Re: Liberals make excuses for thuggery

[Stan de SD]

On Jan 9, 1:15 am, Jym Dyer <j...@econet.org> wrote:
> >> Before Obama was elected, my husband said, "I'll bet you that
> >> Oakland has riots after the election".  I said, "Obama will
> >> probably win, so there won't be any riots."  My husband said,
> >> "They'll be riots no matter who wins."
> > So police kill unarmed and [supine] suspects because a black
> > man gets elected President.
>
> > You have a rather low opinion of the competence and dedication
> > of the police.
>
> =v= Actually what's low is her (and her husband's) IQ.  None of
> that follows any course of logical reasoning.  It's just bigoted
> spewage that requires no thought whatsoever.

As opposed to your well-though-out knee-jerk left-wing posts, huh?

[Stan de SD]

On Jan 11, 11:06 am, Jym Dyer <j...@econet.org> wrote:
> >>> Well, what did Obama have to do with the cops
> >>> shooting a handcuffed BART rider?
> >> Nada
> > Then why mention it in conjuction with Obama?
>
> =x= She just wanted the world to know that her dear husband's
> wit and intelligence have nothing to do with thinking and
> reasoning, and everything to do with coded racist spewage.

And what "coded racist spewage" was that? Not toeing the PC liberal
party line, and pointing out that there's a certain element of
thuggery well-known in Oakland?