Kevin Spacey's Manhood
Jared
really big penis and low-hanging balls. Also heard from quite a few sources
that he likes to "mingle" with younger gay boys at Hollywood parties and
that his "afairs" with women in the news are just show because of his recent
popularity with "American Beauty" and Academy Award considerations. My guess
is that Kevin has to be seen in public w/ women just to make his character
in "American Beauty" more believable to the general public. I also wouldn't
be suprised that the rumors about his genitals were true. He seems exactly
like the type of guy that would be hung. I'll bet Kevin has no problem
getting anyone he wants, male or female.
Michael Ritchie
>
> I also wouldn't
> be suprised that the rumors about his genitals were true. He seems exactly
> like the type of guy that would be hung. I'll bet Kevin has no problem
> getting anyone he wants, male or female.
And exactly what "kind of guy" is usually hung?
--M.
RGINA
>> He seems exactly like the type of guy that would be hung.
Michael Ritchie then asked:
>And exactly what "kind of guy" is usually hung?
Murderin,' theivin' varments, that's who, goll darnit'! Or is that
hanged?(brow wrinkling) Gotta watch them verbs, I reckon.
alt showbiz gossip
C.L. Lassiter
> Jared wrote:
>>
>> I also wouldn't
>> be suprised that the rumors about his genitals were true. He seems exactly
>> like the type of guy that would be hung. I'll bet Kevin has no problem
>> getting anyone he wants, male or female.
> And exactly what "kind of guy" is usually hung?
My kind of guy.
Oh, come on, Michael. You knew I was going to say it!
cl
*NaNcY*
<mrit...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
>Jared wrote:
>>
>> I also wouldn't
>> be suprised that the rumors about his genitals were true. He seems exactly
>> like the type of guy that would be hung. I'll bet Kevin has no problem
>> getting anyone he wants, male or female.
>
>And exactly what "kind of guy" is usually hung?
>
>--M.
This reminds me of something. I watched Star Trek Generations on TV
recently, and they cut out the part where it was pretty obvious just
how hung Patrick Stewart is! I felt so cheated.
--
*NaNcY*
/\_____/\
/ o o \
( == ^ == )
) - (
( )
( ( ) ( ) )
(__(__)___(__)__)
"Onward through the fog!"
http://people.delphi.com/nlopez/
asgtp#66
Jared
men (like Kevin) who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging
testicles. A few other male celebrities that may fit this category are Sam
Elliott, Nick Nolte, John Goodman, and Chris Isaak.
Anyhow, I've heard from Hollywood sources (guys that know and have "been
with" Kevin) that he is, indeed, endowed.
I couldn't help but notice, when seeing "American Beauty", how similar
certain scenes might be to Kevin's own life (Kevin's character's lack of
sexual interest in his wife, the "thats-what-it-looked-like" blow-job scene
with the young man next door, the kiss on the lips from the boy's father,
etc.). The scenes he did with the daughter's schoolfriend were done very
well and almost believable, but I did feel there was a lot of the REAL Kevin
in his character.
Anyone who has seen the film, share your input on this.
----------
In article <20000113160502...@ng-fi1.aol.com>, rg...@aol.com
(RGINA) wrote:
> jared wrote:
>
>>> He seems exactly like the type of guy that would be hung.
> Michael Ritchie then asked:
>
>>And exactly what "kind of guy" is usually hung?
>
Grnbrier
>Kevin's confidence suggests that he is well-endowed.
Is his "confidence" evidenced by the shoe-polish covered Karastan he wore
during the filming of the dreary American Beauty? I couldn't take my eyes off
that ghastly rug. Reeeeaaly unnerving.
>Also, studies show that
>men (like Kevin) who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging
>testicles.
...and those studies would be?...
>Anyhow, I've heard from Hollywood sources (guys that know and have "been
>with" Kevin) that he is, indeed, endowed.
But Kevin said he's str8 <g>
>I couldn't help but notice, when seeing "American Beauty", how similar
>certain scenes might be to Kevin's own life (Kevin's character's lack of
>sexual interest in his wife, the "thats-what-it-looked-like" blow-job scene
>with the young man next door, the kiss on the lips from the boy's father,
>etc.). The scenes he did with the daughter's schoolfriend were done very
>well and almost believable, but I did feel there was a lot of the REAL Kevin
>in his character.
So you have a MAJOR crush on the faddish La Spacey, eh?
>Anyone who has seen the film, share your input on this.
The MOVIE was overrated tripe. Totally ~sucked~.
Doogie
Michael Ritchie
>
> Kevin's confidence suggests that he is well-endowed.
A public show of confidence could be hiding an
endowment that is exactly the opposite.
> Also, studies show that
> men (like Kevin) who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging
> testicles.
You probably also believe in palm-reading.
> I couldn't help but notice, when seeing "American Beauty", how similar
> certain scenes might be to Kevin's own life (Kevin's character's lack of
> sexual interest in his wife, the "thats-what-it-looked-like" blow-job scene
> with the young man next door, the kiss on the lips from the boy's father,
> etc.). The scenes he did with the daughter's schoolfriend were done very
> well and almost believable, but I did feel there was a lot of the REAL Kevin
> in his character.
Um, he's a actor, and a good one; portraying believeable
characters is his stock in trade. Do you think that
Kevin murdered someone in real life simply
because he did a good job playing a murderer
in MIDNIGHT IN THE GARDEN OF GOOD AND EVIL?
--M.
Michael Ritchie
>
> > And exactly what "kind of guy" is usually hung?
>
>
> Oh, come on, Michael. You knew I was going to say it!
Leave it to you to come out (so to speak) of
the woodwork for a thread on penis size.
Good to see you again!
--M.
Charmayne7
>men (like Kevin) who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging
>Elliott, Nick Nolte, John Goodman, and Chris Isaak.
>
Charmayne Seven
"Don't worry; I'll take the bullet for you."--One student to another, during
the Columbine High tragedy.
"Greater love hath no man than this: that he lay down his life for his
friends."John 15:13
*Remove the symbols to contact me.*
Jared
>> I couldn't help but notice, when seeing "American Beauty", how similar
>> certain scenes might be to Kevin's own life (Kevin's character's lack of
>> sexual interest in his wife, the "thats-what-it-looked-like" blow-job scene
>> with the young man next door, the kiss on the lips from the boy's father,
>> etc.). The scenes he did with the daughter's schoolfriend were done very
>> well and almost believable, but I did feel there was a lot of the REAL Kevin
>> in his character.
>
> Um, he's a actor, and a good one; portraying believeable
> characters is his stock in trade. Do you think that
> Kevin murdered someone in real life simply
> because he did a good job playing a murderer
> in MIDNIGHT IN THE GARDEN OF GOOD AND EVIL?
If I looked at it from a literal standpoint, then yes, but that's not the
angle I'm seeing it. I'm referring how the actor feels, not what he does. I
believe an actor puts a lot of himself or his own personal experiences in
the roles he plays. I just felt that a lot of the homosexual overtones in
"American Beauty" and with Kevin's character shed light on what the REAL
Kevin might actually be like.
Michael Ritchie
> I'm referring how the actor feels, not what he does.
Do you know Spacey? Otherwise, how do you know how
and what he feels?
> I believe an actor puts a lot of himself or his own personal experiences in
> the roles he plays. I just felt that a lot of the homosexual overtones in
> "American Beauty" and with Kevin's character shed light on what the REAL
> Kevin might actually be like.
Except the homosexual overtones in the movie actually
have little to do with the Spacey character. Yes,
I imagine that Spacey is gay, but certainly not based
on some sub-Freudian analysis of an acting role.
--M.
Reets
>Is his "confidence" evidenced by the shoe-polish covered Karastan he wore
>during the filming of the dreary American Beauty? I couldn't take my eyes off
>that ghastly rug. Reeeeaaly unnerving.
Stark carpets add so much more tone to a room. Consider a smart custom made
broadloom in putty with a patterned border. Absolutely pass on Aubussons.
If it looks right, it IS right.
Reets
Jared
Geez, lighten up Michael!!
I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob. I'll bet
you're a barrel of joy to be around.
Gary Smith
>
> Jared wrote:
>
> >Kevin's confidence suggests that he is well-endowed.
>
> during the filming of the dreary American Beauty? I couldn't take my eyes off
> that ghastly rug. Reeeeaaly unnerving.
It was actually a Cue-mew-loft Nylon model from the Joey Bishop Classic
Collection.
Gary Smith
Gary Smith
That's because he IS a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
Gary Smith
Michael Ritchie
>
> > Yes,
> > I imagine that Spacey is gay, but certainly not based
> > on some sub-Freudian analysis of an acting role.
>
> I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
> really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
Excuse me for thinking that people should be
accountable for what they post. If you post
a strongly-worded but ill-conceived message,
and I care about the content, I'll call you
on it. You say you know what Spacey "feels"
when he's acting, and I'll call you on it.
If I wanted to be nasty, I could have been.
I thought I was rather kind.
> I'll bet
> you're a barrel of joy to be around.
In real life, I am. Another thing you'll
learn if you stick around long enough is that
most people's Usenet personae are not very
close to their RL selves.
--M.
David Migicovsky
<oi6g4.1747$541....@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>
>
> > Jared wrote:
> >> I'm referring how the actor feels, not what he does.
> >
> > Do you know Spacey? Otherwise, how do you know how
> > and what he feels?
> >
> >> I believe an actor puts a lot of himself or his own personal
experiences in
> >> the roles he plays. I just felt that a lot of the homosexual overtones
in
> >> "American Beauty" and with Kevin's character shed light on what the
REAL
> >> Kevin might actually be like.
> >
> > Except the homosexual overtones in the movie actually
> > I imagine that Spacey is gay, but certainly not based
> > on some sub-Freudian analysis of an acting role.
> >
>
> Geez, lighten up Michael!!
> I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
> you're a barrel of joy to be around.
>
Michael may well come across as a nasty, sarcastic little snob. That
doesn't change the fact that your "analysis" of the movie is absurd at
best.
--
| David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
| Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
| Mimes! Monkeys! More! alt.culture.fabulous
| E-mail: d m i g i c o v at a l t dot n e t
Michael Ritchie
>
> > Geez, lighten up Michael!!
> > I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
> > really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob. I'll bet
> > you're a barrel of joy to be around.
>
Thank you, sir, may I have another?
--M., happy that he's being talked about
again (as Oscar Wilde said, "The only thing
worse than being talked about is *not* being
talked about")
Tom Hens
Jared <bri...@hotmail.com> wrote...
> Geez, lighten up Michael!!
> I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
> really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
*NaNcY*
<mrit...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
>Gary Smith wrote:
>>
>> > Geez, lighten up Michael!!
>> > I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
>> > really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob. I'll bet
>> > you're a barrel of joy to be around.
>>
>> That's because he IS a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
>
>Thank you, sir, may I have another?
>
Michael is not a sarcastic little snob, he is just is articulate.
David Migicovsky
news:3881E466...@columbus.rr.com...
> Gary Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Geez, lighten up Michael!!
> > > I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and
you
> > > really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob. I'll
bet
> > > you're a barrel of joy to be around.
> >
> > That's because he IS a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
>
> Thank you, sir, may I have another?
>
> again (as Oscar Wilde said, "The only thing
> worse than being talked about is *not* being
> talked about")
Yes, well let's not forget he said that before "being talked about on
radio/TV/Internet" were options. I've also thought that his life was proof
there *are* worse things than being talked about.
Brian OConaill
Jared wrote in message ...
>
>Geez, lighten up Michael!!
>I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
>really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
I consider myself to be as perceptive as the next guy, but I'm stumped on
this one. How do you work out someone's height from their Usenet posts?
Brian
Brian OConaill
Michael Ritchie wrote in message <3881E466...@columbus.rr.com>...
>--M., happy that he's being talked about
>again (as Oscar Wilde said, "The only thing
>worse than being talked about is *not* being
>talked about")
Rather ironic that a libel suit led to his downfall. If he'd lived
according to his epigrams he might have have avoided a lot of
unpleasantness.
Brian
Grnbrier
>Rather ironic that a libel suit led to his downfall. If he'd lived
>according to his epigrams he might have have avoided a lot of
>unpleasantness.
But, but... bringing up *that* inconvenient little truth would be letting the
FACTS get in the way of a good comeback line, wouldn't it???
Doogie
Jared
> Michael may well come across as a nasty, sarcastic little snob. That
> doesn't change the fact that your "analysis" of the movie is absurd at
> best.
>
> | David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
> | Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
> | Mimes! Monkeys! More! alt.culture.fabulous
> | E-mail: d m i g i c o v at a l t dot n e t
Yeah, but not half as absurd as this stupid little quote of yours.
Jared
----------
In article <85stuc$526$2...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>, "Brian OConaill"
<br...@oconaill.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
It's just a figure of speech, dude
Jared
----------
In article <38812160...@columbus.rr.com>, Michael Ritchie
<mrit...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
> Jared wrote:
>>
>> > Yes,
>> > I imagine that Spacey is gay, but certainly not based
>> > on some sub-Freudian analysis of an acting role.
>>
>> Geez, lighten up Michael!!
>> I've looked at a lot of your responses to others' posts as well and you
>> really come across sounding like a nasty, sarcastic little snob.
>
> Excuse me for thinking that people should be
> accountable for what they post. If you post
> a strongly-worded but ill-conceived message,
> and I care about the content, I'll call you
> on it. You say you know what Spacey "feels"
> when he's acting, and I'll call you on it.
> If I wanted to be nasty, I could have been.
> I thought I was rather kind.
>
Like I said, lighten up. It's just a speculation on a stupid movie, and
you're making me feel as though I'm being graded on a school term paper. If
you're going to respond to the topic, fine - but why insult me by saying
what I write is "some sub-Freudian analysis". A rather cunting remark,
don't you think?
Michael Ritchie
>
> Like I said, lighten up. It's just a speculation on a stupid movie, and
> you're making me feel as though I'm being graded on a school term paper.
> If you're going to respond to the topic, fine - but why insult me by saying
> what I write is "some sub-Freudian analysis".
Because it was.
> A rather cunting remark, don't you think?
Indeed. And for your nicely catty remark, I'll
raise your grade from B- to B.
>*NaNcY* wrote:
>>
>> Michael is not a sarcastic little snob
And you, Nancy, of course, get an A.
--M., giving himself just a B for this post
Peep...@webtv.net
>>Could this list include Russell Crowe? My
>>goodness, that man is fine.
>And I know for a fact that the man is
>incredibly well-endowed.
Expliquez, s'il vous plait.........!!
Curious hugs,
Janice
--
Top 10 Reasons to Oppose the WTO:
http://www.globalexchange.org/economy/rulemakers/topTenReasons.html
----------------------------------
(-)> *peep* (-)> *peep* (-)> *muckmouth*
Reets
>Michael is not a sarcastic little snob, he is just is articulate.
What a dope, NuTzY. *AS IF* an articulate person and "sarcastic little snob"
are mutually exclusive...
Reets
Charmayne7
>that
>>>men (like Kevin) who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging
>>>testicles. A few other male celebrities that may fit this category are Sam
>>>Elliott, Nick Nolte, John Goodman, and Chris Isaak.
>>>
>
>And I know for a fact that the man is incredibly well-endowed.
He just has that look, doesn't he? But, seriously, how do you know for a fact?
I assume you've seen irrefutable evidence (beyond the fact that he has very
large hands)?
Jared
----------
In article <38822577...@columbus.rr.com>, Michael Ritchie
<mrit...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
> Jared wrote:
>>
>> Like I said, lighten up. It's just a speculation on a stupid movie, and
>> you're making me feel as though I'm being graded on a school term paper.
>> If you're going to respond to the topic, fine - but why insult me by saying
>> what I write is "some sub-Freudian analysis".
>
> Because it was.
>
>> A rather cunting remark, don't you think?
>
> Indeed. And for your nicely catty remark, I'll
> raise your grade from B- to B.
Do as you please, you nelly fucking bitch!
*NaNcY*
Ooooo Michael, Jared is flirting with!
David Migicovsky
<38822577...@columbus.rr.com>...
> Jared wrote:
> >
> > Like I said, lighten up. It's just a speculation on a stupid movie,
and
> > you're making me feel as though I'm being graded on a school term
paper.
> > If you're going to respond to the topic, fine - but why insult me by
saying
> > what I write is "some sub-Freudian analysis".
>
> Because it was.
>
Didn't this start with speculation on the (large) size of Spacey's genitals
based on the timbre of his voice?
When someone starts a thread that ludicrously, it really has nowhere to go
but down.
merri...@netscape.com
Jared wrote:
>
> > Michael may well come across as a nasty, sarcastic little snob. That
> > doesn't change the fact that your "analysis" of the movie is absurd at
> > best.
> >
> > --
> > | David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
> > | Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
> > | Mimes! Monkeys! More! alt.culture.fabulous
> > | E-mail: d m i g i c o v at a l t dot n e t
>
> Yeah, but not half as absurd as this stupid little quote of yours.
Hey Jared,
You forgot *neener neener*....
Sheesh! Kids today!
>plonk<
*M
merri...@netscape.com
Johnny Bravo Fan Club wrote:
>
<snip>
> Besides the fact that he wore a rather tight pair of tightie-whities
> in one of his movies (and it didn't have that stuffed look), he also
> had a woodie in one scene in "LA Confidential" and it was quite
> amazing to behold.
Ummmm, how could I have missed that? What scene please?
>
> As for "personal experience," I subtly checked him out when I met him,
> as did two friends of mine, and we all came to the conclusion that
> he's packing quite a lot down there. To put it another way, he's got a
> *bulging* bulge! ;-)
I *gotta* ask -- how *Does* one *subtly* check out another's privates? I
mean aside from telling him his shoe is untied (and offering a knee for
him to prop a foot on) or organizing an impromptu limbo dance? A really
*low* dance....
*M
the mind boggles at the possibilities....
David Migicovsky
<k5t38s42sji6q8q8e...@4ax.com>...
> >
>
> Michael is not a sarcastic little snob, he is just is articulate.
How sad the same can't be said for you. What the fuck is "he is just is
articulate" supposed to mean?
David Migicovsky
>
> > Michael may well come across as a nasty, sarcastic little snob. That
> > doesn't change the fact that your "analysis" of the movie is absurd at
> > best.
> >
> > | David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
> > | Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
> > | Mimes! Monkeys! More! alt.culture.fabulous
> > | E-mail: d m i g i c o v at a l t dot n e t
>
>
This isn't a quote. For it to be a quote, I would have to be quoting
something that someone said. Moreover, my sig. file is irrelevant to the
issue at hand, which is quite simply the utter stupidity of everything you
have said.
Let me explain it to you -- you came in here saying something astoundingly
stupid. You were called on it, you hemmed and hawed, you brought in all
kinds of extraneous issues, all to avoid acknowledging what's perfectly
obvious -- you can't tell the size of a man's cock and balls by the sound
of his voice and contrary to your assertion, studies *do not* show that men
who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging testicles. There
hasn't even been one study so much as suggesting it. How do I know this?
Simple. No one would possibly fund such a stupid study. There hasn't even
been a reliable study on penis size, let alone one that correlates testicle
size with voice.
Now if you don't want it to be pointed out to you that everything you've
said in this thread sounds like wishful thinking from a silly queen with a
hard-on for Kevin Spacey, simply stop trying to defend what you said and
let it drop. It can't be defended because it was stupid, wrong, and in the
case of the so-called studies, a blatant lie.
David Migicovsky
article <fl858sgd4qgklebkr...@4ax.com>...
> As Alphamale Gore's Campaign Is Almost Put Out of Its Misery, "Jared"
> <bri...@hotmail.com> uttered:
>
> >
> >Do as you please, you nelly fucking bitch!
>
>
Come sit next to me, Leslie. We'll talk. <g>
David Migicovsky
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 03:30:10 GMT, "Jared" <bri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >----------
> >In article <38822577...@columbus.rr.com>, Michael Ritchie
> ><mrit...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>> Like I said, lighten up. It's just a speculation on a stupid movie,
and
> >>> you're making me feel as though I'm being graded on a school term
paper.
> >>> If you're going to respond to the topic, fine - but why insult me by
saying
> >>> what I write is "some sub-Freudian analysis".
> >>
> >> Because it was.
> >>
> >>
> >> Indeed. And for your nicely catty remark, I'll
> >> raise your grade from B- to B.
> >
>
>
>
With who, you semi-literate cow?
Her Highness The Pink Princess
<s...@sig.com> writes:
>Didn't this start with speculation on the (large) size of Spacey's genitals
>based on the timbre of his voice?
>
>When someone starts a thread that ludicrously, it really has nowhere to go
>but down.
I think someone said that, recently, re. a date with Mumsey.
Reigning and Deigning
Pink Wishes
The Princess \^*^*^/
COSTUMES! NOW!
MAGIC! NOW!
THE PRINCESS VIDEOS! NOW!
http://www.facemakersincorporated.com
Michael Ritchie
>
> > Indeed. And for your nicely catty remark, I'll
> > raise your grade from B- to B.
>
> Do as you please, you nelly fucking bitch!
My, my, but someone's knickers are in *quite* a
steaming little bunch, aren't they? That's no
way to get on my good side. But I'll let David
have the last word, since he said it so well:
>> Now if you don't want it to be pointed out to you that everything you've
>> said in this thread sounds like wishful thinking from a silly queen with a
>> hard-on for Kevin Spacey, simply stop trying to defend what you said and
>> let it drop. It can't be defended because it was stupid, wrong, and in the
>> case of the so-called studies, a blatant lie.
--M.
{{{{{LCM}}}}}
Pink Princess) wrote:
>In article <01bf60aa$df90f870$4506010a@call69>, "David Migicovsky"
><s...@sig.com> writes:
>
>>Didn't this start with speculation on the (large) size of Spacey's genitals
>>based on the timbre of his voice?
>>
>>When someone starts a thread that ludicrously, it really has nowhere to go
>>but down.
>
>I think someone said that, recently, re. a date with Mumsey.
>
>Reigning and Deigning
>
>Pink Wishes
>The Princess \^*^*^/
Oh now really. Mumsey doesn't do such things, darling! She dates only
rich old men in iron lungs. The only going down that ever happens is
the old coot down a hill with his brakes off if he doesn't treat her
like the gold she is. Honestly, sweetie - she'll get wind of these
statements and then I just don't know what she'll do. She's very
likely to sue you for one million dollars again. Well, once our lawyer
is done with TWANS and her big lawsuit.
Standing Around, Looking Outraged But Fabulous
{{{{{LCM}}}}}
Centre of the Known Universe
"Love is a bowl of vomit,
and you, my dear, are a chunky bit."
Jared
>> > Michael may well come across as a nasty, sarcastic little snob. That
>> > doesn't change the fact that your "analysis" of the movie is absurd at
>> > best.
>> >
>> > | David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
>> > | Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
>> > | Mimes! Monkeys! More! alt.culture.fabulous
>> > | E-mail: d m i g i c o v at a l t dot n e t
>>
>>
>
> This isn't a quote. For it to be a quote, I would have to be quoting
> something that someone said. Moreover, my sig. file is irrelevant to the
> issue at hand, which is quite simply the utter stupidity of everything you
> have said.
>
> Let me explain it to you -- you came in here saying something astoundingly
> stupid. You were called on it, you hemmed and hawed, you brought in all
> kinds of extraneous issues, all to avoid acknowledging what's perfectly
> obvious -- you can't tell the size of a man's cock and balls by the sound
> of his voice and contrary to your assertion, studies *do not* show that men
> who have very deep, full voices have large, low-hanging testicles. There
> hasn't even been one study so much as suggesting it. How do I know this?
> Simple. No one would possibly fund such a stupid study. There hasn't even
> been a reliable study on penis size, let alone one that correlates testicle
> size with voice.
>
> said in this thread sounds like wishful thinking from a silly queen with a
> hard-on for Kevin Spacey, simply stop trying to defend what you said and
> let it drop. It can't be defended because it was stupid, wrong, and in the
> case of the so-called studies, a blatant lie.
Hahaha. As a matter of fact, I know all that. I just began the post to see
what sort of response I would get since it WAS so ridiculous. You people in
these Usenet groups are so self-righteous and I thought it would be fun to
fuck with you.
Yeah, my post was stupid, but who are the idiots responding to it? Look how
long the thread has gotten?
Game Over :)
Jared
> Jared wrote:
>>
>> > Indeed. And for your nicely catty remark, I'll
>> > raise your grade from B- to B.
>>
>> Do as you please, you nelly fucking bitch!
>
> My, my, but someone's knickers are in *quite* a
> steaming little bunch, aren't they? That's no
> way to get on my good side. But I'll let David
> have the last word, since he said it so well:
>
>>> said in this thread sounds like wishful thinking from a silly queen with a
>>> hard-on for Kevin Spacey, simply stop trying to defend what you said and
>>> let it drop. It can't be defended because it was stupid, wrong, and in the
>>> case of the so-called studies, a blatant lie.
>
Well if we're going to quote people, I think I'll let "strider9823" have the
last word on you:
"I mention two dark movies that I liked, and you jump down my
throat about that with your gross misinterpretations. I just mentioned
a movie should make a point. American Beauty has none. Now I suggest
you calm down, try to breathe through your nose, and realize that I am
correct.
You sure are an emotional little guy. Take it easy.
Best Wishes Always,
Strider"
> > >If you are a professor, no wonder our educational system is falling
> > apart. A professor should only recommend good movies!
I certainly hope this isn't true. If you actually are a college professor
you sure are a dumbshit for wasting your time responding to Usenet posts.
After all, my posts were all bullshit anyways.
Well, the fun is over. I'll leave and go make some good use of my
time...sorry I wasted your :)
Sbensong
> I just mentioned
>a movie should make a point. American Beauty has none.
Anyone who watched attentively could find a number of points: the joys of
breaking free and being true to oneself; that youth is wasted on the young; the
hollowness of basing a life on self-actualization bromides. This movie didn't
lack for messages or symbols: See the red roses-ding, ding, ding, it's sexual
fantasy time.
Charmayne7
>in one of his movies (and it didn't have that stuffed look), he also
>had a woodie in one scene in "LA Confidential" and it was quite
>amazing to behold.
>
Which scene would that be? I feel the need to investigate.... Also which film
contained the "brief" scene?
>As for "personal experience," I subtly checked him out when I met him,
>as did two friends of mine, and we all came to the conclusion that
>he's packing quite a lot down there. To put it another way, he's got a
>*bulging* bulge! ;-)
Maybe he was just glad to see the three of you!
P.S. We are talking about Russell Crowe, aren't we? The thread started out
being about Kevin Spacey, and since they were both in L.A. Confidential, I
wasn't quite sure after a while.
David Migicovsky
> Jared wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed. And for your nicely catty remark, I'll
> > > raise your grade from B- to B.
> >
> > Do as you please, you nelly fucking bitch!
>
> My, my, but someone's knickers are in *quite* a
> steaming little bunch, aren't they? That's no
> way to get on my good side.
True. However, Brian Krause's knickers in a steaming little bunch is a good
way to get on your inside.
David Migicovsky
<dXKg4.185$fY4....@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>
>
> I certainly hope this isn't true. If you actually are a college
professor
> you sure are a dumbshit for wasting your time responding to Usenet posts.
> After all, my posts were all bullshit anyways.
> Well, the fun is over. I'll leave and go make some good use of my
> time...sorry I wasted your :)
The last defense of the fool who's painted himself into a corner: I didn't
mean it, you were stupid to believe I did, and now that I've made a
complete ass out of myself I'll pretend that's what I intended all along
and leave.
Sbensong
>professor
>> you sure are a dumbshit for wasting your time responding to Usenet posts.
>The last defense of the fool who's painted himself into a corner:
>| David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
>| Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
Obviously so, if he was impressed by your academic credentials.
David Migicovsky
<20000118013042...@ng-fj1.aol.com>...
Actually he was referring to Michael, not me. As a dean, I no longer teach.
<g>
--
| David Migicovsky, Evil Overlord of ACF
| Dean, Faculty of Felching, Bungmunch University
merri...@netscape.com
can...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> You're all wrong, the truth is Kevin does not even have a penis! He is
> what they call a "nomaphrodite". There are only a handful of such
> cases in all of medical literature, so please keep this under your hat
> as it is a sensitive issue.
Now wait one gol-darned second! I thought a nomaphrodite wore silly hats
and lived in deep forests.....and couldn't possibly have low-hanging
testicles because they were too short....
*M
{{{{{LCM}}}}}
>You're all wrong, the truth is Kevin does not even have a penis! He is
>what they call a "nomaphrodite". There are only a handful of such
>cases in all of medical literature, so please keep this under your hat
>as it is a sensitive issue.
Oh now really - scandal is scandal, darling, and I approve and
perpetuate it at every conceivable corner, but this is too far
fetched. The thing I find most disappointing - frustrating, even - is
that I think Kevin Spacey is about the hottest thing out of Hollywood
since Mrs. O'Leary's kicky little cow. And even that didn't come from
Hollywood, so you can see my point.
The thing is, and it's a shocker of a sadness, is that the poor man
*makes* himself ugly by all his tiresome "I'm not gay" stories. I'd
better a dollar he is, and I don't even have a dollar. If he's
straight, that's fabulous too. But honestly - the way he snubbed
RuPaul in Miami did the deed for me - and put him in my bad books. As
soon as he saw that Ru was another guest on the radio show that day,
he stormed off, saying he wouldn't be interviewed with that "thing."
Or something to that effect. I don't care if you're buggering bowling
balls, sweetie - that's your own affair. But don't put someone down
because *you* don't want to be seen as anything but what your hype
machine tells you you have to be.
I think he's believing his publicity - that he can be the next Clark
Gable or something like that. He's a talented actor. He's gorgeous.
He's witty and he's got every shot at winning a million Oscars in his
time. But he's got *no* credibility, as far as I'm concerned - and not
in the good TWANSy sort of way.
Tsk. Maybe I'm idealistic or naive, but if he is gay and he came out,
it would blow over and he could carry on and accomplish *everything*
his gifts now promise. It's the year two bloody thousand, darlings! If
not now, then when the buggery bollocks when? But he won't. Because
you see, darling, Clark Gable wasn't gay. It's as simple as that.
Personally, I think the world is ready for a gay Clark Gable, and call
me crazy, sweeties, but Kevin Spacey is that man.
Just Ranting A Bit, But Freshening My Drink And Looking Fabulous
james jorden
<< As a matter of fact, I know all that. I just began the post to see
what sort of response I would get since it WAS so ridiculous. You people in
these Usenet groups are so self-righteous and I thought it would be fun to
fuck with you.
Yeah, my post was stupid, but who are the idiots responding to it? Look how
long the thread has gotten?
Game Over :) >>
Is that your FINAL answer? Or do you want to phone a friend who can confirm
for us just how big a dork you are?
james jorden
jjo...@ix.netcom.com
www.parterre.com
"Wit ought to be a glorious treat like caviar; never spread it about like
marmalade." - Noel Coward