Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Women are men's slaves

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Sue d'Eaunim

unread,
Mar 19, 1995, 3:03:55 PM3/19/95
to

In article: <3kftkk$e...@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> wpbu...@unity.ncsu.edu (W. Perry
Bullock) writes:
^^^^^^^
>
> You people have it wrong, Women are owned by men, for men, and exist to
> serve men, not the other way around.
> :-)

BULLOCKS! Err.. sorry. I'll go now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to he...@anon.penet.fi.
If you reply to this message, your message WILL be *automatically* anonymized
and you are allocated an anon id. Read the help file to prevent this.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to ad...@anon.penet.fi.

rla...@name1.ak.net

unread,
Mar 20, 1995, 9:01:42 AM3/20/95
to
wpbu...@unity.ncsu.edu (W. Perry Bullock) wrote:

> You people have it wrong, Women are owned by men, for men, and exist to
> serve men, not the other way around.
>:-)

ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,
good thing you keyed the :-),
otherwise someone might have taken it seriously
and the ncsu server could be on overload right now.

Farnorth


rla...@name1.ak.net

unread,
Mar 20, 1995, 9:37:10 AM3/20/95
to
an17...@anon.penet.fi (Sue d'Eaunim) writes, in reply to Perry Bullock's
... 'women are owned by men, for men, and exist to serve men':

>BULLOCKS! Err.. sorry. I'll go now.

Which (for anyone reading who does not speak the Queen's English) is
roughly translatable as "horseshit".

Now, Perry. If you'd be kind enough to agree to file the paperwork changing
your last name to one determined by a joint US-UK panel of a.s.f.
subscribers...

Farnorth
<who does not speak the Queen's English but who has read lots of it, and
who thinks Sue's post is precious, regardless>


Ms. Margo

unread,
Mar 20, 1995, 11:09:33 PM3/20/95
to
W. Perry Bullock (wpbu...@unity.ncsu.edu) wrote:

: You people have it wrong, Women are owned by men, for men, and exist to
: serve men, not the other way around.

My houseplants can write better flamebait...


--
ma...@netcom.com
Please don't send wanna's, as I'm having a hell of a time with the men
that I have.

D888888

unread,
Mar 29, 1995, 10:52:55 AM3/29/95
to
Dear Ms. Margo:
Thank you from the bottom of my heart for putting the "person" in his
place that so foolishly thinks that women belong to men. Obiviously this
person has never had a Dom/sub relationship, or any other type of
relationship with a woman. It is physically and mentally imposible, (as
you know) , for the male to have control over a woman, even in the whitest
of white vanilla relationships. The woman always controls the man,
because she controls the sex. Men are only motivated by sex and therefore
by nature are subs to all women. The only possible control of "sex?" by a
man would be if he is allowed to control his hand, for sexual purposes.
My Goddess does not want to see me often, so she has prepared a calendar
for me that details what I may do each day, i.e. visit her, or not. Use
my right hand on my organ, slowly, fast, rough... or if as usual, not at
all! This way she is able to train me to be a better sub and yet does not
have to spend her precious time on me. I' m very appreciative of her
training and compensate her for her guidance. If you have the chance,
please comment on this type of training and let me know what you think.
Have you ever tried it?
Anyway, back to the original subject, thank you again for answering the
fool who can't see what is in front of him! sub d888888
0 new messages