Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Rittenhouse Verdict Raises Concerns That It's No Longer Safe To Beat People To Death With A Skateboard

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Warhaul

unread,
Aug 6, 2023, 4:23:18 AM8/6/23
to
On 21 Nov 2021, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> posted some
news:s8lkpgtaml3lb7pjo...@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:34:26 -0800 (PST), bigdog
><geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 7:33:58 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>wrote:
>>> https://tinyurl.com/wtend9rr
>>>
>>> U.S.?s Americans deal with the aftermath of the Rittenhouse verdict,
>>> many are being forced to come to terms with the fact that it's no
>>> longer safe to beat people to death with a skateboard in America.
>>>
>>> "I'm devastated. I'm terrified. I don't even recognize my own
>>> country anymore," said local concerned citizen Gail Piddlesnoot.
>>> "How have we gotten to the point in our nation where people can no
>>> longer beat someone with a skateboard, or kick someone in the face,
>>> or threaten to kill them without risk of being shot? It's just
>>> horrible."
>>>
>>> The American Society of Communist Skateboard Murderers (ASCSM)
>>> reports that more and more of their members are dropping out, no
>>> longer confident that they can go out at night, burn down cities,
>>> and bash in people's skulls with skateboards unmolested.
>>>
>>> "This sets a dangerous precedent," said Piddlesnoot. "It could be
>>> that in a very short time, we will no longer see gangs of marauding
>>> skateboard-murdering arsonists roaming our streets at night, and
>>> that's a very sad thought."
>>>
>>> Experts are recommending that in the near future, for everyone's
>>> safety, people who own skateboards just ride them for fun instead of
>>> beating people with them.
>>
>>While this is obviously a tongue-in-cheek post, a simple google search
>>will reveal dozens of cases in which a skateboard has been used as a
>>weapon to inflict death or great bodily harm. That fact alone
>>justifies Kyle's use of deadly force against Anthony Huber, a guy with
>>a violent criminal history. The left believe it was Kyle's moral duty
>>to allow Huber to continue to bludgeon him and take it like a man.
>>That was the argument made by the assistant AD at Kyle's trial. I'm
>>sure that argument played well with the jury. The last volley fired
>>from a sinking ship.
>
> What they HATE is that Kyle had a better weapon.

And he used it effectively.

0 new messages