McVAY HOMOSEXUALIST ESCORTS FOR MEN ON THE MOVE
Ken's Escort Service
Are you over the belt; or flabby and obese?
Are you unattractive and a recluse?
All of the above does not matter! Our escorts
do not care and they are professionals.
Don't go to the next NAMBLA function or Gay Pride Parade solo.
CALL McVAY'S ESCORTS NOW!!!
* All escorts eighteen and nineteen years old
* All escorts regularly screened for HIV
* Guaranteed protection of privacy
* Expanding for full coverage of Canada and USA
Call to see if your city is included in our growing coverage
Call for an interview to become one of Lance's Escorts in your area
McVay's Escorts
995 Bowen Road
Apt. 3108
Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461
LEGAL NOTICE
McVay's Escorts is not a male prostitute service.
We provide male companions for homosexual men who
through no fault of their own can't get a companion
for social functions.
Any sexual acts a McVay Escort may perform on a customer
is the escort's sole responsibility.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
Ken McVay
Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :
:
[removed]xxxxxxxxxxxxx :
Bellville TX xxxxxxxxx :
:
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Scott Bradbury (hereinafter "Defendant") is an adult
citizen and resident of the State of Texas residing at [removed]xxxxxxxxx,
Bellville, Austin County, Texas xxxxx with a telephone number of
xxx-xxx-xxxx.
3. At all times material hereto Defendant was supplied access to
the Internet and to electronic mail (hereinafter "e-mail")by Flash.net
Communications, Inc., (hereinafter "flash.net") an internet service
provider located in Forth Worth, Texas, and by other internet service
providers unknown to Plaintiff including several services which allowed
Defendant to publish and communicate by e-mail anonymously.
4. At all times material hereto Defendant published material on
the Internet and by e-mail using aliases which include but are not limited
to of "Doc Tavish," "sonn...@flash.net," "Secret Squirrel," "Mixmaster,"
"Horst Wessel," "-88-," and "Heinrich Himmler."
5. Defendant is a virulent anti-Semite who refers, inter alia, to
Jews as "vermin," advocates a "final solution" to the "Jewish problem" in
the United States and endorses the stereotype of Jews propagated by Julius
Striecher and Adolf Hitler stating, inter alia:
"What I like is the Nazi stereotype which shows the Jew as having
brushy eye brows, close set dark beady eyes and all accented by the
bulbous proboscis (big hook nose). I've seen the cartoons which shows Jews
looking like rats and I really think they are some of the most hilarious
visual images around- after all look at the typical Hollywood comedians--
all Jews! Who can't laugh at those rat like faces with the wiggling bushy
eye brows and those rat like snozzolas flapping in the breeze!"
6. At all times material hereto Defendant uses the services
provided by flash.net, with the knowledge and approval of flash.net, to
propagate his message of hate on the internet.
7. In addition to propagating his anti-Semitic propaganda on the
internet, Defendant has in the past and continues in the present to conduct
campaigns of harassment, defamation, and threats of violence against
individuals, including inter alia, the Plaintiff to this action, who
oppose his bigotry meant to frighten, annoy, and intimidate his opponents.
8. Said campaign of stalking and intimidation has been a
consistent pattern of behavior conducted by the Defendant over an extended
period of time.
9. Said campaign has included in the past threats of violence
against his opponents which has included, inter alia, the following threats
of violence:
a. On December 19, 1996, the Defendant publically made the following
threat to Keith Morrison, a citizen of Canada "I am a good shot Talmudist
if you come and find me I will demonstrate my skill to you. Do you have
any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to your head? I would be legal
too- self defense from a rabid virulent anti-Christ. I promise you that
your kind are not welcome in my part of the country and I am on first name
basis with the local D.A. Hunt me down and you will be put out of your
misery like a rabid dog. One shot one kill. dead eye Doc Tavish."
b. On March 9, 1997, Defendant publically made the following
threat to person unknown "Author: Billy Dale McTavish . . . .Vengeance is
sweet and I know that the day will come when I'll get to see the sneak
that did this to me get a thorough interrogation from Bruno! I will love
standing there watching him peel your skin off layer by layer with his lash
and ever so methodically. Your screams of pain will fall on deaf ears. I
will take extreme delight in watching the foam come spewing out of your
vile mouth as Bruno gives you another! Do not worry for I will not let him
kill you. You must heal up and become well- so the process can start right
back over again to be repeated again and again. You will see no end to your
pain! I solemnly promise the day will come when the tables will turn.
Destiny will place you at my feet and you will pray for death and it will
by no means come. /s/ Tavish."
c On April 15, 1997, Defendant published the following threat to Daniel
Keren, Ph. D.: "I do believe that Bruno would derive great pleasure in
applying his craft to Mr. Keren. Yes Bruno is from the old Bavarian School
of inquisitive acquisition. Bruno knows how to stimulate every nerve but
yet not do any sort of damage. Yes Bruno would spend hours in a cold dark
damp dungeon with him. Bruno is a firm believer in the old adage: "No pain,
no gain." :-) Mr. Keren will probably over react to Bruno BUT Bruno went
back home to Bavaria a while back because certain ones in this ng hurt his
feelings! He is a big dumb brute in the common sort of way but he's such a
likable lug too! I may be able to persuade him to come back but I don't
know. If I can get Bruno back then may be Gunther and Gerhardt may return
too! They all claim that life is too hard for them in America with all of
this hatred by Nizkooks running around. They say it reminds them of when
the Communists ruled and how the Commies kept files on everyone. Reminds me
of what commie East Germany used to be!"
d. On May 2, 1998, Defendant published the following threat to someone
who disagreed with one of his bigoted rants:: "I just wish these dumb asses
would realize that they can't get away with this. I'll send a copy to
tavish-central, a copy to the Houston Branch of the FBI and a copy to the
nut cake's ISP. Now people can understand why I positively abhor the
majority of Kikes I encounter. Bruno at the moment is muttering about how
nice it would be if he would be allowed to interrogate this person. I agree
that Bruno should be able to apply his talents. I could picture Bruno being
slow and very methodical too! :-)"
e Defendant published the following threat to Mark Van Alstine, a
researcher on the Holocaust: " . . . . . Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of
Nizkor [http://nizkor.org; a site on the Internet about the history of the
Holocaust] and that is all we need to bring hin in for an especially
vigorous interrogation! He will not be so cocky after Bruno works with him.
Don't worry Bruno has never killed anyone yet and he is a master at his
craft. Bruno could rightfully be called a master of pain for he knows how
to work every nerve and fiber to achieve the results desired with the very
least amount of tissue damage. The man is devoted to his work as a true
artisan!"
f Defendant has published the following threat to Jeffrey G. Brown
"I'll beat you to a bloody pulp."
g. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to a person
publishing anonymous material: "Why don't you identify yourself then? Bruno
has already picked the lash he will use in my interrogation of you. He at
first opted for his short fat bull whip. This whip does not cut the flesh
but it makes extremely painful throbbing welts that only diminish in pain
over a few days. He has chosen his custom stage coach style whip that is
nearly twenty feet long. Each stroke is just like a hot knife hitting
butter. This whip n each stroke cuts beyond the subcutaneous epidermal
layers. He'll literally peel you like an onion. Each stroke of this lash
will feel just like having a white hot wire streak across your back and
buttocks. Bruno is an artisan at his craft and he most eagerly awaits
hoisting you up in manacles to administer the "truth serum." I will relish
watching you flop around like a fish. Pleasant dreams!"
h. Defendant addressed the following threat to Joel Rosenberg, a citizen
of Minnesota: " Herr Rosenberg so very nice of you to slither out and play
tonight! We all see that you have not for once changed your tone yes? You
will change your tune very soon! They all do; believe me they all do! We
have a nice damp dungeon all prepared for you in Berlin. We will talk at
great length and get to the very root of your attitude yes? I personally
will not let Bruno interrogate you too long no!"
i. Defendant publically addressed the following threat of violence to
another person: "Yeah SOG [sic] just keep your mouth running while you can.
You'll be squealing like stuck pig when we shove the rotisserie skewer
where the sun don't shine on April 20th! You'll cook quite well over an
open fire! You'll probably give us all gas BUT that is why we'll have
plenty of Tagment [sic] on hand. Burp! Bruno says that he knows how to
tenderize you too. I think he wants to use his 20 foot whip! Ouch!:
j. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to another
person: "I can only say that Bruno knows that this happened and right now
he is outside practicing with his whip. Her looks mighty g-d damned furious
in the hot Texas sun cracking that whip. Damn it sounds like a 30' 06 going
off each time he pops that thing. I'd hate to "Count 25" for him! Yes,
indeedy!! :-) Doc Tavish Singing "Our Day Will Come!"
k. In December, 1999, Defendant publically addressed the following threat
to Sara Salzman, a citizen of Colorado: "Bruno [sic] eagerly awaits the day
when he is able to peel your kind like onions with his lash. I could just
see the sweat and blood spray when Bruno lays on the flay. In your case I
wouldn't want him to damage your hide. I want a new shade for my floor lamp
and a new holster for my Desert Eagle pistol. Bruno would, in your case,
use electricity and the various exploitations of body cavities with large
blunt objects. :-) . . . . .Mazel Tob you witch. /s/ Doc Tavish.
j. On or about December 7, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to an unknown person: "I will get revenge sooner or later for your inciting
blacks to harass me by e-mail. You're on federal territory now! You WILL be
ferreted out- make no mistake about it! BTW if you were to only think about
it- your very actions only make others believe that I am justified in my
dislike of your kind. You are sneaky rat like vermin meant to be hunted
down and eliminated. :-) Just call me the Verminator! /s/ Doc Tavish/"
10. Said campaign of threats was maliciously designed to frighted,
intimidate, annoy, harass, and silence any person who objected to
Defendant's anti-Semitic agenda by having a chilling effect on any person
expressing or considering expressing opposition to Defendant's bigotry.
11. Said campaign of harassment and intimidation has included,
inter alia, the publication of the private names and addresses of his
victims and their families with suggestions of violence and the offering of
rewards to those who would supply him with the addresses and telephone
numbers of his victims.
12. Said campaign of harassment has included the forging of
communications and publishing such forgeries representing that they
originated with the victims of his campaigns of harassment.
13. Said campaign of harassment has included the publication and
circulation of claims which are false and known by Defendant to be false
concerning the sexual orientation and practices of his opponents.
14. Said campaign of harassment has included harassment by sending
his opponents harassing electronic communications (e-mail) including sexual
innuendo, threats, and bigoted slurs.
15. Defendant is supported and assisted in his campaigns of
harassment as aforesaid by various accomplices who Plaintiff believes and
therefore avers include, inter alia:
16. The aforesaid campaigns arise from Defendant;'s pathological
hatred of Jew and/or any person opposed to his pathological hatred and are
conducted maliciously, wantonly, wilfully, and recklessly by the Defendant
and his accomplices and in outrageous disregard of the rights of his
victims with the specific purpose of intimidating and silencing his
opponents, intentionally causing them mental distress, anguish and grief,
and adversely affecting their reputation in the communities in which they
reside.
17. That such purpose and intent of Defendant is known to
Defendant's accomplices who actively support Defendant's goals and purposes
and assist him in stalking his victims during his campaigns of harassment,
defamation, and intimidation.
18. Such agreement on the part of his accomplices includes the
ethnic prejudice and hatred that motivates Defendant.
19. That said accomplices include, inter alai:
a. David E. Michael, a British neo-Nazi and denier of the Holocaust who is
an adherent of and/or organizer for the neo-Nazi British National Party.
b. Don Ellis, an anti-Semite and debunker of the Holocaust who resides in
Star City, Arkansas.
c. A person publishing material on the internet through remarq.com under
various pseudonyms including but not limited to, "Mike Kalvatis," "Pat
Blakely," "Jesus Christ," "RevWhte," "Rabbi Brimstone" and various forged
headers. Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that said person is the
aforementioned Don Ellis.
20. That the various accomplices of Defendant are aware of his
activities and act in concert with him and with his aid, assistance and
approval.
21. That the existence, purpose, nature, and intent of Defendant's
activities is know to flash.net which continues to allow the Defendant to
use their facilities for such purposes and otherwise supports the
activities of the Defendant.
COUNT I: Harassment by Telephonic Communication
21. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 20 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
22. At various times Defendant has communicated with Plaintiff by
electronic mail (e-nail) which is sent through interstate telephone lines
and received through a telephone connection maintained by Plaintiff and, as
such, constitutes telephonic communication.
23. That as part of his campaign of harassment and intimidation
Defendant has, in the past, sent Plaintiff electronic communications
consisting of the word "kike" repeated several hundred times.
24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only want to blow Joe
You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
25 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Joe me thinks Yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --Yale is a
queer -- he does suck cock
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-2."
26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Are you homosexual, Yale?
Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
make trouble like a malicious fag does
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
27. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale wants to suck your cock Joe and he doesn't know how to ask so he
persists in his silly games to get your attention -- fags are in a lot of
ways just like little girls -- just ignore cock sucker Edeiken and he'll
most likely will try to go after another person."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-4"
28 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"and you still want to wrap your lips around his aryan cock"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-5."
29 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Yale Edeiken wants to suck Joe Bellinger's cock
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-6"
30. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale still wants to suck Joe's aryan cock"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-7"
31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"So why do you still want to suck his cock?
Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
Doc Tavish"
32 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff
an electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"And you're still a flaming fag cock sucker/"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-9."
33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
lifestyle.
When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all?"
I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
your Barbie doll faggot child molester
Doc Tavish:
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made.
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A11."
35 That on July 31, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic
communication stating in pertinent part:
"You want to suck Tavish's, Vange's and Phillips' Nazi cocks. Why does your
side call others homophobes? You must either be homo or at least
sympathetic to their utterly disgusting ways! I'd bet that you suck cock
and butt fuck too! Careto deny it?
Bickhus Dickhus
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-12."
36. That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You want to lick Tavish's prick like a little kid licks a lollipop."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-13."
37 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only act up because Tavish won't let you use your tongue on him."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-14."
38 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Yale and Jeffrey want to gang rape Tavish because Tavish won't give in to
their homosexual lusts."
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-15."
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
40. Said telephonic communications were intended and designed to
alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress
upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred.
41. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
42, Said telephonic communications were received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
43. Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
44, Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
45. Said telephonic communications were made willfully, wantonly,
and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT II: Harassment by Terorrostic Threat
46. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 45 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
47. Defendant has, at various times, publically made threat of
violence against Plaintiff consistent with the pattern of his threats
against others.
48 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
49. Said telephonic communication was received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
50. On November 14, 1999, Defendant made the following public
statement to Plaintiff:
"I'd say that the above is explicit evidence of libel and slander. I surely
wish Mr. Richard Phillips et al immediately files suit, has subpoenas
herewith issued. I will be glad to attend the trial and I hope that a good
public flogging is part of the reparations Yale has to receive in lieu of
monetary damages he will have to render. . . . BTW Richard- Bruno has
volunteered to administer the flogging if is permissible [sic] by the
court. He has been practicing a lot lately. Perhaps he senses something
in the air. I hate saying it but he is somewhat bestial or animalistic in
his instincts but he is loyal to me to the end."
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
52. On December 18, 1999 Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
"Remember Yale- the jury award I seek is not monetary but to have full
access to you for thirty [sic] minutes in front of the court house to
literally beat you black and blue without any civil or criminal
repercussions. I really believe that this would be the only fair and
equitable verdict! : It will be just you and me Yale and I promise you that
you will think a long damned time because you will hurt for a long time
before you will engineer anymore of your malicious devilish mischief. Doc
Tavish Merrily Waiting on Judgment Day."
53. On December 19, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
"Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH (Standing Behind Yale With a Big Fat
Truncheon) . . . . Give me a break and just let a court grant me thirty
minutes immunity from any criminal or civil action- I would just love to
beat Yale to a jolly bloody pulp in front of his family. To me this is the
only form of fair justice. I promise that I will not take his life nor do
any permanent physical harm but I guarantee Yale will be sore for a very
long time. That is a solemn promise I would like to make and keep!"
54. Defendant has repeatedly published this and similar threats
to Plaintiff on various occasions since the original publication of these
threats.
55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and that such damages actually occurred.
56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
57. Said threats were made over the internet in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
58, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
59. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT III: Harassment by Incitement of Others
60. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 59 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
61. As part of his consistent pattern of harassment Defendant has,
individually and in collaboration with others published the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of his opponents with requests that others
harass those who object to the anti-Semitic propaganda he distributes.
62. Said information has included the names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of his detractors families, parents, children, employers,
associates, and neighbors with instructions that they be contacted with
false and/or outrageous material about his detractors private lives.
63. Said campaigns of stalking and harassment have included the
offering of rewards and other encouragements to various of Defendant's
accomplices to provide him with such information to assist Defendant in his
stalking, harassment, and intimidation of his victims.
64. Together with the accomplices named above and various others
unknown to Plaintiff, Defendant has compiled and published and/or assisted
in the compilation and publication of the "Nizkor Telephone Book" which
publishes such information in a malicious effort to harass, annoy, and
intimidate his detractors and to have a chilling effect upon their exercise
of their right of free speech
65. Such acts were done maliciously with the intent of harassing,
annoying and intimidating his detractors, adversely affecting their private
lives and employment, and chilling their exercise of their right of free
speech.
66. In or about April, 1998, Defendant commenced such a public
campaign of stalking, harassment, and intimidation against Plaintiff.
67. Prior to commencing this campaign of harassment Defendant
published the following statement on April 28, 1998, directed at Plaintiff
under his nom de plume of "Doc Tavish":
Hey, Yale, you were right about you being easy to find . What do the folks
in Allentown think knowing the have a socialist living on the block? :-) Be
sure to give my regards to "Alta" if you get my drift! /s/ Tavish
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-1."
68. Said message was intended and published in order to alarm and
harass Plaintiff and by making him believe that Defendant knew where
Plaintiff lived, intimidate Plaintiff from publishing material critical of
Defendant.
69. At approximately the same time Defendant, referring to himself
as "Gumshoe Tavish" made similar claims about the location of one Jeffrey
G. Brown and threatened to reveal to the alleged neighbors of Jeffrey G.
Brown that he was a pederast.
70. Shortly thereafter Defendant began to publish Plaintiff's
name, address, and telephone number using a variety of services which
disguised his location together with requests that others harass the
Plaintiff.
71. The first such message was published on June 1, 1998, with the
phrase "Reach out and touch someone." Attached. Said post is attached
hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-2."
72. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
harass Plaintiff.
73, That similar messages were published by Defendant on a regular
and continual basis with the final form of the message being to following
example published on December 7, 1999:
Yale F. Edeiken, ZHID, of 1590 Alta Dr., Allentown, Pa, wants lots of
late night callers, and will even welcome visitors, late nights, to
discuss the Holohoax. He can be reached at 610 435-9820 He even likes
discussing, and even meeting with faggots, and other pedophiles to discuss
matters. His specialties are butt-fucking, cocksucking, and fondling
tinky winkies.
Yale likes to go to peep shows and likes group grope at the local gay bar
in Allentown. -88- Horst Wessel
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit
"B-3."
74. Said message was published by Defendant over one hundred (100)
times.
75. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
harass Plaintiff.
76. In addition to publishing the Plaintiff's name, address, and telephone
number, Defendant acting individually and by and/or in concert with his
aforementioned accomplices published the names addresses and telephone
numbers of Plaintiff's ,family including his wife, father, brother, sister,
stepmother and business associates with similar invitations to harass,
annoy and frighten them.
77. Said information was provided both separately and as part of
the aforementioned "Nizkot Telephone Book" where other opponents of
Defendant and his accomplices were similarly harassed.
78. All such publications were made either by the Defendant and/or
with his knowledge, consent, approval, and cooperation.
79. Said publications and incitements were intended and designed
to alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional
distress upon Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
80. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
91. Said publications and incitements were made over the internet
in violation of the criminal laws of the United States and the criminal
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
82, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
83. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT IV: Defamation
84. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 83 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
85. As part of his publications concerning Plaintiff and other,
Defendant consistently fabricated false allegations against Plaintiff and
others and knowingly published said fabrications as fact with the malicious
intent of damaging the reputations of Plaintiff and others.
87. Said fabrications were known by the Defendant and his
accomplices to be false and defamatory.
88. Many of the said defamatory publications were made directly to
third parties within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with the intention of
damaging the reputation of Plaintiff within the community in which he
resides thereby vesting jurisdiction with this Honorable Court.
89. On or about October 26, 1999, Defendant began a campaign of
defamation against Plaintiff by publishing a claim that Plaintiff had sent
hin and electronic communication stating: ""Scottie if only I have you just
one night I's give you something no woman will ever be able to give you.
Give up women and join our ranks." Said publication is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C-1."
90. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to Defendant.
91. No such communication was made but, rather, it was
maliciously fabricated by Defendant with the intent of defaming Plaintiff.
92. When Plaintiff complained to Defendant about his forgery,
Defendant again published said forgery and threatened to send said
publication to Plaintiff's internet service provider who would then
"wonder" about the Plaintiff. Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C-2."
93. Said publication is a direct admission of the malicious intent
on the part of Defendant to defame Plaintiff.
94. On or about November 2, 1999, Defendant published the claim
that "You have threatened to do a "homosexual gang rape" to be ASSisted by
your pals Jeffrey G. Brown and Ken McVay - what else can you say other than
you're gay? /s/ Doc Tavish." Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C-3."
95. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had threatened Defendant with sexual
molestation.
96. No such communication was made but, rather, it was
maliciously fabricated by Defendant with the intent of defaming Plaintiff.
97 On or about October 27, 1999, Defendant published an article
entitled "Attention Faggots Yale F. Edeiken and Jeffrey G. Brown" in which
he again repeated\ his allegation that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual
advances to him. Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof
as Exhibit "C-4."
98. Said publication was false and defamatory in that it
represented that Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to Defendant.
99. On or about October 27, 1999, Defendant again maliciously
published a communication which he falsely and maliciously claimed had been
written by the Plaintiff and, again, falsely and maliciously claimed that
the Plaintiff had made unwanted sexual advances to hi,. Said publication
is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-5."
100. Said defamatory publication was forwarded directly to
Enter.net, business located within the County of Lehigh. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, thereby vesting jurisdiction in this Honorable Court.
101. On or about October 28, 1999, Defendant again refused to
retract his false and defamatory statements insisting that the fabrications
he had published were accurate. Said publication is attached hereto and
made part hereof as Exhibit "C-6."
102. Defendant again forwarded said malacious and defamatory
communication to Enter.net, a third person located within Lehigh County,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
103. On or about October 28, 1999, Defendant again refused to
retract his false and defamatory statements insisting that the fabrications
he had published were accurate, stating in pertinent part:
". . . . what we have here is a textbook case of how homosexuals really
hate being rejected. Yale will not take "NO" as answer [sic] O don't
care that he can use his tongue in his misguided attempt to show "50 Ways
to Leave My (Female) Lover."
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-7."
104. On or about November 3, 1999, published a false and
defamatory statement claiming that Plaintiff was sexual pervert engaging in
sex with animals. Said publication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "C-8."
105. On or about November 3, 1999, Defendant made a further false
and defamatory publication again stating that Plaintiff had sex with
animals and further stating that Plaintiff was a "neo-Bolshevist" who
wanted to turn the United States into a Soviet-style dictatorship. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-9."
106. On or about November 7, 1999, Defendant again fabricated
material which he claimed had been written by Plaintiff and maliciously
published it on the int4rnet and sent a copy of his false and defamatory
statement to Enter.net, a business located within the County of Lehigh,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Said publication is attached hereto and made
part hereof as Exhibit "C- 10."
107. On or about November 11, 1999, Defendant published the
following false and defamatory statement about Plaintiff on the internet
stating in pertinent part:
" . . . . .faggots Brown and Edeiken will positively not leave me alone.
What is it about homosexuals that the more they are rejected and dejected
the more they have to keep coming after a person? It must be some
"feminine" quirk resembling "hell hath no fury like a rejected or scorned
woman." . . . .Again Yale F.. Edeiken won't leave me alone and now his
fellow anti-Christ and Sodomite is moving in for the kill. See what being
the quintessential Aryan gets you."
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "C-11."
108. In addition to the defamatory material recited above
Defendant has continually referred to Plaintiff in his various publications
as a "shyster," a "criminal" and a "Bolshevist."
109. In each of the hundreds of times Defendant has maliciously
published such false and defamatory material both published on the internet
and communicated to third persons within the County of Lehigh, Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania material Defendant has intended to adversely effect the
reputation of the Plaintiff.
110. Plaintiff has continually contacted Defendant, informed him
of the defamatory nature of the material that he publishes and sends to
third parties.
111. Plaintiff has additionally contacted Flash.net Communications
and informed them of the various defamatory statements made by Defendant
and the various forgeries he has distributed through their facilities.
112. In response to the demands for retraction Defendant has
replied "Fuck off, Kike." and "Eat shit, Kike."
113. Defendant has, further, acted in concert with Flash.net
Communications to block any demands for a retraction by threatening the
internet services of others.
114. Defendant has, further, acted in concert with his accomplices
named above to further spread the defamatory statements published by
Defendant.
115. Said publications and their distribution were intended and
designed to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and alarm, harass,
intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
and others and that such damages actually occurred.
116. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
116. Said defamation was done maliciously willfully, wantonly, and
in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
COUNT V: Invasion of Privacy
117. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 116. of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
118. The falsehoods and forgeries as stated above constitute an
invasion of privacy under the false light doctrine.
119. Said invasions of privacy and their distribution were
intended and designed to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and alarm,
harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon
Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
120. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
121. Said invasions of privacy were done maliciously willfully,
wantonly, and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the
malicious intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating
Plaintiff and to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of
free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
610-435-9820
--
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465021522/thenizkorproject:
Lying About Hitler, by Dr. Richard Evans
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393020444/thenizkorproject
The Holocaust on Trial, by D.D. Guttenplan
david_michael
As usual, one should not rely on information from Nizkor if one wants
the whole truth about anything.
Mr McVay neglects to mention that the lawsuit in question by Mr
Edeiken was thrown out by the American courts. Why has he neglected to
mention this? Because he wishes to deceive his readers.
Mr McVay neglects to mention that another lawsuit bought against me by
Mr Edeiken was thrown out by the American courts and, indeed, that Mr
Edeiken's right to sue me in future has been curtailed. Why has he
neglected to mention this? Because he wishes to deceive his readers.
The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated post
are quite false and indeed highly defamatory. Why does Mr McVay repeat
them? Because he is a dishonest person who wishes to deceive his
readers.
As always, the best response is simply to point out his dishonesty and
leave readers to draw their own conclusions about him and his
'anti-revisionist' cause.
Dr David E Michael
Steven Mock
news:b7fe1abc.0302...@posting.google.com:
> The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated post
> are quite false and indeed highly defamatory. Why does Mr McVay repeat
> them?
Because they're not false, notwithstanding your assertions to the contrary.
And if they were defamatory, you would have taken action long ago, rather
than just treating us to your incessant whining.
> As always, the best response is simply to point out his dishonesty and
> leave readers to draw their own conclusions about him and his
> 'anti-revisionist' cause.
I'm fine with that.
Steven Mock
--
"I may not agree with your bumper sticker;
but I'll defend your right to stick it." - Ed Anger
david_michael
> david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote in
> news:b7fe1abc.0302...@posting.google.com:
>
> > The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated post
> > are quite false and indeed highly defamatory. Why does Mr McVay repeat
> > them?
>
> Because they're not false, notwithstanding your assertions to the contrary.
> And if they were defamatory, you would have taken action long ago, rather
> than just treating us to your incessant whining.
That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to see some
evidence from you to back it up?
Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive and
difficult. However, the last gentleman who, like you, seemed to think
that there were no limits as to what I'd let him get away with ended
up with a very large bill indeed. (And I'm not referring to my small
victories against the likes of Yale F Edeiken, Philipps Electronics
and Merit Computers . . .)
But let's see your evidence.
David
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <b7fe1abc.0302...@posting.google.com> in
alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 06:22:56 -0800,
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
[snip]
> The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated
> post are quite false and indeed highly defamatory.
Want to test that theory?
[snip]
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPk8nYZQgvG272fn9EQJxowCfWbtKrHlc4XDtM0519BmfKHrFRlAAn2m6
yDJlKKnctvBD2C26WRdhH2n4
=Q5dQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com> in
alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 21:45:44 -0800,
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
[snip]
> That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to see
> some evidence from you to back it up?
> Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive and
> difficult.
Translation: "Bwacckk bwaaack bwaaack bwaaack."
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPk8n+5QgvG272fn9EQK2dQCgw5mc2oe1ELEF6pEPDKwnuCkzs48An39Q
pV2LqFDATarOCL5Dovi8bagO
=tmXZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
steve wolk
"david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com...
Translation: I'll drop some names and run.
Steven Mock
news:b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com:
> Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote in message
> news:<Xns9323816D4316...@206.172.150.13>...
>> david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote in
>> news:b7fe1abc.0302...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> > The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated
>> > post are quite false and indeed highly defamatory. Why does Mr
>> > McVay repeat them?
>>
>> Because they're not false, notwithstanding your assertions to the
>> contrary. And if they were defamatory, you would have taken action
>> long ago, rather than just treating us to your incessant whining.
>
> That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to see some
> evidence from you to back it up?
Sure. If they really were false and defamatory, you would have done
*something* over the past 3 years other than simply bleat "liar, liar,
pants on fire".
As for evidence? I dare ya to sue me and find out.
<cue: patter of tiny feet>
david_michael
"John Morris" <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
news:3t9u4v4ae5h8gs1r7...@4ax.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In <b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com> in
> alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 21:45:44 -0800,
> david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to see
> > some evidence from you to back it up?
>
> > Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive and
> > difficult.
>
> Translation: "Bwacckk bwaaack bwaaack bwaaack."
>
> - --
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
Simple question for you Morris. Do you approve of making false accusations
of criminal misconduct against your political opponents if they're
revisionists?
Yes or no?
David
Ken McVay
Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
COMPLAINT
"Are you homosexual, Yale?
Doc Tavish"
Doc Tavish:
Doc Tavish"
Bickhus Dickhus
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
COUNT IV: Defamation
Respectfully submitted,
Ken McVay
and self-described abject failure as the "organizer of the Hull
and North Lincolnshire unit of the British National Party,"
stated his position on the terrorist murder of about 3000 people
on September 11, 2001 in the attacks in New York, Washington
and Pennsylvania.
<quote>
Now, however, the chickens are coming home to roost. This afternoon a
truly wonderful thing has happened: the oppressed of the earth have
turned around and have shown that they do not have to be nature's
eternal victims. They have shown that the poor, the downtrodden, and the
powerless can strike back at the very heart of the dark forces that are
oppressing them. This time it was not Palestinian children who cowered
in fear as death came from the skies -- this time it was the very fat
bankers and financiers who sustain the terroristic regime of Sharon.
This time it was those very military men who mastermind the attacks on
the women and children of Iraq. They thought they were so safe as they
planned death and destruction from their comfortable offices in the
Pentagon, and as they did their dirty deals in the World Trade Center.
Now they have been given a bloody nose that they will never forget.
Today was a glorious day. May there be many others like it.
Death to American capitalism!
Death to international finance!
David Michael
Message-ID: <3b9e...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:18:49 +0100
</quote>
(2) When challenged with: "You applaud the terror and killing of
thousands of innocent people perpetrated by the terrorists who attacked
the Pentagon and attacked and destroyed the World Trade Center, calling
their actions "a wonderful thing," the day the attacks occurred a
"glorious day," and finishing by fervently wishing for "many more" such
days.", his response was:
"I do indeed."
Message-ID: <3bae...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 02:26:45 +0100
(3) To a debating opponent who doesn't share his admiration for terrorism:
<quote>
All I can say in response to your filthy remark is that I very much hope
that, if there is an anthrax attack on America, your loved ones fall
victim to it so that you get a dose of your own putrid medicine.
</quote>
Message-ID: <3bc9...@news-uk.onetel.net.uk>
Sun, 14 Oct 2001 20:34:44 +0100
<quote>
"It was not a horrific event, Tony. It was you arrogant, murderous,
scummy, neoliberal bastards getting precisely what you deserve. You
filthy pigs export your murder and your corruption and your dirt
across the world and then you play all holier-than-thou when someone
gives you a dose of your own medicine. Doesn't wash with me."
</quote>
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael)
27 Nov 2002 20:52:20 -0800
Message-ID: <b7fe1abc.02112...@posting.google.com>
<quote>
As I have recently been appointed the organizer of the Hull and North
Lincolnshire unit of the British National Party, I'm afraid I simply
won't have time to continue our little debates in this forum. It's a
question of directing one's efforts to the place where they will have
most effect. Good wishes to all who wish to continue the good fight
here.
</quote>
david_...@onetel.net.uk (David Michael)
24 May 2001
Message-ID: <3B0C4356...@onetel.net.uk>
<quote>
Islam is not our enemy. America is our enemy. We should be fighting
shoulder-to-shoulder with our Islamic friends under the slogan
'death to America!'
</quote>
http://www.redaction.org/wwwboard/msgs5/5940.HTM
June 13, 2002
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <3e4f...@212.67.96.135> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 16 Feb 2003
06:58:22 -0000, "david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> "John Morris" <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
> news:3t9u4v4ae5h8gs1r7...@4ax.com...
> > In <b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com> in
> > alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 21:45:44 -0800,
> > david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to
> > > see some evidence from you to back it up?
> > > Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive and
> > > difficult.
> > Translation: "Bwacckk bwaaack bwaaack bwaaack."
> Simple question for you Morris. Do you approve of making false
> accusations of criminal misconduct against your political opponents
> if they're revisionists?
> Yes or no?
No.
Do you believe your participation in assembling the Nizkor Phonebook
was actually criminal?
Yes or no.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPk+R+JQgvG272fn9EQLoMwCgnS2uObfOICqTCrDkGDppkYFzDHYAn1eT
DtkhCn79+U2f3UTOLsPndwnD
=Lert
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
steve wolk
"John Morris" <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In <b7fe1abc.0302...@posting.google.com> in
> alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 06:22:56 -0800,
> david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated
> > post are quite false and indeed highly defamatory.
>
> Want to test that theory?
If he ever had wanted to test it, I'm sure his hero, David Irving, disabused
him of that notion. (chuckle)
Ken McVay
Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
COMPLAINT
"Are you homosexual, Yale?
Doc Tavish"
Doc Tavish:
Doc Tavish"
Bickhus Dickhus
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
COUNT IV: Defamation
Respectfully submitted,
david_michael
"Ken McVay" <kmc...@vex.net> wrote in message
news:jXP3a.1045$Tb7.20...@news.nnrp.ca...
> Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
> Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
> IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
> CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
> YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
> Plaintiff :
> :
> vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
> SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
> "DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
<snip defamation>
Already have. You are defaming me by repeatedly reposting false allegations
of criminal activity, secure in the knowledge that it would be mightily
difficult to sue you for it. It's the only way you know to oppose me as you
do not have the wit to deal with my arguments.
Edeiken v. Bradbury was thrown out by the courts. Edeiken v. Michael was
thrown out by the courts. Edeiken, who has described you quite correctly as
an 'asshole', has now fled alt.revisionism -- not before it was revealed
that he has had a number of malpractice suits against him.
Funny how you don't want your readers to know that.
You probably also aren't too keen on them knowing your views on kiddie porn
as published in an interview with The Ethical Spectacle, 1(6) June 1995,
when you inadvertently admitted to downloading photographs of naked children
from the Internet and expressed rather unconventional views about it:
See http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html.
<begin quote from Nizkor director Ken McVay>
I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of proportion (I've
been on and around the Net since 1988, and have yet to come across anything
I'd consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked children, but then I've
got some of those in my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any
great moral danger to our society).
<end quote from Nizkor director, Ken McVay>
There are many campaigners against the exploitation of children who might
differ somewhat with you on this particular point.
David
----> Tavish <----
kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Thoroughly debunked with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
----> Tavish <----
kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
Why do you keep repeating a lawsuit which was dismissed against me and which is
filled with numerous evil lies meant to defame me and many accusations which are
outright perjurious? The shyster who sued me also used subpoenaed information in
a criminal manner to make death threats against me and don't forget he forged a
phoney digital sig too! You are a loser, your B'nai Brith pals are losers, and
Yale Edeiken LOST!!!
ONCE AGAIN:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 05:33:23 GMT, <DcsU9.453$3Z6.56...@news.nnrp.ca>
kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:
Seeing how smear agent and proven liar Ken McVay keeps propagating the following
smear law suit which I won by the way; I will show how much "truth" there is not
in the smear Ken McVay keeps propagating. I debunk the greater majority of lies
which were made against me as sworn testimony in a civil court of law. Seeing
how I was maliciously prosecuted for my alleged acts in USENET I will use USENET
and documents to prove the accusations are contrivances. Also everyone should
note that Ken McVay has seen these refutations of mine before so what does this
say of his honesty when he keeps repeating the same lies?
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>
>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
>"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
>"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
>"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :
>
>COMPLAINT
Funny thing-- Yale F. Edeiken never would furnish neither my attorney nor myself
a copy of his accusations or complaints against me BUT you got a copy and you
wonder why the court threw it out on the grounds of jurisdiction. If I were
allowed to counter the numerous perjuries and contrived lies against me Yale F.
Edeiken would have lost his law license and most likely would have been
criminally prosecuted!
>
> 1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
>adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
>
> 2. Defendant Scott Bradbury (hereinafter "Defendant") is an adult
>citizen and resident of <deleted by Scott Bradbury>
>
> 3. At all times material hereto Defendant was supplied access to
>the Internet and to electronic mail (hereinafter "e-mail")by Flash.net
>Communications, Inc., (hereinafter "flash.net")
Everyone notice that Flash.net is based in Texas yet Yale also accused me of
making "Nazihunter" posts from three Canadian ISPs in his other "complaints."
> an internet service provider located in Forth Worth, Texas, and by other internet
> service providers unknown to Plaintiff including several services which allowed
>Defendant to publish and communicate by e-mail anonymously.
>
> 4. At all times material hereto Defendant published material on
>the Internet and by e-mail using aliases which include but are not limited
>to of "Doc Tavish," "sonn...@flash.net," "Secret Squirrel," "Mixmaster,"
>"Horst Wessel," "-88-," and "Heinrich Himmler."
>
> 5. Defendant is a virulent anti-Semite who refers, inter alia, to
>Jews as "vermin,"
I call Gentiles who do as you do vermin also!
>advocates a "final solution" to the "Jewish problem" in the United States
So you claim. PROOF?
>and endorses the stereotype of Jews propagated by Julius
>Striecher and Adolf Hitler stating, inter alia:
>
> "What I like is the Nazi stereotype which shows the Jew as having
>brushy eye brows, close set dark beady eyes and all accented by the
>bulbous proboscis (big hook nose). I've seen the cartoons which shows Jews
>looking like rats and I really think they are some of the most hilarious
>visual images around- after all look at the typical Hollywood comedians--
>all Jews! Who can't laugh at those rat like faces with the wiggling bushy
>eye brows and those rat like snozzolas flapping in the breeze!"
FREE SPEECH and considering how you and yours have criminally harassed me I
consider the taunt light hearted. I said that on Feb. 2, 2000 and after your
pals (and you) had posted my address and telephone number with incitements I get
beaten with baseball bats!
> 6. At all times material hereto Defendant uses the services
>provided by flash.net, with the knowledge and approval of flash.net, to
>propagate his message of hate on the internet.
Once again you made a sworn statement my ISP was an American based ISP yet you
falsely accuse me of making "Nazihunter" posts in another one of your
complaints. Those posts came from three Toronto, Ontario Canada based ISPs!
I am not a hacker and I don't know how to use other ISPs nor did I ever have
accounts with Canadian ISPs!
> 7. In addition to propagating his anti-Semitic propaganda on the
>internet, Defendant has in the past and continues in the present to conduct
>campaigns of harassment, defamation, and threats of violence against
>individuals, including inter alia, the Plaintiff to this action, who
>oppose his bigotry meant to frighten, annoy, and intimidate his opponents.
So you say!
> 8. Said campaign of stalking and intimidation has been a
>consistent pattern of behavior conducted by the Defendant over an extended
>period of time.
>
> 9. Said campaign has included in the past threats of violence
>against his opponents which has included, inter alia, the following threats
>of violence:
>
> a. On December 19, 1996, the Defendant publically made the following
>threat to Keith Morrison, a citizen of Canada "I am a good shot Talmudist
>if you come and find me I will demonstrate my skill to you. Do you have
>any idea what the Desert Eagle .50 would do to your head? I would be legal
>too- self defense from a rabid virulent anti-Christ. I promise you that
>your kind are not welcome in my part of the country and I am on first name
>basis with the local D.A. Hunt me down and you will be put out of your
>misery like a rabid dog. One shot one kill. dead eye Doc Tavish."
Out of context but you gloss over the key element which you left in and it is:
"I would be legal too- self defense.." Self defense is not a death threat.
> b. On March 9, 1997, Defendant publically made the following
>threat to person unknown "Author: Billy Dale McTavish . . . .Vengeance is
>sweet and I know that the day will come when I'll get to see the sneak
>that did this to me get a thorough interrogation from Bruno! I will love
>standing there watching him peel your skin off layer by layer with his lash
>and ever so methodically. Your screams of pain will fall on deaf ears. I
>will take extreme delight in watching the foam come spewing out of your
>vile mouth as Bruno gives you another! Do not worry for I will not let him
>kill you. You must heal up and become well- so the process can start right
>back over again to be repeated again and again. You will see no end to your
>pain! I solemnly promise the day will come when the tables will turn.
>Destiny will place you at my feet and you will pray for death and it will
>by no means come. /s/ Tavish."
You didn't show it in context either! You did not show why I said what I said
the above but I do so now:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=33236EE5.252%40phoenix.net&output=gplain
From: Billy Dale McTavish <tav...@phoenix.net>
Subject: COWARDS! SNEAKY VERMIN!!
Date: 1997/03/09
Message-ID: <33236E...@phoenix.net>
You are cowards and sneaks that E-Mail Bomb.
You hit me Feb 21, Mar 7, and twice today!
You only make it very easy to despise you!
Have fun because I am getting a new E-mail
account tomorrow and it will not be
published.
Vengeance is sweet and I know that the day will come...
<END>
Truth would not have suited your purpose.
>c On April 15, 1997, Defendant published the following threat to Daniel
>Keren, Ph. D.: "I do believe that Bruno would derive great pleasure in
>applying his craft to Mr. Keren. Yes Bruno is from the old Bavarian School
>of inquisitive acquisition. Bruno knows how to stimulate every nerve but
>yet not do any sort of damage. Yes Bruno would spend hours in a cold dark
>damp dungeon with him. Bruno is a firm believer in the old adage: "No pain,
>no gain." :-) Mr. Keren will probably over react to Bruno BUT Bruno went
>back home to Bavaria a while back because certain ones in this ng hurt his
>feelings! He is a big dumb brute in the common sort of way but he's such a
>likable lug too! I may be able to persuade him to come back but I don't
>know. If I can get Bruno back then may be Gunther and Gerhardt may return
>too! They all claim that life is too hard for them in America with all of
>this hatred by Nizkooks running around. They say it reminds them of when
>the Communists ruled and how the Commies kept files on everyone. Reminds me
>of what commie East Germany used to be!"
Big deal and no one took the above as a threat at that time in proper context.
You show you are grabbing at straws and here is the archive in context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=33558E55.4307%40phoenix.net&output=gplain
From: Doc Tavish <-----@phoenix.net>
Subject: Re: Crushed Brains (Re: crushed testicles)
Date: 1997/04/16
Message-ID: <33558E...@phoenix.net>
>d. On May 2, 1998, Defendant published the following threat to someone
>who disagreed with one of his bigoted rants::
Bigoted rants? I was replying to death threats!
> "I just wish these dumb asses would realize that they can't get away with this.
>I'll send a copy to >tavish-central, a copy to the Houston Branch of the FBI and
>a copy to the nut cake's ISP. Now people can understand why I positively abhor the
>majority of Kikes I encounter. Bruno at the moment is muttering about how
>nice it would be if he would be allowed to interrogate this person. I agree
>that Bruno should be able to apply his talents. I could picture Bruno being
>slow and very methodical too! :-)"
Notice the Plaintiff left out those words were said in reply to two death
threats his pals made against me as this archive proves:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=354b9506.79026646%40news.tavish-central.net&output=gplain
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Dr. Morbius Tavish)
Subject: Two Death Threats to Tavish for Today - Off to the FBI These Shall Go!
Date: 1998/05/02
Message-ID: <354b9506...@news.tavish-central.net>
>e Defendant published the following threat to Mark Van Alstine, a
>researcher on the Holocaust: " . . . . . Mr. Van Alstine is a saboteur of
>Nizkor [http://nizkor.org; a site on the Internet about the history of the
>Holocaust] and that is all we need to bring hin in for an especially
>vigorous interrogation! He will not be so cocky after Bruno works with him.
>Don't worry Bruno has never killed anyone yet and he is a master at his
>craft. Bruno could rightfully be called a master of pain for he knows how
>to work every nerve and fiber to achieve the results desired with the very
>least amount of tissue damage. The man is devoted to his work as a true
>artisan!"
Once again much ado made over a post no one took as a threat at the time and it
was tongue in cheek but showing it in context would reduce the shock and smear
value. To see it in true context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=32E59328.33AA%40heil.net&output=gplain
From: Reinhardt Heydrich <si...@heil.net>
Subject: Re: The incorrigible Joel Rosenberg
Date: 1997/01/21
Message-ID: <32E593...@heil.net>
> f Defendant has published the following threat to Jeffrey G. Brown
>"I'll beat you to a bloody pulp."
So what? You left out his challenge and what would be the odds I would ever be
in a room with him?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=358ac1cd.332885857%40news.tavish-central.net&output=gplain
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: Re: Leadership of the Bolshevists - The Facts (was Georg Brown's
typical slander> Liar Philllips ignores his own 'logic')
Date: 1998/06/19
Message-ID: <358ac1cd....@news.tavish-central.net>
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998 13:29:44 -0400, jgb...@earthlink.net (Jeffrey G.
Brown) wrote:
>Were we in the same room, you would lack the guts to physically attack me.
I' beat you to a bloody pulp in a New York second and so much so that
your gay lover wouldn't recognize you! :-)
~~End of Exact Context GOOGLE Archive~~
>g. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to a person
>publishing anonymous material:
Notice I made the reply to an anonymous coward who was harassing me. You
left out what was done to me! You don't like having posts forged in your
identity and neither do I!!!
>"Why don't you identify yourself then? Bruno
>has already picked the lash he will use in my interrogation of you. He at
>first opted for his short fat bull whip. This whip does not cut the flesh
>but it makes extremely painful throbbing welts that only diminish in pain
>over a few days. He has chosen his custom stage coach style whip that is
>nearly twenty feet long. Each stroke is just like a hot knife hitting
>butter. This whip n each stroke cuts beyond the subcutaneous epidermal
>layers. He'll literally peel you like an onion. Each stroke of this lash
>will feel just like having a white hot wire streak across your back and
>buttocks. Bruno is an artisan at his craft and he most eagerly awaits
>hoisting you up in manacles to administer the "truth serum." I will relish
>watching you flop around like a fish. Pleasant dreams!"
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=LilY3.2546%2416.305770%40news.flash.net&output=gplain
From: "Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com>
Subject: Re: Personal Information I'll Share
Date: 1999/11/16
Message-ID: <LilY3.2546$16.3...@news.flash.net>#1/1
References: <Se1Y3.1862$16.2...@news.flash.net>
<1999111615...@cotse.com>
>h. Defendant addressed the following threat to Joel Rosenberg, a citizen
>of Minnesota: " Herr Rosenberg so very nice of you to slither out and play
>tonight! We all see that you have not for once changed your tone yes? You
>will change your tune very soon! They all do; believe me they all do! We
>have a nice damp dungeon all prepared for you in Berlin. We will talk at
>great length and get to the very root of your attitude yes? I personally
>will not let Bruno interrogate you too long no!"
A tongue in cheek post which even Rosenberg did not take seriously. Here it is
in full context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=32E2E4BD.5EC8%40giebel.net&output=gplain
From: Reinhardt Heydrich <si...@heil.net>
Subject: Re: Jewish vindictiveness
Date: 1997/01/19
Message-ID: <32E2E4...@giebel.net>#1/1
references: <5btjff$i...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>
<joelr.8...@winternet.com>
>i. Defendant publically addressed the following threat of violence to
>another person: "Yeah SOG [sic] just keep your mouth running while you can.
>You'll be squealing like stuck pig when we shove the rotisserie skewer
>where the sun don't shine on April 20th! You'll cook quite well over an
>open fire! You'll probably give us all gas BUT that is why we'll have
>plenty of Tagment [sic] on hand. Burp! Bruno says that he knows how to
>tenderize you too. I think he wants to use his 20 foot whip! Ouch!:
SOG was an anonymous obnoxious troll who continually made personal attacks.
Here is the post in full context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3320E4A8.2DFA%40phoenix.net&output=gplain
From: Doc Tavish <tav...@phoenix.net>
Subject: Re: AV SHIT Rectum Boy
Date: 1997/03/07
Message-ID: <3320E4...@phoenix.net>#1/1
References: <330f8887...@199.0.216.204> <01bc1c1d$c643e960$2f7b50cc@main>
<3308F9...@phoenix.net> <330D0F...@usa.net> <3313A0...@phoenix.net>
<01bc2728$e3a44520$2b7b50cc@main>
>j. Defendant has publically addressed the following threat to another
>person: "I can only say that Bruno knows that this happened and right now
>he is outside practicing with his whip. He looks mighty g-d damned furious
>in the hot Texas sun cracking that whip. Damn it sounds like a 30' 06 going
>off each time he pops that thing. I'd hate to "Count 25" for him! Yes,
>indeedy!! :-) Doc Tavish Singing "Our Day Will Come!"
Notice Yale F. Edeiken left out I was replying to a death threat such as:
"You think you're a pretty clever bastard don't you? You'll be dead very soon!"
BUT Yale wouldn't let honesty stand in his way to demonize me. Here is the post
in full context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=356b3cd6.91173259%40news.phoenix.net&output=gplain
From: doc_t...@DELETEME.bigfoot.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: Hagbard (?) Threatens Me by E-Mail...
Date: 1998/05/26
Message-ID: <356b3cd6...@news.phoenix.net>#
>k. In December, 1999, Defendant publically addressed the following threat
>to Sara Salzman, a citizen of Colorado: "Bruno [sic] eagerly awaits the day
>when he is able to peel your kind like onions with his lash. I could just
>see the sweat and blood spray when Bruno lays on the flay. In your case I
>wouldn't want him to damage your hide. I want a new shade for my floor lamp
>and a new holster for my Desert Eagle pistol. Bruno would, in your case,
>use electricity and the various exploitations of body cavities with large
>blunt objects. :-) . . . . .Mazel Tob you witch. /s/ Doc Tavish.
To this very day Yale F. Edeiken NOR any of his supporters have been able to
show a post Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> made and me replying to Sara
salzman with those words! How about it liars and perjurers? Show here post with
full headers and my posting the above to her and her Message ID showing in my
headers under "References."
>j. On or about December 7, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
>to an unknown person: "I will get revenge sooner or later for your inciting
>blacks to harass me by e-mail. You're on federal territory now! You WILL be
>ferreted out- make no mistake about it! BTW if you were to only think about
>it- your very actions only make others believe that I am justified in my
>dislike of your kind. You are sneaky rat like vermin meant to be hunted
>down and eliminated. :-) Just call me the Verminator! /s/ Doc Tavish/"
Notice I replied to an anonymous coward who was trying to incite blacks to
harass me (with his forging posts in my identity)?
Here is the post in full:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=G2f34.10303%240p4.1054050%40news.flash.net&output=gplain
From: "Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com>
Subject: Forged Post Has Been Reported and Appropriate Action Being Taken aka
Re: Where's Bruno??
Date: 1999/12/07
Message-ID: <G2f34.10303$0p4.1...@news.flash.net>
Defending oneself from anonymous cowardly acts which Edeiken's supporters
perpetrated against me aren't actionable offenses against me!
> 10. Said campaign of threats was maliciously designed to frighted,
>intimidate, annoy, harass, and silence any person who objected to
>Defendant's anti-Semitic agenda by having a chilling effect on any person
>expressing or considering expressing opposition to Defendant's bigotry.
You're being melodramatic.
> 11. Said campaign of harassment and intimidation has included,
>inter alia, the publication of the private names and addresses of his
>victims and their families with suggestions of violence and the offering of
>rewards to those who would supply him with the addresses and telephone
>numbers of his victims.
FALSE!! You have to show proof! You are the one who posted my address and
telephone number with death threats as I have already proved with you
"nazihunter" posts in the month and year of December 1999 which is fully
documented and proven in this archive as well as many others:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter
Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 18:46:33 -0600
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
Also:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=oisojtk9amim07dlukf3uah172bpl7gahd%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: A Simple Test Which The Apellate Judges Will Get To Take (This is a
Trial Run - This Test May Be Modified) nazihunter December 1999
Message-ID: <oisojtk9amim07dlu...@4ax.com>
> 12. Said campaign of harassment has included the forging of
>communications and publishing such forgeries representing that they
>originated with the victims of his campaigns of harassment.
So you say. I showed how you and your lackeys forged me and offered proof and
all you do is accuse!
> 13. Said campaign of harassment has included the publication and
>circulation of claims which are false and known by Defendant to be false
>concerning the sexual orientation and practices of his opponents.
So what? Most of your pals are people who refer to others as homophobes when
they criticize the gay lifestyle and your pal Ken McVay attended a gay pride
parade as proven here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=6msk97%24hgk%241%40news.trends.ca&output=gplain
From: kmc...@nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
Subject: Dear Nizkor, We have another way to hate...
Date: 1998/06/25
Message-ID: <6msk97$hgk$1...@news.trends.ca>
Your pal Joel Rosenberg condones lesbians with his Lesbians of Darkness swill:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=40e63tctlr0ja1a7ccl6u660afdfa762cr%404ax.com&output=gplain
Subject: Joel Rosenberg's Lesbians of Darkness
Message-ID: <40e63tctlr0ja1a7c...@4ax.com>
> 14. Said campaign of harassment has included harassment by sending
>his opponents harassing electronic communications (e-mail) including sexual
>innuendo, threats, and bigoted slurs.
So you say but all you have offered in you other complaint list is contrived
e-mails you or one of your accomplices contrived using USENET posts made by
other people and then YOU swearing they were sent and signed by me as
faultlessly detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com
Subject: "Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony"...
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 18:46:33 -0600
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
YOU on the other hand sent many obscene e-mails and I have all of them on file
complete with all headers!
>
> 15. Defendant is supported and assisted in his campaigns of
>harassment as aforesaid by various accomplices who Plaintiff believes and
>therefore avers include, inter alia:
>
> 16. The aforesaid campaigns arise from Defendant;'s pathological
>hatred of Jew and/or any person opposed to his pathological hatred and are
>conducted maliciously, wantonly, wilfully, and recklessly by the Defendant
>and his accomplices and in outrageous disregard of the rights of his
>victims with the specific purpose of intimidating and silencing his
>opponents, intentionally causing them mental distress, anguish and grief,
>and adversely affecting their reputation in the communities in which they
>reside.
You are being melodramatic again.
> 17. That such purpose and intent of Defendant is known to
>Defendant's accomplices who actively support Defendant's goals and purposes
>and assist him in stalking his victims during his campaigns of harassment,
>defamation, and intimidation.
>
> 18. Such agreement on the part of his accomplices includes the
>ethnic prejudice and hatred that motivates Defendant.
>
> 19. That said accomplices include, inter alai:
I am NOT responsible for what other adults who live in another country and
another state do JUST as I can';t hold other people responsible for what others
do. One exception is; YOU are the sole person who obtained my address and
telephone number using a subpoena and then you distributed it and your mailing
list recipients joined in the harassment you, yourself, initiated against me.
>a. David E. Michael, a British neo-Nazi and denier of the Holocaust who is
>an adherent of and/or organizer for the neo-Nazi British National Party.
>
>b. Don Ellis, an anti-Semite and debunker of the Holocaust who resides in
>Star City, Arkansas.
>
>c. A person publishing material on the internet through remarq.com under
>various pseudonyms including but not limited to, "Mike Kalvatis," "Pat
>Blakely," "Jesus Christ," "RevWhte," "Rabbi Brimstone" and various forged
>headers. Plaintiff believes and therefore avers that said person is the
>aforementioned Don Ellis.
>
> 20. That the various accomplices of Defendant are aware of his
>activities and act in concert with him and with his aid, assistance and
>approval.
I can't be held responsible for what others do. They are adults and they are
responsible for any offenses they may have done. I can't hold your allies
responsible for all your perjury against me can I?
> 21. That the existence, purpose, nature, and intent of Defendant's
>activities is know to flash.net which continues to allow the Defendant to
>use their facilities for such purposes and otherwise supports the
>activities of the Defendant.
Get it through your head; Flash.net knew I did not violate any laws nor did I do
as you accused. You couldn't even provide them with proof I did as you accuse
and the following examples show what a p;erjurer you truly are!
>COUNT I: Harassment by Telephonic Communication
>
> 21. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
>through 20 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
>
> 22. At various times Defendant has communicated with Plaintiff by
>electronic mail (e-nail) which is sent through interstate telephone lines
>and received through a telephone connection maintained by Plaintiff and, as
>such, constitutes telephonic communication.
You are the one who made an obscene telephone call to me and you are the one who
sends vulgar e-mail to me. I have your telephone call recorded (which you left
on my answering machine and which was played to the court on my behalf yet you
wonder why you lost your lawsuit against me!) and all of your vulgar e-mails
archived complete with headers. Here is just one example of hundreds:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=aso1ot0mft1koh6t00jcfj7u070llo2sl3%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: E-Mail Harassment, RICO, Manufacturing Evidence, Legal System Abuse and
Who Is Really Guilty aka Re: rene salzman sucks dog cock
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:18:43 -0500
Message-ID: <aso1ot0mft1koh6t0...@4ax.com>
Status: U
Return-Path: <ya...@enter.net>
Received: from mail1.enter.net ([63.65.0.21])
by elektra (Earthlink/Netcom Mail Service) with ESMTP id
tnaa99.8gk.37tiu4v
for <xx...@ix.netcom.com>; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 05:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oemcomputer (atmax-5-20.enter.net [207.16.153.214])
by mail1.enter.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7BBioi05143;
Sat, 11 Aug 2001 07:44:50 -0400
From: ya...@enter.net
Message-ID: <001901c12265$5b20c4c0$d69910cf@oemcomputer>
To: <xx...@ix.netcom.com>, <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
Cc: <xx...@ix.netcom.com>, <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Fw: DRUNKEN SOT ACCOSTS PEOPLE AT COUNTY COURT HOUSE
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 08:58:44 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Attention Defendant Bradshit
Hey you lying fuck, did you post this your gutless self or was it one
of your homosexual, lovers?
<END>
Compare what Yale e-mailed me above with his complaint against me:
"13. Said campaign of harassment has included the publication and
circulation of claims which are false and known by Defendant to be false
concerning the sexual orientation.." YET he e-mails me (on file too):
" Hey you lying fuck, did you post this your gutless self or was it one
of your homosexual, lovers?" WHY SHOULD AN ATTORNEY SUCH AS YALE F. EDEIKEN
STILL BE ALLOWED TO PRACTICE LAW IN ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA IS A MYSTERY TO
ME!!!
> 23. That as part of his campaign of harassment and intimidation
>Defendant has, in the past, sent Plaintiff electronic communications
>consisting of the word "kike" repeated several hundred times.
>
> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.
you only want to blow joe
you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence!
>
> 25 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>Joe me thinks Yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --Yale is a
>queer -- he does suck cock
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-2."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981205232659.3493.qmail%40hades.rpini.com&output=gplain
From: Anonymous <nob...@remailer.ch>
Subject: Re: Teamwork: A Mystery to Joe
Date: 1998/12/05
Message-ID: <199812052326...@hades.rpini.com>#1/1
References: <19981204234321...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was
remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems
or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <ad...@remailer.ch>.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Teamwork: A Mystery to Joe
> > >> A typical smear from Yale.
> > > How can I smear someone by reprinting his own words.
>
>
> > They are not my words, so it remains a smear, and you remain a queer.
>
> They were published under your name.
joe me thinks yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --
yale is a queer -- he does suck cock
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Notice the post was anonymous and it was NOT signed "Doc Tavish" as Yale accused
in his perjured sworn statement. Just another perjured complaint!
> 26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"Are you homosexual, Yale?
>
>Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
>make trouble like a malicious fag does
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=486bdd608ea62beed680ad5921a2f402%40anonymous.poster&output=gplain
From: Secret Squirrel <an...@squirrel.owl.de>
Subject: Yale The FAG Burps
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <486bdd608ea62bee...@anonymous.poster>#1/1
References: <19981204233749...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<postm...@squirrel.owl.de>. The message sender's identity is unknown,
unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> > THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> I neither smear you or fear you. I have very little to fear from a
> lying anti-Semite without even the nerve to defend his ideas before an >
impartial tribunal.
>
>
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at jbel...@sprynet.com you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
are you homosexual yale
your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely
trying to make trouble like a malicious fag does
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Again- an anonymous post and it was NOT signed Doc Tavish as Yale claimed in a
sworn statement. I wonder if he would deny he has perjured himself!
> 27. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"Yale wants to suck your cock Joe and he doesn't know how to ask so he
>persists in his silly games to get your attention -- fags are in a lot of
>ways just like little girls -- just ignore cock sucker Edeiken and he'll
>most likely will try to go after another person."
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-4"
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 28 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"and you still want to wrap your lips around his aryan cock"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-5."
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 29 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> Yale Edeiken wants to suck Joe Bellinger's cock
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-6"
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 30. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "Yale still wants to suck Joe's aryan cock"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-7"
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement.
> 32 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff
>an electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "And you're still a flaming fag cock sucker/"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-9."
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
>have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
>oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
>Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
>lifestyle.
>
>When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
>to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
>yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
>Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
>pride at all?"
>
>I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
>homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
>pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
>homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
>because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
>your Barbie doll faggot child molester
>
> Doc Tavish:
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981206172003.29681.qmail%40nym.alias.net&output=gplain
From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Yale Edeiken a Trolling Chickenhawk?
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <1998120617200...@nym.alias.net>#1/1
References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com> <3669b...@news3.ent
X-Comment1: This message did not originate from the
X-Comment2: above address. It was automatically remailed
X-Comment3: by an anonymous mail service. Please report
X-Comment4: problems or inappropriate use to
X-Comment5: <postm...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.politics.libertarian.gay
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> Message-ID: <3669b...@news3.enter.net>
yale edeiken's obvious chickenhawk troll lines:
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at ya...@enter.net you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
what are you doing yale trolling for young boys again -- we all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who oppose
"gay rights" -- we also know how you have slandered the most
righteous rev fred phelps in the past for his stands against
the homosexual lifestyle
when are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and
seek to live a meaningful life with purpose -- why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
allentown pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all
i guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from nizkor you are -- why are nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you
are homosexual
if any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group because you
all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with your
barbie doll faggot child molestor
aryan-american
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again an anonymous post which Yale perjured himself by signing my nym
"Doc Tavish" in his complaint and attributed it to me in a sworn statement.
> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!!
> 35 That on July 31, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic
>communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You want to suck Tavish's, Vange's and Phillips' Nazi cocks. Why does your
>side call others homophobes? You must either be homo or at least
>sympathetic to their utterly disgusting ways! I'd bet that you suck cock
>and butt fuck too! Careto deny it?
>
> Bickhus Dickhus
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-12."
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 36. That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You want to lick Tavish's prick like a little kid licks a lollipop."
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-13."
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 37 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You only act up because Tavish won't let you use your tongue on him."
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-14."
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
> 38 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"Yale and Jeffrey want to gang rape Tavish because Tavish won't give in to
>their homosexual lusts."
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-15."
Could not find in GOOGLE archives but everyone should see the pattern of perjury
or falsifying evidence.
The following false contrived accusation is the pinnacle of perjury or
manufacturing of evidence to be submitted as sworn testimony in a court of law
and this was done by a Plaintiff (who was his own attorney and who is an
attorney) against the Defendant; me. I will slam dunk this criminality in full
just below!
> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=d0ic0v81gdhrd1djqe4k4k2mnvq4c4sdi5%404ax.com&output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17
> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~
Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"
Witness this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.242633%40newshog.newsread.com&output=gplain
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!!
> 40. Said telephonic communications were intended and designed to
>alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress
>upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred.
You need to accuse someone else you lying perjurious shyster because I proved
you manufactured the above complaints.
> 41. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
>mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
You're being melodramatic again.
> 42, Said telephonic communications were received by the Plaintiff
>within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
>Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
>
> 43. Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
>criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
>Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
>
> 44, Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
>laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
>
> 45. Said telephonic communications were made willfully, wantonly,
>and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
>intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
>to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
>
> WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
>excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
>of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
>damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
>Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
>interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
You need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and you should lose
your law license and then spend some time behind bars for the most evil
malicious prosecution you waged against me with all of your evil lies against
me!!!
>COUNT II: Harassment by Terorrostic Threat
>
> 46. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
>through 45 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
>
> 47. Defendant has, at various times, publically made threat of
>violence against Plaintiff consistent with the pattern of his threats
>against others.
>
> 48 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
You perjured sworn testimony against me was deep sixed in the entry above you
evil liar shyster .
> 49. Said telephonic communication was received by the Plaintiff
>within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
>Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
B.S. That complaint came right from your computer and text editor!!
> 50. On November 14, 1999, Defendant made the following public
>statement to Plaintiff:
>
>"I'd say that the above is explicit evidence of libel and slander. I surely
>wish Mr. Richard Phillips et al immediately files suit, has subpoenas
>herewith issued. I will be glad to attend the trial and I hope that a good
>public flogging is part of the reparations Yale has to receive in lieu of
>monetary damages he will have to render. . . . BTW Richard- Bruno has
>volunteered to administer the flogging if is permissible [sic] by the
>court. He has been practicing a lot lately. Perhaps he senses something
>in the air. I hate saying it but he is somewhat bestial or animalistic in
>his instincts but he is loyal to me to the end."
A fitting legal outcome for a lying bastard who makes numerous false and evil
accusations against me! The above post can be seen in proper context here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8027vo%24133v%40news1.newsguy.com&output=gplain
From: "Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMdanetwork.com>
Subject: Re: Liar Philllips' big yellow stripe
Date: 1999/11/06
Message-ID: <8027vo$13...@news1.newsguy.com>
The next entry shows how evil yale F. Edeiken truly is and it also proves how
stupid he is. He confessed to making a criminal death threat against me in a
sworn statement to a court of law. Yale made the death threat almost two weeks
before I was served with his malicious prosecution against me. Also my
confidential info (my identity, address, and telep;hone number) were not known
until Yale issued a subpoena to my ISP to get and Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F.
Edeiken alone was the sole bearer of that info in December 1999. The subpoena
was never entered into court records and it does not appear on the docket thus
Yale's lie about my confidential information becoming public knowledge is a lie!
> 51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
>to Plaintiff:
>
>Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
>Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
>with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
>for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter."
>Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
I now prove beyond any fault that Yale F. Edeiken made an admission he was
"nazihunter" on December 14th and 15th 1999 and how he hung himself:
For a fact: I was not advised the subpoena to my ISP was going to be made and
(required by law on the plaintiffs' attorney's behalf) allowed to "quash it" NOR
was the returned subpoena entered into the docket! Those are FACTS!
I WAS NEVER GIVEN NOTICE THAT A SUBPOENA WAS GOING TO BE SERVED ON MY ISP AND
THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY E-MAILING ME AGAINST MY WILL AT
THE TIME TOO! HE VIOLATED THE LAW PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
That subpoena was NOT turned over and it does NOT appear on the docket thus it
is NOT public domain and for a fact the plaintiff's attorney illegally
distributed the information he obtained and for a FACT I was not allowed to
object or quash it!
Courtesy of Ken McVay, director of Nizkor, and from Nizkor web site:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH" (Defendant)
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
[...]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: (610) 434-7004
Fax: (610) 434-6978
<END>
From the above admission to Lehigh County Civil Court and on public record as
sworn testimony I now ask these questions concerning the above "ADMISSION OF
FACT":
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you all know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b) Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>? If he did not implicate himself then why
would he be personally threatened with my reply to "nazihunter" who at that time
was just a mentally unbalanced poster who on the night before made a criminal
death threat against me? The above is in court records and was filed as a sworn
complaint against me, the Defendant, who on just the night before had his name,
address, and telephone number posted with an incitement to murder.
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
More supporting evidence which proves that Yale F. Edeiken alone was sole
possessor of my identity, address, and telephone number at that time:
(Yale F. Edeiken's activities on December 14, 1999)
Now take note of the following post from Yale F. Edeiken himself:
Concerning being arrested:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: We Want Porn Please Add Us to Your Lists!
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3856...@news3.enter.net>
References: <82rla9$f...@sirius.infonex.com>
<82s6km$444$2...@dosa.alt.net>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-4-5.enter.net
X-Trace: 14 Dec 1999 14:38:06 -0500, atmax-4-5.enter.net
[... more false accusations linking to an anonymous post deleted]
You will be interested to learn that a civil suit has already been
filed and a warrant for his arrest is about to be issued.
--YFE
~~End of Post~~
Did everyone notice the time and date the post was archived originally by
DejaCom? It was: Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
The above post as well as the posts which follow were all archived in
a very short time frame by DejaCom. Notice in the following posts you see
my name being forged and also my telephone number and address being posted
along with the mention of me being arrested! Now I ask what are the odds
that another person just would happen to obtain my unlisted telephone
number and address and at the same time be posting it to USENET announcing
I am going to be arrested. Once again Yale F. Edeiken engaging in criminal
harassment!
From: "Bradbury MacTavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Tavish's widdle dickie needs a lickin
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Anonymously posted.
Hello to all of my friends and fans out there! Once again,
as the holidays approach, my widdle dickie feels the need
of your attention.
Won't you come and visit my widdle dickie, before Bubba
makes me his and his alone, like before I get arrested?
I live at <address and telephone number deleted>, but
if you are not able to put your lips on widdle dickie in
person, call me for phone sex, at <address and telephone
number deleted> and we'll get it on...
----------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:28:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1999121501...@cotse.com>
From: "Scott Bradbury" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Please suck my tiny dick as a holiday gift
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Lines: 27
Anonymously posted.
My name is Scott Bradbury ..... my adoring and sometimes
sniveling fans know me as "Doc Tavish."
I have a difficult problem. I am about to be arrested,
which means only this guy named Billy Bob will be sucking
my tiny dick.
I don't know when I'm going to be jailed, but the warrant's
been issued... even my close friend and sometimes-lover Fat
Harold won't be able to cuddle my tiny dick then...
Will you show your affection now, by sucking my tiny dick
before I am arrested?
I live in Texas, you know..... where we grow really big
mouths and really small dicks. I live at <address and
telephone number deleted> if you can't suck my tiny dick in
person, can we have phone sex instead? I sure hope so,
because you won't be able to reach me at <address and
telephone number deleted> much longer!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Remember the two posts above mention me being arrested in addition to
giving out my unlisted telephone number and address! What are the odds
that a separate person from Yale F. Edeiken would be posting my unlisted
telephone number and address in addition to announcing I was going to be
arrested? Notice the time and dates of the archival process!
All of the above criminal harassment happened because a mentally disturbed
attorney obtained my unlisted address and unlisted telephone number by use
of a subpoena as shown here:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net.. This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290.. November 30,1999 Return address: Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard
Street; Allentown, PA 18104." (Subpoena on file with my attorney, Flash
Net, and law enforcement) [For the record the subpoena does NOT appear on
the docket- rather my confidential info went directly to one of
Yale F. Edeiken's "drops."]
Yale F. Edeiken had a subpoena issued on November 30,1999 and sent it from
Allentown, Pennsylvania to Flash Net in Dallas, Texas. The travel time and
turnaround would be reasonable to assume that Yale F. Edeiken received
my confidential info on about December 14, 1999! I ask again; what are the odds
that another person other than Yale F. Edeiken would be using the COTSE
anonymizer in a small time frame on the night of December 14, 1999 to
violate my right to privacy!? Yale F. Edeiken did in FACT identify himself
as the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was threatened (personally) when I
replied to "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>.
[...]
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
From the above one can discern that the subpoena Yale F. Edeiken issued on
November 30, 1999 never made it back to the court house to be entered on the
docket. Yale F. Edeiken had my identity, unlisted telephone number and address
returned to his "drop" at:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104
Hence the information he obtained never in FACT became public knowledge like he
wants everyone to believe! Yale F. Edeiken issued the subpoena
on November 30, 1999 from Allentown, Pennsylvania to my ISP Flash Net in Dallas,
Texas. With the time consideration for United State's Postal Service trip two
ways and Flash Net processing the request a fair estimation would say Yale F.
Edeiken received what he wanted on or about December 14, 1999. Seeing how the
subpoena never made it to the docket and became "public knowledge" Yale F.
Edeiken was the sole possessor of my information on December 14, 1999.
The real rub in knowing this comes from the knowledge Yale F. Edeiken engaged in
his criminal acts and death threats against me on December 14, 1999, a full 16
days before his lawsuit was served on me!!
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
For a FACT-- that subpoenaed information (my real identity, my address, and my
telephone number) was not public domain or else a subpoena would not have been
issued to obtain it!! Remember Yale F. Edeiken himself posted these very words
regarding subpoenas:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
AND as the docket plainly shows that Yale NEVER turned over the subpoenaed
information to the court BUT rather he took the information he received (which
he never gave me the chance to "quash" as required by law) and illegally
distributed it to Ken McVay of Nizkor (of all people) who then passed it on to
Marduk aka Nazihunter who then made death threat posts soon after!
Here is that docket again and how to get a copy:
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
FOR A FACT Yale F. Edeiken lied through his teeth about using his power of
attorney to obtain my confidential information too as this archive proves:
<START>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=x68H4.58%243r3.3683%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Bradbury Explains How He Made an Ass of Himself
Date: 04/06/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <x68H4.58$3r3....@monger.newsread.com>
> You maintain that you got my information
> from public domain--
That's a lie. I said it was in the public domain.
<<Comment January 13, 2002: That is a lie. Yale never turned the subpoena over
to make it public domain and the proof he did not turn it over is that it does
not appear on the docket!! IOW Yale used his power of an attorney criminally to
deny me my right to privacy!!>>
> you will be given the chance soon to tell how you got my otherwise unobtainable
> info from any other source than by intimidating my ISP to surrender it to you.
> Flash Net of Dallas Texas has been requested to answer as to whether or not you
> used your power of attorney to obtain otherwise not obtainable information.
<<Comment January 13, 2002: For a fact Yale F. Edeiken badgered my ISP and
threatened to sue them numerous times if they wouldn't turn over my confidential
information. Flash.net attorney Matthew Terrell told Edeiken finally they would
only do so if a subpoena was served. Proof on file.>>
Nope. I won't.
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=CBLK4.3314%24%25L6.201547%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: MUST READ! for those who wish to see Bradbury lie again.
Date: 04/17/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <CBLK4.3314$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
[...]
>I am reporting you to PA BAR, D.O.J., and the Disciplinary Board.
All of whom will laugh ay you.
>They are going to get copies of your subpoena, your admission to distributing
> my customer info to YOUR mailing list,
That's a lie, Defendant Bradbury.
<<Special note December 18, 2002: This link proves Yale F. Edeiken propagated
the subpoenaed information to a mailing list thus caught lying again!
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=396b163b.19786667%40news.flash.net&output=gplain
Date: 2000/07/11
Message-ID: <396b163b...@news.flash.net>
"Yale "Tubby" Edeiken's Mailing List and His Numerous Lies Exposed (Short
Version)" MUST READ!>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=jRJR4.5762%24LM4.410341%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: wish tavish good luck with his civil case
Date: 05/09/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <jRJR4.5762$LM4.4...@monger.newsread.com>
Defendant Bradbury <spnn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8f7fg...@news1.newsguy.com...
> On 8-May-2000, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
<<January 13, 2003 comment: I have already proven that Yale F. Edeiken was
"nazihunter" in December of 1999 and notice how he acts below. He did make a
blundering admission as sworn testimony that he was "nazihunter"
<anon...@cotse.com> in December 1999>>
> > with a baseball bat
> > Scott Bradbury
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
> > XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >
> > (XXX) XXX-XXXX
> >
> > --
> > Anon news web interface. FAQ available for review at:
> > http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
:
> Thanks for providing more fodder for my case. I find it fascinatiing
> that you are only able to make such posts as you have made only with the
> intelligence that Yale F. Edeiken obtained by misuse of the subpoena.
Tgat is a lie and actionavle as such.
A retraction is demanded.
> You made your first post with the same sort of death threat on December
> 14, 1999 -- just two weeks after Edeiken had a subpoena drawn up and sent
> to Flash Net.
That is a lie and acrtionable as such.
A retraction is demanded.
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=RN%25T4.3309%24v%255.235346%40newshog.newsread.com&output=gplain
Subject: Re: PLEASE KILL MY SON
Date: 05/15/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <RN%T4.3309$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
> On Mon, 15 May 2000 21:31:19 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >news:391f5a8d...@news.flash.net...
>
> [...]
:
> > > ((Federal Crimes were committed with four death threat telephone calls
> >> made possible with information that was illegally disseminated after it
> >> was obtained using a subpoena issued by Yale F. Edeiken))
:
> > At which point it became public information.
<<Comment December 18, 2002: As another document in this very post proves that
subpoena was never turned over to the court and it does NOT show on the docket
and it is thus NOT public domain information! Yale caught lying again!!>>
> It became "public domain" after YOU obtained it with a subpoena
Correct. And the information was filed with a court.
<<Comment December 18, 2002: Another lie because if it was filed with the court
it would show on the docket along with the other subpoenas!!!>>
> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
(Doc Tavish comment January 16, 2001: Edeiken is lying about a mailing
list as shown with his own words in this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=396b163b.19786667%40news.flash.net&output=gplain
Date: 2000/07/11
Message-ID: <396b163b...@news.flash.net>
"Yale "Tubby" Edeiken's Mailing List and His Numerous Lies Exposed (Short
Version)" MUST READ! Where is the subpoena registered with the court Yale?
It's not on the docket!!!!!)
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your
attempts to incite criminal harassment.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my civil
rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
:
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
<STOP>
> 52. On December 18, 1999 Defendant published the following
>threat to Plaintiff:
I posted it to USENET and I did not e-mail it too you shyster!
>"Remember Yale- the jury award I seek is not monetary but to have full
>access to you for thirty [sic] minutes in front of the court house to
>literally beat you black and blue without any civil or criminal
>repercussions. I really believe that this would be the only fair and
>equitable verdict! : It will be just you and me Yale and I promise you that
>you will think a long damned time because you will hurt for a long time
>before you will engineer anymore of your malicious devilish mischief. Doc
>Tavish Merrily Waiting on Judgment Day."
That would be a very appropriate court ruling seeing how you acted in a very
criminal manner against me and you're supposed to be an attorney!
Here is the USENET post in actual context:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=83gavl3149a%40news1.newsguy.com&rnum=1
From: "Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
Subject: Yale Even Supports Harassing His Victims' Employers As Well!
Date: 1999/12/18
Message-ID: <83gav...@news1.newsguy.com>
I now comment January 13, 2002: The above is mild considering all the harassment
and smear I have had to endure on account of your nut case false malicious
prosecution against me. Too bad the state won't give you lethal injection!
> 53. On December 19, 1999, Defendant published the following
>threat to Plaintiff:
>
>"Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH (Standing Behind Yale With a Big Fat
>Truncheon) . . . . Give me a break and just let a court grant me thirty
>minutes immunity from any criminal or civil action- I would just love to
>beat Yale to a jolly bloody pulp in front of his family. To me this is the
>only form of fair justice. I promise that I will not take his life nor do
>any permanent physical harm but I guarantee Yale will be sore for a very
>long time. That is a solemn promise I would like to make and keep!"
Repeating the same accusation you did higher up heh? No wonder why two law
offices distanced themselves from you as you freely admitted to all:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
> 54. Defendant has repeatedly published this and similar threats
>to Plaintiff on various occasions since the original publication of these
>threats.
More lies from a proven perjurer and pathological liar!
> 55. Said threats were intended and designed to alarm, harass,
>intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress upon Plaintiff
>and that such damages actually occurred.
>
> 56. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
>mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
>
> 57. Said threats were made over the internet in violation of the
>criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
>Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
>
> 58, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
>Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
>
> 59. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
>disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
>harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
>chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
>
> WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
>excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
>of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
>damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
>Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
>interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
You are the one who should be paying me damages you evil perjurious shyster!
>COUNT III: Harassment by Incitement of Others
>
> 60. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
>through 59 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
>
> 61. As part of his consistent pattern of harassment Defendant has,
>individually and in collaboration with others published the names,
>addresses, and telephone numbers of his opponents with requests that others
>harass those who object to the anti-Semitic propaganda he distributes.
Another lie which you have yet to substantiate. Anyone who has read this post to
this point knows what a liar you are.
> 62. Said information has included the names, addresses, and
>telephone numbers of his detractors families, parents, children, employers,
>associates, and neighbors with instructions that they be contacted with
>false and/or outrageous material about his detractors private lives.
Another lie which you have yet to substantiate. Anyone who has read this post to
this point knows what a liar you are.
> 63. Said campaigns of stalking and harassment have included the
>offering of rewards and other encouragements to various of Defendant's
>accomplices to provide him with such information to assist Defendant in his
>stalking, harassment, and intimidation of his victims.
Another lie which you have yet to substantiate. Anyone who has read this post to
this point knows what a liar you are.
> 64. Together with the accomplices named above and various others
>unknown to Plaintiff, Defendant has compiled and published and/or assisted
>in the compilation and publication of the "Nizkor Telephone Book" which
>publishes such information in a malicious effort to harass, annoy, and
>intimidate his detractors and to have a chilling effect upon their exercise
>of their right of free speech
Another lie which you have yet to substantiate. Anyone who has read this post to
this point knows what a liar you are.
> 65. Such acts were done maliciously with the intent of harassing,
>annoying and intimidating his detractors, adversely affecting their private
>lives and employment, and chilling their exercise of their right of free
>speech.
All of the above accusations are what YOU have done to me with your death threat
posts you and your pals have made against me using information you subpoenaed!
> 66. In or about April, 1998, Defendant commenced such a public
>campaign of stalking, harassment, and intimidation against Plaintiff.
>
> 67. Prior to commencing this campaign of harassment Defendant
>published the following statement on April 28, 1998, directed at Plaintiff
>under his nom de plume of "Doc Tavish":
>Hey, Yale, you were right about you being easy to find . What do the folks
>in Allentown think knowing the have a socialist living on the block? :-) Be
>sure to give my regards to "Alta" if you get my drift! /s/ Tavish
>
>Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-1."
So what?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=354646a2.71243424%40news.tavish-central.net&output=gplain
Date: 1998/04/28
Message-ID: <354646a2...@news.tavish-central.net>
> 68. Said message was intended and published in order to alarm and
>harass Plaintiff and by making him believe that Defendant knew where
>Plaintiff lived, intimidate Plaintiff from publishing material critical of
>Defendant.
I wish you could see how stupid you look with the above statement!
> 69. At approximately the same time Defendant, referring to himself
>as "Gumshoe Tavish" made similar claims about the location of one Jeffrey
>G. Brown and threatened to reveal to the alleged neighbors of Jeffrey G.
>Brown that he was a pederast.
Show proof.
> 70. Shortly thereafter Defendant began to publish Plaintiff's
>name, address, and telephone number using a variety of services which
>disguised his location together with requests that others harass the
>Plaintiff.
False and you also offer not one bit of proof. You make accusations and don't
offer proof but I prove what I claim and I claim you are a liar who perjured
himself in a court of law and this one post alone has many criminal acts and
perjury documented and proven.
> 71. The first such message was published on June 1, 1998, with the
>phrase "Reach out and touch someone." Attached. Said post is attached
>hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B-2."
Another lie. The post you submitted as sworn evidence was not signed by me nor
did it say what you claim.
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=358612544&fmt=text
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=199806012316.QAA16385%40sirius.infonex.com&output=gplain
From: da_mai...@alias.cyberpass.net (none)
Subject: Yales Address and Phone Number
Date: 01 Jun 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1998060123...@sirius.infonex.com>
X-No_Archive: : yes
Organization: Still thinking
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Yale F Edeiken
1590 XXXXX
Allentown,PA 18102
610-XXX-XXXX
~~~End of Exact DejaCom Archive~~~
<<January 13, 2002: I did X out details in the above example for this post.>>
> 72. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
>intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
>harass Plaintiff.
>
> 73, That similar messages were published by Defendant on a regular
>and continual basis with the final form of the message being to following
>example published on December 7, 1999:
>
> Yale F. Edeiken, ZHID, of 1590 Alta Dr., Allentown, Pa, wants lots of
>late night callers, and will even welcome visitors, late nights, to
>discuss the Holohoax. He can be reached at 610 435-9820 He even likes
>discussing, and even meeting with faggots, and other pedophiles to discuss
>matters. His specialties are butt-fucking, cocksucking, and fondling
>tinky winkies.
>
>Yale likes to go to peep shows and likes group grope at the local gay bar
>in Allentown. -88- Horst Wessel
>
> Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit
>"B-3."
You really goofed up big time trying to pin that on me! Your goofy accusation to
my ISP about the above was archived and debunked here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=B_604.1407%240p4.202441%40news.flash.net&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken's ISP Won't Deal With Truth! aka Fw: (fwd) Re: Call
Yale Edeiken Late Nights to Discuss
Date: 1999/11/28
Message-ID: <B_604.1407$0p4.2...@news.flash.net>
Also this material buttresses the above archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8f6c3v018i2%40news2.newsguy.com&rnum=5
Subject: Re: Holocaust gas tales/Tooth Fairy in the same league
Date: 2000/05/08
Message-ID: <8f6c3...@news2.newsguy.com>
(Excerpt)
Yale falsely assumes because my ISP is Flash Net and he sees
"Anonymous <flash-...@nym.alias.net> wrote in message"
in the headers it was me. The "flash-bounce" has nothing to do
with me!
Here is what DejaCom has on "flash-bounce":
http://x41.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=553772389&fmt=text
From: Anonymous <flash-...@nym.alias.net>
Subject: test neo flash
Date: 27 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999112718...@p3E9D28F4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de>
X-Disclaimer: This message did not originate from the above address.
The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Again, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find out the original sender's identity! If you
wish to be blocked from future mailings or want to report other problems
with this service, please contact the operator at <flash...@nym.alias.net>.
Organization: mail...@zedz.net
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.test,misc.test
Wed Nov 24 08:14:22 EST 1999 neo flash neo flash
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Post~~~
Here is another posting with "flash-bounce" in the headers and how can anyone
say that I posted it through Flash Net?
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=553806410&fmt=text
From: Anonymous <flash-...@nym.alias.net>
Subject: CHINA ATTACK ON U.S. SAID POSSIBLE
Date: 27 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999112719...@p3E9D28F4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de>
X-Disclaimer: This message did not originate from the above address.
The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Again, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find out the original sender's identity! If you
wish to be blocked from future mailings or want to report other problems
with this service, please contact the operator at <flash...@nym.alias.net>.
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: soc.culture.burma
Im a recent message to Associated Press, Retired Adm.Thomas Moorer, a former
US Joint Chiwf of Staffs, says China is preparing to take over the Panama Canal
once the United States relinquishes control. He warned of possible Chinese use
of the area to launch a nuclear attack on the United States. He gave details of
how
China is planning to seize control through a Hongkong company named Hutchison
Whampos Ltd, which has won the right to operate ports on both sides of the
Panama Canal.
[...]
ASIAN AMERICANS WHO ARE FOR DEMOCRACY IN ASIA AND THE WORLD
_________________________
Posted via Soc.Culture.Burma Anonymous Posting Service at
Burma's Democratic Freedom Fighters Memorial. It is FREE
for anyone and it is made impossible to find out who U R.
http://ffmemorial.hypermart.net/scb.htm
Let the Burmese have DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM FROM FEAR!
~~~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~~
Does the above post look like anything I've ever posted? Of course not!
However according to Yale F. Edeiken I would have had to post the above too!
I rest my case. I also will add that I sincerely believe that Yale F. Edeiken
is unfit to practice law and I base this on his behaviour in public forum with
all of his outrageous smears and false accusations. Yale F. Edeiken is not
honest, he has been caught in numerous lies-- he is a disreputable attorney
who is both unscrupulous and unethical and it should be any reputable
attorney's goal to see him purged from the legal system.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
> 74. Said message was published by Defendant over one hundred (100)
>times.
Cry me a River pleeze! I made no such post so live with it!
> 75. That the intention of such message was to alarm Plaintiff and
>intimidate him from criticizing Defendant and inciting others to criminally
>harass Plaintiff.
>
>76. In addition to publishing the Plaintiff's name, address, and telephone
>number, Defendant acting individually and by and/or in concert with his
>aforementioned accomplices published the names addresses and telephone
>numbers of Plaintiff's ,family including his wife, father, brother, sister,
>stepmother and business associates with similar invitations to harass,
>annoy and frighten them.
Once again you are a liar. The post which was made which did as you accuse me of
doing above was made through a Road Runner cable based modem account which I do
not have nor did I ever have access to! Some of your minions have claimed that I
could have done it from Austin, Texas from a Road Runner but as you well know I
was awake at the time (remember I am narcoleptic and my sleep patterns vary) and
at home when you made an obscene telephone call to me. I can't be at home and in
Austin at the same time frame either! Once again I debunk you false accusation
against me:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ccg1dt0aud9h7tbtl81vi0eu5c29ktv5p8%404ax.com&rnum=9&filter=0
Subject: Re: Holocaust Calendar: April 8
Organization: Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Smears Private Citizens
Reply-To: doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM
Message-ID: <ccg1dt0aud9h7tbtl...@4ax.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 21:05:34 GMT
I had to prove again to Ken McVay continually using your malicious lies against
me in order to smear me that I was falsely accused and my evidence would stand
up in any court. I DID NOT POST YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS NAMES ETC. AS YOU ACCUSE.
> 77. Said information was provided both separately and as part of
>the aforementioned "Nizkot Telephone Book" where other opponents of
>Defendant and his accomplices were similarly harassed.
>
> 78. All such publications were made either by the Defendant and/or
>with his knowledge, consent, approval, and cooperation.
I am not responsible what other people do and you as an attorney should realize
that!
> 79. Said publications and incitements were intended and designed
>to alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional
>distress upon Plaintiff and others and that such damages actually occurred.
>
> 80. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
>mental anguish and was deprived of he enjoyment of life's pleasures.
>
> 91. Said publications and incitements were made over the internet
>in violation of the criminal laws of the United States and the criminal
>laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
>
> 82, Said threats were made in violation of the laws of the
>Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
>
> 83. Said threats were made willfully, wantonly, and in outrageous
>disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious intent of
>harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and to have a
>chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
>
> WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
>excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
>of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
>damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
>Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
>interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
You should be the one paying me you lying shyster!
>COUNT IV: Defamation
>
> 84. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
>through 83 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
>
> 85. As part of his publications concerning Plaintiff and other,
>Defendant consistently fabricated false allegations against Plaintiff and
>others and knowingly published said fabrications as fact with the malicious
>intent of damaging the reputations of Plaintiff and others.
What do you think you kook lawsuit with all of its perjury and false accusations
has done to me and your pals are still spreading your manure as if it were the
"Gospel Truth."
> 87. Said fabrications were known by the Defendant and his
>accomplices to be false and defamatory.
I am not responsible for what others do and it is obvious who defames people and
who still defames people with perjured false accusations made in a court of law.
> 88. Many of the said defamatory publications were made directly to
>third parties within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with the intention of
>damaging the reputation of Plaintiff within the community in which he
>resides thereby vesting jurisdiction with this Honorable Court.
If the legal community would take proper action against you then true justice
would finally be served and as it is of January 23, 2003 your legal reputation
has suffered on account of your smears against me and your smears against my
former attorney among the other things you have quite a reputation of doing such
as engaging in shoving matches in the Lehigh County Courthouse itself as
documented to your continual shame here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=40qb0v8cv3as2i0ffp6bmgi6fji8imfums%404ax.com&rnum=4
Subject: Re: Bradbury: What the Legal Record Shows ...
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:46:48 -0600
Message-ID: <40qb0v8cv3as2i0ff...@4ax.com>
(Excerpt)
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Subject: CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <3921e1e6....@news.newsguy.com>
http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
Column:
Corrections:
Memo:
CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call
Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined $600 plus
costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy sheriff and another
man in a courthouse elevator.
During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda Hartman with his
briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by saying he had a gun,
according to District Justice Diane Jepsen, who heard the case. Edeiken
later was found to have a permit for and was carrying a .357 Magnum.
Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay the fine
after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and disorderly conduct
filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no longer has a permit for his gun.
According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side elevator,
which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with Joanne Keller.
Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been sentenced and Hartman was
taking her to pay fines and costs before her release.
Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public defender Earl
Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.
Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had burglarized
him, pushed his way onto the elevator.
But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already was on the
elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving match. Witnesses
varied on what was said.
Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said he was
referring to Keller.
Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a house owned by
Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a character witness for Keller
at her sentencing.
Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and Hartman,
according to testimony.
Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered Edeiken
to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to exit, Edeiken told
Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was going to draw it. No weapon
was seen.
Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman took
Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held pending their
proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to stay until she got help.
When she returned, Edeiken was gone.
---end---
Proof Edeiken has a violent history.
FAIR USE INTENDED
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=6nnnjts00vnb4kfovfuekvejvq8k7pau4j%404ax.com&rnum=5
Subject: How Can I Retract What an Allentown Newspaper Reported and has Been
"Admitted as Fact?" IT'S THEIR WORDS NOT MINE!!!!
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:53:26 -0500
Message-ID: <6nnnjts00vnb4kfov...@4ax.com>
(Excerpted)
Return-Path: <ya...@enter.net>
Received: from mail1.enter.net (sourcenat1.bigmailbox.com [209.132.220.250]) by
mailrecv11.bigmailbox.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5SH6MI09103 for
<doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:06:23 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (mat-4-8.enter.net [207.16.155.156]) by
mail1.enter.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5SH6LY27630 for
<doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:06:21 -0400
From: ya...@enter.net
Message-ID: <001601c0fff6$31c67020$9c9b10cf@oemcomputer>
To: <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Fw: Allentown Attorney Goes Amuck in County Courthouse and Goes on a
Spree of Violence
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:17:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This publication contains defamatory material.
An immediate retraction is demanded.
<<Doc Tavish comment June 28, 2001: Take it up with The Morning Call- they
reported your shoving match and resultant conviction. I am only showing the link
to their archive which has (excerpt) as text...>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
The material isn't defamatory Yale and you know it is true!
The one who has hurt your reputation is YOU and only YOU!
Other kook accusations deleted and will be addressed in another post seeing how
this post is already humongous.
> 121. Said invasions of privacy were done maliciously willfully,
>wantonly, and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the
>malicious intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating
>Plaintiff and to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of
>free speech.
>
> WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
>excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
>of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
>damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
>Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
>interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
> Respectfully submitted,
Since when is submitting outright lies and perjured statements to a court of law
being "Respectfully submitted"?
>________________________
>Yale F. Edeiken
>c/o Trainor Law Offices
>1720 Fairmont Street
>Allentown PA 18104
> 610-435-9820
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Special note: The names of Todd Miller and Paul Trainor represent two law
offices in Allentown, Pennsylvania which Shyster Edeiken has tried to convince
others he was an associate. The names represent "Todd Miller and Associates" and
"Trainor Law Offices." For a fact Yale F. Edeiken is NOT:
1) A member of the Bar Association
2) Associated with a law firm
3) In the phone book under attorneys!!
I ask: What sort of an attorney is not even in the phone book? How could he ever
get an established client list? What sort of an attorney would make such obvious
perjury to a court of law? There are many questions which could be asked but for
a fact-- Ken McVay and Yale F. Edeiken are cut form the same cloth and they are
about as honest too!
----> Tavish <----
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>"Ken McVay" <kmc...@vex.net> wrote in message
>news:jXP3a.1045$Tb7.20...@news.nnrp.ca...
>> Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>> Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
>>
>> IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>>
>> CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>>
>> YALE F. EDEIKEN :
>> :
>> Plaintiff :
>> :
>> vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
>> :
>>
>> SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
>> "DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
>
><snip defamation>
>
>Already have. You are defaming me by repeatedly reposting false allegations
>of criminal activity, secure in the knowledge that it would be mightily
>difficult to sue you for it. It's the only way you know to oppose me as you
>do not have the wit to deal with my arguments.
>
>Edeiken v. Bradbury was thrown out by the courts. Edeiken v. Michael was
>thrown out by the courts.
For the record here is the reason BOTH were thrown out:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations as detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Also this document should be available too:
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Do not forget-- Yale did exactly the same thing to David E. Michael (so he has a
pattern of being deceptive):
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk&lr=&hl=en
Message-ID: <39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:13:59 +0100
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: The other Edeiken lawsuit
NNTP-Posting-Host: async170-6.nas.onetel.net.uk
X-Trace: 10 Sep 2000 17:14:15 GMT, async170-6.nas.onetel.net.uk
[...]
Mr Edeiken has filed a lawsuit against me in Pennsylvania. No documents
were ever served on me with regard to this lawsuit. Moreover, it stated
no cause of action. As Mr Edeiken had obviously assumed that I would
chicken out, allowing the thing simply to lapse unserved, I appointed an
attorney in PA to deal with him in a very non-chickenly way.
I recently received a communication from that attorney's paralegal that
stated, inter alia:
<begin quote>
Please be advised that we have filed the Rule to Show Cause in your
case. Mr. Edeiken must now move forward with this matter and file a
complaint . . . we are awaiting the statutory allowed time period during
which Mr. Edeiken can make a response.
<end quote>
Mr Edeiken evidently thought that he could use the law to silence
certain revisionist posters here.
We are now waiting for HIM to produce his arguments and evidence and
place them before the courts where he may rest assured that they will
meet a vigorous response. ~~End Of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>Edeiken, who has described you quite correctly as
>an 'asshole',
Don't forget he called McVay "cock sucker" too!
>has now fled alt.revisionism -- not before it was revealed
>that he has had a number of malpractice suits against him.
>
>Funny how you don't want your readers to know that.
That is because McVay is a smear agent for B'nai Brith-- the same people who
have also given financial support to devout communist David Lethbridge as I show
here:
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit-99/audit99-07.html
1999 Audit of anti-semitic incidents
The Struggle Against Antisemitism and Hate
...A Chill in the Air
In the past year the League has become aware of a trend whereby extreme right
wingers engage in libel law suits, attempting to impose a "libel chill" on human
rights advocates. Most notably, Eileen Pressler and her husband have
successfully sued anti-racist activist David Lethbridge in British Columbia...
<END>
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit-98/as98-03.htm
THE B'NAI BRITH CANADA
League for Human Rights
[A] set-back for the anti-racist movement in B.C., indeed across Canada, came
with the court's finding in favour of Eileen and Klaus Pressler in their
defamation suit against Dr. David Lethbridge. The Salmon Arm couple sued CHBC (a
Kelowna television station) and Lethbridge, a psychology professor and human
rights activist, on the basis of one eight minute television news story in 1993
that allegedly impugned their reputations by “unfairly casting them as white
supremacists and neo-Nazi hate mongers”.... As Lethbridge's lawyer, Irvine
Epstein. Q.C. put it: “This case is about the right, and indeed the duty of a
concerned citizen to inform and educate others in opposition to those who preach
racial hatred, bigotry and intolerance.”
The B'nai Brith Lodge and League in B.C. continue to provide moral and financial
support to Lethbridge through a province-wide and national fundraising campaign.
An appeal is planned as the eyes of the anti-racism and human rights community
are on this very important case. <END>
Proof the communist bastard the League of Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
(who also finance Ken McVay's Nizkor [as I show further down]), David Lethbridge
is a communist and NOT a human rights activist:
http://www.communist-party.ca/english/pv/dec99_antifa.html
THE SPECTRE OF GLOBAL FASCISM
By David Lethbridge, Director, Bethune Institute for Anti-Fascist Studies
1999 WAS A YEAR of struggle in the anti-fascist movement. The Bethune Institute,
carrying out a consistently militant approach, was able to achieve a number of
successes...
But the main threat facing the working class of every nation is the growing
possibility of global state fascism. We must examine this possibility seriously,
neither giving way to hysterical exaggeration, nor refusing to draw the
necessary conclusions from objective political, economic, and historical
analysis.
The driving force toward global fascism is US imperialism. Like an
ever-expanding bloodstain, it is spreading and deepening its influence into
every corner of the world. Intent on global economic domination, it is backed up
by a ruthless and sophisticated military machine...
But to many workers today, the idea of global US fascism is literally
unthinkable. Imperialist control of ideology means that the very mode in which
people think is manipulated. The ideological attack against socialism,
Communism, and working-class power continues unabated. Further, since elections
continue to be held, and the State continues to operate through a multi-party
system, the spectre of global fascism remains largely invisible at very centre
of its production.
In this context, it is worth quoting what Lenin wrote in 1919, as fascism first
began to take hold: "The forms of domination may vary: capital manifests its
power in one way where one form exists, and in another way where another form
exists - but essentially the power is in the hands of capital, whether there are
voting qualifications or some other rights or not - in fact, the more democratic
it is the cruder and more cynical is the rule of capitalism. One of the most
democratic republics in the world is the United States of America, yet nowhere
is the power of capital, the power of a handful of multimillionaires over the
whole of society, so crude and so openly corrupt as in America" (The State,
Collected Works, v. 29)
Yet global US fascism is more an undeniable possibility than an accomplished
reality. Counter-trends are developing. Mass movements opposing corporate
globalization are maturing. The working class and the peasantry, especially in
South America, is rising and showing signs of strength. Organized labour in
North America is reaching toward left positions. Socialist and Communist parties
around the world are holding their own and building their base. <END>
David Lethbridge is a communist B'nai Brith fully endorses!
http://www.campuslife.utoronto.ca/groups/communist/default.html
Welcome to the University of Toronto
Communist Club's Page!
We are a group of activists on campus who work and fight for the introduction of
progressive gains when possible. But most of the time we are fighting against
the forces of the right-wing that are trying to drive all of society,
universities included, back to the old, UGLIER days of capitalism. Here in
Ontario we are fighting the drastic and ill-conceived cuts to virtually every
area in which workers have made gains since the 1930s. Our membership is open to
students, staff, and faculty. Our outlook is revolutionary...
In the past few years our club's work has been in various areas including
anti-racism... As Communists, we also look at the long-term project of building
a socialist Canada.
You are Invited to Our Next Event
Knowing the Enemy: New Trends in Canadian Fascism
With David Lethbridge, Director, Salmon Arm Coalition Against Racism
Monday, March 2
7:00 pm
G.C.D.O. Hall, 290 Danforth Avenue
<END>
Notice who the commies have as a guest speaker? David Lethbridge!
Proof that the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada (who gave
moral and financial support to David Lethbridge) is a funding arm of Ken McVay's
NIZKOR:
http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation with the
League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada. The League is a national
volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism, racism and bigotry,
and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may call
B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist that they
wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer, you can print this
form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o
The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code_______
E-Mail Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to "The League for Human Rights of B'nai
Brith Canada," and add the words "Nizkor Trust Fund" to the cheque's memo
section...
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt. [#0235903-43-13]
<END>
>You probably also aren't too keen on them knowing your views on kiddie porn
>as published in an interview with The Ethical Spectacle, 1(6) June 1995,
>when you inadvertently admitted to downloading photographs of naked children
>from the Internet and expressed rather unconventional views about it:
>
>See http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html.
>
><begin quote from Nizkor director Ken McVay>
>I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of proportion (I've
>been on and around the Net since 1988, and have yet to come across anything
>I'd consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked children, but then I've
>got some of those in my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any
>great moral danger to our society).
><end quote from Nizkor director, Ken McVay>
>
>There are many campaigners against the exploitation of children who might
>differ somewhat with you on this particular point.
>
>David
More info on David Lethbridge:
http://www.nsnews.com/issue/w043097/doug-1.html
Ranting our way to ruination
OLIVER Cromwell killed the King and "turned the world upside down," a Biblical
expression then worked into an anthem.
His dictatorship was supported by odd fanatics of every stripe.
There were the Levellers, the Agitators, the Diggers, the Seekers, Ranters, and
Muggletonians, all of whom finally found themselves at the receiving end.
The same thing is happening here. We too have our Levellers and Ranters. But
whether they can be overcome is moot. They set the pace, be they pressure groups
like the Canadian Jewish Congress, or the violence-prone Anti-Racist Action.
In Cromwell's day, dissidents could be whipped through the streets, tied to a
cart. Or have their heads put on a spike. We are now more refined. But the
sentiments are the same.
That's why we now have opinion crime: federal "hate laws," plus the NDP's
misnamed Human Rights Act, a new kind of "Holy Office" for those who don't
salute the right gods. Many public bodies follow the same band.
The fate of Paul Fromm is a prime example. He is an Ontario teacher who has
never been charged with any crime, hate or otherwise. But he opposes immigration
and multiculturalism, which can now be a mortal sin.
He puts out a newsletter and makes speeches. So B'Nai Brith -- a Jewish charity,
of all things -- complained to Fromm's school board. Exit Fromm.
Not that he had talked about such things in the adult classes he was teaching.
He was politically incorrect. And that was enough. Finis and fired. Applause
from the Levellers.
That sort of thing is not confined to the lower echelons. Last year the Supreme
Court of Canada ruled that Malcolm Ross, a New Brunswick teacher, could be
dismissed for writing books of which the Jewish Congress disapproved. By all
reports, Ross, like Fromm, was an excellent teacher who had never opened his
mouth on controversial matters in school. The court said he had the freedom to
write. But he could not be a teacher as well.
The world turned upside down! Militant homosexuals, extreme leftists and radical
feminists are free to spout their stuff in the schools and be patted on the head
for it.
An article in a small Toronto publication put it rather well.
"Speak out against liberal stronghold ideas like multiculturalism and
immigration and you will quickly be compared to Hitler and labelled a racist.
"Those on the left will hunt you like a dog. Why? Because they are strong
believers in free speech, but only when it applies to them. For everyone else,
they prefer censorship....
"If you do not buy into the liberal mantra you can be fired from your place of
employment. Does that seem like freedom of speech to you? It should not, because
it is not."
The David Lethbridge case is an example of how it's OK to be a leftist fanatic.
He is a teacher at Okanagan College. He is also the local Communist Party of
Canada candidate in the coming election, and spends most of his time hunting
"racists."
He has crowed like a cock about how he helped get Fromm fired. And has spoken at
conferences organized by the ARA rabble.
Does the college take exception to his activities? Not so you would notice. He
marches forward on his mission, chanting his mantra. Students follow his Pied
Piper act. To cheers from a student mob he could even drop his pants in public
and "moon" other speakers. A real New Age intellectual..... <END>
The above is the types of filth and vermin Ken McVay is associated with!
Black Knight
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 18:16:08 -0000, <3e4f...@212.67.96.135> "david_michael"
> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >
Get a job, you bum.
Black Knight
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:33:03 GMT, <jXP3a.1045$Tb7.20...@news.nnrp.ca>
> kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay) wrote:
>
> >Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
> >Last-Modified: 2001/02/15
> >
> >IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
> >
> >CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
> Why do you keep repeating a lawsuit which was dismissed against me and which is
> filled with numerous evil lies meant to defame me and many accusations which are
> outright perjurious? The shyster who sued me also used subpoenaed information in
> a criminal manner to make death threats against me and don't forget he forged a
> phoney digital sig too! You are a loser, your B'nai Brith pals are losers, and
> Yale Edeiken LOST!!!
It doesn't matter if Yale lost on a technicality. I know from
experience you did all this stuff, you fucking lazy bum.
That's how the gangsters in organized crime usually get off scot
free-on legal technicalities.
Bruno
>
>
Gord McFee
> Steven Mock <sm...@nizkor.org> wrote in message news:<Xns9323816D4316...@206.172.150.13>...
>> david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote in
>> news:b7fe1abc.0302...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> > The allegations against me contained in Mr McVay's oft-repeated post
>> > are quite false and indeed highly defamatory. Why does Mr McVay repeat
>> > them?
>>
>> Because they're not false, notwithstanding your assertions to the contrary.
>> And if they were defamatory, you would have taken action long ago, rather
>> than just treating us to your incessant whining.
>
>
> That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to see some
> evidence from you to back it up?
>
> Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive and
> difficult. However, the last gentleman who, like you, seemed to think
> that there were no limits as to what I'd let him get away with ended
> up with a very large bill indeed.
Really? Proof?
I thought not.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Gord McFee
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In <3e4f...@212.67.96.135> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 16 Feb 2003
> 06:58:22 -0000, "david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>> "John Morris" <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
>> news:3t9u4v4ae5h8gs1r7...@4ax.com...
>
>> > In <b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com> in
>> > alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 21:45:44 -0800,
>> > david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
>
>> > [snip]
>
>> > > That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going to
>> > > see some evidence from you to back it up?
>
>> > > Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive and
>> > > difficult.
>
>> > Translation: "Bwacckk bwaaack bwaaack bwaaack."
>
>> Simple question for you Morris. Do you approve of making false
>> accusations of criminal misconduct against your political opponents
>> if they're revisionists?
>
>> Yes or no?
>
> No.
>
> Do you believe your participation in assembling the Nizkor Phonebook
> was actually criminal?
>
> Yes or no.
We may not live long enough to see his answer to that.
----> Tavish <----
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Get a job, you bum.
My life is not any of your business you Pharisee. I am retired and I, unlike
your pal Ken McVay who regularly begs for donations, am not a bum. I am self
sufficient and Ken McVay is not. You should be telling him to get a job instead
of devising some self serving FUND after another!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhao2v4fbuij94mcmi6sicj73sa4eifsns%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e060868_1%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3e235877_3%40news2.uncensored-news.com&rnum=1
Subject: Did Ken McVay pay tax on those $50,000+ donations he denies receiving?
Message-ID: <3e235...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2003 00:23:26 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kpbl2v8od8empt5mdkt30k3t8ehs5q3jeh%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught Lying Big Time About his San Antonio
Connection!
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:17:47 -0600
Message-ID: <kpbl2v8od8empt5md...@4ax.com>
david_michael
Your evidence to support that allegation is?
<cue patter of tiny feet>
David
----> Tavish <----
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>It doesn't matter if Yale lost on a technicality.
Lost on a technicality? He lost because the court found out that they gave a
judgment in favor of Yale and then found out I was never served with complaints
and that he violated a written agreement about no longer making ANY contact with
me. That is why I hired an attorney which you vermin still claim I did not have
before August 25, 2000 though Yale issued a subpoena to my attorney's law office
in July 2000 and both of these TRUTHS can be verified by getting the court
records from the source I show in the info below:
<END>
<START>
ORDER
[...]
<STOP>
PROOF I had an attorney BEFORE August 25, 2000:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=oghmnt40ao9l6brg2vigq5f6p7i1ci1o4s%404ax.com&rnum=9
Subject: Once Again I Prove I had an Attorney Prior to August 25, 2000..
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:18:20 -0500
Message-ID: <oghmnt40ao9l6brg2...@4ax.com>
(Excerpt)
<<Doc Tavish comment March 27, 2001: How could my attorney who told
Edeiken on May 29, 2000 that I was his client file when he had not
received the complaint? Edeiken did my attorney the same way he did
David's! As for me not having an attorney then why did Yale F. Edeiken
on "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." This is on the docket of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
and anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786"
I did have an attorney as established on July 14, 2000! Why would Yale be
wanting to subpoena my attorney in Edeiken Vs Bradbury if I didn't have an
attorney!? Once again my enemies lie! End of Doc Tavish Comment>>
<END>
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <d0nv4v8pk1h3ck06s...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
on Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:03:58 -0600, "----> Tavish <----"
<t--avi-...@ix.n-etc-om.comRemoveHyphens2Mail> wrote:
> The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County
> Office of Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself
> against numerous perjured false accusations as detailed in this
> archive:
False. You received multiple copies of the petitions and motions
filed against you. Since you would not name an attorney-of-record,
the papers were served directly on you. You have no one to blame but
yourself for the summary judgment against you.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPlBcQZQgvG272fn9EQJM5ACeKVKzMPDAbmfeFv0YJf+T+iIDcoIAnRKT
aVc4W6ZkIvX3XvaLrqFDd1tc
=bLWf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com> in
alt.revisionism, on 16 Feb 2003 18:18:10 -0800,
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
> news:<ac4v4vot16ag65n3j...@4ax.com>...
> > In <3e4f...@212.67.96.135> in alt.revisionism, on Sun, 16 Feb
> > 2003 06:58:22 -0000, "david_michael"
> > <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> > > "John Morris" <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
> > > news:3t9u4v4ae5h8gs1r7...@4ax.com...
> > > > In <b7fe1abc.03021...@posting.google.com> in
> > > > alt.revisionism, on 15 Feb 2003 21:45:44 -0800,
> > > > david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > > That's a very serious statement indeed, Mock. Are we going
> > > > > to see some evidence from you to back it up?
> > > > > Defamation actions, particularly overseas, are expensive
> > > > > and difficult.
> > > > Translation: "Bwacckk bwaaack bwaaack bwaaack."
> > > Simple question for you Morris. Do you approve of making false
> > > accusations of criminal misconduct against your political
> > > opponents if they're revisionists?
> > > Yes or no?
> > No.
> > Do you believe your participation in assembling the Nizkor
> > Phonebook was actually criminal?
> > Yes or no.
> Your evidence to support that allegation is?
Readily available to me.
Now answer the question. Do you believe your participation in
assembling the Nizkor Phonebook was actually criminal?
> <cue patter of tiny feet>
Hardly. I'm challenging your to sue me.
<cue clucking like a chicken>
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPlBgiZQgvG272fn9EQIidwCcCvTvuRQxpv2krOjQHn4w5ekXnQcAniyT
idNwxjvgp0ySGkKwPWCxRimJ
=gLBj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
david_michael
"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:3E503AE4...@rogers.com...
You have the name and contact details of my South African attorney from the
time when you chickened out of the Himmler challenge. Ask him!
David
david_michael
"John Morris" <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
As far as I'm aware, cueing people to cluck like chickens does not create
cause for a lawsuit. Do it in England and you could well be sectioned under
the Mental Health Act, however.
David
Steven Mock
news:3e50...@212.67.96.135:
> You have the name and contact details of my South African attorney
> from the time when you chickened out of the Himmler challenge. Ask
> him!
As I recall, Dr. Michael, you're the one who chickened out of the Himmler
challenge.
Oh wait, its all documented right here...
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/m/michael-david/
No wonder you're trying so desperately to discredit Nizkor. You can't keep
brazenly lying like you do above when the evidence of your dishonesty is so
clearly and neatly organized on the web.
----> Tavish <----
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
Why don't you refile the lawsuit like many make the claim can be done and try to
sue me then vermin? Present the same exact case and evidence and I will have you
brought up on perjury charges within my jurisdiction. Put your money where you
big mouth is you swine because I am tired of being defamed by a bunch of
absolutely worthless vermin such as you!
>That's how the gangsters in organized crime usually get off scot
>free-on legal technicalities.
I resent to your implication I am a criminal-- you bastard!
That technicality you and the rest of your filthy weasel vermin continue to
overlook is (among others):
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks!
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
IOW I could not have had a valid defense seeing how neither my attorney nor
myself ever got the complaints again st me!! DON'T FORGET IT EITHER YOU
VERMIN!!!
BTW Your fellow vermin also claimed I would never get that judgment overturned
etc. BUT you vermin were WRONG as usual. Care to deny the hard hitting truth of
this you dumb swine?
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
And to think vermin like you are still clueless as to why "anti-semitism" is on
the rise! People get tired of being harassed by "The Chosen" and we know how
swine like you look down on the rest of us.
If you think the kook lawsuit against me had merit then get off your ass and
re-open it and file it in my jurisdiction!
>Bruno
---
>I ask-- why do we never see Jews criticize the communism
>which existed before Stalin took control?
"Because there was very little to criticize."
Susan Cohen - January 24, 2001
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&selm=3A6F230F.3AFF4272%40his.com
Message-ID: <3A6F230F...@his.com>