On Sep 10, 8:33 pm, Jym Dyer <j...@econet.org> wrote:
> Andre Jute purports:
>
> > This clown Jymbo cut out the distribution list; it is a
> > typical juvenile debating trick perpetrated by those who know
> > they don't have the brains to carry a convincing argument.
>
> =v= No, the problem is that you cross-posted your message to a
> bunch of newsgroups where it's off-topic, in violation of the
> very rudiments of Usenet courtesy. I merely set followups to
> the subset of newsgroups where it's on-topic.
>
> > If there's so much science, why do the Global Warmies need the
> > lie of Michael Mann's Hockey Stick [blah blah blah].
>
> =v= Again the denialists keep repeating decade- or decades-old
> "controversies" that have been scrutinized and (where needed)
> corrected long ago. Nothing in particular relies on MBH98;
> there have been several workings of the data that reached the
> same conclusion. You got nothin' there.
>
> =v= This is the typical denialist strategy: Just keep dredging
> up the same old long-debunked crap over and over again to waste
> everyone's time playing whack-a-mole.
>
> > Furthermore, are you aware that the same "science" was quoted
> > by Velikovsky and Daniken in support of their wacky theories?
>
> =v= Wow, this is even more pathetic than the usual denialist
> fare. Did you read that somewhere or did it originate somewhere
> in the slack-jawed drooling neural collisions that you use in
> the stead of intelligence?
>
> > [Deletia: lots and lots of wasted whack-a-mole bandwidth.]
>
> > Oh dear. Do you own a car, Jymbo? If you do, I'm a better
> > conservationist than you are.
>
> =v= You truly are an idiot, aren't you? I've been carfree
> longer than you have, in fact.
>
> > [Deletia: extended completely inaccurate speculations about
> > myself, culminating in a truly moronic mischaracterization.]
>
> =v= Shut the Hell up, geek.
> <_Jym_>