Thanks,
Hey, didn't she just have a baby? Give her a break!
Matt Lupo
yeah, I know it's just a show...
--
G. M. Lupo: ham...@lupo.com
P.O. Box 161963, Atlanta, GA 30321-1963
<http://www.webcom.com/hamlet/>
<http://www.atlantajaycees.org/>
Yes! Antisp...@webtv.net is my email address
Duh, she had a baby on TV, not in real life!
Eh, new around here, are you! ;-)
I was wondering about her Helen's breast when I saw "As Good As It
Gets" as well, but her acting usually took my mind off her breasts. I
was pleasantly surprised at just what a good actor she is. Too bad
she felt the need to get the fake breasts when her acting only is
enough to make her a must for casting in major movies.
*NaNcY*
/\_____/\
/ o o \
( == ^ == )
) - (
( )
( ( ) ( ) ) keeper of the ASG anti-FAQ
(__(__)___(__)__) http://www.rt66.com/~nlopez/
>I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
>latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true?
Almost.
Actually, she's sporting a penile implant. But we, the viewers,
can't see the results of *that.*
Doogie
> I was wondering about her Helen's breast when I saw "As Good As It
> Gets" as well, but her acting usually took my mind off her breasts. I
> was pleasantly surprised at just what a good actor she is. Too bad
> she felt the need to get the fake breasts when her acting only is
> enough to make her a must for casting in major movies.
Maybe she's just that good of an actress. She's able to make her
breasts seem larger.
Matt Lupo
HamActor
>I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
>latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true? I haven't yet seen
>the film yet, but I recall she didn't have any artificial enhancement
>in 1990's 'Waterdance'.
>
Although I haven't seen the movie and therefore can't say much about her
breasts (okay, I could talk about them, but not in the context of the
movie...)... here's a lonely little thought...
The part was intended for an older actress (first choice was Holly Hunter, I
believe)...perhaps the wise and wily film mavens believed that bigger breast
would make her look older. I think someone needs to tell that it's LOWER
breastss that make women look older...
FaithGeo
"Witty Signature Still Under Construction"
<snip>
>FaithGeo
>"Witty Signature Still Under Construction"
Oh, Faith honey, PLEASE don't bother constructing one. NONE OF THEM are
witty--only cloyingly annoying. And after reading these lame little billboards
of stupidity for the 300th time, they really get to ya. Makes you think of the
person's stupid sig, rather than what they're saying in the post. I admit, some
of them are "cute" the first time or two.
You're much better off without using that hopelessly idiotic feature of a "sig
file." I was even thinking of starting a thread about people's irritating sig
files, but wasn't ready to cope with the inevitable flamefest.
From now on, when you read your NGs, note who has a sig file and who doesn't.
I'll wager that after a while, It'll become clear to you that the more
intelligent posters DO NOT indulge in this silly little ego-trip.
Doogie
saw AGAIG last nite...something's happened....HH has a huge
rack....not like tiny Jamie who's always cavorting about in a t-shirt
on MAY....I'd be interested to know from anyone who has the inside
skinny.....
The obvious exception to this rule would be Catty.
HamActor
Oh how I wish Holly Hunter had gotten the part. She is such a great
actress. And that part seemed to be written for her.
Oh well, the movie was excellent anyway, thanks to James Brooks superlative
direction.
Holly Hunter might be 15 minutes older than Helen Hunt.
HamActor
> I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
> latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true? I haven't yet seen
> the film yet, but I recall she didn't have any artificial enhancement
> in 1990's 'Waterdance'.
>
> Thanks,
The breasts I saw in Waterdance sure wouldn't have stretched the shirts
she wore in As Good...They definitely wouldn't have filled out those tank
tops in Twister either. So I'd say that she got some "enhancement" some
time between
1992-95....
mike
It does seem like there are some "older" actresses out there (Jessica Lange?)
who could have been considered for this part, but Brooks says Hunt just blew
him away, despite her age.
>fait...@aol.com (FaithGeo) writes:
><snip>
>>FaithGeo
>>"Witty Signature Still Under Construction"
>Oh, Faith honey, PLEASE don't bother constructing one. NONE OF THEM are
>witty--only cloyingly annoying. And after reading these lame little billboards
>of stupidity for the 300th time, they really get to ya. Makes you think of the
>person's stupid sig, rather than what they're saying in the post. I admit, some
>of them are "cute" the first time or two.
>You're much better off without using that hopelessly idiotic feature of a "sig
>file." I was even thinking of starting a thread about people's irritating sig
>files, but wasn't ready to cope with the inevitable flamefest.
thanks for sparing us from this (for the time being anyway) =)
>From now on, when you read your NGs, note who has a sig file and who doesn't.
>I'll wager that after a while, It'll become clear to you that the more
>intelligent posters DO NOT indulge in this silly little ego-trip.
you mean, like you used to yourself? you even had a cute way of
signing your name (i put a couple of examples at the bottom).
granted, it's been awhile since you used a .sig file, but still...pot,
kettle--aw, you know the drill! =)
>Subject: Movieline Blind Item--Sept.
>From: grnb...@aol.com (Grnbrier)
>Date: 1997/08/04
>Message-ID: <19970804222...@ladder02.news.aol.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.showbiz.gossip
>[More Headers]
>BOOTY CALL: It's bewildering how so many people know the name of this
>international glam gal despite her having done little anyone can actually
>recall on any small or big screen. Her equally glamorous star guy has done
>tons of movies without anyone's recalling his ever being truly good in any
>of them. Although both of them are barely functioning children who can
>scarcely take care of themselves, the totally self-centered doll laments
>long and loud how she wants to merge their gene pools to spawn a no-doubt
>destined-to-be-gorgeous, no-doubt destined-to-be-screwed-up starbaby. Does
>the clueless movie guy have any idea that while he's busy in flick after
>flick, his offscreen leading lady works a list of part-time boyfriends
>almost as long as his own?
> ~Doogie~
> ========
>". . . So! You come crawling back to Broadway! Well, Broadway doesn't go for *booze* and *dope*." --Helen Lawson (Valley of the Dolls)
>Subject: Re: "Furniture to Go": Gay?
>From: grnb...@aol.com (Grnbrier)
>Date: 1997/08/01
>Message-ID: <19970801190...@ladder02.news.aol.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.showbiz.gossip
>[More Headers]
>Adrian Barns <ba...@intertex.com.ca> ejaculates:
><<About time somebody got wise to this pair of uphill gardeners. They are
>digusting, one is a classic girley jew and the other looks like he has
>inter-rectal-transfered-cancer or as it is commomly known, AIDS. One
>time I saw them do a show of 1950's furniture and at the end the lard
>gut who just seems to do nothing other than watch the guy who looks like
>he has AIDS lie on his belly in fornt of the TV and swing his legs
>around while pointing his fat ass at the camera. Sickening filth.>>
>What an breathtakingly ignorant post. Get the hell out of our Trailer
>Park, Adrian (now *there's* a "girley" <sic> name for ya. Guffaw!
> ~Doogie~
> ========
>". . . So! You come crawling back to Broadway! Well, Broadway doesn't go for *booze* and *dope*." --Helen Lawson (Valley of the Dolls)
i'm not flaming you for it, just wanted to know why you'd changed your
mind (especially as your old .sig is good).
dez
asgtpr #60a
....a pistol-hot cup of Dez...
"Chef of chicanery, your buns are mine!"
--the Tick
>grnb...@aol.com (Grnbrier) imbibed the Christmas spirit and shared:
<snip of ill-advised post of mine>
>you mean, like you used to yourself? you even had a cute way of
>signing your name (i put a couple of examples at the bottom).
>granted, it's been awhile since you used a .sig file, but still...pot,
>kettle--aw, you know the drill! =)
>> ~Doogie~
>> ========
>>". . . So! You come crawling back to Broadway! Well, Broadway doesn't go
for *booze* and *dope*." --Helen Lawson (Valley of the Dolls)
>i'm not flaming you for it, just wanted to know why you'd changed your
>mind (especially as your old .sig is good).
damn, Damn, DAMN!!!!! I *knew* the moment I hit the "send" button, I was gonna
get busted for this! Thank you for your "gentle reminder" of my silly
capriciousness, dez. And, I just may change my mind on this earth-shattering
topic again tomorrow!
BTW, *your* sig is a good one. Guess I recently encountered numerous other
*annoying* ones (perhaps from other NGs) before I hastily fired off
this post. My buns are yours <g>.
Doogie
-->Working on his new sig file...
<<you mean, like you used to yourself? you even had a cute way of
signing your name (i put a couple of examples at the bottom).
granted, it's been awhile since you used a .sig file, but still...pot,
kettle--aw, you know the drill! =)>>
> >i'm not flaming you for it, just wanted to know why you'd changed your
> >mind (especially as your old .sig is good).>>
HAHAHAHAHA...oh, how polite!
Grnb...@aol.com, felt compelled to show restraint and share the
following:
>
> damn, Damn, DAMN!!!!! I *knew* the moment I hit the "send" button, I was gonna
> get busted for this! Thank you for your "gentle reminder" of my silly
> capriciousness, dez. And, I just may change my mind on this earth-shattering
> topic again tomorrow!
>
> BTW, *your* sig is a good one. Guess I recently encountered numerous other
> *annoying* ones (perhaps from other NGs) before I hastily fired off
> this post. My buns are yours <g>.
>
> Doogie
> -->Working on his new sig file...
>
>
Doogie,
No, say it ain't so! Most of the sig files ARE stupid, including *in my
opinion* part of the sig file of the original poster. Someone has a sig
file from Pinky and the Brain that's pretty funny.
Although, I like your original...maybe I should create "Sparkle Neeley,
Sparkle..."
Sincerely,
"Helen Lawson"
Helen Hunt is on the cover of the January issue of Allure magazine in a tight
sweater and pictured inside as well - she's a B- cup at best.
<snip>
>Although, I like your original...maybe I should create "Sparkle Neeley,
>Sparkle..."
LOL!
"Sure, I take dolls 'cause I gotta get some sleep. I gotta get UP in
the morning and 'Sparkle Neely, Sparkle'."
Maybe I WILL have to reconsider resurrecting my old sig file. Or
maybe change it each time with a different line from Valley.
Doogie
"They work faster!"
>Sincerely,
>"Helen Lawson"
> Padding? Like hell
> She was in one scene with a wet t shirt!! And another scene
> she was obviously bouncing while she was running.
> It was all plain to see.
> But at one point I thought maybe she just gained weight.
> She did look heavier in the movie than on the series.
I don't think she has gotten implants - I think she was wearing those gel
packs like the ones Bridget Fonda seemed to be wearing in the promo
posters for "Jackie Brown."
j
I watched Valley of the Dolls once and all I remember is my then
boyfriend rolling around the floor gasping for air between bouts of
insane, drunken laughter!!
Unfortunately, we were at my parents' house and, yes, they were watching
it with us.
!!!!!
Lucky Lulu, wishing THAT trip down memory lane was cancelled! :-)
There's a shop called the Floating Brick Studio Store on Santa Monica Blvd. in
West Hollywood, and not only do they have vintage "Trailer Trash" film posters,
they have a poster of "Valley" displayed in the window. Our kinda store, eh?
Linda ASGTPR#49
>dez...@ix.netcom.com (Font of All Important Info) was able to say this
>after electroshock therapy:
>
><<you mean, like you used to yourself? you even had a cute way of
>signing your name (i put a couple of examples at the bottom).
>granted, it's been awhile since you used a .sig file, but still...pot,
>kettle--aw, you know the drill! =)>>
>
>> >i'm not flaming you for it, just wanted to know why you'd changed your
>> >mind (especially as your old .sig is good).>>
>
>HAHAHAHAHA...oh, how polite!
oh, shut the fuck up and go to hell already.
<doogie's part politely snipped>
>No, say it ain't so! Most of the sig files ARE stupid, including *in my
>opinion* part of the sig file of the original poster. Someone has a sig
>file from Pinky and the Brain that's pretty funny.
like i give a shit about your opinion, you waste of sperm and eggs.
if you don't know where either part of my .sig comes from, that's not
my problem. i'm not going to change it for you.
i suppose you're going to whine endlessly about how you are being
picked on again...YAWN...
>Doogie, hon, what WAS the hilarious line(s) Patty Duke was spewing about
>"boobs" or "jugs" outside of a "nudie" theater?!
About halfway into the movie, our girl Patty (Neely) was drunkenly staggering
around a "strip" section of town after getting thrown out of a bar in San
Francisco ("Hey, that's ME singin' up on that jukebox, pal") and she's kind of
wandering from XXX theatre to XXX theatre. She happens upon a theatre that is
showing one of her old friend Jennifer's (Sharon Tate) French 'art films' ("The
Flame of Montemarte" is the feature). Virtuous Neely is clearly disgusted by
Jennifer's shameless decline and mutters some absurdities to the poster of
Jennifer outside the theatre. She then moves on further down the strip,
ruminating, "Boobies, boobies, boobies. Nothin' but boobies! Who need's em? I
did great without 'em!" The scene fades out and we next see Neely waking up in
a cheap hotel room with some cheezy looking questionable character rummaging
through her purse... and the rest, as they say, is history!
>I watched Valley of the Dolls once
AAACK! Lulu, doll, it *must* be experienced more than once!
>and all I remember is my then
>boyfriend rolling around the floor gasping for air between bouts of
>insane, drunken laughter!!
Valley DOES seem to have that effect on thinking people!
>Unfortunately, we were at my parents' house and, yes, they were >watching it
with us.
>!!!!!
>Lucky Lulu, wishing THAT trip down memory lane was cancelled! :-)
On the contrary darlin', you just MIGHT want to rent it again!
Doogie
(thoroughly embarassed that I was able to take Lulu carefully
through that absurd "Valley" scene from memory)
Yes, for a company talent show, I performed the "Sanitarium" scene where
Neely and Tony Polar meet again. Neely, recently dried out, decides
that playing checkers with the other loonies is dull, so she asks one of
the loonies to play "Come Live with Me..." and as she sings, suddenly a
wheelchair bound Tony Polar begins to warble the lyrics back to Neely...
It turned into such a touching duet...
I think we really brought tears to the audience's eyes...don't know if
it was from sentiment of the moment or laughter...I prefer to think of
it as sentiment...<sniff>
"I'll Plant my Own Tree...and I'll make it grow..."
Sincerely,
"Helen Lawson"
Jenny (sil...@bmtc.mindspring.com) writes:
> In article <19971229000...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
> dsha...@aol.com (DSharpe33) wrote:
>
>> Padding? Like hell
>
> I don't think she has gotten implants - I think she was wearing those gel
> packs like the ones Bridget Fonda seemed to be wearing in the promo
> posters for "Jackie Brown."
Is that what she's got in there? I saw her on Leno a week or two back, and
remember thinking she must have gotten them done since she last
showed off her little ones on film.
Sean
--
Keep your face to the sunshine and you cannot see the shadows - Helen Keller
Please go ahead be mortally disappointed. I dare you.
In article <68bgua$a...@camel19.mindspring.com>,
Bal...@sir.com (BallFour) said:
> I'm sorry, but does Helen Hunt even have breasts? Judging from the
> holier-than-thou attitude of this NG I would have guessed that you
> regulars would have had them removed by now.
%run compchk
....comprehension checker running....
....pass one complete....
....pass two complete....
....comprehension check complete...
....no comprehension found....
%
Or, in other words, what the heck are you talking about?
-- William December Starr <wds...@crl.com>
>Message-id: <19971228212...@ladder02.news.aol.com>
>
>
>When I saw AGAIG the other day, her boobs were
>difficult not to notice and it was a noticeable difference.
>But the movie is great and so I didn't really care about what
>she did or didn't do to herself.
>I wish they would have used an older actress for her part.
>Jack Nicholson is great in the movie.
>
The first time I saw AGAIG and saw Jack's puffy, scabrous, spotted paw
(euuuuuwwww, gross!) in Helen's hair in one of the concluding scenes, I
thought he'd be a better match for her ma. But with the second viewing, I
decided he was too old for Shirley Knight, too.
Chloe
according to the ImDb, it's more like 5 years.....
-e
> saw AGAIG last nite...something's happened....HH has a huge
> rack....not like tiny Jamie who's always cavorting about in a t-shirt
> on MAY....I'd be interested to know from anyone who has the inside
> skinny.....
well my boyfriend said to ask if anyone noticed that when she ran over to
Jack Nicholson's apartment in the rAin she didn't have a bra on in front
but when the camera showed her back as he was letting her in, she had bra
straps showing thru her wet T shirt...
No, but I thought she looked more bosomy as the movie went on. Like the
first scene of her didn't look that ample. Did anyone else notice or is
it because I suddenly remembered this thread and started noticing? Just
came from seeing the movie, btw, and enjoyed it.
Eh? Are you talking about yourself in the third person again? You really
need to stop doing that.
--
RJStep (http://rjstep.base.org)
"When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But
let him sit on a hot stove for a minute—and it's longer than any hour.
That's relativity." -- Albert Einstein
Might I add:
"Stupid ass nurse!"
Jefe
Thank you for your concern. Unfortunately, I don't live with my parents and
happen to be above 20 years of age.Just kinda screws up your whole reply,
doesn't it?
Now let's end this little match before it becomes another one-thread-war.
--
RJStep (http://rjstep.base.org)
"When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But
let him sit on a hot stove for a minute—and it's longer than any hour.
That's relativity." -- Albert Einstein
PS If you don't have a nicer or at least a true comment about Helen, maybe
you should just unsubscribe from this NG.
I always liked both of those... :-)
>saw AGAIG last nite...something's happened....HH has a huge
rack....not like
>tiny Jamie who's always cavorting about in a t-shirt
on MAY....I'd be
>interested to know from anyone who has the inside
skinny.....
Okay now just take a look at Helen in the episode of Mad About You in which
it is New Year's Eve If you check her out I think you'll see that Helen has
a;ways had a decent bust line .
and it is only when she decides to show it that people start thinking she has
gotten inplants
>She should start using more hair implants before she loses the whole top
of
>her head.
OOPS!! I think someone is going to catch a Hella lot of Flack from that
remark!!!
>Excuse me but you have interrupted an adult conversation .Please ask your
>
mother or father to please come back to the computer.
P.S. Isn't it past
>your bed time.
But when you make such an insult we adults here do get kinda upset.
and besides only a child would make such a statement as the one that you
made.
Doug Browning
vgt...@freenet.mb.ca
http://www.winnipeg.freenet.mb.ca/~vgt507
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, G. M. Lupo wrote:
> The Gossiper wrote:
>
> > I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
> > latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true? I haven't yet seen
> > the film yet, but I recall she didn't have any artificial enhancement
> > in 1990's 'Waterdance'.
>
> Hey, didn't she just have a baby? Give her a break!
>
> Matt Lupo
> yeah, I know it's just a show...
>
> --
> G. M. Lupo: ham...@lupo.com
> P.O. Box 161963, Atlanta, GA 30321-1963
> <http://www.webcom.com/hamlet/>
> <http://www.atlantajaycees.org/>
>
>
Matt Lupo
Doug Browning wrote:
>
> Helen didn't have a baby, her character in MAY did...
>
> On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, G. M. Lupo wrote:
>
> > The Gossiper wrote:
> >
> > > I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
> > > latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true? I haven't yet
> > > seen the film yet, but I recall she didn't have any artificial
> > > enhancement in 1990's 'Waterdance'.
> >
> > Hey, didn't she just have a baby? Give her a break!
--
I believe that's why he said "yeah, I know it's just a show..." See, it's
just a joke!
> Doug Browning wrote in message ...
>
> >Helen didn't have a baby, her character in MAY did...
>
> I believe that's why he said "yeah, I know it's just a show..." See,
> it's just a joke!
What??? It's just a joke? Who is this jerk anyway?
Matt Lupo
No, no ,no. 'May', or MAY, stands for Mad About You.
John
>>> Matt Lupo
>>> yeah, I know it's just a show...
>>
>>Helen didn't have a baby, her character in MAY did...
>
>I believe that's why he said "yeah, I know it's just a show..." See, it's
>just a joke!
>--
Whether her character on MAY had a baby or not, we all know that Helen
herself didn't have a baby, but her breasts seem to be a lot larger than
earlier days. I say she has had implants. All you have to do is look at an
episode from the first season of MAY, or Helen's earlier movies like Girls
Just Wanna Have Fun, and you can see a difference in her breasts.
Holly Alderson
>> The Gossiper wrote:
>>
>> > I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
>> > latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true?
They definitely seem more prominent to me than in any MAY episode I can recall.
I just saw Good as It Gets last night, and every scene that HH is in seems to
be calculated to showcase her breasts. You cannot miss them - they are in your
face at all times during this movie, especially the wet t-shirt scene.
>Helen didn't have a baby, her character in MAY did...
>Doug Browning
>vgt...@freenet.mb.ca
>http://www.winnipeg.freenet.mb.ca/~vgt507
>On Sat, 27 Dec 1997, G. M. Lupo wrote:
>> The Gossiper wrote:
>>
>> > I've heard that Helen Hunt is sporting some breast implants in her
>> > latest movie 'As Good As It Gets'. Is this true? I haven't yet seen
>> > the film yet, but I recall she didn't have any artificial enhancement
>> > in 1990's 'Waterdance'.
>>
>> Hey, didn't she just have a baby? Give her a break!
>>
>> Matt Lupo
>> yeah, I know it's just a show...
>>
>> --
>> G. M. Lupo: ham...@lupo.com
>> P.O. Box 161963, Atlanta, GA 30321-1963
>> <http://www.webcom.com/hamlet/>
>> <http://www.atlantajaycees.org/>
>>
>>
They're wonderful. Bigger than they were in
Twister. Either enhanced be child-bearing or
augmented by a surgeon. They look nice.
Mike Rice
Don't know whether they're implants or not, but they seem
exceedingly *nice* regardless. Gel packs seem unlikely
though, given the wet t-shirt and *brief* nude back/side
shot.
Regardless though, this movie was *great*. I entirely understand
how you'd find the pairing uncomfortable, but Helen did such an
amazing job with the part, you can't possibly wish someone else
played the role (ditto Greg Kinnear by the way).
>I don't think I've seen that. What did she play in May?
Matt Lupo
MAY is short for Mad About You..
> Helen didn't have a baby, her character in MAY did...
>
> Doug Browning
Doug! You wouldn't know humor if it bit you on the Hiney Butt!!!!!
But not Nicholson, he was terrible. They keep building films
around the seventies Nicholson persona and he simply isn't
that character anymore, nor can he play it effectively. He
was playing Scrooge to Helen's Bob Cratchit. Jack is
supposed to gradually melt, but he stayed stupid and clumsy
to the end. It made no dramatic or comic sense for her to
warm to him. His character was a damaged piece of goods
which left no room to root for for or like him. Nicholson was
most winning in As Good As It Gets, when he complimented
her at dinner, with the greatest compliment a man can
get: "You make me want to be a better man." His character
doesn't even understand how breathtaking the statement is.
I found myself unable to rute for Jack in this film.
Its alright,though, I simply redoubled my rooting for the amazing
Helen who put in a terriffic, better than necessary performance, in
Twister, a film which they probably tried to force her to
play by the numbers, it was such a formula.
Mike Rice
>every scene that HH is in seems to
>>be calculated to showcase her breasts. You cannot miss them - they are in
>your
>>face at all times during this movie, especially the wet t-shirt scene.
>
>Is there a down side to this? ;)
>
>
Not really. But they don't do anything for me.
Now Harrison Ford shirtless - there's an image to burn in my retina.
She was only about 12 when she did "Swiss Family Robinson" -- I remember this
because she was in my 7th and/or 8th grade class (forget which) and
we already knew who she was from the show at that time. Also, people develop
at different ages, so it's possible she just hadn't developed yet as of that
time.
Ellen
sa...@netcom.com
In article <Pine.SV4.3.91.98010...@winnie.freenet.mb.ca>,
Doug Browning <vgt...@freenet.mb.ca> wrote:
>Helen didn't have a baby, her character in MAY did...
>
>Doug Browning
>Whether her character on MAY had a baby or not, we all know that
>Helen
herself didn't have a baby, but her breasts seem to be a lot larger
>than
earlier days. I say she has had implants. All you have to do is look
>at an
episode from the first season of MAY, or Helen's earlier movies like
>Girls
Just Wanna Have Fun, and you can see a difference in her breasts.
Maybe but she could be using something else instead of implants
I seem to have noticed the change right after she had the baby on MAY, that is
why I think they used something to make her look more authentic IMHO, and she
may have liked the look so much she decided to keep it.
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Holly Alderson wrote:
> Whether her character on MAY had a baby or not, we all know that Helen
> herself didn't have a baby, but her breasts seem to be a lot larger than
> earlier days. I say she has had implants. All you have to do is look at an
> episode from the first season of MAY, or Helen's earlier movies like Girls
> Just Wanna Have Fun, and you can see a difference in her breasts.
>
> Holly Alderson
>
>
>
>
It the quality of the product that counts, not the quantity.