So when Usenet is dead... what will all the trolls do?
High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
on alt.slack when Usenet finally ceases to be. Will Doc Martian
finally have to accept his mother is dead? Will the SubGenii who run
the Alcandor Project find something else to do? Will Dean get a new
round of enemas to face his failing message board? Will Thundartard
find a new place to get Yiffed?
just john
Main answer: Twitbook, etc.
And I suspect thunderhoof's here for the conversation, not for the odd
sex substitute, unless you two have been doing something behind my back ...
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/jjMusic
High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
He is pinker than pink and likes fur in the stink. No thanks.
just john
And usenet will never exactly die. People will continue to run servers.
Heck, even IMBJR had one up for a while, if I recall aright.
For a story I was considering, I imagined the future of usenet as having
a time of those servers running separately for a while, so there would
be a bunch of different opinions on which "usenet" was the REAL one,
then a hundred years down the line, archivists would combine with retro
fans and try to resurrect a Sol-system-wide usenet. Archives wouldn't
exactly agree, and there'd be some cases of deliberate falsification ...
just john
> On May 20, 7:48 pm, just john<teuy13...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>> On 5/20/10 7:39 PM, High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces wrote:
>>
>>> Tell us you vision of what will happen to the loser kooks and trolls
>>> on alt.slack when Usenet finally ceases to be. Will Doc Martian
>>> finally have to accept his mother is dead? Will the SubGenii who run
>>> the Alcandor Project find something else to do? Will Dean get a new
>>> round of enemas to face his failing message board? Will Thundartard
>>> find a new place to get Yiffed?
>>
>> Main answer: Twitbook, etc.
>>
>> And I suspect thunderhoof's here for the conversation, not for the odd
>> sex substitute, unless you two have been doing something behind my back ...
>>
> He is pinker than pink and likes fur in the stink. No thanks.
Gee, can you be pink and a member of a widely scorned fringe group at
the same time?
High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
Sure. Happens all the time.
High Mistress Inquisitor Pisces
Well Duke goes down this week.
just john
Well, it's a free countr-- I mean, it's a Con-controlled oligarchy, so
do what you will.
Ankara
"just john" <teuy...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:27idnexWN55dV2jW...@giganews.com...
Actually no one will run usenet servers once it all fades away...
- which isnt *QUITE* there yet. There are still a bunch of big ones
up and running....but I don't think it will be very long in coming.
The reason no one is gonna bother is that IT SUCKS.
It is ANCIENT technology that has been patched up for
so long that there are at least 5319283928 ways to do the same thing
that usenet does, BETTER THAN HOW USENET DOES IT.
IMBJR did suffer under romantic notions of putting one up and
running it himself. but trust me, that is ALL it is; ROMANCE.
Anyone who tries to run a usenet server eventually comes to
their senses and puts up a web forum instead.
TAKE IT FROM SOMEONE WHO KNOWS.
It is a complete WASTE of resources for personal communication
and it is unwieldy and prone to propagation failure. -which is
really why parity files (PAR) exist....so I suppose it DID encourage
innovation.
--
Ankara
http://taphouse.org/
There is no cabal.
Cover me in lesbians and throw it the hard way.
Lemme show you mine. -Zeppo
nikolai kingsley
> Tell us you vision of what will happen to the loser kooks and trolls
> on alt.slack when Usenet finally ceases to be.
they'll set up their own little blogs or webforums and then forbid
anyone else to post messages there.
Rev. Ivan Stang
> "just john" <teuy13...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
> There is no cabal.
>
> Cover me in lesbians and throw it the hard way.
> Lemme show you mine. -Zeppo
It's still how I watch TV!
tan
Not.
>IMBJR did suffer under romantic notions of putting one up and
>running it himself. but trust me, that is ALL it is; ROMANCE.
>Anyone who tries to run a usenet server eventually comes to
>their senses and puts up a web forum instead.
>TAKE IT FROM SOMEONE WHO KNOWS.
Uhu. Heard that b4.
>It is a complete WASTE of resources for personal communication
>and it is unwieldy and prone to propagation failure. -which is
>really why parity files (PAR) exist....so I suppose it DID encourage
>innovation.
Now, Usenet is your last forepost of uncensored discussions.
Anything else is censored by now.
Secondly, it is the most resilient system. There is no such a thing
as a single point of failure on usenet. Because there are hundreds
of thousands of servers carrying the same information worldwide.
If any of those severs go dow, you still have the information.
With web based approaches, once some server goes down or taken out,
the whole thing dissapears.
Finally, usenet is semi-structured information.
Meaning, each article has headers that could be used for all sorts
of purposes, including article formatting. You can add your custom
headers to carry any kind of information you want to via X-header
design.
So, once the usenet is gone, all you are going to have is totally
censored crap and of the lowest grade at that. You can trust me
on that one easily.
--
What IS?
http://oshosearch.net/Convert/search.php
Most Osho books on line:
tan
Correct. Or rather dominate it to the point where you won't recognize
what was there in the first place.
just john
Sure, that's the engineer's answer.
But (and I hadn't intended the pun when I selected my example) a Google
search on the terms "steam train restoration" comes up with "About
91,100 results"
Rev. Richard Skull
Go troll on of the Social Sites?
Back to the Funny Farm?
Popess Pantiara Evokovitch
I think Mikey will have to go back to trolling amazon classical music
purchases. He did that once, talked about how anyone who liked that
certain cd was a satanic idiot or somesuch, but the post only lasted a
few days before amazon took it down.
The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel
> ...there are at least 5319283928 ways to do the same thing
> that usenet does, BETTER THAN HOW USENET DOES IT.
>
Define "better".
The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel
> Now, Usenet is your last forepost of uncensored discussions.
> Anything else is censored by now.
You call it "censorship". I call it "moderation"--and frankly, most
places their isn't enough of it to keep the griefers and scumbags out.
> Secondly, it is the most resilient system. There is no such a thing
> as a single point of failure on usenet. Because there are hundreds
> of thousands of servers carrying the same information worldwide.
> If any of those severs go dow, you still have the information.
>
> With web based approaches, once some server goes down or taken out,
> the whole thing dissapears.
>
I'm sure a web-based distributed network could be made. Actually I'm
pretty sure there is one already. Don't the various filesharing
technologies work more or less that way?
Rev 11D Meow!
just fucking GREAT!
way too many guys
whippin' out their peenorz on camera
that is so fucking lame
no wonder the entire population of 4chan
simply cannot get any fucking nooky ever
except from palms
greased with lube of duh realm
IMBJR is probably lickin'-it-up, though! ::)))
four eyes
three grins
Rev 11D Meow!
CATURDAY!!!
The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel
> On Thu, 20 May 2010 21:49:36 -0700 (PDT), "The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos
>
> > On May 20, 4:32 pm, "Ankara" <uh-...@somewhere.com> wrote:
> > > ...there are at least 5319283928 ways to do the same thing
> > > that usenet does, BETTER THAN HOW USENET DOES IT.
>
> > Define "better".
>
> >http://boards.4chan.org/b/
>
> just fucking GREAT!
>
> way too many guys
> whippin' out their peenorz on camera
>
> that is so fucking lame
>
Taken a good look at alt.syntax.tactical lately?
Look, you want good discussion, you put up with moderators and their
egos. You want uncensored content, you put up with penis macros.
Choose wisely.
--
C.
FWIW /x/, /tg/, and the various other topical boards aren't quite so
bad--as long as your willing to put up with each boards specific
flavor of geekery.
Rev 11D Meow!
Israel" <chaos_...@antisocial.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 8:57�pm, Rev 11D Meow! <Ji...@Crack.Corn> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 May 2010 21:49:36 -0700 (PDT), "The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos
> >
> > Israel" <chaos_isr...@antisocial.com> wrote:
> > > On May 20, 4:32�pm, "Ankara" <uh-...@somewhere.com> wrote:
> > > > ...there are at least 5319283928 ways to do the same thing
> > > > that usenet does, BETTER THAN HOW USENET DOES IT.
> >
> > > Define "better".
> >
> > >http://boards.4chan.org/b/
> >
> > just fucking GREAT!
> >
> > way too many guys
> > whippin' out their peenorz on camera
> >
> > that is so fucking lame
> >
>
> Taken a good look at alt.syntax.tactical lately?
>
> Look, you want good discussion, you put up with moderators and their
> egos. You want uncensored content, you put up with penis macros.
> Choose wisely.
"Bob" damn script kiddies!
damn them all to HELL!!!
then eat the HELL out of them
fucking script kiddies
could learn a lesson or two
from the trials and tribulations
Living In A COBOL-Based PRISON!!!
Big Business
tha's what i'm sayin'
BIG HUGE GIANT BIDNIZZ
nikolai kingsley
> FWIW /x/, /tg/, and the various other topical boards aren't quite so
> bad--as long as your willing to put up with each boards specific
> flavor of geekery.
i) /lit/ ftw
ii) it's "you're", not "your"
The Rev. Dr. Lt. Chaos Israel
So it is.
How many u's in "fuuuuuu"?
--
C.
nikolai kingsley
>> it's "you're", not "your"
>
> So it is.
>
> How many u's in "fuuuuuu"?
all of them!
tan
>On May 20, 4:48=A0pm, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>> Now, Usenet is your last forepost of uncensored discussions.
>> Anything else is censored by now.
>
>You call it "censorship". I call it "moderation"--and frankly, most
>places their isn't enough of it to keep the griefers and scumbags out.
A matter of interpretation.
There is no such a thing as moderation as far as I have seen.
It is ALL censorship.
Once you get a chance to destroy something you stoopid CPU between
your ears is programmed to hate, you simply become sick, obscessed
with destruction. Pretty much inevitably.
>> Secondly, it is the most resilient system. There is no such a thing
>> as a single point of failure on usenet. Because there are hundreds
>> of thousands of servers carrying the same information worldwide.
>> If any of those severs go dow, you still have the information.
>>
>> With web based approaches, once some server goes down or taken out,
>> the whole thing dissapears.
>>
>
>I'm sure a web-based distributed network could be made. Actually I'm
>pretty sure there is one already. Don't the various filesharing
>technologies work more or less that way?
I don't see how.
There is no concept of peer to peer links in web based lifeforms.
The reason usenet is not destructible, like internet itself,
is because there are peer to peer links or uplinks.
The more links each nntp server has, the more difficult it is to
destroy the usenet.
tan
>On Thu, 20 May 2010 19:53:30 -0400, just john
><teuy...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>>And usenet will never exactly die. People will continue to run servers.
>> Heck, even IMBJR had one up for a while, if I recall aright.
People do not realize that usenet is being purpusefuly destroyed
just to destroy the last platform for uncensored discussions.
There are no technical reasons for the biggest providers to
drop the Usenet, at least the text related groups. The amount of
traffic on text groups is miniscule compared to traffic elsewhere
on the net.
So, why the biggest names chose to drop usenet?
For what?
What seems to be the problem with it?
The nntp protocol is one of the most resilient and flexible protocols
there are. Even web sucks donkey balls compared to it.
There are switches and settings to configure your servers in any
way you please, ORDERS of magnitude more flexible than anything else.
You can honor or ignore cancels, supersedes, newgroups or rmgroups.
The biggest tragedy of usenet is servers stopped honoring the
automatic group creation via newgroup control messages so it became
difficult to impossible to expand the list of subjects and issues
discussed.
With Russ Allbery and David Lawrence dictators that worked for YEARS
to convert usenet into a totally censored and well controlled
information system, slowly, slowly, people had to move to other
places because it was such a hassle to create some group.
Interestingly enough, both of those suckers do work for ISC
(Internet Software Consortium), sponsored in part by DISA
(Defense Information Systems Agency), getting millions in
"sponsorship" money.
The whole story of usenet is far from being told or understood.
Once usenet is gone, get ready to be implanted with a chip,
just like Nicholas Rockefeller agenda states. Within few years,
all of you will be wearing the chip implants. You can bet your
balls on that one.
>I keep thinking I should bring it back to life.
The more nntp servers there are, the better.
Getting the uplink to other servers isn't even worth mentioning.
Some servers have tens if not hundreds of uplinks.
So, no matter what other servers do, usenet is still there.
Plus, you don't have to watch the flying dicks and pussies
when you work on usenet. All you have is pure information.
But you CAN add pictures, sounds, videos or anything you want
to a usenet article. It is all supported by NNTP protocol.
You can even have the http formatted messages if you want to
so your article will look exactly like web pages.
So...
Question: why is usenet being destroyed?
Why most of the biggest players are dropping the nntp servers?
ANY clue?
>-----
>Bertie Blunt (His Parrot's A Cunt)
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Question: why is usenet being destroyed? Why most of the biggest players
> are dropping the nntp servers? ANY clue?
It must be the jooooz!
--
No.
tan
>On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:32:04 -0400, "Ankara" <uh-...@somewhere.com>
>wrote:
>
>>IMBJR did suffer under romantic notions of putting one up and
>>running it himself. but trust me, that is ALL it is; ROMANCE.
>>Anyone who tries to run a usenet server eventually comes to
>>their senses and puts up a web forum instead.
Web forums is probably the lowest grade garbage possible.
First of all, they are limited to a few subjects for each board.
So, to discuss a different issue, you'd have to go to some other
board. For what?
Secondly, they are totally censored and by the most idiotic,
power obscessed zombies.
You can not create an equivalent of a group if you are just user.
It all has to be "authorized" by the owner.
If I hate anything on the net, that would be these sub-idiotic
boards, filled with clueless, blabbering some ass licking stuff,
just to make sure their posts are not cancelled and their
accounts are not deleted.
Do you even BEGIN to comprehend the consequences of this
sickness?
Running the nntp server is one of the simpliest things in the
world nowadays.
How much of a chance for MOST of what you post on alt.slack or
auk to be allowed on some board? Guess.
>I keep having that voice in my head still! It does not help that when
>I read ppl discussing the Duke situation they make running a server
>sound easy.
It IS.
>However, it potentially IS if one forgets any notion of having it
>contect to other servers, which kind of dents the idea of usenet
>somewhat.
Not really. Getting the uplinks is pretty easy and every server
wants to have as many uplinks anyway. The more uplinks they have,
the better propagation they get, the more articles they have,
the stronger is the nntp net.
Again, nntp is a network, parallel to the model of internet.
As resilient as anything on the net. Probably the MOST resilient
part of the net.
Many people do not even realize what they are getting into by
NOT supporting the nntp servers. They are simply hanging themselves
by their own balls. Within a couple of years, what they will have
left with is this sucky NWO world of biorobots and zombies, being
fed the lowest grade crap there is.
And THAT is the "bottom line" of destuction of usenet.
>I think we need to grow out of usenet and accept the web.
Web is shit, and of pure grade.
VAST majority of it.
It is 99% spam.
Most of the pages are not even readable because they contain
mostly google spam. There is one or two sentences of information
out of the entire page in most cases.
The ratio of information to total page size is less than 1% in
most cases. At the most, 5%.
> If we can
>get someone to duplicate the feel of usenet on a website then that
>would be good. GG is not doing it tho.
It is already being done by quite a few web based usenet sites,
except they have the same problem. Single point of failure.
Furthermore, nothing prevents usenet to be html based article
format. Right out of the box. You don't even have to do anything
to have usenet articles look like web pages.
tan
Look, Your Holy Suckiness,
you think being kinky beyond stupidity is something
that makes you "superior" to others?
You simply do not have guts to say what you really have to say.
So you hide behind these stoopid patterns everybody does,
just to make them look "superior", "more advanced" and crap like that.
Vast majority of stuff of yours as far as I have seen,
is UTTER idiocy.
Simple as that.
There isn't a GRAIN of creativity in it
beyond perversions.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> There isn't a GRAIN of creativity in it beyond perversions.
Creativity. If that's a euphemism for lying then I agree. I'm a bit
confused about the "perversions" though. When have I talked about
perversions?
--
No.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:35:51 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Question: why is usenet being destroyed?
>
NOT.
By ANY means.
Secondly, you do not have to support the binary groups.
You can also limit the size of the posts to anything you like.
There are ALL sorts of automatic ways to take care of that issue.
> And as
>for actually "destroyed" - perhaps not, as the likes of giganews seem
>to be doing well - well,
Sure. They simply make more bux as other big players drop their
customer base.
But you can not rely on the giganews type of guys.
You need smaller, independent servers, as many as you can manage.
Then the distributed nature of it kicks in.
It is the best protection by far.
> that is until the rights owners start chasing
>them down.
I do not thing the copyright issue is as big as some make it
look like. You have the same problem ANYWHERE on the net.
Just post a torrent link on any stoopid board.
What is the difference?
They can not destroy torrent networks.
I have been involved in a big operation by recording industry
trying to destroy the torrent networks by distributing the
most lethal rootkits with torrents.
I have my own monitoring firewall and when I was hit, I logged
their entire network so bad that they could be put behind bars
for quite some time and that information was published in
various places. What happened as a result, I have no clue.
Not even interested in it.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:52:36 +0000, tan wrote:
>
>> There isn't a GRAIN of creativity in it beyond perversions.
>
>Creativity. If that's a euphemism for lying then I agree.
This is EXACLY what perversion is.
> I'm a bit
>confused about the "perversions" though. When have I talked about
>perversions?
In this very message.
Perversion is when you take something and totally destroy the
original meaning and make it look like something else.
Just because your being is full of poisonous stuff as a result
of utter frustration in your life.
Simple as that.
I have no time to chew on it for you.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> In article <scOdnamNT_qVHmvW...@giganews.com>, "Rev.Dr.
> LoBotomy" <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> wrote:
>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:52:36 +0000, tan wrote:
>>
>>> There isn't a GRAIN of creativity in it beyond perversions.
>>
>>Creativity. If that's a euphemism for lying then I agree.
>
> This is EXACLY what perversion is.
>
>> I'm a bit
>>confused about the "perversions" though. When have I talked about
>>perversions?
>
> In this very message.
> Perversion is when you take something and totally destroy the original
> meaning and make it look like something else. Just because your being is
> full of poisonous stuff as a result of utter frustration in your life.
> Simple as that.
> I have no time to chew on it for you.
>
Actually that's perversity. Perversion is when priests diddle alter boys.
--
No.
tan
Perversion is distortion of natural flow of things.
It is not only sex related.
It is in the very mind mechanics.
It is basically an attempt at poisoning something,
ridiculling something as being some idiocy,
just what you do here all day long.
Most of what most of you write is PURE grade perversion.
Rev.Dr. LoBotomy
> Perversion is distortion of natural flow of things. It is not only sex
> related.
> It is in the very mind mechanics.
In idiomatic English it is only ever used to mean sexual perversion.
Perversity is the word you want.
--
No.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:49:10 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article <l2tcv59lrs40qcll0...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:32:04 -0400, "Ankara" <uh-...@somewhere.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>IMBJR did suffer under romantic notions of putting one up and
>>>>running it himself. but trust me, that is ALL it is; ROMANCE.
>>>>Anyone who tries to run a usenet server eventually comes to
>>>>their senses and puts up a web forum instead.
>>
>>Web forums is probably the lowest grade garbage possible.
>
>them.
>
>>First of all, they are limited to a few subjects for each board.
>>So, to discuss a different issue, you'd have to go to some other
>>board. For what?
>
Not really. Just the other way around.
First of all, there are at least 20 thousand groups on any semi-
decent server, which gives you an opportunity to talk about any
issue that you can imagine.
Secondly, the nntp protocol allows for automatic group creation
with a newgroup control message. The group can be created within
milliseconds.
In fact, that is how this ugly big-8 works this very moment.
ANY control messages issued from "authorized" From: header
will create a group automatically.
Except David Lawrence, being the maintainer of INN server,
the most popular server out there, has wired in the mechanism
of PGP signing the control messages and the default INN
config files come with their own email as being "authorized",
like they are some kind of authority, which they are not.
They are merely serving the interests of military intelligence
via DISA.
> Even here, this is a group for
>SubG's - not a genral posting group.
So what?
There are tons of groups to talk on any subject.
Secondly, how can you prevent someone from posting ANY kind
of crap to non-moderated group? In fact, there is really no
subject on this group. It is just a royal garbage dump.
>>Secondly, they are totally censored and by the most idiotic,
>>power obscessed zombies.
>
>This always becomes an issue because poster forgot that the owner can
>do with the forum as they please and quite often that is not how the
>poster pleases.
Correct. As a result, what I have seen on those forums is such
a low grade ass licking stuff, it is hard to believe my eyes.
In fact, if I ever happen to hit some link and it turns out to
be some "forum", in 99.9% of cases I hit the back arrow, without
even reading anything.
Another point is the message format on forums is just insane.
All the articles in a thread are shown in a single page.
As a result, the communications tend to be one liners.
Otherwise, you won't be able to read the whole truck load of stuff
in one web page.
>>You can not create an equivalent of a group if you are just user.
>>It all has to be "authorized" by the owner.
>>
>>If I hate anything on the net, that would be these sub-idiotic
>>boards, filled with clueless, blabbering some ass licking stuff,
>>just to make sure their posts are not cancelled and their
>>accounts are not deleted.
>
>Actually, what you sound like you are objecting to is today's youth.
>They post ENORMOUS amounts of twattery on the net. If we were all 30+,
>things might be different.
Well, I don't mind them posting any kind of garbage.
But I do not have to mix with it.
Usenet is probably the most meaningful and most flexible
way to communicate. You can present the entire articles having
extensive coverage of something need be.
>>Do you even BEGIN to comprehend the consequences of this
>>sickness?
>>
>>Running the nntp server is one of the simpliest things in the
>>world nowadays.
>>
>>How much of a chance for MOST of what you post on alt.slack or
>>auk to be allowed on some board? Guess.
>
>I think you over-estimate us. Many of us are on Facebook, for example.
Well, I would not touch that thing with 6 foot pole.
I looked at it a couple of times and still, to this day,
can not figure out what's the whole point of it.
It is all fragmented crap to me.
The one liner garbage utterly devoid of any meaning,
at least from what I have seen to date.
>>>I keep having that voice in my head still! It does not help that when
>>>I read ppl discussing the Duke situation they make running a server
>>>sound easy.
>>
>>It IS.
>
>I get a lot of mixed signals on this. The kind of set up I would go
>for would be an isolated server - which would be easier to deal with,
>but that's not really usenet. The users of POV-Ray have a similar
>setup, but they have always come across as cliqued.
Well, I could see a use for isolated server for some enerprises
for their internal information exchange needs, which works like
a champ. For example, with the latest version of NewsMaestro,
you can automatically download any specific messages from any
groups and automatically generate the web sites having all the
article formatted nicely, looking as good as any web page out there.
And these > followup markers are automatically expanded and
properly tabulated and styled differently for each followup level.
You can filter and search your archives going back as many years
as you wish.
So you can have a single usenet feed and generate totally different
information for each department for example.
The the most powerful filters there are, you can AUTOMATICALLY
zoom in on any news, information, reports, project specs,
bottom line and you name it.
ALL fully automatic.
You don't even have to push a single button to get what you want.
ALL you have to do is to look at your site and it is automatically
updated. Or you can post anything to any group and it automatically
appears as a web page for others to look in their own tabs.
Setting a server nowadays is a couple of hours of work.
Getting the uplinks is as easy as it gets.
ALL you need is a static IP and almost anybody you send an email
will link to you. It is to their advantage and yours.
>>>However, it potentially IS if one forgets any notion of having it
>>>contect to other servers, which kind of dents the idea of usenet
>>>somewhat.
>>
>>Not really. Getting the uplinks is pretty easy and every server
>>wants to have as many uplinks anyway. The more uplinks they have,
>>the better propagation they get, the more articles they have,
>>the stronger is the nntp net.
>>
>>Again, nntp is a network, parallel to the model of internet.
>>As resilient as anything on the net. Probably the MOST resilient
>>part of the net.
>>
>>Many people do not even realize what they are getting into by
>>NOT supporting the nntp servers. They are simply hanging themselves
>>by their own balls. Within a couple of years, what they will have
>>left with is this sucky NWO world of biorobots and zombies, being
>>fed the lowest grade crap there is.
>>
>>And THAT is the "bottom line" of destuction of usenet.
>
>Looks like you just talked yourself into running a usenet server.
Well, I am interested in it. I just don't have enough hands to
handle all this "priority" stuff.
You still need to take care of some things with server.
No time for that. But it IS in my mind. Who knows?
I can setup a server within minutes if I wanted to.
>>>I think we need to grow out of usenet and accept the web.
>>
>>Web is shit, and of pure grade.
>>VAST majority of it.
>
>Again, because most of it is youth-driven.
So what? Let them. I have no objections to what others are doing.
I am talking about MY interests, not theirs.
They want to waste away on forums? Understood. Kids need some
"action". But I could care less about THAT kind of "action".
Utterly meaningless to me. Just a waste of life.
>>It is 99% spam.
>>Most of the pages are not even readable because they contain
>>mostly google spam. There is one or two sentences of information
>>out of the entire page in most cases.
>
>I think not, even though there is a lot of prattle out there.
Well, from what I have seen, that is what it is.
Almost every time I need some information, I immediately realize
I have to go through at least 30 pages of utter spam just to get
to any place even close to what I am looking for.
You hit a link and you get a truckload of google spam with ads
flashing all over, inviting you to push another link, where they
try to sell you even more crap I would not want even in my horror
dreams. You have to flip at least 3 pages just to realize they
are screwing you just like all others.
>>The ratio of information to total page size is less than 1% in
>>most cases. At the most, 5%.
>
>Cite.
Just hit about any page and try to comute the amount of to the
point information to the amount of ad spam on the page and all
sorts of links that have nothing to do with what you are looking
for despite the fact you got their link via google search.
I estimate at least 90% of google hits have absolutely nothing
to do with what that link should have.
tan
>
>However, be careful. We are SubGeniuses.
Well, look guys. I know this "subgenius" thing sounds kinky
and pleases your egos, but I have seen way to little substance
even remotely related to ANY kind of "genius" around here.
> Think carefully about that
>really means.
Well, what it means is this:
1) You think you are "special" - the genius part.
2) You tnink you are some kind of "advanced" underground.
You know? Those guys that claim to be "revolutionary",
some kind of "alternative".
3) You are bluffing.
4) This is basically a garbage dump where you exchange
the kinky insults and twist and pervert each other words
and laugh at each other, trying to show how "advanced"
you are, how "superior" you are to other.
And that is pretty much the whole trip here.
You want to argue?
Fine, take your best shot.
Who knows, I may even find it interestingly enough to...
> Disect that word and you will aat first frown at what it
>implies, but then you realise that its bette than being a
>mouth-breathing moran.
Not really.
From what I have seen so far, this is some of the most
moronic stuff. In fact, I bet you can hardly find anything
more moronic than this group. Prolly AUK is the closest
competitor "out there".
You waste your intelligence on inventing some kinky
stupidity that self-justifies your "superity" over others,
which simply indicates to me a deep complex of inferiority.
Simple as that.
>-----
>Bertie Blunt (His Parrot's A Cunt)
--
Sir Smerker the Positive
"tan" <t...@nowhere.land> wrote in message
news:ht67am$75t$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
TL;DR
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:59:54 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>I do not thing the copyright issue is as big as some make it
>>look like. You have the same problem ANYWHERE on the net.
>
>truly know it. Why else do we have stuff like Blue-Ray - that's a
>format meant to replace DVD for only one reason - a vain attempt at
>intellectual property control.
They are just wasting their time.
By killing usenet they achive absolutely nothing.
Vast majority of net traffic happens where?
On usenet?
You must be kidding.
Few months ago I have seen some study that indicates
at least 30% of global net traffic happens via torrents,
and there is NOTHING anybody can do against torrents.
Period.
The biggest law case in europe was just a flop.
They simply do not have a legal argument agaist it.
In fact, I predict if usenet dies,
the next fronties from communications of ANY kind
will be via torrent networks, and those are not censored.
I know how to do it even at this very moment.
People simply never looked at it and do not even suspect
the hidden potential of torrent networks that are even
more resilient than usenet is.
>>Just post a torrent link on any stoopid board.
>>What is the difference?
>>They can not destroy torrent networks.
>
>Don't fool yourself. They can effectively do so for the masses.
Not sure what you mean.
WHO is "they"?
WHAT can they possibly do to p2p networks that are dynamically
wirable via torrent. Do you realize how many torrents are out
there? Well, MILLIONS. And every single torrent is potentially
a thread for discussion of ANYTHING you want, just like a usenet
thread.
> It
>will become then a minority sport that's not worth then persuing. The
>internet is not some utopia that is in safe hands - it depends a lot
>on the will of money and big money is eyeing the net with fright.
Correct. Take for example google and wikipedia, the most extensive
networks of highly censored and highly selected information.
Even as it stands right now, google can no longer support such
an extensive system of censorship. They'd have to have an order
of magnitude more censorship employees than they have the rest
of their personnel.
Things already percolate even though google would censor them.
With p2p netowks and usenet, there is nothing they can do.
Period.
Unless they cancel democracy and install devil in the supreme
court, there is nothing they can do.
>>I have been involved in a big operation by recording industry
>>trying to destroy the torrent networks by distributing the
>>most lethal rootkits with torrents.
>
>Well, you have now just become non-credible. I may has well be arguing
>with a JFK conspiracy nut at this point.
It does not matter to me.
I don't care about credibility.
I could just pull you some logs right now that would crack
some minds around. I bet The Real Giant Of Though could have
made quite some bux with this kind of info. All you need is
a top notch lawyer and then you just start a class action suite.
Lifting some of their logs and logs of some go-between parties
with the court order, you could prolly make some guys at the
very top of the food chain shake pretty bad.
I bet you won't even have to take this thing to court.
I'd rather settle if I were them.
But I have no interest in THIS kind of business.
You want to take my word for it, fine.
You don't, lil do I care. This is not a priority item of ANY kind.
>>
>>I have my own monitoring firewall and when I was hit, I logged
>>their entire network so bad that they could be put behind bars
>>for quite some time and that information was published in
>>various places. What happened as a result, I have no clue.
>>Not even interested in it.
>
>WTF What kind of nonsense statement is that? Cite, but I doubt you
>can.
One more time: I can spend a few minutes and pull your the
logs of their entire network. All top level hosts and all the
active proxies, hacked with rootkit, pumping tens of thousands
of trojans, viruses and rootkits and destroying peoples computers.
At least until very recently, the latest version of the rootkit,
distributed via this network, was so lethal, that you can not
possibly recover from it once your boxe is infected.
The top notch security experts I talked to said: about the only
thing you can do is to reformat your drive, and good luck after
that. In fact, once I realized how screwed I am, i did reformat
the drive COMPLETELY. As soon as I did O/S reinstall and tried
to install the antivirus sw, within seconds it told me it could
not install itself because it found 7 vulnerabilities. So,
installing itself would simply mean it was installing itself
under total supervision of rootkit if you know what that means.
There is much more information about it, but I have no time
to deal with it. Already wasted too much time on this.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:12:07 +0000, tan wrote:
>
>
>> Perversion is distortion of natural flow of things. It is not only sex
>> related.
>> It is in the very mind mechanics.
>
>In idiomatic English it is only ever used to mean sexual perversion.
There is a noun, pervert,
and there is a verb to pervert.
These are different things.
>Perversity is the word you want.
I do not agree. but keep your version.
Does not matter to me.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:03:23 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Just hit about any page and try to comute the amount of to the
>>point information to the amount of ad spam on the page and all
>>sorts of links that have nothing to do with what you are looking
>>for despite the fact you got their link via google search.
>
I am not going to "cite" you ANYTHING.
You get it, fine.
You don't, fine.
>Plus I notice you didn't respond to my reaction to your idiocy over
>malware developed for the recording industry.
I have not time.
As far as "idiocy" goes, I hope you can stand by your word.
As far as "malware development", this has been documented in the
media. Interestingly enough, some US senators are involved.
You like that one?
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:09:46 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Well, look guys. I know this "subgenius" thing sounds kinky
>>and pleases your egos, but I have seen way to little substance
>>even remotely related to ANY kind of "genius" around here.
>>
>>> Think carefully about that
>>>really means.
>>
>>Well, what it means is this:
>>
>>1) You think you are "special" - the genius part.
>>
>>2) You tnink you are some kind of "advanced" underground.
>>You know? Those guys that claim to be "revolutionary",
>>some kind of "alternative".
>>
>>3) You are bluffing.
>>
>>4) This is basically a garbage dump where you exchange
>>the kinky insults and twist and pervert each other words
>>and laugh at each other, trying to show how "advanced"
>>you are, how "superior" you are to other.
>>
>>And that is pretty much the whole trip here.
>
>about taking the word apart and looking at it carefully. Like the
>maladjusted normal you are, you focused only on the later part of the
>word.
>
>>
>>You want to argue?
>>
>>Fine, take your best shot.
>>Who knows, I may even find it interestingly enough to...
>>
>>> Disect that word and you will aat first frown at what it
>>>implies, but then you realise that its bette than being a
>>>mouth-breathing moran.
>>
>>Not really.
>>
>>From what I have seen so far, this is some of the most
>>moronic stuff. In fact, I bet you can hardly find anything
>>more moronic than this group. Prolly AUK is the closest
>>competitor "out there".
>>
>>You waste your intelligence on inventing some kinky
>>stupidity that self-justifies your "superity" over others,
>>which simply indicates to me a deep complex of inferiority.
>>
>>Simple as that.
>
>on usenet.
Good.
That is EXACTLY why I am here.
You think it is just accidental?
Plus I like to do things no one in his clear mind would even
bother with.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:27:15 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Few months ago I have seen some study that indicates
>>at least 30% of global net traffic happens via torrents,
>
I do not have time to bother with bullshit like this.
You can find that research yourself.
I am not your nanny.
>>and there is NOTHING anybody can do against torrents.
>>Period.
>>
>>The biggest law case in europe was just a flop.
>>They simply do not have a legal argument agaist it.
>
>WHOOOSH
>
>Try the technical aspect I was going for.
Just don't be a pest.
You are not as dumb as you look, or ARE you?
Enough.
>But I bet you will not.
>
>You are someone who is suffering from citelessnes.
>*rolls eyes at increasing bullshit*
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:28:27 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article <6aidnUDQ2tboBGvW...@giganews.com>, "Rev.Dr. LoBotomy"
> <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:12:07 +0000, tan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Perversion is distortion of natural flow of things. It is not only sex
>>>> related.
>>>> It is in the very mind mechanics.
>>>
>>>In idiomatic English it is only ever used to mean sexual perversion.
>>
>>There is a noun, pervert,
>>and there is a verb to pervert.
>>These are different things.
>>
>>>Perversity is the word you want.
>>
>>I do not agree. but keep your version.
>>Does not matter to me.
>
>
>You keep saying that in various threads, but it's very clear you do
>mind. Mind a lot.
Don't take yourself too serously.
There is nothing to it.
Just empty baloon.
>-----
>Bertie Blunt (His Parrot's A Cunt)
--
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:01:18 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article <5r9dv5hs74mpvtdsa...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:03:23 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Just hit about any page and try to comute the amount of to the
>>>>point information to the amount of ad spam on the page and all
>>>>sorts of links that have nothing to do with what you are looking
>>>>for despite the fact you got their link via google search.
>>>
>>>THAT is not citing.
>>
>>I am not going to "cite" you ANYTHING.
>
>
>>You get it, fine.
>>You don't, fine.
>>
>>>Plus I notice you didn't respond to my reaction to your idiocy over
>>>malware developed for the recording industry.
>>
>>I have not time.
>>As far as "idiocy" goes, I hope you can stand by your word.
>
>
>>
>>As far as "malware development", this has been documented in the
>>media. Interestingly enough, some US senators are involved.
>>
>>You like that one?
>
Jeez!
Are you THAT interested?
Well, here is just a miniscule sample of that network:
Google on 129.47.9.160 and see what you get.
I have a very extensive log, down to miliseconds
of every single one of hosts involved on that network.
Root servers:
129.47.9.160 - static IP, reverse DNS does not resolve
74.125.10.34
090504 21:22:10 Pass In TCP RIP: 74.125.10.34 RPort: 80 LIP:
94.178.14.72 LPort: 3791
File share: (UDP
090504 21:59:31 Deny Out UDP RIP: 74.125.10.34 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 85-127-83-238.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at
ROOTKIT File Share
74.125.10.34
67.55.13.135
95.84.39.134
85.127.83.238
96.53.229.236
208.122.31.28
89.138.54.59
58.148.245.222
207.228.233.20
64.16.40.18
221.130.195.237 - remote port 81
78.27.46.150
195.137.203.98
119.235.51.68
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:03:29 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Good.
>>That is EXACTLY why I am here.
>>You think it is just accidental?
>
>
>>Plus I like to do things no one in his clear mind would even
>>bother with.
>
Are you retarded?
I though I am talking to sub-geniouououssssses here.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:05:18 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article <o3adv5l4ds45o1u99...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:27:15 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Few months ago I have seen some study that indicates
>>>>at least 30% of global net traffic happens via torrents,
>>>
>>>Cite, or it's just blather.
>>
>>I do not have time to bother with bullshit like this.
>
I work in chunks. When I finish a chunk of work,
I look into this hole to see what is new under the sun.
You have few seconds. Then I go for few minutes.
That is how it works.
Enough.
>>You can find that research yourself.
>>I am not your nanny.
>
>I bet your tits are dry.
>
>>
>>>>and there is NOTHING anybody can do against torrents.
>>>>Period.
>>>>
>>>>The biggest law case in europe was just a flop.
>>>>They simply do not have a legal argument agaist it.
>>>
>>>WHOOOSH
>>>
>>>Try the technical aspect I was going for.
>>
>>Just don't be a pest.
>>You are not as dumb as you look, or ARE you?
>
>You can see me? LOL What a tard.
tan
Here is a VERY small sample of actual attacks:
090504 21:23:22 Deny Out UDP RIP: 208.122.31.28 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 ralley File Sharing
Web server:
Attackers:
58.148.245.222:26376
80.73.6.137, port 179 from port 56143 - relay medianet.ua
Root server: 129.47.9.160 - static IP, reverse DNS does not resolve
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Query on: 129.47.9.160
Target Host Name: No Data Exists
WhoIs Server: whois.arin.net
OrgName: Whittaker Corporation
OrgID: WHITTA
Address: 1955 North Surveyor Ave
City: Simi Valley
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 93063-3386
Country: US
NetRange: 129.47.0.0 - 129.47.255.255
CIDR: 129.47.0.0/16
NetName: WCAIFHLS
NetHandle: NET-129-47-0-0-1
Parent: NET-129-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Assignment
Comment:
RegDate: 1987-07-31
Updated: 2007-05-22
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2009-04-30 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
==================================================================
Does various outgoing queries of broadcast type.
Some of them involve other activity during the same span of time.
Sequence 1:
090503 16:40:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1447 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:40:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1447 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:40:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1447 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:45:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1486 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:45:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1486 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:45:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1486 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:46:13 Deny In TCP RIP: 207.228.233.20 RPort: 50575 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 80 dslb-088-068-193-193.pools.arcor-ip.net
Web Hosting: Deny
090503 16:46:16 Deny In TCP RIP: 207.228.233.20 RPort: 50575 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 80 dslb-088-068-193-193.pools.arcor-ip.net
Web Hosting: Deny
Typical sequence:
Notice other hosts become active at the same time.
Sequence 2:
090503 16:50:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1624 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:50:19 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1625 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 16:50:19 Deny Out ARP
090503 16:50:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1624 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:50:22 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1625 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 16:50:22 Deny Out ARP
090503 16:50:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1624 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:50:28 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1625 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 16:52:23 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1725 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 16:52:26 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1725 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 16:52:32 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1725 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 16:55:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1850 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:55:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1850 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 16:59:07 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1977
090503 16:59:10 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1977
090503 16:59:39 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1998
090503 16:59:42 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1998
090503 16:59:42 Deny In TCP RIP: 78.27.46.150 RPort: 8100 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1999 banana Backdoor/SubSeven Trojan Block
090503 16:59:45 Deny In TCP RIP: 78.27.46.150 RPort: 8100 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1999 banana Backdoor/SubSeven Trojan Block
090503 16:59:51 Deny In TCP RIP: 195.137.203.98 RPort: 9595 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2001 banana TransScout: Block
090503 16:59:54 Deny In TCP RIP: 64.16.40.18 RPort: 58914 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2004 banana TransScout: Block
090503 16:59:57 Deny In TCP RIP: 64.16.40.18 RPort: 58914 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2004 banana TransScout: Block
090503 16:59:57 Deny In TCP RIP: 119.235.51.68 RPort: 49894 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2005 banana TransScout: Block
090503 17:00:00 Deny In TCP RIP: 195.137.203.98 RPort: 9595 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2001 banana TransScout: Block
090503 17:00:00 Deny In TCP RIP: 119.235.51.68 RPort: 49894 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2005 banana TransScout: Block
090503 17:00:03 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2007
090503 17:00:04 Deny In TCP RIP: 64.16.40.18 RPort: 58914 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2004 banana TransScout: Block
090503 17:00:06 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2007
090503 17:00:06 Deny In TCP RIP: 119.235.51.68 RPort: 49894 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2005 banana TransScout: Block
090503 17:00:12 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2007
090503 17:00:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2015 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:00:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2015 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:00:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2015 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
Sequence 3:
090504 10:55:43 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1773 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:55:46 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1773 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:55:52 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1773 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:56:37 Deny In TCP RIP: 82.208.213.2 RPort: 60869 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1807 banana Spy Sender Trojan: Block
090504 10:57:22 Deny Out UDP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:57:23 Deny Out UDP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:57:25 Deny Out UDP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:57:26 Deny Out UDP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:57:28 Deny Out UDP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:57:29 Deny Out UDP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 137 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 137 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 10:58:52 Deny Out UDP RIP: 87.194.8.87 RPort: 3407 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 54333
090504 10:58:56 Deny Out UDP RIP: 222.160.85.139 RPort: 1676 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 54333
090504 10:59:03 Deny Out UDP RIP: 86.218.107.216 RPort: 6881 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 54333
090504 11:00:43 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1965 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 11:00:46 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1965 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 11:00:52 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 1965 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 11:01:37 Deny In TCP RIP: 75.58.146.27 RPort: 37632 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2002 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:39 Deny In TCP RIP: 75.58.146.27 RPort: 37632 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2002 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:46 Deny In TCP RIP: 75.58.146.27 RPort: 37632 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2002 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:47 Deny In TCP RIP: 77.195.198.189 RPort: 21828 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2003 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:47 Deny In TCP RIP: 77.195.198.189 RPort: 21828 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2003 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:48 Deny In TCP RIP: 91.191.138.2 RPort: 6969 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2005 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:52 Deny In TCP RIP: 77.195.198.189 RPort: 21828 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2003 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:01:54 Deny In TCP RIP: 91.191.138.2 RPort: 6969 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2005 banana TransScout: Block
090504 11:02:22 Deny Out UDP RIP: 61.51.73.24 RPort: 7565 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 54333
090504 11:02:25 Deny Out UDP RIP: 84.52.160.186 RPort: 1066 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 54333
090504 11:02:30 Deny Out UDP RIP: 58.35.79.160 RPort: 7323 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 54333
090504 11:05:43 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2176 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 11:05:46 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2176 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
090504 11:05:52 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.199.187 LPort: 2176 Searching... *** ROOTKIT Server
And here is an attack:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Session started on: Sunday, May 03, 2009, Time: 17:01:47
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
090503 17:02:59 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2096
090503 17:03:02 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2096
090503 17:03:08 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2096
090503 17:04:53 Deny In TCP RIP: 86.45.246.171 RPort: 26925 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2140 banana DeepThroat Trojan Block
090503 17:05:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2161 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:05:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2161 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:05:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2161 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:05:47 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2180
090503 17:05:50 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2180
090503 17:05:56 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2180
090503 17:10:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2313 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:10:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2313 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:10:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2313 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:11:42 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2354
090503 17:11:48 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2354
090503 17:15:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2461 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:15:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2461 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:15:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2461 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:20:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2610 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:20:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2610 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:20:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2610 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:22:30 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2678
090503 17:22:36 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2678
090503 17:25:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2764 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:25:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2764 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:25:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2764 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:25:36 Deny Out TCP RIP: 78.151.134.63 RPort: 10758 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2773 banana SubSeven 2.1/2.2 Trojan: Block
090503 17:25:38 Deny Out TCP RIP: 41.212.201.251 RPort: 53384 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2774 banana SubSeven 2.1/2.2 Trojan: Block
090503 17:25:39 Deny Out TCP RIP: 78.151.134.63 RPort: 10758 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2773 banana SubSeven 2.1/2.2 Trojan: Block
090503 17:25:41 Deny Out TCP RIP: 41.212.201.251 RPort: 53384 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2774 banana SubSeven 2.1/2.2 Trojan: Block
090503 17:25:45 Deny Out TCP RIP: 78.151.134.63 RPort: 10758 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2773 banana SubSeven 2.1/2.2 Trojan: Block
090503 17:25:47 Deny Out TCP RIP: 41.212.201.251 RPort: 53384 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2774 banana SubSeven 2.1/2.2 Trojan: Block
090503 17:30:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2909 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:30:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2909 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:30:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2909 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:33:18 Deny In TCP RIP: 74.216.26.235 RPort: 14167 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2989 sewer-output Rat Trojan: Block
090503 17:33:21 Deny In TCP RIP: 74.216.26.235 RPort: 14167 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2989 sewer-output Rat Trojan: Block
090503 17:33:27 Deny In TCP RIP: 74.216.26.235 RPort: 14167 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 2989 sewer-output Rat Trojan: Block
090503 17:34:32 Deny In TCP RIP: 196.25.255.214 RPort: 37922 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3024 banana Wincrash Trojan: Block
090503 17:34:35 Deny In TCP RIP: 196.25.255.214 RPort: 37922 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3024 banana Wincrash Trojan: Block
090503 17:35:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3043 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:35:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3043 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:35:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3043 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:40:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3178 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:40:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3178 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:40:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3178 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:44:14 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3288
090503 17:44:20 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3288
090503 17:45:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3320 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:45:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3320 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:45:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3320 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:50:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3460 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:50:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3460 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:50:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3460 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:51:15 Deny Out UDP RIP: 94.178.11.221 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 17:55:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3625 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:55:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3625 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:55:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3625 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 17:59:30 Deny Out UDP RIP: 76.113.20.46 RPort: 777 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 18:00:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3817 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:00:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3817 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:00:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3817 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:05:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3988 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:05:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3988 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:05:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 3988 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:07:04 Deny Out UDP RIP: 213.93.200.245 RPort: 526 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 18:08:30 Deny In TCP RIP: 79.124.103.203 RPort: 64895 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4092 banana Wincrash Trojan: Block
090503 18:08:33 Deny In TCP RIP: 79.124.103.203 RPort: 64895 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4092 banana Wincrash Trojan: Block
090503 18:10:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4149 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:10:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4149 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:10:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4149 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:11:50 Deny Out UDP RIP: 120.8.54.143 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 18:13:28 Deny In ICMP RIP: 195.241.64.60 Type: 4 LIP:
91.124.232.166 36.Red-83-46-94.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net ROOTKIT
36.Red-83-46-94.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net
090503 18:14:05 Deny Out TCP RIP: 62.72.234.30 RPort: 16209 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4267 banana banana
090503 18:14:08 Deny Out TCP RIP: 62.72.234.30 RPort: 16209 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4267 banana banana
090503 18:14:14 Deny Out TCP RIP: 62.72.234.30 RPort: 16209 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4267 banana banana
090503 18:15:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4313 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:15:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4313 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:15:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4313 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:20:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4471 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:20:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4471 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:23:15 Deny In TCP RIP: 198.54.202.250 RPort: 37922 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4567 banana Filenail Trojan: Block
090503 18:25:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4630 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:25:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4630 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:25:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4630 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:26:59 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4687
090503 18:27:02 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4687
090503 18:27:08 Deny Out TCP RIP: 221.130.195.237 RPort: 81 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4687
090503 18:30:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4796 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:30:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4796 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:35:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4956 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:35:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4956 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:35:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 4956 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:36:30 Deny Out UDP RIP: 91.78.183.46 RPort: 1 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 18:36:42 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:36:43 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:36:45 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:36:48 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:36:50 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:36:57 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:37:13 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:37:45 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:37:56 Deny In TCP RIP: 85.225.64.174 RPort: 51413 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 5000 banana Sokets de Trois v1. Trojan: Block
090503 18:40:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1150 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:40:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1150 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:43:12 Deny In TCP RIP: 122.2.96.217 RPort: 14038 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1243 banana Backdoor/SubSeven Trojan Block
090503 18:43:18 Deny In TCP RIP: 122.2.96.217 RPort: 14038 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1243 banana Backdoor/SubSeven Trojan Block
090503 18:45:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1312 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:45:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1312 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:45:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1312 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:47:32 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1386 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:47:35 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1386 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:47:41 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1386 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:49:00 Deny Out UDP RIP: 76.254.61.116 RPort: 666 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 18:49:19 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1441 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:49:22 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1441 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:49:28 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1441 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:50:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1477 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:50:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1477 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:50:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1477 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:50:45 Deny In TCP RIP: 86.133.202.74 RPort: 8816 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1492 banana FTP99CMP Trojan: Block
090503 18:50:48 Deny In TCP RIP: 86.133.202.74 RPort: 8816 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1492 banana FTP99CMP Trojan: Block
090503 18:50:54 Deny In TCP RIP: 86.133.202.74 RPort: 8816 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1492 banana FTP99CMP Trojan: Block
090503 18:50:55 Deny In TCP RIP: 86.133.202.74 RPort: 8816 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1492 banana FTP99CMP Trojan: Block
090503 18:53:58 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1604 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:54:01 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1604 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:54:07 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1604 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:55:03 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1636 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:55:12 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1636 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:55:18 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1646 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:55:21 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1646 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:55:27 Deny Out TCP RIP: 129.47.9.160 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1646 No Data Exists *** ROOTKIT Server
090503 18:56:44 Deny Out UDP RIP: 202.28.250.209 RPort: 80 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 56143
090503 18:57:11 Deny Out TCP RIP: 192.168.1.1 RPort: 53 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 55637
090503 18:57:14 Deny Out TCP RIP: 192.168.1.1 RPort: 53 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 55637
090503 18:57:20 Deny Out TCP RIP: 192.168.1.1 RPort: 53 LIP:
192.168.1.3 LPort: 55637
090503 18:57:48 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1731 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:57:51 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1731 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
090503 18:57:57 Deny Out TCP RIP: 89.138.54.59 RPort: 38802 LIP:
91.124.232.166 LPort: 1731 89-138-57-185.bb.netvision.net.il Penetration
Attempts netvision.il
tan
>
>Try harder.
Are you in your mind?
How much are you going to pay for the logs?
Those logs are worth quite a bit.
>That's just a list of IP numbers with next to no context.
You need to do YOUR part also, being a sub-geniououououosss
you claim you are.
Or you want me to CHEW this thing for you?
How much are you going to pay?
You want a paypal account to make a deposit to?
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:21:52 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article <r0cdv5p3n1moq70m3...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:05:18 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <o3adv5l4ds45o1u99...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
>>> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:27:15 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Few months ago I have seen some study that indicates
>>>>>>at least 30% of global net traffic happens via torrents,
>>>>>
>>>>>Cite, or it's just blather.
>>>>
>>>>I do not have time to bother with bullshit like this.
>>>
>>>Ithink you do, otherwise you would have blanked me by now.
>>
>>I work in chunks. When I finish a chunk of work,
>>I look into this hole to see what is new under the sun.
>>You have few seconds. Then I go for few minutes.
>>That is how it works.
>>
>>Enough.
>
Good. Because there IS a magic to what I do.
But you behave just like a regular sucker.
tan
YOU are fake.
This information is worth in gold, if you have brains that is.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:32:34 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article <e4ddv5t96k07l564e...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:21:52 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <r0cdv5p3n1moq70m3...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
>>> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:05:18 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <o3adv5l4ds45o1u99...@4ax.com>, IMBJR
>>>>> <im...@cloon.gasm> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Fri, 21 May 2010 15:27:15 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Few months ago I have seen some study that indicates
>>>>>>>>at least 30% of global net traffic happens via torrents,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Cite, or it's just blather.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I do not have time to bother with bullshit like this.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ithink you do, otherwise you would have blanked me by now.
>>>>
>>>>I work in chunks. When I finish a chunk of work,
>>>>I look into this hole to see what is new under the sun.
>>>>You have few seconds. Then I go for few minutes.
>>>>That is how it works.
>>>>
>>>>Enough.
>>>
>>>Lordy, you make what everyone else also does sound magical.
>>
>>Good. Because there IS a magic to what I do.
>>But you behave just like a regular sucker.
>
>didn't mean special, though, she meant "special".
Do you want me to tell you how their network works?
Deposit $500 and I'll tell you some very interesting things.
Who knows, you may get rich as a result.
I'll take 20% of what you make out of it.
RustyBillyBob
>
> So...
>
> Question: why is usenet being destroyed?
> Why most of the biggest players are dropping the nntp servers?
> ANY clue?
>
So...why are you asking questions, instead of answering them?
It's beginning to sound as if you have some knowledge of the mechanics
of the 'net, the web, whatever - a bunch of interconnected computers.
So, stop asking pointless questions, and start giving answers that
will make inter-web communication better/easier/cheaper/less sabotage-
able. Up until about today, I considered your input to be totally
worthless; here's your chance to redeem yourself, and gain valuable
BillyBob coupons.
Stop your greasy-assed spamming about heretical nonsense, and tell us
something we don't know, but want to know. Tall order, Mr. Tanner -
are you up to it?
And by the way, if you program as sloppily as you type text, your
skilz are not in demand. We already have all the language-butchers we
need, and most of them have more to say, and a better sense of humor
than you do.
Rise above what you've been.
tan
>On May 21, 7:35=A0am, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>
>> So...
>>
>> Question: why is usenet being destroyed?
>> Why most of the biggest players are dropping the nntp servers?
>> ANY clue?
>>
>So...why are you asking questions, instead of answering them?
>
>It's beginning to sound as if you have some knowledge of the mechanics
>of the 'net, the web, whatever - a bunch of interconnected computers.
>So, stop asking pointless questions, and start giving answers that
>will make inter-web communication better/easier/cheaper/less sabotage-
>able. Up until about today, I considered your input to be totally
>worthless; here's your chance to redeem yourself,
Forget about it.
>and gain valuable BillyBob coupons.
Oh, that sounds like a deal.
Do I stick em on my forehead so everybody knows how important I am?
Enough.
>
>Stop your greasy-assed spamming about heretical nonsense, and tell us
>something we don't know, but want to know. Tall order, Mr. Tanner -
>are you up to it?
>
>And by the way, if you program as sloppily as you type text, your
>skilz are not in demand. We already have all the language-butchers we
>need, and most of them have more to say, and a better sense of humor
>than you do.
>
>Rise above what you've been.
>
--
tan
Forget abouts its.
My clients are of the Intel caliber,
and in the Sucking Silivon Valey at that.
>Rise above what you've been.
>
--
RustyBillyBob
>
> From what I have seen so far, this is some of the most
> moronic stuff. In fact, I bet you can hardly find anything
> more moronic than this group. Prolly AUK is the closest
> competitor "out there".
>
And you're here exactly WHY?
tan
>
>If it were gold, you not have posted ANY of it.
There isn't enough in it for The Giants Of YOUR Caliber
to understand anything of real value.
I bet you can not even understand what is happening there.
>
>Listen my little "script kiddie",
WUT?
How bout Da Kernel Level?
Ever heard?
:)
>the real blackhats do not go around
>boasting about the size of their e-peens on usenet.
Shice. You ask for this crap.
You get it.
And you are STILL not happy?
WHAT would make you happy, Mr. Smart?
> They make money.
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:42:50 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Do you want me to tell you how their network works?
>>
>>Deposit $500 and I'll tell you some very interesting things.
>>Who knows, you may get rich as a result.
>>I'll take 20% of what you make out of it.
>
Donnow bout that, but that is CHEAP, Mr. Smart.
WAY to cheap.
tan
>he has are worth something.
Ok, Mr. Smart, what is a spinlock and why and where it is used.
You can take ALL your time googling for it.
Then we talk more.
You, suckers ARE taking my time here, I tellya.
But, considering the Royal Crowd you are,
sure, eat it.
tan
Guess, Mr. Smart.
tan
Ok, you stoopid arse.
Did you hear what I asked?
What is a spinlock? Why is it needed? What are its limitations?
What are the boundary conditions?
(Talking about script kiddies, you idiots)
tan
I asked you, jerks and cowards, do you want to see who you REALLY
are?
For a stinky 50 bux, you'll see something about yourself
that is worth YEARS of your wasted time here.
Not a SINGLE one of you, cowards, agreed.
Why?
Would you rather pay $30 to the lowest grade conman?
Ankara
"tan" spoke out it's bunghole:
Obviously you know nothing about what you are talking about.
What's even funnier is how you come out in defense of usenet
which I understand you get all misty about it and all, but it is
SERIOUSLY underperforming system in this day and age.
Also who is gonna index all these endless archives you are
talking about, because unless you set retention of your very own
server to 'endless' then the messages don't stick around very long.
If google wasn't doing it, messages from the 90's and early 2000's
would be nothing but rumor and innuendo...so welcome to google.
The funniest part about all of this, when you are asked about
perhaps running your own, you back away from THAT idea
WHICH IS EXACTLY THE POINT the ONLY reason why usenet
has been so useful to us, is because it has been supported by
redundancies everywhere and YOU and I don't have the headache
of keeping it all running. That is all nice and socialist workers paradise
but what happens when they decide to pull the plug (which the very first
usenet server is doing now) GUESS WHAT...GOODBYE
You talk about censorship of web forums but don't seem to realize that
you are JUST AS CONTROLLED by usenets EXISTENCE. You have
NO VOICE in keeping it running, and if the big schools decide to pull
the plug well than that's that, and UNLESS some bobo like you
decides to take on the cost and headache THEMSELVES its all over
with.
--
Ankara
http://taphouse.org/
There is no cabal.
Cover me in lesbians and throw it the hard way.
Lemme show you mine. -Zeppo
tan
>
>"tan" spoke out it's bunghole:
>Obviously you know nothing about what you are talking about.
Good. Get lost then.
Enough.
I do not have time for horseshit like this.
>What's even funnier is how you come out in defense of usenet
>which I understand you get all misty about it and all, but it is
>SERIOUSLY underperforming system in this day and age.
>Also who is gonna index all these endless archives you are
>talking about, because unless you set retention of your very own
>server to 'endless' then the messages don't stick around very long.
>If google wasn't doing it, messages from the 90's and early 2000's
>would be nothing but rumor and innuendo...so welcome to google.
>
>The funniest part about all of this, when you are asked about
>perhaps running your own, you back away from THAT idea
>WHICH IS EXACTLY THE POINT the ONLY reason why usenet
>has been so useful to us, is because it has been supported by
>redundancies everywhere and YOU and I don't have the headache
>of keeping it all running. That is all nice and socialist workers paradise
>but what happens when they decide to pull the plug (which the very first
>usenet server is doing now) GUESS WHAT...GOODBYE
>
>You talk about censorship of web forums but don't seem to realize that
>you are JUST AS CONTROLLED by usenets EXISTENCE. You have
>NO VOICE in keeping it running, and if the big schools decide to pull
>the plug well than that's that, and UNLESS some bobo like you
>decides to take on the cost and headache THEMSELVES its all over
>with.
>
>
>
--
tan
Ok, fine. I'll look at it, just out of respect
to The Giant Hole like this.
>Obviously you know nothing about what you are talking about.
I know EXACTLY what I am talking about it.
I'll put my 10 bux against yours.
Deal?
>What's even funnier is how you come out in defense of usenet
>which I understand you get all misty about it and all,
I donnow what kinda horseshit you imply by it.
>but it is
>SERIOUSLY underperforming system in this day and age.
Are you a TOTAL idiot?
In which way it "underperforms" ANYTHING you know of on the net?
>Also who is gonna index all these endless archives you are
>talking about,
Prolly the best indexing system there is,
and it is free too.
Called Lucene.
Ever heard?
>because unless you set retention of your very own
>server to 'endless'
You can set retention to your server to anything you want.
What is the argument here?
>then the messages don't stick around very long.
Are you also as dumb as it gets?
>If google wasn't doing it, messages from the 90's and early 2000's
>would be nothing but rumor and innuendo...so welcome to google.
Screw google. They are history.
>The funniest part about all of this, when you are asked about
>perhaps running your own, you back away from THAT idea
>WHICH IS EXACTLY THE POINT the ONLY reason why usenet
>has been so useful to us,
I do not understand all the subtleties of your argument.
> is because it has been supported by
>redundancies everywhere
There are no redundancies as far as usenet goes.
> and YOU and I don't have the headache
>of keeping it all running.
Fine, so what is the argument here?
>That is all nice and socialist workers paradise
Jeez!
>but what happens when they decide to pull the plug (which the very first
>usenet server is doing now) GUESS WHAT...GOODBYE
WHO pulls the plug?
>You talk about censorship of web forums but don't seem to realize that
>you are JUST AS CONTROLLED by usenets EXISTENCE.
WUT?
>You have
>NO VOICE in keeping it running,
How would you know?
>and if the big schools decide to pull
>the plug
Screw them.
We'll have slacker's running the usenet.
Why not?
>well than that's that, and UNLESS some bobo like you
>decides to take on the cost and headache THEMSELVES its all over
>with.
Not only "bobo like me".
Bobo like you also.
What choice do you have if you realize what we are talking about?
tan
You are just a stoopid suckass to me.
A total coward.
A weewee.
That is ALL there is to it.
You want to see MY "humiliation"?
For what, you ding dong?
What would it buy YOU, Mr. Smart?
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 18:04:24 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Good. Get lost then.
>>Enough.
>>I do not have time for horseshit like this.
>
Jesus funken hell!
Biorobots again?
>-----
>Bertie Blunt (His Parrot's A Cunt)
--
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 18:38:35 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>Screw google. They are history.
>
>technology statement of the 2010s. ALREADY.
And you can suck the exhaust pipe too.
Did you know?
>
>-----
>Bertie Blunt (His Parrot's A Cunt)
--
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:59:21 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>In article
> <3ef05c30-04c8-4b4e...@f13g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,
> RustyBillyBob <rastab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On May 21, 10:09=A0am, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> From what I have seen so far, this is some of the most
>>>> moronic stuff. In fact, I bet you can hardly find anything
>>>> more moronic than this group. Prolly AUK is the closest
>>>> competitor "out there".
>>>>
>>>And you're here exactly WHY?
>>
>>Guess, Mr. Smart.
>
There is nothing to "get" here in this hole,
filled with idiots, thinking they are somehow "superior".
Just plain zombies.
>
>-----
>Bertie Blunt (His Parrot's A Cunt)
--
tan
>On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:58:40 GMT, t...@nowhere.land (tan) wrote:
>
>>
>>You can take ALL your time googling for it.
>>
>>Then we talk more.
>>
>>You, suckers ARE taking my time here, I tellya.
>>But, considering the Royal Crowd you are,
>>sure, eat it.
>
Look. I know you are one of the most profound idiots around here.
What else is new under the sun?