Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

So-called "nude child art"

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Joe Cosby

unread,
Nov 10, 2001, 5:52:32 PM11/10/01
to
Modemac <mod...@modemac.com> hunched over a computer, typing
feverishly;
thunder crashed, Modemac <mod...@modemac.com> laughed madly, then
wrote:

>All I can say is, when I took a look at this web site, I had a strong urge
>to go over my browser's cache directory with a file-wiping program.
>
> www.alessandrasmile.com
>
>So why am I posting the URL here? Mostly because this is a Web site that I
>found more shocking than the white supremacist crap that we usually like to
>sit back and laugh at. This Web site is one of those "gray areas" on the
>ragged edge of free speech and free expression, where it's damn hard to
>swallow the excuses they use of "art" and "artistic photography" and
>"beautiful drawings," when it seems obvious (especially with some of the
>stuff on display there) that a fair amount of is designed to be as close to
>child pornography as is legally possible. The feds are trying to "crack
>down" on these guys, of course...maybe you've heard of the furor a couple of
>years ago when mega-bookstore Barnes & Noble faced protests and child
>pornography charges when they included a book for sale called "The Age Of
>Innocence" by David Hamilton.

There's some pretty vile shit out there that makes this look tasteful.

It doesn't matter. People are vile. That's the thing. You can take
the sites down but people are still vile. You just can't see it. Man
is a bad animal. You can't get away from it.

***

Interestingly, in the time since I originally posted this, this
article has been one of the largest referrers of visits to my website.

In other words, a very large percent of visits to my web site have
been people clicking the link in this particular article.

Why?

Because the words 'nude child art' connected to a large number of
search engine searches.

Think about it.


***


My definition of a 'human being' is a thin veneer of
socially-acceptable behaviour painted over a festering blob of
conflicting fears, hatred, anger, confusion and core sickness. The
only difference between people is how well their paint job holds up.

Everybody is ruled by fear. And everybody succeeds in hiding the
fact, so everybody also thinks they are the only one who is sick.
Which just makes it worse.

Then to cement the whole thing, we have absolutely no general tendency
to improve ourselves, examine ourselves, or seek in any way to become
something better than what we are.

Watch TV. Look at commercials. Look at pinks in the street. All the
effort is devoted to maintaining an illusion that the veneer is all
there is. That you are a smooth well-polished surfboard without a
crack or pit or abrasion.

--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com

matter is energy. In the universe there are many energy fields
which we cannot normally perceive. Some energies have a spiritual
source which act upon a person's soul. However, this soul does
not exist abinissio as orthodoz Christianity teaches, it has to
be brought into existence by a process of guided self-observation.
However, this is rarely achieved oweing to man's unique ability
to be distracted from spiritual matters by every day trivia.
VBC MAN 1: What was that about hats again?


Sig by Kookie Jar 5.98d http://go.to/generalfrenetics/

0 new messages