Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Chris Isaak - any gossip?

775 views
Skip to first unread message

EcollierD

unread,
Feb 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/1/97
to

Album after album and interview after inteview, Chris Isaak moans about
the latest woman who broke his heart. But I have yet to read of--or see
him pictured with--a real girlfriend. I met him a couple of years ago and
he certainly acts as though he is very interested in the opposite sex,
though this of course means little.
So are these coldhearted women real? Is Isaak just very succesful at
living a private life, and very unsuccesful in finding love?

Collier

Alexandra

unread,
Feb 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/2/97
to

As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's
been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
her "inner beauty."

Kisses,
Alexandra
ะฯ^Qเกฑ


Cathe (CatheB) Alleger

unread,
Feb 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/2/97
to

He is around San Francisco, in his Norht Beach home, and seen with lots
of women. (mostly friends) His last girlfriend seemed to be his steady at
least until he went to tour Europe, but I don't think she had a handle of
the musicians schedule.
IF you want to check out Isaak half naked, then you might have to take a
short drive to Ocean Beach, or Rockaway Beach, or Half Moon Bay where he
surfs. (Yes, he does change out of his wetsuit right there by his mustang.)
He was on the morning schedule, so those of us with boards would see him
out there from sunrise til about 10am.
that's all I have on him....other than he is an absolute riot with a
really weird sense of humor, and if he gives up singing he could be a
stand up.


CatheB

Jeffrey D. Paul

unread,
Feb 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/2/97
to

Alexandra wrote:

>
> On 1 Feb 1997 00:03:50 GMT, ecol...@aol.com (EcollierD) wrote:
>
> >Album after album and interview after inteview, Chris Isaak moans about
> >the latest woman who broke his heart. But I have yet to read of--or see
> >him pictured with--a real girlfriend. I met him a couple of years ago and
> >he certainly acts as though he is very interested in the opposite sex,
> >though this of course means little.
> >So are these coldhearted women real? Is Isaak just very succesful at
> >living a private life, and very unsuccesful in finding love?
> >
> >Collier
>
> As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's
> been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
> one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
> her "inner beauty."
>
> Kisses,
> Alexandra
> ะฯ^Qเกฑ
He used to date Margaret Cho, who told my friend that Chris
is well-endowed.
JP

C.L. Lassiter

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

Alexandra (net...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:

[]

: As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's


: been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
: one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
: her "inner beauty."

Any word on his "Baja" cd? I like his voice, but I've never bought any of
his work. But I've heard him sing a couple of tunes from it on various
talk shows and liked what I heard, but I don't want to buy a cd for 2
cuts.

cl, who wouldn't mind watching Mr. Isaak change into (or out of) his
wetsuit

kir...@ix.netcom.com

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

sea...@email.unc.edu (C.L. Lassiter) wrote:


>Any word on his "Baja" cd?

[snipped rest of message]

It is one of his best..In it he revists a number of songs from prior
releases...It's not quite a greatest hits b/c he brings a fresh
approach to each song.....I loved it!

Kirbles


Laura Beatty

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

A good friend of mine dated him way back and I met him a few
times briefly at a nightclub I worked at. Some pals of mine
did drugs with him, but that was *years* ago and I don't know
if that's something he does regularly.

I understand he's *very* well endowed, but nutty about hygiene
and safe sex. Obviously that's a good idea, but I got
the impression he was obsessive about the hygiene stuff.

He's got a really good, snappy sense of humor, but he's definitely
weird. I like weird people, but he's *weird* - he says *really*
random stuff.

laura

Philip Tuley

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

Jeffrey D. Paul <pa...@csulb.edu> wrote:
: Alexandra wrote:
: > >So are these coldhearted women real? Is Isaak just very succesful at

: > >living a private life, and very unsuccesful in finding love?
: > >
: > >Collier
: >
: > As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's
: > been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
: > one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
: > her "inner beauty."
: > Alexandra

: > ะฯ^Qเกฑ
: He used to date Margaret Cho, who told my friend that Chris
: is well-endowed.
: JP
Wouldn't know about well-endowed, but he used to date a radio announcer
named Mimi Chen for a while. She came into the recording studio that I
managed about 10 years ago with Chris in tow. Her pipes, by the way, were
great!


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Tuley, Official Artisan of The Pink Princess
still working from the work-trailer at asgtp#160


julesdlr

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

Philip Tuley wrote:

> Wouldn't know about well-endowed, but he used to date a radio announcer
> named Mimi Chen for a while. She came into the recording studio that I
> managed about 10 years ago with Chris in tow. Her pipes, by the way, were
> great!

The B.A.R., a local gay weekly, had a very good gossip column a few
years back-- unfortunately the columnist committed suicide. Anyway, the
B.A.R. was the first mention of Isaak's "package" that I had heard of.
It said to check out the then current issue of S.F. Focus to see for
ourselves. There was an interview with Isaak and a photo of him in
tight white pants that was rather stupendous. Unfortunately, I never saw
that picture.

Sincerely,

Jules

Cathy L. Morgan

unread,
Feb 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/3/97
to

In article <5d4shf$7jo$3...@newz.oit.unc.edu>, sea...@email.unc.edu (C.L.
Lassiter) wrote:

> Alexandra (net...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>
> []


>
> : As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's
> : been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
> : one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
> : her "inner beauty."
>

> Any word on his "Baja" cd? I like his voice, but I've never bought any of
> his work. But I've heard him sing a couple of tunes from it on various
> talk shows and liked what I heard, but I don't want to buy a cd for 2
> cuts.
>
> cl, who wouldn't mind watching Mr. Isaak change into (or out of) his
> wetsuit

All of his CDs are good. My favorite is the second one. Though, I might be
just a bit biased--I've seen him live about 50 times and met him once on
my birthday. A really sweet guy w/ice blue eyes. Doesn't drink or smoke,
lives in the Richmond District of SF, hangs out a some cheap neighborhood
Chinese restaurant and surfs. Never mind ~watching~ him change out of his
wetsuit, I'd HELP him!

clm in sf

--
"The greatest pleasure in life is in doing what people say you cannot do." ---Walther Bagehot

Miss Lo

unread,
Feb 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/4/97
to

In article <32F515...@csulb.edu>, "Jeffrey D. Paul"
<pa...@csulb.edu> writes

>Alexandra wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Feb 1997 00:03:50 GMT, ecol...@aol.com (EcollierD) wrote:
>>
>> >Album after album and interview after inteview, Chris Isaak moans about
>> >the latest woman who broke his heart. But I have yet to read of--or see
>> >him pictured with--a real girlfriend. I met him a couple of years ago and
>> >he certainly acts as though he is very interested in the opposite sex,
>> >though this of course means little.
>> >So are these coldhearted women real? Is Isaak just very succesful at
>> >living a private life, and very unsuccesful in finding love?
>> >
>> >Collier
>>
>> As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's
>> been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
>> one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
>> her "inner beauty."
>>
>He used to date Margaret Cho, who told my friend that Chris
>is well-endowed.

I know 3 women who slept with him (one of which he was engaged to). One
of the women described him as "so big he couldn't fit a condom on it".
------------
Miss Lo
ASGTPR#29
"Ass, Gas, or Grass - no one rides for free"


--------------International Home of the Trailer Park Map---------------
<<http://ds.dial.pipex.com/town/parade/aaj01>>

Alexandra

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

On Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:35:54 +0000, Miss Lo <aa...@dial.pipex.com>
wrote:

>I know 3 women who slept with him (one of which he was engaged to). One
>of the women described him as "so big he couldn't fit a condom on it".
>------------

Why do you think we won't let him move out of San Francisco?;-)
Kisses,
Alexandra
ะฯ^Qเกฑ


C.L. Lassiter

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

Cathy L. Morgan (clmo...@earthlink.net) wrote:
: In article <5d4shf$7jo$3...@newz.oit.unc.edu>, sea...@email.unc.edu (C.L.
: Lassiter) wrote:

[]

: > Any word on his "Baja" cd? I like his voice, but I've never bought any of


: > his work. But I've heard him sing a couple of tunes from it on various
: > talk shows and liked what I heard, but I don't want to buy a cd for 2
: > cuts.
: >
: > cl, who wouldn't mind watching Mr. Isaak change into (or out of) his
: > wetsuit

: All of his CDs are good. My favorite is the second one. Though, I might be
: just a bit biased--I've seen him live about 50 times and met him once on
: my birthday. A really sweet guy w/ice blue eyes. Doesn't drink or smoke,
: lives in the Richmond District of SF, hangs out a some cheap neighborhood
: Chinese restaurant and surfs. Never mind ~watching~ him change out of his
: wetsuit, I'd HELP him!

Well, I have a serious photography hobby, so I can get into the
voyeuristic side of things. But mind you, I'm all for a "hands on"
experience, especially if the post about his being too large for any
condom is true.

And thanks (everyone) for the information. I guess I'm definitely going
to have to invest in some Isaak music.

cl

eve...@aol.com

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

>On Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:35:54 +0000, Miss Lo <aa...@dial.pipex.com>
>wrote:
>
>>I know 3 women who slept with him (one of which he was engaged to). One
>>of the women described him as "so big he couldn't fit a condom on it".

Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
make guys feel better about themselves.

Evelyn

RFerrie

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

eve...@aol.com wrote:
<snip>

>
> Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
> 'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
> manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
> make guys feel better about themselves.
>
> Evelyn

I read a great quote from a condom manufacturer P.R.-type guy a few years
back, when "sized" condoms were being introduced (or promoted, maybe?).
He said the greatest difficulty was selecting "names" for the sizes,
since nobody would want to buy "small". He jokingly said they considered
"large, giant, and enormous".

Renee (no clever condom reference here)

T.-and-...@worldnet.att.net

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

RFerrie wrote:
>
> eve...@aol.com wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
> > 'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
> > manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
> > make guys feel better about themselves.
> >
> > Evelyn

Years ago I read a very funny article -- I swear this is true -- about
the European Community's attempts to standardize all kinds of products
Europe-wide. One of their sticking points was settling on a standard
size for the "Eurocondom." It seems the Scandinavians had rather
different ideas about just how big an average condom had to be from the
Italians. Sadly, I can't remember how they settled the dispute, or what
size they settled on.

Terry Hicks, who hastens to add that he knows nothing about the relative
sizes of Scandinavians, Italians, or anyone else save his own little
self

Eric Simonson

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

On 5 Feb 1997 16:07:05 GMT, RFerrie <rfe...@inforamp.net> wrote:


>I read a great quote from a condom manufacturer P.R.-type guy a few years
>back, when "sized" condoms were being introduced (or promoted, maybe?).
>He said the greatest difficulty was selecting "names" for the sizes,
>since nobody would want to buy "small". He jokingly said they considered
>"large, giant, and enormous".
>
>Renee (no clever condom reference here)

How about 'Fun Size', 'Party Size', and "Regular'.

Alexandra

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

On Wed, 05 Feb 1997 17:40:33 GMT, simo...@netcom.com (Eric Simonson)
wrote:

Or how about: "Fun Size", "Party Size" and "Drunk"....
Kisses,
Alexandra
ะฯ^Qเกฑ


Philip Tuley

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

RFerrie <rfe...@inforamp.net> wrote:
: eve...@aol.com wrote:
: <snip>
: >
: > Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
: > 'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
: > manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
: > make guys feel better about themselves.
: >
: > Evelyn

: I read a great quote from a condom manufacturer P.R.-type guy a few years

: back, when "sized" condoms were being introduced (or promoted, maybe?).
: He said the greatest difficulty was selecting "names" for the sizes,
: since nobody would want to buy "small". He jokingly said they considered
: "large, giant, and enormous".


During WWII, it was common practice to cover the end of your rifle with a
condom in order to prevent the insides of the barrel from getting wet. The
British condom manufacturers, in an effort to boost Brit morale and
reputations, made some specifically to be thus used, and marked them in
large letters "Average", in spite of the fact that the condoms were over
14 inches in length and quite wide.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Tuley, Official Artisan of The Pink Princess

still working out of the work-trailer at asgtp#160

eve...@aol.com

unread,
Feb 5, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/5/97
to

In article <32F91C...@worldnet.att.net>,
T.-and-...@worldnet.att.net writes:

>Years ago I read a very funny article -- I swear this is true -- about
>the European Community's attempts to standardize all kinds of products
>Europe-wide. One of their sticking points was settling on a standard
>size for the "Eurocondom." It seems the Scandinavians had rather
>different ideas about just how big an average condom had to be from the
>Italians. Sadly, I can't remember how they settled the dispute, or what
>size they settled on.

>Terry Hicks, who hastens to add that he knows nothing about the relative
>sizes of Scandinavians, Italians, or anyone else save his own little
>self

One of their *sticking points*?? BwaHaaHaa!

Evelyn, not taking any sides in this dispute either except to wonder
whether Italians are so fond of grabbing their thingies in public because
they're nervous about them shrinking (or disappearing?)

*NaNcY*

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

On Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:35:54 +0000, Miss Lo <aa...@dial.pipex.com>
wrote:

>In article <32F515...@csulb.edu>, "Jeffrey D. Paul"

>>He used to date Margaret Cho, who told my friend that Chris
>>is well-endowed.
>


>I know 3 women who slept with him (one of which he was engaged to). One
>of the women described him as "so big he couldn't fit a condom on it".

>------------
Oh dear....it seems like it is time to edit the old "hung like a
horse" list!


Jeff Kirk

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

In article <19970205154...@ladder01.news.aol.com>, eve...@aol.com
says...

>
>Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
>'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
>manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
>make guys feel better about themselves.

You must mean Magnums. I believe Joey is the resident expert on them 'round
these parts, however. :)

Jeff
--Note my new e-mail address: kir...@jumpnet.com
--New home page address: http://www.jumpnet.com/~kirker/me.htm


puz...@aol.com

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

In article <32ff2f37...@207.126.101.82>, nlo...@rt66.com (*NaNcY*)
writes:

>Oh dear....it seems like it is time to edit the old "hung like a
>horse" list!

There is a 'hung like a horse' list? Shit, who the hell is on it? And
don't give me those unfuckable guys, {Uncle Milty}, sheesh!!

Puzz

Miss Lo

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

In article <19970206074...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
puz...@aol.com writes
Darlin', run and get yourself a copy of the anti-faq. It contains the
List, and other essential material.

Darren

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Alexandra <net...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article
<33051b21...@nntp.ix.netcom.com>...

> On Wed, 05 Feb 1997 17:40:33 GMT, simo...@netcom.com (Eric Simonson)
> wrote:
>
> >On 5 Feb 1997 16:07:05 GMT, RFerrie <rfe...@inforamp.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I read a great quote from a condom manufacturer P.R.-type guy a few
years
> >>back, when "sized" condoms were being introduced (or promoted, maybe?).

> >>He said the greatest difficulty was selecting "names" for the sizes,
> >>since nobody would want to buy "small". He jokingly said they
considered
> >>"large, giant, and enormous".
> >>

> >>Renee (no clever condom reference here)
> >
> >How about 'Fun Size', 'Party Size', and "Regular'.
>
> Or how about: "Fun Size", "Party Size" and "Drunk"....
> Kisses,
> Alexandra
> ะฯ^Qเกฑ
>
>

OK, I have a question, how did a thread titled " Chris Isaak, any gossip"
become a thread on condom sizes?

Was it a serious off-topic question or is there something in here between
the lines about Chris that I wasn't aware of...(is he really that big?)


RFerrie

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Philip Tuley wrote:
>
> RFerrie <rfe...@inforamp.net> wrote:
> : eve...@aol.com wrote:
> : <snip>
> : >
> : > Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy

> : > 'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
> : > manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
> : > make guys feel better about themselves.
> : >
> : > Evelyn
>
> : I read a great quote from a condom manufacturer P.R.-type guy a few years

> : back, when "sized" condoms were being introduced (or promoted, maybe?).
> : He said the greatest difficulty was selecting "names" for the sizes,
> : since nobody would want to buy "small". He jokingly said they considered
> : "large, giant, and enormous".
>
> During WWII, it was common practice to cover the end of your rifle with a
> condom in order to prevent the insides of the barrel from getting wet. The
> British condom manufacturers, in an effort to boost Brit morale and
> reputations, made some specifically to be thus used, and marked them in
> large letters "Average", in spite of the fact that the condoms were over
> 14 inches in length and quite wide.
>

Before you tell that one too many times, you might want to check
alt.folklore.urban, who get that one a lot. Dang good story. The usual
version has the "average" ranking to demoralize the Germans, though. I
think (I never paid that much attention in a.f.u. It gets to be very
pedantic over there....)

Renee (suddenly feeling VERY pedantic)

Miss Lo

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

In article <01bc1437$ff005560$533ad3cf@mike>, Darren <nu...@biz.com>
writes

>OK, I have a question, how did a thread titled " Chris Isaak, any gossip"
>become a thread on condom sizes?
>
>Was it a serious off-topic question or is there something in here between
>the lines about Chris that I wasn't aware of...(is he really that big?)
>
Wow -- you must be new here. Read the anti-faq. Topic headers are only
good for, oh, 2 or 3 posts....then expect them to change.

To answer your question, yes, he really is that big. he is also well
known for prefering Asian women.

C.L. Lassiter

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Darren (nu...@biz.com) wrote:

[]

: OK, I have a question, how did a thread titled " Chris Isaak, any gossip"


: become a thread on condom sizes?

Commonly referred to as "thread drift." Akin to continental drift, except
*much* faster.

There are times I wish people would just start a new thread, but others
that I find it fascinating to see what started as something mutates (I
definitely wouldn't say "evolves.") into something totally different.


: Was it a serious off-topic question or is there something in here between


: the lines about Chris that I wasn't aware of...(is he really that big?)


Apparently.

cl, who volunteers to find out--You listening Mr. I?


DNA409

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Hello All,
I know this isn't gossip about a real phony plastic person, but I
thought you would all find it amusing anyway (in the wake of Trailer Trash
Barbie, etc.)
My friend Ben Wade just received a cease and desist order from one of
Mattel's attorneys. It said that he has violated Mattel's intellectual
rights as Barbie is a copyrighted work of art. They said his photo
"Mistress Babs: The Queen of All She Surveys" is unflattering to Barbie
and depicts her in "sexually- explicit clothing". There is nothing
sexually explicit about the photo. It is an obvious parody of the doll.
Please see for yourself by visiting the following web site. It is a site
created to showcase the work of a group of independant Nashville artists
called Untitled (of which I am also a member).
The address is:
http://www.nashville.net/~urchard/untitled

The specific address for the offending photo is:
http://www.Nashville.Net/~urchard/untitled/wade/bwad2.htm

Thank you,
Neil.
"Pink is the navy blue of Indiana" - Diana Vreeland

Brian & Sharon Beuchaw

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

Jeffrey D. Paul (pa...@csulb.edu) wrote:
> Alexandra wrote:
> >
> > On 1 Feb 1997 00:03:50 GMT, ecol...@aol.com (EcollierD) wrote:
> >
> > >Album after album and interview after inteview, Chris Isaak moans about
> > >the latest woman who broke his heart. But I have yet to read of--or see
> > >him pictured with--a real girlfriend. I met him a couple of years ago and
> > >he certainly acts as though he is very interested in the opposite sex,
> > >though this of course means little.
> > >So are these coldhearted women real? Is Isaak just very succesful at
> > >living a private life, and very unsuccesful in finding love?
> > >
> > >Collier
> >
> > As far as I know, he still lives out here in the avenues in S.F. He's
> > been pining away after the same woman for a long time. I'm not usually
> > one to dis somebody based on their looks, but I have a feeling he sees
> > her "inner beauty."
> >
> > Kisses,
> > Alexandra
> > ะฯ^Qเกฑ

> He used to date Margaret Cho, who told my friend that Chris
> is well-endowed.
> JP

I swear, someone should publish a coffee-table book of photos called
"Penises of the Rich and Famous." It would make a fortune.

Sharon


Tilman Hausherr

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

In <19970206212...@ladder01.news.aol.com>, dna...@aol.com
(DNA409) wrote:

He is not the only one having received such a letter. Carol McCullough
(http://www.maui.net/~mcculc/) was also threatened, and took her barbie
art down. She had some very funny photos, like "Pope Barbie" (with red
high heel shoes), "Barbie on the cross" and "Terrorist Barbie and
Hostage Barbie".

I think that parodies in the US are protected by US law; I suggest a
look at http://www.benedict.com in the section on the "pretty woman"
litigation. (Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music)


Anyway, Mattel has not yet threatened me for my (text only)
"Scientologist Barbie and Ken" parody.

http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/cos_fun/barbie.06

Tilman


--- Tilman Hausherr
til...@berlin.snafu.de http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/

Scientollywood: http://www.snafu.de/~tilman/scientollywood.html

Roman Iwaschkin

unread,
Feb 6, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/6/97
to

In article <19970205210...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,

eve...@aol.com wrote:
>Evelyn, not taking any sides in this dispute either except to wonder
>whether Italians are so fond of grabbing their thingies in public because
>they're nervous about them shrinking (or disappearing?)

Nah. They're worried about the pickpockets.

--
Roman Iwaschkin

Ginny

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

>Philip Tuley wrote:
>>
>> RFerrie <rfe...@inforamp.net> wrote:
>> : eve...@aol.com wrote:
>> : <snip>
>> : >
>> : > Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
>> : > 'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
>> : > manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
>> : > make guys feel better about themselves.
>> : >
>> : > Evelyn
>>
>> : I read a great quote from a condom manufacturer P.R.-type guy a few years
>> : back, when "sized" condoms were being introduced (or promoted, maybe?).
>> : He said the greatest difficulty was selecting "names" for the sizes,
>> : since nobody would want to buy "small". He jokingly said they considered
>> : "large, giant, and enormous".
>>


I've never seen "sized" condoms (although I've never really looked),
but it seems that the sizes would have to be somewhat like the sizes
for olives...the smallest ones are *extra large* :)

Ginny

Life is Uncertain, Eat Dessert First!


Alexandra

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

On 6 Feb 1997 14:13:12 GMT, "Darren" <nu...@biz.com> wrote:

>Alexandra <net...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in article
><33051b21...@nntp.ix.netcom.com>...
>> On Wed, 05 Feb 1997 17:40:33 GMT, simo...@netcom.com (Eric Simonson)
>> wrote:

>> >
>> >How about 'Fun Size', 'Party Size', and "Regular'.
>>
>> Or how about: "Fun Size", "Party Size" and "Drunk"....

>OK, I have a question, how did a thread titled " Chris Isaak, any gossip"


>become a thread on condom sizes?
>

Chris Isaak + Big Penis = Large Condom Sizes. See, now wasn't that
easy?

>Was it a serious off-topic question or is there something in here between
>the lines about Chris that I wasn't aware of...(is he really that big?)
>

Chris Isaak + Large Condom Sizes = Big Penis. I think ir's what
mathematicians call "disrtributive law."


Kisses,
Alexandra
ะฯ^Qเกฑ


Stephen Gilliard

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

>Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
>'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
>manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
>make guys feel better about themselves.
>
>Evelyn


Yes, they make them. But at 2 AM, you're pretty much left with what
you can find. And Trojan large and Magnum might not be on sale unless
you find an all night drug store.

Let me put it this way: it seems like a better proplem to have than it
really is.
http://www.interport.net/~gilliard
The Gilliard News

Stephen Gilliard

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

>Before you tell that one too many times, you might want to check
>alt.folklore.urban, who get that one a lot. Dang good story. The usual
>version has the "average" ranking to demoralize the Germans, though. I
>think (I never paid that much attention in a.f.u. It gets to be very
>pedantic over there....)
>
>Renee (suddenly feeling VERY pedantic)


I don't know about the average stencils or the size of condoms, but
the practice was and still is common. It keeps out sand. water and
everything else, including the odd bug. The key is to make sure
they're unlubricated.

Alexandra

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

I have the BEST comeback to this! But I ain't gonna do it, I just
ain't!

Kisses,
Alexandra
ะฯ^Qเกฑ


Linda F. Cauthen

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

Kisses,
Alexandra
-*^Q*o*>>>

C'mon Alexa! What can we use to bribe you?

Linda ASGTPR#49 (and the Liquor Locker is sitting around waiting for my
regular Friday order anyway)


================================================
Sent via The Vine - The Entertainment Industry Online
http://www.vine.org for information


EcollierD

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

On 07 Feb 1997, net...@ix.netcom.com (Alexandra) wrote:

>Chris Isaak + Large Condom Sizes = Big Penis. I think ir's what
>mathematicians call "disrtributive law."

>Kisses,
>Alexandra
>ะฯ^Qเกฑ

Oh, my. I had no idea what I would start with this thread... Thanks for
all the responses!

Collier

Carlos Rodriguez

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

has anyone heard that Chris was physically abusive to his exs?

los

Lee Weiser

unread,
Feb 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/7/97
to

In article <3304ef79...@207.126.101.82> nlo...@rt66.com (*NaNcY*) writes:

>On Fri, 07 Feb 1997 06:17:46 GMT, gill...@interport.net (Stephen
>Gilliard) wrote:
>>>Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
>>>'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
>>>manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
>>>make guys feel better about themselves.
>>>Evelyn
>>Yes, they make them. But at 2 AM, you're pretty much left with what
>>you can find. And Trojan large and Magnum might not be on sale unless
>>you find an all night drug store.
>>
>>Let me put it this way: it seems like a better proplem to have than it
>>really is.

>Well Steve.....are we bragging here? ;-) First Joey, and no you....as
>the official penish inspector, I insist on at least digitized proof!


Nancy -
Um...."penish"!?!?!? }:->

--Lee

Alexandra

unread,
Feb 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/8/97
to

On 7 Feb 1997 12:32:37 GMT, ecol...@aol.com (EcollierD) wrote:

>On 07 Feb 1997, net...@ix.netcom.com (Alexandra) wrote:
>
>>Chris Isaak + Large Condom Sizes = Big Penis. I think ir's what
>>mathematicians call "disrtributive law."
>

>Oh, my. I had no idea what I would start with this thread... Thanks for
>all the responses!
>

Yer welcome. The class is ready for the next test question...

Kisses,
Alexandra
ะฯ^Qเกฑ


*NaNcY*

unread,
Feb 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/8/97
to

On Fri, 07 Feb 1997 06:17:46 GMT, gill...@interport.net (Stephen
Gilliard) wrote:

>>Don't they make X-large size condoms? (I've never had any reason to buy
>>'em <sniff> -- oh well, a girl can always hope :) I heard one condom
>>manufacturer labeled their regular size condoms 'extra large' just to
>>make guys feel better about themselves.
>>
>>Evelyn
>
>
>Yes, they make them. But at 2 AM, you're pretty much left with what
>you can find. And Trojan large and Magnum might not be on sale unless
>you find an all night drug store.
>
>Let me put it this way: it seems like a better proplem to have than it
>really is.

Well Steve.....are we bragging here? ;-) First Joey, and no you....as
the official penish inspector, I insist on at least digitized proof!

;-)


*NaNcY*

unread,
Feb 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/8/97
to

On Fri, 7 Feb 1997 21:30:52 LOCAL, az...@azstarnet.com (Lee Weiser)
wrote:

>In article <3304ef79...@207.126.101.82> nlo...@rt66.com (*NaNcY*) writes:
>

>Nancy -
> Um...."penish"!?!?!? }:->

Lee....I got so excited over the mere thought of viewing Steve's and
Joey's willies that I just wasn't thinking straight! ;-)


Jeff Kirk

unread,
Feb 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/8/97
to

In article <32fcd0d4...@nntp.ix.netcom.com>, net...@ix.netcom.com says...

If you insist... :)

Actually, I have one question about something I was told as a child and was
wondering if anyone could confirm it. I'm sure this might sound *really*
stupid, but is it true that one's pants have a tendency to ride up one's ass
when one repeatedly engages in anal sex? Judging from some butt-looking :) I
can see why this could be true, but does anyone have a physical/medical
explanation for this?

Jeff

P.S. No, it hasn't happened to me, in case you were wondering. :)

Lee Weiser

unread,
Feb 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/8/97
to

In article <3307b391...@207.126.101.82> nlo...@rt66.com (*NaNcY*) writes:

>On Fri, 7 Feb 1997 21:30:52 LOCAL, az...@azstarnet.com (Lee Weiser)
>wrote:
>In article <3304ef79...@207.126.101.82> nlo...@rt66.com (*NaNcY*)
writes:

<steve's post snipped>

>>>Well Steve.....are we bragging here? ;-) First Joey, and no you....as
>>>the official penish inspector, I insist on at least digitized proof!
>>
>>Nancy -
>> Um...."penish"!?!?!? }:->

>Lee....I got so excited over the mere thought of viewing Steve's and
>Joey's willies that I just wasn't thinking straight! ;-)


I've been accused of the same thing! :-)

--lee

julesdlr

unread,
Feb 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/8/97
to

Jeff Kirk wrote:

> Actually, I have one question about something I was told as a child and was
> wondering if anyone could confirm it. I'm sure this might sound *really*
> stupid, but is it true that one's pants have a tendency to ride up one's ass
> when one repeatedly engages in anal sex? Judging from some butt-looking :) I
> can see why this could be true, but does anyone have a physical/medical
> explanation for this?
>
> Jeff

I was told that Santa Claus came down the chimney on Christmas Eve and
brought presents. But you're obviously gullible so here goes: People
who don't get fucked up the ass are really uptight and walk around with
their ass cheeks totally clenched so NOTHING can ride up there.

Sincerely,

Jules (channeling the spirit of Derek Jarman who said:

"Until I was in my early thirties I avoided passive sex. Inhibition
and social conditionaing made it a traumatic and painful experience.
This was hard to overcome. But now I know that until I'd begun to enjoy
it, I had not reached balanced manhood. You must make the sacrifice to
bury the centuries. When you overcome yourself you understand that
gender is its own prison. When I meet heterosexual men I know they have
experienced only half of love.")

MLewis2707

unread,
Feb 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/9/97
to

az...@azstarnet.com (Lee Weiser):

>In article <3304ef79...@207.126.101.82> nlo...@rt66.com (*NaNcY*)
writes:

>>Well Steve.....are we bragging here? ;-) First Joey, and now you....as


>>the official penish inspector, I insist on at least digitized proof!
>
>
>Nancy -
> Um...."penish"!?!?!? }:->

>--Lee

Lee - It's obvious that Nancy gets excited about her work and well... who
cares about spelling when one is anticipating going on (that particular)
duty.

emma smoot in #52


Peter Thorn

unread,
Feb 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/10/97
to

Ginny (Coo...@bbs.annex.com) writes:
> I've never seen "sized" condoms (although I've never really looked),
> but it seems that the sizes would have to be somewhat like the sizes
> for olives...the smallest ones are *extra large* :)

Well, I don't know about olives, but the smallest condoms I've ever seen
are called "finger cots". They look *exactly* like the prophylactics,
except you roll them over a finger. They're used to cover any open nicks
or cuts which occur when you work in food services. When I was working in
a cafeteria we always referred to them as finger-condoms. I suppose
they'd be good for safer-sex for Vulcans.

As for the "I can't fit into a condom" stories, I find it somewhat
difficult to credit them. I recall reading an article which talked about,
among other things, getting a condom over a Coke can. The things stretch
quite a bit. Hmmm...maybe I'll conduct the experiment....

:Peter
--

"Oh, just learn to cope..." --me
Peter Thorn The OwlsBurrow aw...@freenet.carleton.ca
NEMO NISI FORTIS SUPEREST <> ONLY THE STRONG SURVIVE

Sara M.

unread,
Feb 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/11/97
to

aw...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Peter Thorn) wrote:

>As for the "I can't fit into a condom" stories, I find it somewhat
>difficult to credit them. I recall reading an article which talked about,
>among other things, getting a condom over a Coke can. The things stretch
>quite a bit. Hmmm...maybe I'll conduct the experiment....

Well, the Coke can may go into it, but I wonder how happy it would
be at the tightness of the condom on it...which is the type of argument
I've seen used for those extra-big condoms. (And, from what I've
seen, it's a good argument :) ).


-- Sara
(Testing out a new From: address -- let's see if it works)


Miss Lo

unread,
Feb 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/11/97
to

In article <5doccr$o...@freenet-news.carleton.ca>, Peter Thorn
<aw...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> writes

>As for the "I can't fit into a condom" stories, I find it somewhat
>difficult to credit them. I recall reading an article which talked about,
>among other things, getting a condom over a Coke can. The things stretch
>quite a bit. Hmmm...maybe I'll conduct the experiment....
>
All I can tell you is, that the woman I heard this from has seen ALOT of
penises (peni?) and would know from b-i-g. And yes, I believe her.
From the way she described the appendage, it sounded like a forearm.

buster

unread,
Feb 13, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/13/97
to

the condom size requirement thing is a myth probably statred by those
needed to feed their own egos around penis size. I have done public
AIDS/HIV education and it consistently comes Up :) My response to this
is to find the most muscular man in the room and fit the standard condom
over his fist and most of the way up his arm then ask who is bigger than
that. On a bet I once managed to put one over the head of a man with a
crew cut

busterPeter Thorn wrote:
>
> Ginny (Coo...@bbs.annex.com) writes:
> > I've never seen "sized" condoms (although I've never really looked),
> > but it seems that the sizes would have to be somewhat like the sizes
> > for olives...the smallest ones are *extra large* :)
>
> Well, I don't know about olives, but the smallest condoms I've ever seen
> are called "finger cots". They look *exactly* like the prophylactics,
> except you roll them over a finger. They're used to cover any open nicks
> or cuts which occur when you work in food services. When I was working in
> a cafeteria we always referred to them as finger-condoms. I suppose
> they'd be good for safer-sex for Vulcans.
>

> As for the "I can't fit into a condom" stories, I find it somewhat
> difficult to credit them. I recall reading an article which talked about,
> among other things, getting a condom over a Coke can. The things stretch
> quite a bit. Hmmm...maybe I'll conduct the experiment....
>

CINEGOSSIP

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

A year or so ago, CNN reported a Jeanie Moos "MOOStly New York" story
about a satiric window display of alternate Barbies (Biker Barbies,
Skid-Row Barbies, etc.) in New York City but the dolls in the windows
there were not being sold. The window exhibit was simply a satirically
skewing salute to Barbie and was protected as satire.

Indeed, back in 1993, St. Martin's Press published an anthology of
alternate Barbie stories entitled "Mondo Barbie" (Book Ordering ISBN #
0-312-08848-5); however, again, the stories were protected as satire.

So, I wonder how Mattel would disapprove of your web page yet give
those other projects a pass.


--- Cinegossip


Big Gerrge

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

UNDERSTAND THAT RAY CHARLES WAS ASKED HOW HE FELT ABOUT BEING BLIND SINCE
BIRTH HE REPLIED''''ITS BETTER THAN BEING BLACK''''
BIG GERRGE

Big Gerrge

unread,
Feb 20, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/20/97
to

CRUISE WORKED ON A FARM HIS JOB SHOWING BLIND TURKEYS WHERE TO
SHIT BIG GERRGE

Miss Lo

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to bigg...@aol.com

In article <19970220200...@ladder02.news.aol.com>, Big Gerrge
<bigg...@aol.com> writes

>UNDERSTAND THAT RAY CHARLES WAS ASKED HOW HE FELT ABOUT BEING BLIND SINCE
>BIRTH HE REPLIED''''ITS BETTER THAN BEING BLACK''''
>BIG GERRGE

What, are you typing real big in hopes he'll be able to read it? He's
blind, not deaf. Stop shouting.

First, read your computer manual and learn how to turn off your caps
lock key.

Next, got the the Netiquette section of AOL and real it well.

Third, if you insist on telling bad, borderline racists jokes here, you
better be wearing an asbestos suit.

......that sound that you hear is this bozo's 50 hours ticking
away......

Daniel J Horne

unread,
Feb 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/21/97
to

Big Gerrge (bigg...@aol.com) wrote:
: CRUISE WORKED ON A FARM HIS JOB SHOWING BLIND TURKEYS WHERE TO
: SHIT BIG GERRGE

I'm sorry, but if you can't talk about Chris Isaak's reputedly enormous
penis, then you really shouldn't tease us with such an indicative
thread marker. Go away. ;)

Dan, who suddenly enjoys CI's music a lot more now.
--

daniel j. horne...http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~dhorne...dhorne@sas.upenn.edu
sometimes they turn off the lights in this ballroom
but we'll dance anyway, you and i
even in the dark
especially in the dark

Me

unread,
Feb 22, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/22/97
to

chris isaak....he's gay.he's quite discreet but most of his tour group
would confirm it. but he's a really nice guy...

Daniel J Horne

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

Me wrote:
: chris isaak....he's gay.he's quite discreet but most of his tour group

: would confirm it. but he's a really nice guy...

See, you shouldn't post things like that. It tends to get those of us w/
CI fetishes all up in arms because we'll never have the chance to meet
him! It's just like when I found out that my favorite stud actor who
acts butch as hell in public is gay. There has been speculation on him
in this ng before, about frequenting bathhouses, I think. Sigh. He
probably has a larger than life endowment as well, just like CI.

Dan, wow, I posted one of those "blind" items!

Laura Beatty

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

In article <5eo22b$n...@netnews.upenn.edu> dho...@mail1.sas.upenn.edu (Daniel J Horne) writes:
>Me wrote:
>: chris isaak....he's gay.he's quite discreet but most of his tour group
>: would confirm it. but he's a really nice guy...
>
>See, you shouldn't post things like that. It tends to get those of us w/
>CI fetishes all up in arms because we'll never have the chance to meet
>him!

Don't worry. Chris Isaak is *definitely* not gay.

I mean, *DEFINITELY*

Michael Ritchie

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

In article <5eojbm$e...@fido.asd.sgi.com> lau...@sgi.com (Laura Beatty) writes:

>Don't worry. Chris Isaak is *definitely* not gay.

>I mean, *DEFINITELY*

Oh, Laura, you teasing little minx, tell us about the last time you
had sex with him; did the earth move? Inquiring minds NEED
to know.

--M.

BYXXEZA

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

There also was a Klaus Barbie.....

Jeff Kirk

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

In article <5eo22b$n...@netnews.upenn.edu>, dho...@mail1.sas.upenn.edu says...

>
>See, you shouldn't post things like that. It tends to get those of us w/
>CI fetishes all up in arms because we'll never have the chance to meet
>him! It's just like when I found out that my favorite stud actor who
>acts butch as hell in public is gay.

And this would be ... ?

Jeff

Daniel J Horne

unread,
Feb 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/25/97
to

Jeff Kirk (kir...@jumpnet.com) wrote:
: In article <5eo22b$n...@netnews.upenn.edu>, dho...@mail1.sas.upenn.edu says...

: >
: >See, you shouldn't post things like that. It tends to get those of us w/
: >CI fetishes all up in arms because we'll never have the chance to meet
: >him! It's just like when I found out that my favorite stud actor who
: >acts butch as hell in public is gay.

: And this would be ... ?

Well, you snipped the rest of my post, which contained the part that
should identify him.
Dan.

RCR

unread,
Feb 26, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/26/97
to

In <5etqbb$1...@netnews.upenn.edu> dho...@mail1.sas.upenn.edu (Daniel J

Horne) writes:
>
>Jeff Kirk (kir...@jumpnet.com) wrote:
>: In article <5eo22b$n...@netnews.upenn.edu>,
dho...@mail1.sas.upenn.edu says...
>: >
>: >See, you shouldn't post things like that. It tends to get those of
us w/
>: >CI fetishes all up in arms because we'll never have the chance to
meet
>: >him! It's just like when I found out that my favorite stud actor
who
>: >acts butch as hell in public is gay.
>
>: And this would be ... ?
>
>Well, you snipped the rest of my post, which contained the part that
>should identify him.
>Dan.

I didn't see it either, so come on, quit being coy and just spit it
out!
--
Rebecca

0 new messages