Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: MID reference for Shadow

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Shadow

unread,
May 29, 2020, 4:06:44 PM5/29/20
to
On Fri, 29 May 2020 17:38:07 +0100, David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

>On Fri, 29 May 2020 13:12:19 -0300, Shadow <S...@dow.br> wrote:

>>On Fri, 29 May 2020 15:21:33 +0100, David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>><CUT_DISGUSTING_STALKING>
>>
>>>You've just said you have had *accounts* - plural - for "decades" - yet
>>>you refused to tell me ONE of them.
>>
>> Of course. He doesn't strike me as stupid. Why do you think he
>>is? Please cite proof. No URLs, post the message_ID
>

>Wolffan wrote ......
>
>_You_ tried to stalk _me_ in many online
>fora, especially ASC, where I’ve had *accounts* for _decades_.

Correct. STALKING IS BD's main occupation. It has been for
decades.

><OT_URLS_SNITTED>

You already forgot I wrote:
"No URLs, post the message_ID"???
OMG!!! It's FIVE LINES UP.

You are referring, of course, as to why "good guys" can have
more than one account WITH the blessing of the moderators, which was
discussed a MERE 6 MONTHS ago?
That same thread pointed out you had been *BANNED* *TWICE*
from the ASC Forum for criminal behavior.
Maybe you "forgot"?
Oh, you did?
Drink less.

-------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

65 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Shadow

unread,
May 29, 2020, 7:28:14 PM5/29/20
to
On Fri, 29 May 2020 22:46:39 +0100, David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

>On 29/05/2020 18:32, Mike Easter wrote:
>> Arnold Lane wrote:
>>> You can have as many Apple IDs as you like which surely means as many
>>> ASC usernames as you like?
>>>
>>> https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7715344
>>
>> Good point.  So David B's anti-W argument is moot no matter which way
>> you parse the modifier.
>
>Why do you trust the word of a 'rogue' poster here in ACW?

Because he hasn't *LIED* so far, and he observed Usenet
etiquette.
The link he posted - which had no strange addons, and was
strictly On Topic - was answered by a level 9 user with over 58
thousand points. (I can't remember how many points you had when you
were *BANNED* the second and final time ... but you obviously never
helped anyone).
Pretty obvious, huh?

Now explain why anyone in their right minds would trust
ANYTHING you say or do.
TIA

If you're having trouble remembering what you are, here we go:

Diesel

unread,
May 30, 2020, 1:11:02 AM5/30/20
to
Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:nr53dfdlu5fblvmda...@4ax.com
Fri, 29 May 2020 23:27:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Now explain why anyone in their right minds would trust
> ANYTHING you say or do.

Are you trying to toss Mike a bone by saying he wasn't in his right
mind when he tried to tell us David was a victim of cyber bullying and
wasn't a stalker? Or have I misunderstood you here? If the former,
that's going to need to be a pretty big bone, Mikes in way over his
head and can't swim.



--
Look! He's protecting himself with a zesty tartar sauce.

Shadow

unread,
May 30, 2020, 8:07:46 AM5/30/20
to
On Sat, 30 May 2020 05:11:01 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <nob...@haph.org>
wrote:

>Shadow <S...@dow.br> news:nr53dfdlu5fblvmda...@4ax.com
>Fri, 29 May 2020 23:27:17 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> Now explain why anyone in their right minds would trust
>> ANYTHING you say or do.
>
>Are you trying to toss Mike a bone by saying he wasn't in his right
>mind when he tried to tell us David was a victim of cyber bullying and
>wasn't a stalker? Or have I misunderstood you here?

Neither. I was offering advice to any noob that might read
here.

> If the former,
>that's going to need to be a pretty big bone, Mikes in way over his
>head and can't swim.

I used to be a lifeguard before I studied medicine, but could
only save anyone that indicated they needed help.
M.E. has not shown any sign he wants any.
So I'm sitting and waiting.

Shadow

unread,
May 30, 2020, 8:56:51 AM5/30/20
to
On Sat, 30 May 2020 13:35:01 +0100, David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

>On 30/05/2020 06:11, Diesel wrote:
>> David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
>> news:3pfAG.46959$dM3....@fx23.ams1 Fri, 29 May 2020 21:46:39 GMT in
>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/05/2020 18:32, Mike Easter wrote:
>>>> Arnold Lane wrote:
>>>>> You can have as many Apple IDs as you like which surely means as
>>>>> many ASC usernames as you like?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7715344
>>>>
>>>> Good point.  So David B's anti-W argument is moot no matter
>>>> which way you parse the modifier.
>>>
>>> Why do you trust the word of a 'rogue' poster here in ACW?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Did you visit the link?
>
>Of course I did!
>
>> No worries, I did. Here's what was found:
>>
>> Lou63m
>> Lou63m
>> User level: Level 1
>> (4 points)
>> iPadSpeciality level out of ten: 0
>> Question: Q:
>> can I have more than one apple id?
>>
>> Can I have more than one apple ID?
>>
>> Posted on Oct 20, 2016 9:36 AM
>> Reply
>> Question marked as Apple recommended
>> User profile for user: Michael Black Michael Black
>> Michael Black
>> User level: Level 9
>> (58,804 points)
>> Answer: A:
>>
>> Yes, you can have as many as you would like. Each must have its own
>> unique email address as primary of course. And purchases made on one
>> are not transferrable to another, nor can any two be merged later on.
>> You also cannot transfer or merge content between iCloud accounts
>> created with separate AppleIDs.
>>
>> Posted on Oct 20, 2016 9:40 AM
>>
>> Michael seems to have a lot of points for someone who doesn't know
>> what they're writing about, as you clearly inferred with your reply
>> to Mike Easter.
>>
>> Any explanation? Will this month be the month where you issue the
>> most apologies, then, David? As I'm sure you realize by now, you owe
>> Wildmann one for falsely having accused him of violating Apple forum
>> policies.
>
>I've looked hard, and failed to determine - WHO IS <redacted>?

I can't believe it!. You completely ignored the content of the
post and started asking OT personal questions again.
>
>> You owe Mike a steak dinner for the reputation damage he took on your
>> behalf. It's going to take him years to fix this mess, too. See, what
>> you thought was annoying initially is blowing up quite nicely, right
>> in his face. He's becoming known in the same ways as yourself;
>> unreliable, a troll, and liar. I can't thank you enough for opting to
>> annoy me in that manner. :)
>>
>> Mike is like watching a train wreck in slow motion. It's great
>> entertainment.
>
>I'd have FAR more respect for 'Mike' if I knew who he really is. I've
>sometimes thought he might work for one of the security services.

You say that about EVERY ONE OF YOUR VICTIMS. We've seen what
happens to ANYONE that reveals any personal information.
Which is followed by "I'm really sorry for hurting you and
your loved ones. Will you forgive me?"
>
>You should be more kind to him. He's done nothing wrong as far as I'm aware.

Drink less, it might improve your memory.
M.E. *LIED*, maybe unwittingly, when he said you were not a
common criminal. He even went as far as "inventing" his own definition
of "cyberstalking".
Now he's licking his wounds.

Shadow

unread,
Jun 6, 2020, 9:35:49 AM6/6/20
to
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:15:07 +0100, David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

>On 06/06/2020 08:48, Diesel wrote:
>> David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
>> news:WpsAG.54429$wn3....@fx36.ams1 Sat, 30 May 2020 12:35:01 GMT
>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 30/05/2020 06:11, Diesel wrote:
>>>> David_B <Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
>>>> news:3pfAG.46959$dM3....@fx23.ams1 Fri, 29 May 2020 21:46:39 GMT
>>>> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 29/05/2020 18:32, Mike Easter wrote:
>>>>>> Arnold Lane wrote:
>>>>>>> You can have as many Apple IDs as you like which surely means
>>>>>>> as many ASC usernames as you like?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7715344
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good point.  So David B's anti-W argument is moot no matter
>>>> owe <redacted> one for falsely having accused him of violating
>>>> Apple forum policies.

Seems you didn't notice the question.
Maybe it was too far up and by the time you scrolled down you
"forgot" all about it?
Either drink less or *LIE* less.

Since you kept the reference to my nick in the subject line, I
can only conclude you need reminding again of what you are:
0 new messages