unread,
Jan 17, 2008, 6:04:30 PM1/17/08
to
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:40:29 -0500, AI wrote:

>> From: mcc...@millcomm.com
>> Newsgroups: alt.fan.frank.mccoy
>
>> So .... (HERE comes the FUN part ... I wonder what a newspaper would
>> make of this; and I'm *almost* tempted to call the local press and tell
>> them all the juicy details!)
>
> Don't bother. You're a pornographer, and most of the populace would
> prefer that you were dead.

Bah. This guy is hounded by religious zealots, led by his wife. Sexual
fantasy is his way of fighting back against a belief system that he finds
obnoxious and oppressive. His story would make an interesting movie.

Charlie

obbz...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 17, 2008, 6:28:55 PM1/17/08
to
On Jan 17, 11:29 am, Modemac <mode...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 17, 11:12 am, obbzer...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Wait, nevermind, the Frank McCoy group isn't even in the list.
>
> That's because I'm not the guy in question.  

.nod I got that but didn't notice the guy's group wasn't listed until
after I posted it. Reposted elsewhere where he's likely to see it.

Message has been deleted

Charlie Wilkes

unread,
Jan 19, 2008, 1:01:42 AM1/19/08
to
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:16:59 -0500, AI wrote:

> Charlie Wilkes <charlie...@users.easynews.com> writes:
>> Bah. This guy is hounded by religious zealots, led by his wife.
>> Sexual fantasy is his way of fighting back against a belief system that
>> he finds obnoxious and oppressive. His story would make an interesting
>> movie.
>

> All true. But that doesn't mean that the newspapers are going to give a
> shit that he was minorly abused by the cops.

I agree. It's not much of a news story. But I think it's a waste of
public resources to harass this guy. I hope his old chums on Usenet pass
the hat to help him out with his legal expenses, etc.

Charlie

>
> His stories would make an even more interesting movie.
>

Ace Lightning

unread,
Jan 19, 2008, 2:25:22 AM1/19/08
to
Charlie Wilkes wrote:
>>All true. But that doesn't mean that the newspapers are going to give a
>>shit that he was minorly abused by the cops.
>I agree. It's not much of a news story. But I think it's a waste of
>public resources to harass this guy. I hope his old chums on Usenet pass
>the hat to help him out with his legal expenses, etc.

they are.

0 new messages