On Sat, 30 May 2020 13:35:01 +0100, David_B <
Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:
>On 30/05/2020 06:11, Diesel wrote:
>> David_B <
Dav...@nomail.afraid.org>
>> news:3pfAG.46959$dM3....@fx23.ams1 Fri, 29 May 2020 21:46:39 GMT in
>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/05/2020 18:32, Mike Easter wrote:
>>>> Arnold Lane wrote:
>>>>> You can have as many Apple IDs as you like which surely means as
>>>>> many ASC usernames as you like?
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/7715344
>>>>
>>>> Good point. So David B's anti-W argument is moot no matter
>>>> which way you parse the modifier.
>>>
>>> Why do you trust the word of a 'rogue' poster here in ACW?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Did you visit the link?
>
>Of course I did!
>
>> No worries, I did. Here's what was found:
>>
>> Lou63m
>> Lou63m
>> User level: Level 1
>> (4 points)
>> iPadSpeciality level out of ten: 0
>> Question: Q:
>> can I have more than one apple id?
>>
>> Can I have more than one apple ID?
>>
>> Posted on Oct 20, 2016 9:36 AM
>> Reply
>> Question marked as Apple recommended
>> User profile for user: Michael Black Michael Black
>> Michael Black
>> User level: Level 9
>> (58,804 points)
>> Answer: A:
>>
>> Yes, you can have as many as you would like. Each must have its own
>> unique email address as primary of course. And purchases made on one
>> are not transferrable to another, nor can any two be merged later on.
>> You also cannot transfer or merge content between iCloud accounts
>> created with separate AppleIDs.
>>
>> Posted on Oct 20, 2016 9:40 AM
>>
>> Michael seems to have a lot of points for someone who doesn't know
>> what they're writing about, as you clearly inferred with your reply
>> to Mike Easter.
>>
>> Any explanation? Will this month be the month where you issue the
>> most apologies, then, David? As I'm sure you realize by now, you owe
>> Wildmann one for falsely having accused him of violating Apple forum
>> policies.
>
>I've looked hard, and failed to determine - WHO IS <redacted>?
I can't believe it!. You completely ignored the content of the
post and started asking OT personal questions again.
>
>> You owe Mike a steak dinner for the reputation damage he took on your
>> behalf. It's going to take him years to fix this mess, too. See, what
>> you thought was annoying initially is blowing up quite nicely, right
>> in his face. He's becoming known in the same ways as yourself;
>> unreliable, a troll, and liar. I can't thank you enough for opting to
>> annoy me in that manner. :)
>>
>> Mike is like watching a train wreck in slow motion. It's great
>> entertainment.
>
>I'd have FAR more respect for 'Mike' if I knew who he really is. I've
>sometimes thought he might work for one of the security services.
You say that about EVERY ONE OF YOUR VICTIMS. We've seen what
happens to ANYONE that reveals any personal information.
Which is followed by "I'm really sorry for hurting you and
your loved ones. Will you forgive me?"
>
>You should be more kind to him. He's done nothing wrong as far as I'm aware.
Drink less, it might improve your memory.
M.E. *LIED*, maybe unwittingly, when he said you were not a
common criminal. He even went as far as "inventing" his own definition
of "cyberstalking".
Now he's licking his wounds.